<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zen and the Art of Chess Opening Maintenance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/zen-and-the-art-of-chess-opening-maintenance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/zen-and-the-art-of-chess-opening-maintenance/</link>
	<description>The latest chess news online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:34:22 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Doggers</title>
		<link>http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/zen-and-the-art-of-chess-opening-maintenance/comment-page-1/#comment-96210</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Doggers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 07:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessvibes.com/?p=10133#comment-96210</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take these ones. Browser errors - sorry can&#039;t help you with that. Lost posts - that shouldn&#039;t happen; we&#039;re trying our best to prevent it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take these ones. Browser errors &#8211; sorry can&#8217;t help you with that. Lost posts &#8211; that shouldn&#8217;t happen; we&#8217;re trying our best to prevent it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Castro</title>
		<link>http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/zen-and-the-art-of-chess-opening-maintenance/comment-page-1/#comment-96208</link>
		<dc:creator>Castro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 02:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessvibes.com/?p=10133#comment-96208</guid>
		<description>Thx Arne for your explanation.
There remain, though, 2 questions:
- Is what you say valid even when one gets a browser &quot;error&quot; page? That&#039;s common on this site (and nothing wrong with the browser, nor with other pages of the site).
- I have had really lost posts (in the sense of not showing), which would be unbelieveable to have been &quot;not aproved&quot; (or, at least, it would be useful to know why could they be &quot;not aproved&quot;). Could you please enlight that (type of) situation(s)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx Arne for your explanation.<br />
There remain, though, 2 questions:<br />
- Is what you say valid even when one gets a browser &#8220;error&#8221; page? That&#8217;s common on this site (and nothing wrong with the browser, nor with other pages of the site).<br />
- I have had really lost posts (in the sense of not showing), which would be unbelieveable to have been &#8220;not aproved&#8221; (or, at least, it would be useful to know why could they be &#8220;not aproved&#8221;). Could you please enlight that (type of) situation(s)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arne Moll</title>
		<link>http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/zen-and-the-art-of-chess-opening-maintenance/comment-page-1/#comment-96197</link>
		<dc:creator>Arne Moll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 07:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessvibes.com/?p=10133#comment-96197</guid>
		<description>@Castro, OT but never mind: posts are never lost. They are sometimes just awaiting approval, because they either contain hyperlinks or are overlong. I don&#039;t see what&#039;s so unsual about this; it happens extremely often on sites. 
So, if you post something, check if it appears, and if it doesn&#039;t, it&#039;s either one of these two things. Then just wait for approval and there you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Castro, OT but never mind: posts are never lost. They are sometimes just awaiting approval, because they either contain hyperlinks or are overlong. I don&#8217;t see what&#8217;s so unsual about this; it happens extremely often on sites.<br />
So, if you post something, check if it appears, and if it doesn&#8217;t, it&#8217;s either one of these two things. Then just wait for approval and there you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Castro</title>
		<link>http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/zen-and-the-art-of-chess-opening-maintenance/comment-page-1/#comment-96192</link>
		<dc:creator>Castro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 01:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessvibes.com/?p=10133#comment-96192</guid>
		<description>*misinterpretations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*misinterpretations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Castro</title>
		<link>http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/zen-and-the-art-of-chess-opening-maintenance/comment-page-1/#comment-96191</link>
		<dc:creator>Castro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 01:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessvibes.com/?p=10133#comment-96191</guid>
		<description>@forest

Don&#039;t you think it would be useful (maybe to all) if you could get (and give) answers to what I wrote? Maybe that kind of problems (lost posts and/or related misimpretations) would hardly apear again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@forest</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you think it would be useful (maybe to all) if you could get (and give) answers to what I wrote? Maybe that kind of problems (lost posts and/or related misimpretations) would hardly apear again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arne Moll</title>
		<link>http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/zen-and-the-art-of-chess-opening-maintenance/comment-page-1/#comment-96182</link>
		<dc:creator>Arne Moll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 07:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessvibes.com/?p=10133#comment-96182</guid>
		<description>Yes, Merijn, and this is also exactly what Pirsig describes in his book. So at least I&#039;m not the only one who is so predictable ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Merijn, and this is also exactly what Pirsig describes in his book. So at least I&#8217;m not the only one who is so predictable <img src='http://www.chessvibes.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review: Play 1.b3! : ChessVibes</title>
		<link>http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/zen-and-the-art-of-chess-opening-maintenance/comment-page-1/#comment-96180</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: Play 1.b3! : ChessVibes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 05:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessvibes.com/?p=10133#comment-96180</guid>
		<description>[...] It shows not only his love for the game, but also for the truth. In a way, Odessky combines the romantic and the rational aspects of chess, in an ideal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It shows not only his love for the game, but also for the truth. In a way, Odessky combines the romantic and the rational aspects of chess, in an ideal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Castro</title>
		<link>http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/zen-and-the-art-of-chess-opening-maintenance/comment-page-1/#comment-96178</link>
		<dc:creator>Castro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessvibes.com/?p=10133#comment-96178</guid>
		<description>And I think (as to fashioned views is concerned) some of us must consider ourselves as kind of &quot;romantically racionalists&quot;, because almost everyone seem to become too mystical...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I think (as to fashioned views is concerned) some of us must consider ourselves as kind of &#8220;romantically racionalists&#8221;, because almost everyone seem to become too mystical&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merijn</title>
		<link>http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/zen-and-the-art-of-chess-opening-maintenance/comment-page-1/#comment-96169</link>
		<dc:creator>Merijn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessvibes.com/?p=10133#comment-96169</guid>
		<description>The chess romantics are clearly more emotional about the whole thing than the chess rationalists :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chess romantics are clearly more emotional about the whole thing than the chess rationalists <img src='http://www.chessvibes.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron H.</title>
		<link>http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/zen-and-the-art-of-chess-opening-maintenance/comment-page-1/#comment-96158</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chessvibes.com/?p=10133#comment-96158</guid>
		<description>So funny: when I first saw Michael&#039;s wonderfully scathing comments of the Petroff I thought, &quot;ah yes, so nice, someone speaking up against this.... and now soon we will hear Arne coming up with the opposite point of view, &#039;correcting&#039; his co-editor&#039;s deluded views, pointing out Michael&#039;s mistaken use of words, and altogether wrong way of expressing that view and so and so forth&quot;. And, right as the  mail, within a few days this &#039;article&#039; appeared. 
So, just for the record: Michael, of course you are right, the Petroff IS a boring opening :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So funny: when I first saw Michael&#8217;s wonderfully scathing comments of the Petroff I thought, &#8220;ah yes, so nice, someone speaking up against this&#8230;. and now soon we will hear Arne coming up with the opposite point of view, &#8216;correcting&#8217; his co-editor&#8217;s deluded views, pointing out Michael&#8217;s mistaken use of words, and altogether wrong way of expressing that view and so and so forth&#8221;. And, right as the  mail, within a few days this &#8216;article&#8217; appeared.<br />
So, just for the record: Michael, of course you are right, the Petroff IS a boring opening <img src='http://www.chessvibes.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
