Aronian clear favorite to win Candidates
According to the ChessVibes readers, Levon Aronian is the clear favorite to win the FIDE Candidates matches which start tomorrow in Kazan, Russia. Based on 1,000+ votes, Armenia's number one grandmaster gained an astonishing 65.19%, followed by ex-World Champion Vladimir Kramnik with 16.57%.
It's no surprise that Levon Aronian tops our poll of last week. The Armenian grandmaster is the world's number three and the only player among the participants of the Candidates with a rating over 2800. The margin with which Aronian is taking the lead is quite astonishing, though: 65.19% of the voters clicked on his name - almost two out of three chess fans believes he will win.
Vladimir Kramnik, also unsurprisingly, follows, with 16.57% of the votes. The Russian grandmaster beat Garry Kasparov in the year 2000 to become World Champion. After losing the title, Kramnik remained at the top and played another World Title match in 2008. Currently he's the world's number four.
The third player in the poll is Veselin Topalov, who scored 8.01% of the votes. The Bulgarian became FIDE World Champion in 2005 and lost his title in a reunification match with Kramnik a year later. In early 2009 he won a match against Gata Kamsky and qualified for the World Title match against Vishy Anand in 2010, which he lost. At the moment the Bulgarian is the world's numer seven.
Gata Kamsky (USA) himself scored 3.04% of the votes, followed by Boris Gelfand (2.12%), Teimour Radjabov (2.03%), Shakhryiar Mamedyarov (1.66%) and Alexander Grischuk (1.38%).
In the news
The Russian chess site Chess News is on top of everything and already posted some interesting details. Apparently we can expect similar online coverage as during the Tal Memorial, with Sergei Rublevsky and Alexander Khalifman as commentators, together with host Mark Gluhovsky. Hopefully this also means we'll have the excellent live video images (especially since ChessVibes will not be in Kazan due to reasons unrelated to chess).
Chess News has also mentioned that there will be a glass screen between the podium and the spectators, so that the players won't be able to see anyone in the audience. The most interesting details leaked by the Russians, however, is the fact that Sergey Karjakin and Zahar Efimenko will be assisting Vladimir Kramnik as seconds.
Pairings
The matches will be played over four games. Two days after these matches end, the second round starts, with the winner of Topalov-Kamsky against the winner of Gelfand-Mamedyarov and the winner of Kramnik-Radjabov against the winner of Aronian-Grischuk. These matches will also consist of four games. The final match will consist of six games.
Bracket courtesy of Wikipedia
The dates for the Candidates matches are May 3rd-27th. At the moment of writing the opening ceremony is about to begin in Kazan, where the drawing of colours for all the rounds will be conducted. The first games will be played tomorrow - the official website is kazan2011.fide.com.
Players
Veselin Topalov qualified as the runner up of the previous World Championship. Vladimir Kramnik qualified by rating. Levon Aronian was the winner of the FIDE Grand-Prix 2008-2009 and Boris Gelfand was the winner of the FIDE World Cup 2009. Shakhriyar Mamedyarov was kept as the wild card, originally picked by organizers in Baku, Azerbaijan, before the event was moved to Kazan.
Teimour Radjabov came second in the FIDE Grand-Prix and Alexander Grischuk also qualified from this GP. The Russian replaces Magnus Carlsen who decided not to play early November, 2010. Gata Kamsky is in as the runner up of the Challengers Match 2009.
Time control
The time control will be 120 minutes for the first 40 moves, then 60 minutes for the next 20 moves and then 15 minutes for the rest of the game plus an additional 30 seconds increment per move, starting from move 61. Tiebreaks will consist of four games of 25 minutes plus 10 seconds increment, two blitz games (five minutes plus three seconds) and one sudden death game (five against 4, with 3 seconds increment from move 61, and draw odds for Black).
Prizes
The four losers of the first round matches will each receive a (minimum) amount of 30,000 euros. The two losers of the second round matches will each receive a (minimum) amount of 60,000 euros. The minimum prize fund for the final match of the 3rd round is 180,000 euros which will be divided 50%-50% between the two players (90,000 euros each).
Kazan
The matches will be held in Kazan, Russia. It's the capital city of the Republic of Tatarstan is the sixth largest city of Russia. From Wikipedia we learn that it lies at the confluence of the Volga and Kazanka Rivers in European Russia. The Kazan Kremlin is a World Heritage Site and in April 2009, the Russian Patent Office granted Kazan the right to brand itself as the "Third Capital" of Russia. Besides, in 2009 it was chosen as the "sports capital of Russia".
Link
Latest articles
-
11 hours 4 min ago
-
14 hours 26 min ago
-
1 day 10 hours ago
-
2 days 12 hours ago
-
2 days 13 hours ago
-
3 days 25 min ago
-
3 days 11 hours ago
-
3 days 16 hours ago
-
3 days 21 hours ago
-
4 days 12 hours ago
-
4 days 19 hours ago
-
5 days 10 hours ago
-
5 days 19 hours ago
-
5 days 19 hours ago
-
6 days 8 hours ago
-
1 week 13 hours ago
-
1 week 13 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago











Comments
ebutaljib
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
Bull!
Leko is taking a break from chess.
Jonas
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
Yeah if one doesn't get invitations he is forced to take a "break".
Despicableme
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
i like your thinking
ebutaljib
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
You should really read something about the topic you want to discuss, otherwise you just look stupid. Leko declined all invitations because he wanted a break. Morozevich declined all his invitations because he wants a break. Or do you think Morozevich is boring too?
Despicableme
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
I believe none of them is boring , but im afraid i cant say the same thing about you.
:)
Thomas
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
I know it's futile to counter Leko-bashing with facts, I will try anyway: Fact is that he couldn't qualify via the Grand Prix Series - he finished 7th, still (well) ahead of Kazan participants Mamedyarov, Gelfand and Kamsky. He didn't participate in the World Cup, the other qualifying event.
I know it's stretchy, but just half a point more in Nalchik, Jermuk and Astrakhan and he would have gotten Grischuk's or even Radjabov's spot. In the first two cases, the problem was his "usual" loss in the final round - else he would have been tied with Aronian for first and second place, respectively.
Whether one likes his style or not (how can you be sure that "nobody" does??), he is or was a world-top player who might have qualified for the candidates event, but didn't in the end.
Despicableme
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
I wasnt asking about his presence on this particular event , but in general , and that was not bashing ,he is provably right about why Leko is not invited very often, u just cant accept the facts ...
My point in asking about him was that the guy is missing and nobody seem to care much, see u @
Thomas
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
I consider all questions on-topic (if there is the slightest chance), and this thread is about the candidates event.
As to Leko's invitations: His style - and the way it's described by many chess fans and some journalists - "is what it is" or was what it was for many years. Still, in 2009/2010 he played not just 2* Dortmund (where he and/or his manager have close ties with the organizers) but also Nanjing, Tal Memorial and Corus. And other strong events such as the FIDE Grand Prix Series and the Olympiad, in both cases he qualified and anyone can play only so many events per year.
IF he is no longer invited (ebutaljib might be right that he declined several invitations), it's because his Elo went down and he's currently just world #26. Shirov - a fan favorite with a different style - might face the same problem. Probably neither Shirov nor Leko (nor Timman, going a few years back in time) would consider a Corus/Tata B invitation ... .
Jonas
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
No one wants to see uneventful or preanalized draws anymore and where is Leko there is such a draw. Therefore he doesn't get invitations anymore. Good for chess.
Christian Sánchez
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
Eight Candidates, eight soviet surnames!
gg
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
I think none of the players will even try to win with black, only with white, so there's only one game left for Aronian to win the match without a tiebreak that is impossible to predict. But I suppose there will be many draws and tiebreaks here. Maybe 55-45 after all since Aronian is clearly better than Grischuk.
Paul V
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
First round produced 3 draws
With Sasha escaping with a draw with the Black pieces, Aronian has to face the White pieces twice in the remaining 3 games. Given that Aronian has an edge in Rapid, how do you rate Aronians chances of winning this match?
Is 60% too optimistic?
sporty
2 years 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Already known who is playing white http://www.chessdom.com/news-2011/candidates-matches-opening-live-blog namely Aronian, Mamedyarov, Kamsky, and Radjabov. For Russian pairings of course http://www.chesspro.ru/
Axel
2 years 2 weeks ago
Permalink
“Fine, he beat Kasparov, but that is all he ever did.”
I guess that’s not too bad.
AuN1
2 years 2 weeks ago
Permalink
kramnik will stop aronian, and put an end to this non-sense. fans here have bad memories, or selective ones, and only seem to recall favorable events from recently. volodya will rectify that D-:<
ebutaljib
2 years 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Seems like you have a selective bad memory. Kramnik has a negative score in matches. Fine, he beat Kasparov, but that is all he ever did. The only other player he has ever beaten in a match is Leonid Yudashin. Against everybody else he has either lost or tied. So excuse us if we don't consider him as favourite - we don't really have any reason to.
FIDE candidates 1994:
1st round: Kramnik wins against Leonid Yudashin +2 =5 -0
2nd round: Kramnik loses to Gelfand +1 =5 -2
PCA Candidates 1994
1st round: Kramnik loses to Kamsky +0 =3 -3
1998 Challenger match in Cazorla
Kramnik loses to Alexei Shirov +0 =7 -2
(despite the loss he nevertheless gets to play Kasparov)
1999 FIDE World Championship:
In quarter-final Kramnik loses to Michel Adams after 2nd rapid tiebreaks.
(regular, as well as 1st rapid tiebreaks, were drawn +0 =2 -0 each)
2000 Braingames World Championship
Kramnik wins against Garry Kasparov +2 =13 -0
2004 Classical World Championship
Kramnik draws with Peter Leko +2 =10 -2
2006 World Championship
Kramnik draws with Veselin Topalov +3 =6 -3
(wins after rapid playoff 2.5-1.5)
2008 World Championship
Kramnik loses to Viswantahan Anand +1 =7 -3
So Kramniks overall score in match play (only regular classical games) is
+11 =58 -15
P.S.: And in case you forgot, Aronian has beaten Kramnik in a match 4-2 in 2007. Granted, it was only rapid, but still...
Barthod
2 years 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Thank you for a history lesson. Not sure that your selective stats are of any importance.
It is my opinion that Kramnik is the best player in Kazan and if he is in form he will winn and challenge Anand next year.
gg
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
Selective?
ebutaljib
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
Maybe then you can provide us with complete stats then?
gg
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
Wasn't it nonsense that Kramnik wasn't seen as the favourite in Amber as well?
Thomas
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
The way the poll was designed, one can't really deduce that Aronian is "clear favorite" - hence IMHO the title is misleading. 752 people voted for Aronian, maybe 500 of them give him odds between 51-49 and 60-40 over Kramnik (for the sake of simplicity, I neglect that the other six players could also win the event). For a balanced result, they had to vote 10 or 100 times - I didn't try whether this is possible, in any case I presume hardly anyone made such an effort :) . While I voted for Kramnik, I would say the same if he had emerged as "clear favorite" ... .
gg
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
If you get more than 65% of the votes and no other player is close to 20% it's hardly terribly misleading to call you a clear favourite.
john
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
I think Aronian is the main reason why Carlsen is mistaken not to take all the chances he can to get the title. The Armenian is strong and young and no push over.
RealityCheck
2 years 2 weeks ago
Permalink
I voted for GM Levon Aronian. But I wish all the players well.
Although the 4 games match is short, I'm glad the classic time limit 2hrs 40 mvs ... and classic score card [ 1 ] [ 1/2 ] [ 0 ] are going to be used.
Sander
2 years 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Well, it wouldnt really make much sense changing the score card in matchplay would it?
They could give a 1000 points or just one for a won game, it doesnt matter
RealityCheck
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
@Sander You're right, it wouldn't make much sense to use the soccer score card in match play, but it could've been used to make even less sense, or about as little sense when it is used in round robins. my two cents.
D. M. Modak(India)
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
It appears that Aronian is likely to convert his position to a win vs Grischuk(After White's 50th move I am writing this) and other three games have been drawn in Round 1 of the Ct. Ty.-
D.M.Modak
6th May 2011. 22.05 hrs.
Excalibur
2 years 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Meh,the voting looks like a popularity contest.It certainly is not as clear cut as this pole suggests.Expect some suprises and upsets.
S2
2 years 2 weeks ago
Permalink
I think it is an error if we would translate the percentages of this poll to chances of winning.
Despicableme
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
Im not entirely sure why is that Kramnik is the second choice here , he never won a qualification instance for a WCH match in his life...
BTW , im sure nobody misses his style that much but ... where is Leko?
ablos
2 years 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Mangus Carsen was victimized by Kasparov's deceitful move. Kaspa was afraid that if Carsen joins the tournament he, (Carsen) would win the title and wrestle ou the recrod from him (Kaspa). Dont trust Kaspa.
D. M. Modak(India)
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
I do not agree with ablos' statement calling Kasparov was responsible for Carlsen's withdrawal from the Candidates Matches 2011. After all Carlsen is not a kid anymore and had a clear idea that if he won the Title in 2012 he would beat Kasparov's record and become the YOUNGEST WORLD CHAMPION IN THE HISTORY OF CHESS. It is Carlsen who missed out on this golden opportunity.(Kasparov may have been inwardly very glad when he learnt of Carlsen's withdrawal).
Of course Aronian is expected to win the Candidates here and it is high time our own Anand starts serious preparation for Aronian.
-D.M.Modak
5th May 2011. 6.14 a.m.
ablos
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
subtleties, read how Kaspa was deceived by his predecessors
JustMe
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
what ablos is saying is quite ridiculous :)
ablos
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
Justme if you dont know how to analyze, it is ridiculous.
chesschamp
2 years 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Kramnik and Topalov are out of form. The final will be between Kamsky and Aronian, with the latter as a winner.
FP
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
Breaking news:
Anand is Kamsky's second
Carlsen is Radjabov's second
Kasparov is Gelfand's second
and - behold - Nakamura is Topalov's second.
I think all the second's should play instead.
LuxusOhr
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
Thx for the promotion kakashi, but not all companies like free videos.
kakashi
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
This is a "trailer" for the canidates matches! It's amazing! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ww1IyO7mO6U
Mauricio Valdés
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
Topalov should´ve siad:
"It´s about not shaking hands and not going to the bathroom"
Thomas
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
So far noone commented on what's actually new and quite interesting in the article, but might have been overlooked: Karjakin is Kramnik's second.
I think it's a wise decision (by Kramnik) in the short term, but a risky one in the longer term. Kramnik was Kasparov's second and (a few years) later beat him in a match. Karjakin now is Kramnik's second and will probably play a major role in the next WCh cycle ... . Well, who knows whether that's also the case for Kramnik - this might well be his last chance to regain his title.
gg
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
Karjakin must be the best second available, his opening preparation is excellent and he is 2776. I doubt that Kramnik worries too much about the possibility of Karjakin some time in the future beating him in case he first wins both Candidates and title himself. I think he has said that he will retire before 40, and he will be 36 this year.
Thomas
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
BTW, as pointed out by Dennis Monokroussos, it seems that Chessvibes got the tiebreak rules wrong. There might be up to 10 blitz games (five mini-matches), not just two, before Armaggedon.
The relevant rule 3.7.2 states: "If the scores are level after the games in Article 3.7.1a, then, after a new drawing of colors, a match of 2 games shall be played with a time control of 5 minutes plus 3 seconds increment after each move. In case of a level score, another 2-game match will be played to determine a winner. If still there is no winner after 5 such matches (total 10 games), one sudden-death game will be played as described below in Article 3.7.3."
Article 3.7.1a discusses the rapid games, then "2-game match" obviously refers to blitz - not to the classical and rapid matches which have 4(-6) games.
http://www.fide.com/FIDE/handbook/regscandidates.pdf
gg
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
Indeed, if those had been the seconds. As it is Kamsky has Sutovsky and Volokitin, Grischuk has Riazantsev, Bacrot and Svidler, Gelfand Rodshtein and Huzman, Mamedyarov Ubilava and Mamedov, Radjabov his dad and I don't remember the others.
Eiae
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
I'm looking forward to what Radjabov comes up with. He has been keeping a very low profile lately. Did he spend time on super preparation or on women?!
1-pac
2 years 1 week ago
Permalink
In terms of talent, Kramnik seems to me to be ahead of the field here. Aronian might be playing better lately (better results), but an inspired Vladimir will always have an advantage to me. You are just a little down, Vladimir. That's all. Remember what made you fall in love with this game in the first place. Have fun with chess: play some weird lines, try some speculative/doubtful sacrifices, play lines that YOU might find interesting even if they are not entirely correct. Try some sidelines in the Petroff, try old moves, old ideas, etc. Forget about results for a while and you will surely comeback strong. You owe that not to fans but to yourself.
On the other hand, if Topalov is in shape here he's my favorite. I've not followed his results lately, but when he is on he strikes hard, especially in your mind.
I hope all the players feel well rested and ready to play, because they are all very strong players whose particular styles and game philosophies can certainly ensue great chess. Good luck to all of them!
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions