Reports | June 05, 2011 1:15

Player caught cheating at German Championship

A participant of the German Championship, which concluded on Friday in Bonn, was caught cheating. FM Christoph Natsidis used a chess program on his smartphone during his last-round game against GM Sebastian Siebrecht to analyse a position from the game. The 23-year-old player from Bannewitz, Germany admitted that he cheated, and was excluded from the tournament, missing out on an IM norm he had scored after 8 rounds.

Christoph Natsidis | Photo © official website Yesterday another example was added to the growing list of cheating cases in chess. In a message put on their website, the organizers of the German Championship communicated that one of their participants, FM Christoph Natsidis, had been excluded from the tournament. His last-round game against GM Sebastian Siebrecht was declared lost after Natsidis had admitted that he used his smartphone, equipped with a strong chess program, during the game. Today we spoke on the phone with Natsidis' opponent Sebastian Siebrecht, and here's what he told us:

"We had reached a complicated position. I had taken on b2 which was a bit risky. However, in a very concrete position where calculating was necessary, he was constantly away from the board. Three times, I made a move and it took 8-10 minutes for him to show up at the board. Naturally I started looking for him and I even waited for a while in the toilets. One toilet was occupied, but I didn't hear any typical 'toilet sounds'. During the game [Igor] Khenkin came to me and asked: 'What's going on? Where is your opponent?' I decided to go to the arbiter and try to find Natsidis together. Then, indeed, we did find him in the toilet, but the arbiter did nothing, which made me very angry. I could not play a normal game anymore and in a position that was still complicated, I decided to offer a draw, which he accepted."

This is not where it ended, because after the game the arbiter decided to return to Natsidis, together with Siebrecht, to search the suspect anyway. They found a smartphone in his pocket. Siebrecht:

"Then I knew enough, and I walked away. Later the arbiter came to me and told me that he had asked if the phone had a chess program installed. Natsidis said yes, and showed it to the arbiter - the program was showing a position from our game, about five moves before the end."

Natsidis was caught red-handed, but didn't sweep it under the carpet. He went to his opponent, to apologize. Siebrecht continued:

"He came to me and admitted that he did it, and then apologized. He said: 'I'm completely stupid, I'm really sorry.' And indeed, it was very stupid of him to do it in the final round, because he had already scored his IM norm after the penultimate round."

Before the final round, Natsidis hadn't lost a game yet. Rated 2363, he drew his against Daniel Fridman (2661), Alexsandar Dranov (2465), Christian Seel (2484), Raj Tischbierek (2431), Oswald Gschnitzer (2444) and the tournament winner Igor Khenkin (2620) and beat Christoph Zill (2278) and Hans-Joachim Vatter (2326). It was enough for him to lose against Siebrecht to score an IM norm. No doubt the case will have serious consequences for Natsidis (who, as a law student, should have known better). In their message the organizers of the German Championship already mentioned that he would be excluded from future tournaments and that "other consequences are the subject of investigation after the tournament ends". The regulations of the German Chess Federation don't mention sanctions for cheating cases like this one, only a 2-year ban for doping use. This period of 2 years is borrowed from sports like cycling, where a a normal career lasts about a decade.

"Because a chess career can last forty years, the penalty for such a thing should perhaps be more than two years,"

said GM Sebastian Siebrecht. He added:

"It's absolutely necessary that any technical equipment, like phones, or tablets, or whatever, are forbidden in a tournament hall. If you take it with you, you have to deliver it to the arbiter. These days you cannot do without such a rule."

The news from Germany comes when the chess world hasn't yet forgotten another big story about cheating: in March of this year three players were declared guilty of cheating during the 2010 Olympiad in Khanty-Mansiysk. Last month, in an appeal, two of the three saw their penalties increased. Igor Khenkin won the German Championship, edging out Jan Gustafsson on tie-break. In the women's group, Sarah Hoolt finished in first place. The tournament was held in Bonn, Germany from May 26th till June 3rd. As always, you can download all games in a PGN file below. In the game viewer you can find the games most readers will be interested in: those of Christoph Natsidis.

Game viewer

 
 

Game viewer by ChessTempo



German Championship 2011 | Final Standings
# Name Title Fed Rating Points Perf
1. Khenkin, Igor g GER 2620 2654
2. Gustafsson, Jan g GER 2646 2645
3. Buhmann, Rainer g GER 2579 6 2586
4. Fridman, Daniel g GER 2661 6 2596
5. Gschnitzer, Oswald m GER 2444 6 2561
6. Stern, Rene m GER 2483 2577
7. Huschenbeth, Niclas m GER 2502 2529
8. Siebrecht, Sebastian g GER 2460 2505
9. Seel, Christian m GER 2484 2438
10. Natsidis, Christoph f GER 2363 5 2506
11. Tischbierek, Raj g GER 2431 5 2464
12. Svane, Rasmus   GER 2297 5 2484
13. Vatter, Hans-Joachim f GER 2326 2381
14. Kummerow, Heiko f GER 2326 2399
15. Rietze, Clemens   GER 2283 2392
16. Andre, Gordon   GER 2363 2392
17. Jugelt, Tobias m GER 2403 2407
18. Lubbe, Nikolas   GER 2422 2345
19. Krassowizkij, Jaroslaw   GER 2356 2329
20. Bastian, Herbert m GER 2332 2351
21. Poetsch, Hagen f GER 2424 2296
22. Mueller, Oliver f GER 2327 4 2387
23. Mertens, Heiko   GER 2355 4 2351
24. Dranov, Aleksandar   UKR 2465 4 2293
25. Krause, Ullrich f GER 2283 4 2301
26. Seger, Ruediger m GER 2412 4 2224
27. Strache, Michael   GER 2317 2333
28. Molinaroli, Martin   GER 2286 2298
29. Bracker, Frank   GER 2355 2276
30. Zill, Christoph f GER 2278 2219


Links

Tags:

Share |
Peter Doggers's picture
Author: Peter Doggers

Founder and editor-in-chief of ChessVibes.com, Peter is responsible for most of the chess news and tournament reports. Often visiting top events, he also provides photos and videos for the site. He's a 1.e4 player himself, likes Thai food and the Stones.

Chess Master School

Comments

arbiter's picture

Solution:

Install small lockers sized for a cell phone and keys, and no more at the tournament entrance. 500 small lockers.

The lockers cost 50 cents to use and are required if one decides to bring a cell phone to the tournament.

Effect:

This small charge will pay for the lockers rapidly, and a portion of it can go into the prize fund once the investment has been recouped.

Players will feel more comfortable, and confident, particularly in large open tournaments. This cuts off the primary means of cheating, rather than just discouraging players to do it.

jhoravi's picture

What cellphone was he using? And what chess software? I'm just curious

Andy's picture

To his credit, Natsidis acted decently once he had been caught by admitting and apologising. He could possibly have gotten away with it by not showing them the chess application with the position from the game.
This is very unlike the French case when Feller has acted very badly since the allegations came to light by throwing accusations back at the French federation and vehemently maintaining his innocence despite overwhelming evidence against him (acting like most sports cheats).
I agree with Arne Moll that it is an overrated problem. Cheating seems to provoke an emotive response in people leading to daily mailesque arguments, as can be seen by some of the comments above ('ban for life' etc) which are daft.

Septimus's picture

What lol? If you go murder somebody and tell the police "yeah man I did it, sorry" , should we appreciate the murderer? Cheating should be severely punished. Nothing short of a long ban.

Septi Is A Fool's picture

This is sooo bullshit. Pleading guilt and showing regret is taken serious in all developed justice systems. You should be more like Natsidis and also study law.

We all make mistakes man. All what matters is what we learn from it. But you only want punishment.

Karma will get you. Good luck.

Thomas's picture

If the description by "Eye witness" (that's his chosen handle, "Augenzeuge") on Jan Gustafsson's blog is correct, Natsidis only admitted what was obvious with at least one witness present:
"Before GM Siebrecht accepted the draw offer, he informed the arbiters Alt and Klühners. Back at the board he accepted a draw and then went outside with the officials and FM Natsidis. Mr. Alt asked Mr. Natsidis to empty his pockets, Natsidis complied with a puzzled look. He first showed paper tissues, several sheets of paper and some pens, then the expected mobile phone finally appeared. Mr. Alt activated the phone and opened a chess application. After the position of the just-finished game appeared, there was little room for excuses and Natsidis admitted that he had assistance during the game."

This slightly differs from Siebrecht's own description, who "knew enough" once the smartphone appeared. For what it's worth, the notation implies that neither player offered a draw, but the game ended with a threefold repetition.
It would have been a somewhat different story if Natsidis had immediately confessed before his pockets were searched - but maybe he was hoping that the arbiters would give up after seeing a few irrelevant items.

Maybe Natsidis deserves credit for approaching the opponent to give his excuses - though it might already be part of his "damage control" defensive strategy. There wasn't much room for a Feller-style counterattack, maybe something like "you don't like players from Saxony"? GM Bindrich, who was forfeited in round 4, is also originally from that part of Germany and still lives there - nonetheless this would have been a pretty cheap cheapo IMO.

Septimus's picture

Sure thing genius. Do away with all accountability. How this fair to the other players? Quit smoking dope.

Janis Nisii's picture

I very much doubt Nadsidis did this only in the last game and only during this event.
I remember him in the Mariembad tournament http://www.czechtour.net/history/2007-2008/marienbad/
after having lost the first round, he asked his second round opponent, through the arbiter (!!!) to draw his game without playing (he wasn't even present in the playing hall!). The arbiter insisted justifying this with the fact that if he drew he would have preserved his chances to make an IM norm.
His opponent refused to agree to a draw without playing and Nadsidis withdrew from the event.
These people seriously damage the game. Hope he stays away from Chess (and law, possibly) in the future.

TMM's picture

Wait, he claimed a draw on the basis of wanting to achieve an IM norm? Good to know; I'll just enter some closed IM round robins and claim draws (or even wins?!) to get my norms then :)

CAL|Daniel's picture

It has been done before. Daniel Rensch claimed an IM norm from -1 in the Spice Cup 49 sufficed as he was the bottom seed and the only player under 2550. 0 wins. 8 draws and a loss.

Janis Nisii's picture

@ TIMM: Well, technically he didn't claim anything, it was the arbiter (shame on him, btw) who did for him saying that the guy couldn't be there for some military reasons (this part wasn't very clear) and a draw would have kept him in the tournament, i.e. would have left him chances to get an IM norm which was the reason why the players were playing there.

Alexander's picture

Official tournament rules will have to adapt to growing popularity of smart phones. A good start would be mandatory registration: when they're signing up for a tournament, players should formally acknowledge the fact that they will be carrying a smart phone during gameplay, and also sign a guarantee that they do not posses any chess software on their phones. All players who would carry an unregistered smart phone during gameplay would get disqualified upon the discovery of the fact, as well as those with chess software on their phones.

This precaution would basically amount to a single signature at the start of the tournament. Perhaps it does not prevent systematic cheating - one can always simply not register the phone - but it does offer an additional discouragement. Formal rules strengthen the feeling of cheating, of doing something harmful. If a player binds himself to clean play with a signature, he will be much less prone to occasional cheating.

In every case, FIDE will have to react with new rules regarding open tournaments.

Janis Nisii's picture

Alexander, this is quite complicated and a bit useless, unless you can freely frisk people, which is against the law in most countries, unless the players allows you to do so (only police - generally - can do a search on a person).
I don't understand why people have to bring a phone at all while playing, or any electronic device (watches included) for that matter. It's far more simple to forbid any electronic device and privide small lockers for personal belongings (similar to the ones at the gym clubs) in an area that is forbidden to they players during the game.
Probably organizers will have to buy scanners or what's the name of the devices that detects electronic devices, and write in the tournament's rules that players are disqualified upon detection of any electronic device.
It could also be a good idea to include the authorization to perform personal searches in the rules, so that the players who don't want to be searched, can't play the tournament, a bit brutal, but the only way out.
I'm afraid this is going to grow into a big disturbing paranoia.

jussu's picture

It really beats me why would anyone do this. One cannot possibly keep cheating to reach any considerable heights in chess hierarchy, and stealing a few additional points in a tournament or two seems just utterly pointless. Given that Natsidis admitted his deeds and expressed regret, it would be really interesting to hear his own thoughts on the matter.

help's picture

Good question, but people do. It's as simple as that. People even cheat online, where there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING at stake.

jussu's picture

Yes. I play online a lot, and during five years, I have played four games of which I am certain that my opponent used a computer. Maybe there were a few more, but maybe I am wrong about those four.

Stephen's picture

Maybe just having to sign in and out of the tournament hall every time you go to the bathroom would deter some cheaters.

WhatsNext?'s picture

If you are cheating in a last round, when you already has enough points for a norm, then you probably also have cheated the rounds before...

Sergio's picture

Hence Arne Molls explanation that it might be a compulsury disorder. Cause cheating in this round didn't make any sence. Or was the price monney really high? Or maybe he bacan to think he couldn't play chess without aid and if he played terrible the last round people would question his earlier games.

I got a feeling he won't be invited in most tournaments anymore for a long time.

Hey's picture

Isn't Natsidis actually a Greek surname?

Mark's picture

The majority of people being caught cheating have been those cheating in a really crude manner . IMHO The possibility of cheating has take n alot of the shine out of chess in these sort of tournaments .
I think slow play chess is on the way out because of it - a solution would be to stick to rapidplay games players not allowed to leave the table during the game

Tomek's picture

If you look at the picture of Natsidis, you can actually see a bulge in his left pocket.

Sergio's picture

Is that an I-phone with a superstrong chessprogram in your pocket or are you happy to see me?

Simon's picture

I suppose that once a cheater has been exposed, then they are not going to cheat again since they know that their future games are going to be under scrutiny.A lengthy ban will be over the top but something like a 1 year seems o.k.I think that these cases of people cheating are very rear, the person would have had to be away from the board for many occasions.I have played in many chess tournaments and not once have I had to do a bowel motion, urinating is far more common.The total time that a person could be out of the playing hall should be limited and also the number of occasions.

Sergio's picture

I have to disagree on the amounts and time limit of leaving the playing hall. It is unfair for some players who like to go outside for a smoke or need the bathroom more often cause they drink lots of coffee during their games. Restricting them would be puting unneccesary stress on them which will influence their games.

I think a 1 or 2 year ban will scare cheaters enough to stop it. And it isn't a real problem in chess. It is so uncommon (to get caught atleast) that all the cheaters are known by name, which really damages the person enough I think.

Lamp's picture

"Three times, I made a move and it took 8-10 minutes for him to show up at the board. "

I tend to use the bathroom quite a lot (more than 3 times probably) sometimes when I am nervous or something during games. Does that mean I shall be suspected for cheating?

Simon's picture

Yes, if you go to the bath room and it takes 8 minutes to do what you have to do.I go probably 3 or 4 times also if the game is the 90 min + 30 sec type.But each occasion would only be about 2 or 3 min max.8 to 10 minutes on 3 occasions is too much.You have got to ask yourself why you play competitive chess if you are giving your self this huge handicap.

Simon's picture

Yes, if you go to the bath room and it takes 8 minutes to do what you have to do.I go probably 3 or 4 times also if the game is the 90 min + 30 sec type.But each occasion would only be about 2 or 3 min max.8 to 10 minutes on 3 occasions is too much.You have got to ask yourself why you play competitive chess if you are giving your self this huge handicap.Also if it is your turn to move and you leave the board the suspicion is even greater, I tend to make my move first and then go to the rest room, that way you have the least time handicap.

LerneMapkap's picture

It have to be more creative than a keychain or stress ball. The more productrelated the better. You want people to remember and talk about you positively!.
The biggest waste of time when working out at the gym or at home, thinking you will lose the pounds and inches, is [url=http://www.coachnitijou.com/]コーチ アウトレット[/url] コーチ 財布 http://www.coachnitijou.com/ only core training. The midsection or abdominal region seems to collect fat quicker than any other part of the body, especially in men. This seems to be evident in the amount of men [url=http://www.coachsekai.com/]コーチ アウトレット[/url] コーチ 財布 http://www.coachsekai.com/ sporting the beer belly look and their determination in getting rid of [url=http://www.begincoach.com/]コーチ 財布[/url] コーチ バッグ http://www.begincoach.com/ that "spare tire." They are so desperate to get rid of their ever growing abdomen that they work out only on those muscles without realizing that it is really doing nothing but making them work extra hard and seeing no results..

Pages

Your comment

By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions