Even as a die hard Anand supporter it makes me wonder if this is more due to the tactical errors of Kramnik rather than amazing play by Anand. In all the games upto a certain point both seemed to be playing well (apart from probably better opening preparation by Anand). In games 3 & 5 the game has decisively been won because of two major tactical errors. Bxd3 in game 3 and Nxd4 in game 5, both leading to an immediate loss. Should Kramnik go back to the basic rule that Chess is 99% tactics. Also the match ain't over yet. Not until the fat lady sings.

Ne3!

What a nightmare move

I think it is rather stupid to say one person one only because of the other person's mistakes/ blunders.

Let's get this straight first: In Chess, if both players are to play perfect moves always, the game wil always result in a draw. What makes the game interesting is to see how one player can draw another player into making mistakes. This can be by getting into positions that the other person is uncomfortable with, making sacs with a deeper analysis, forcing the other person into time trouble etc.

I think that is what has precisely happened here. Anand has drawn Kramnik in territories that the latter is not really comfortable with and into positions that Anand probably calculates better. It is then to Anand's credit that he has been able to take the game into that direction and force Kramnik into positions where the chances of his making a mistake are higher. Voila, that happened and Anand pocketed both games 3 & 5.

If anyone is looking for perfect, error-free chess, this is definitely not the place to find that!

That's not true. Quite a few Russians and Westerners are admirers of Anand's chess genius.