Dutch Chess Federation: 'FIDE rating system threatened'
In a letter to the FIDE Executive Board members, the Dutch Chess Federation expresses its concern about the proposals of the Events Commission for the Executive Board Meeting to be held from 15 to 22 October 2011 in Krakow, Poland. We received the letter as well and publish it here.
Haarlem, 21 September 2011
Dear Mr. President, dear Board Members,
It is with great concern that we have taken note of the proposals of the Events Commission for the Executive Board Meeting in Krakow. We feel that the interests of both chess players and chess organizers will be severely harmed if these proposal were to be accepted. And what is more we think that these proposals are a direct threat to the FIDE rating system – a system that is one of the great success stories of FIDE.
Some years ago the expansion of the FIDE rating system to a larger group of players was discussed in the FIDE Congress. At the time, the Presidential Board assured the delegates that the expansion of the rating system would not lead to higher costs for federations or players. Accepting the proposals of the Events Commission to the Executive Board in Krakow would mean a drastic breach of promise. Studying the proposals it becomes obvious that the tariffs are raised dramatically.
Curiously, the proposals lack any explanation on the necessity of these plans. The income and expenses of FIDE in 2010 were balanced, the administrative costs of the rating process are within the limits of the budget and the proposals do not include a higher standard of service. Indeed, a general philosophy behind the plans is lacking, and, while the present financial situation of FIDE seems healthy enough, there are no reasons given for the excessive increase in tariffs.
Please see the attachment for a detailed explanation of the consequences of the proposals. In conclusion, we would like to summarize:
- The proposals will raise the costs for players, organizers and federations excessively.
- The proposals lack any explanation regarding the necessity of these substantial raises in tariffs. Indeed, no coherent vision is presented.
- The proposals will not bring the ‘customers’ a higher standard of service. The product remains the same, but the prices are multiplied with a factor 2 or 3.
- The proposals will lead to more bureaucracy and administrative complications; money will have to be transferred back and forth between players, FIDE and national federations.
- The proposals will erode the FIDE rating system, since many tournaments that are now rated will drop out for financial reasons. Likewise, many chess players will not buy a license and will not be rated in the future.
In the interest of the global chess community, we call on the members of the Executive Board of FIDE to turn down these proposals of the Events Commission in the meeting in Krakow.
ROYAL DUTCH CHESS FEDERATION (KNSB)
FIDE Delegate KNSB
Below we give the attachment to the letter from the Dutch Federation:
Discussion of the proposals of the Events Commission
Unfortunately, the proposals contain no comparisons between the costs of the present situation and the proposed situation. When we do make these comparisons, the following substantial raises come to light:
Proposal to charge title fees directly to title holders – annex 33P (amounts in euro)
|Title||Amount now||Amount proposed||Adm. Cost||Disbursed||Net amount||Raise in %|
Please note that it is the national federations which are disbursed, while the title fees have to be paid directly by the players and arbiters. So, if federations do not, in turn, disburse their members then the increase is even more disproportionate. The administration costs can be raised to € 150 when the application is receives after the deadline and to € 200 if the application is submitted after the commencement of the Meeting/Congress. These amounts have to be paid by the title holders, but their application has to be checked by the federation and the fee must be refunded through the federation. In the proposal no reasons are given why an increase of hundreds of per cents are proposed, and, indeed acceptable.
Regulations on registration and licensing of players – annex 33D (amounts in euro)
|Costs for player||Now||Proposed|
|License fee for 1 year||0||30|
|License fee for life||0||500|
It is obvious that many chess players will not be willing to pay these license fees. However, if an organizer inadvertently accepts a player without a valid license, the organizer shall be penalized € 50 for every infringement. As a consequence many chess players will not be rated any longer, and many organizers will prefer not to have their events rated. Every year 40% of this amount will be refunded to the federations; federations which require financial assistance receive a larger refund. FIDE takes over the administrative work that national federations are doing now in registering their players, but for a substantially higher amount.
Proposal to charge rating fees directly to the organizers – annex 33O (amounts in euro)
|Type of time control||Registration||Swiss system||Other – per section/category/group|
For a late Rating Report at any stage, a surcharge of 50% shall be levies.
The cost now is € 1 per player in a Swiss tournament. So the charges are raised sevenfold! Again any explanation is lacking. For groups there is at the moment a price (in euro) per category for registration fees.
|Category 0 to 3||50|
|Category 4 to 7||100|
|Category 8 to 10||150|
|Category 11 to 14||200|
Also in the rating procedure the costs are raised enormously. 40% of the rating fees will be disbursed to the federations. This does not change the cost explosion and will only lead to more administrative red tape.
On top of this all the treasurer proposes to remove the ceiling on tournament fees, which now stands at € 15.000. See annex 5. The costs for reporting tournaments in active countries will thus rise sky- high. Again it is obvious that many tournament organizers will no longer report their tournaments to FIDE. This in turn means a serious erosion of the FIDE rating system.
Regulations on seminars and title award for organizers – annex 33C
The proposal is that a tournament can only be reported by an International Organizer (IO). The costs for the IO’s will according to the proposals be raised (amounts in euro). It is questionable whether organizers will be willing to pay these fees to FIDE.
|Title fee (once)||100||150|
|License fee (every 4 years)||-||100|
4 hours 8 min ago
4 hours 30 min ago
18 hours 34 min ago
1 day 23 min ago
1 day 17 hours ago
2 days 1 hour ago
2 days 18 hours ago
4 days 1 hour ago
4 days 2 hours ago
5 days 3 hours ago
5 days 17 hours ago
5 days 19 hours ago
6 days 21 hours ago
1 week 16 hours ago
1 week 20 hours ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 2 days ago
1 week 2 days ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 3 days ago