Carlsen catches Aronian in last round, wins Tal Memorial on tiebreak

Magnus Carlsen caught Levon Aronian in the Tal Memorial final standings on Friday in Moscow, Russia. The Norwegian defeated Hikaru Nakamura and finished shared first with the Armenian, who drew with Ian Nepomniachtchi. This means that Carlsen won the tournament on the first tiebreak rule: number of black games. In the last round Peter Svidler defeated Vladimir Kramnik.
|

Photographers at work at the start of the final round
Yet another big one for Magnus Carlsen. The Norwegian, who will turn 21 in six days, won so many tournaments in recent years that it's not a surprise to see him finishing first in Moscow as well.
However, somehow it came as a small surprise anyway, because not many had really thought about what the the tiebreak rules would mean for the tournament situation. Just before he was going to show his win over Hikaru Nakamura, Carlsen was asked about his chances to win overall. His answer made clear that he had done some calculations himself:
If Ian [Nepomniachtchi] wins, he has a better tiebreak than me. But I don't really care.
Because Levon Aronian managed to draw this game, Carlsen finished first together with the Armenian.

The final handshake that finished the Tal Memorial
The first tiebreak rule decided matters: number of black games. Carlsen played with the black pieces five times, Aronian four. The two did share the first two money prizes of 30,000 and 20,000 Euros.
Carlsen not only did a good job behind the chess board; also behind the computer screen he was in great form as he explained his game as an experienced trainer. As we did in previous rounds, we entered all his lines and comments for you for replay:

Carlsen beats Nakamura in the last round to clinch first place
Last seed Ian Nepomniachtchi played a fine tournament. In the first round he started with a win against Kramnik, and in the end he almost won the tournament. In the last round it was Aronian who had to defend for the whole game:

A fighting draw between Nepomniachtchi and Aronian
Aronian won't mind too much that officially he's not the winner. An undefeated +2 in this super strong tournament means that he's now won 13.3 rating points for the January 2012 list, not long after passing the 2800 barrier. Carlsen's virtual rating is 2829 at the moment.
World Cup winner Peter Svidler eventually finished OK with a 50% score thanks to a last-round win against Vladimir Kramnik. The former World Champion cannot be satisfied with -2 and not a single victory.

Svidler beat his compatriot Kramnik with a nice little mating combination at the end
Ivanchuk played an excellent game with Black against Karjakin and almost won. How deep he calculated becomes clear in the lines below - not to be missed!

Great play by Ivanchuk, but Karjakin was solid until the end
The last round also included what was probably the last classical game between Vishy Anand and Boris Gelfand, before they will meet for their World Championship match next year, also in Moscow. Let's hope the games of next year will be more interesting.

A draw between World Champ and his next Challenger
And so the strongest 10-player round robin ever (certainly rating wise) comes to an end. The younger generation finished on top, with one exception: Hikaru Nakamura. After his glorious victory in Wijk aan Zee in January, the American only managed to come close to his top level in Sao Paulo/Bilbao. He will have another chance soon, at the London Chess Classic where he'll meet Anand, Aronian, Carlsen and Kramnik again, and also Adams, Short, McShane and Howell.
Tal Memorial 2011 | Round 9 (Final) Standings
Schedule and pairings
| Round 1 | 16.11.11 | 12:00 CET | Round 2 | 17.11.11 | 12:00 CET | |
| Aronian | ½ ½ | Carlsen | Carlsen | 1-0 | Gelfand | |
| Kramnik | 0-1 | Nepomniachtchi | Karjakin | ½ ½ | Nakamura | |
| Ivanchuk | 1-0 | Svidler | Svidler | ½ ½ | Anand | |
| Anand | ½ ½ | Karjakin | Nepomniachtchi | ½ ½ | Ivanchuk | |
| Nakamura | ½ ½ | Gelfand | Aronian | ½ ½ | Kramnik | |
| Round 3 | 18.11.11 | 12:00 CET | Round 4 | 19.11.11 | 12:00 CET | |
| Kramnik | ½ ½ | Carlsen | Carlsen | ½ ½ | Karjakin | |
| Ivanchuk | 0-1 | Aronian | Svidler | ½ ½ | Gelfand | |
| Anand | ½ ½ | Nepomniachtchi | Nepomniachtchi | ½ ½ | Nakamura | |
| Nakamura | 0-1 | Svidler | Aronian | ½ ½ | Anand | |
| Gelfand | 0-1 | Karjakin | Kramnik | ½ ½ | Ivanchuk | |
| Round 5 | 20.11.11 | 12:00 CET | Round 6 | 22.11.11 | 12:00 CET | |
| Ivanchuk | ½ ½ | Carlsen | Carlsen | ½ ½ | Svidler | |
| Anand | ½ ½ | Kramnik | Nepomniachtchi | ½ ½ | Karjakin | |
| Nakamura | ½ ½ | Aronian | Aronian | ½ ½ | Gelfand | |
| Gelfand | ½ ½ | Nepomniachtchi | Kramnik | ½ ½ | Nakamura | |
| Karjakin | ½ ½ | Svidler | Ivanchuk | ½ ½ | Anand | |
| Round 7 | 23.11.11 | 12:00 CET | Round 8 | 24.11.11 | 12:00 CET | |
| Anand | ½ ½ | Carlsen | Carlsen | ½ ½ | Nepomniachtchi | |
| Nakamura | 0-1 | Ivanchuk | Aronian | 1-0 | Svidler | |
| Gelfand | ½ ½ | Kramnik | Kramnik | ½ ½ | Karjakin | |
| Karjakin | ½ ½ | Aronian | Ivanchuk | ½ ½ | Gelfand | |
| Svidler | ½ ½ | Nepomniachtchi | Anand | ½ ½ | Nakamura | |
| Round 9 | 25.11.11 | 10:00 CET | ||||
| Nakamura | 0-1 | Carlsen | ||||
| Gelfand | ½ ½ | Anand | ||||
| Karjakin | ½ ½ | Ivanchuk | ||||
| Svidler | 1-0 | Kramnik | ||||
| Nepomniachtchi | ½ ½ | Aronian |

Not a bad commentary team for the final round: Grischuk, Sutovsky and the last hour or so... Svidler!
Latest articles
-
13 hours 46 min ago
-
14 hours 58 min ago
-
1 day 17 hours ago
-
2 days 12 hours ago
-
2 days 16 hours ago
-
3 days 11 hours ago
-
4 days 14 hours ago
-
4 days 14 hours ago
-
5 days 2 hours ago
-
5 days 12 hours ago
-
5 days 18 hours ago
-
5 days 23 hours ago
-
6 days 14 hours ago
-
6 days 20 hours ago
-
1 week 12 hours ago
-
1 week 21 hours ago
-
1 week 21 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 2 days ago










Comments
Pulern
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Congrats to Carlsen and Aronian!
Personal FIDE rating records for Carlsen:
Rating: 2326 (3 times, including current)
Rating lead: 23 points (July&Sep 2010)
Number of 1st: 9 times (out of 12 since Jan 2010)
Consecutive 1st: 5 times (current is 3 times)
MCs current Live Rating is 2829,2
Carlsen is 22 points behind Kasparov´s all time high
Aronian is 14 points behind Carlsen
Anand is 23 points behind Carlsen
London Chess Classic: Magnus could enter the new year with a personal all time rating, as well as personal all time rating lead (+23,4 points) if he beats Aronian. Should he lose, then Aronian (just 3,9 points behind) could have chance to steal first place on the January list. With Anand, Kramnik, Nakamura and Englands best... Anything can happen. But the main game will be Carlsen - Aronian. Looking forward to the whole tournament – a worthy finale to 2011.
nickeur
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
If i m the word champion i do the same (as anand reigning) Minimum of lose because i never show a weakness to my possible opponents for reigning!! It's simple strategy and the best way for money.
Septimus
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Go easy on criticizing Anand lest you be branded as nationally/racially/, biased.
Anonymous
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Of course there is some racial and age bias. If Anand was white there would be not this level of criticism. It is hard for some people to accept a dark-skinned world champion. Moreover people prefer younger champions, that's one of the reasons that they are "soft" with young players like Carlsen and harsh with players like Anand and Kramnik. The good thing is that Anand is a serious player, he knows how to do his job well and is not affected by all of this. And his job is not to win just a few tournaments, but to remain world champion by beating every challenger in match play. He has done that successfully in the past, he will do it successfully in the future, even if the challenger is a younger player like Carlsen.
Septimus
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Completely ridiculous to say that Anand is being criticized because of his race. You sir are an idiot for even hinting at coloring criticism at draws, with this kind of garbage allegations. Anant drawing all games = boring. Anand beating Topalov despite all odds = simply brilliant. What the fuk is so hard to understand about this?
Soft with Carlsen? Give me a break dude...just look at his results and his performance against top players.
Ashish
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Oh, get over it. I'm Indian and Anand's age. I'd like to root for him, but when he scores 100% draws, it's hard not to cheer for more dynamic and risk-taking players who also happen to give more interesting interviews.
Anand should beat Gelfand and then gracefully retire to be an elder statesman of chess.
RealityCheck
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
@Johny
is anyone remember Johny winning any spelling bees in last few years....He got bit comfortable and lazy....he is not able to win any spelling bees recently so it is logic he is loosing respect of chess world....and his style?? now...he is boring like christmas I would not call it plaing safelly.... duuuuuhhh
lefier
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
One may suspect that Anand prefers to be 'unbeatable' rather than playing with some risk and perhaps disclose some growing weakness in his play. After all he had some bad experience recently loosing a game against Aronian where he felt lost in his overall chess-understanding.
Mike Magnan
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Congrats to the organizers...great Tourney. Congrats to the winners. Carlsen getting a clutch win with Black..and winning the tourney added a pinch of drama. A lot of players had a shot at winning...and thats a fun tourney to look at. Gelfand landed where he probably was expected to. He played some nice chess. Lost a couple..ok..And the fact that it bothers people that such a distinguished long standing GM managed to fluke out a win and qualify for a WC shot sort of confuses me. A: Good for him...nice "Big thank You " from the chess world for 25 or so years of great chess. He deserves it. Don't forget...All the others played too under those ridiculous conditions..and lost. It was not Gelfands fault..Certainly look to FIDES ineptitude in putting together a cohesive and decent qualification process...They simply can't. They're too inept. But to knock Mr Gelfand I think is unfair. Of course we'd all like to see Anand play harder...so would I have..that's just not his chracter. He was never in any trouble in any of the games he played...and fully in command of his situations. I can sort of understand him not divulging anything for the time being. Nepo was outstanding...beenn keeping on eye on him for a while..nice to see him start growing again..he's a real pain in the arse to play against for these guys I'd imagine. Nakamura...well....I feel a little sorry for him. Besides all that Bravado and bullish beheviour he's sometimes shown..people are not cutting him any slack..and it's his own fault..but listen..he's still just a kid..plenty of time...hooking up with Kasparov can't be easy and I'd imagine harmful. Ivanchuk..Nepo..Karjakin..all came within a half point...they played great! So....sorry you have to read through all this..ultimatly...great Tourney!!!!!!! Congrats to all!!!!
And don't anyone go dissing Petrosian..I love the games he played.
Check out my fun blog..http://magnanschessblog.blogspot.com
Peace yall
Mike Magnan
Jamie
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
+1 Well said Mike.
Anand bashers - he's hiding prep and his chess is phenomenal in WC matches - wait for it.
Gelfand bashers - he won World Cup AND Candidates to qualify - he plays great when it matters (and is also hiding prep!)
Petrosian bashers - just cos he didn't get beat much doesn't mean he was boring! Check out his games - he was a great tactician also.
Love not hate, people x
Mike Magnan
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Oh yeah..I forgot Aronian..haha..he played great too! and particularily vexing for him was letting Carlsen off the hook and not seeing Bc7..which probably wins in the first round!! haha..poor guy must be a little more than peeved at that!! But of course that game with Svidler..my god that was great..but what I particularily loved was seeing Kramnik go down. He's an amazing Talent..but he talks down about younger players...He showed in this tourney exactly who is who. Congrats Vlady.
Bryan Urizar
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Guys, anyone know what happened to Leko? I miss his games against Aronian. They were always crazy lol
stevefraser
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Leko took the year off and is just now beginning to play again (see European team championship).
lefier
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Why is nobody calculating Fischer's score in this tourney, - if he had been there to play. 7? 8?
Leo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Calculating Fischer's score? How on earth would anyone be able to do that, and what would be the point?
stevefraser
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Magnus the Great wins another....He represents the future of professional chess.
christos
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I was watching the live video from Moscow today at the moment Carlsen played 32...Rxe1, taking the game to an opposite coloured Bishop endgame.
He played the move quickly and casually, while Nakamura was left surprised, looking once at the board, once at Carlsen, again at the board, again at Carlsen for some seconds before writing his opponent's move on the soresheet. He slightly delayed recapturing, though he had no other move.
My impression was that Carlsen had long ago planned to go for this endgame, where he thought he had great winning chances (or even a technically won game), while Nakamura had cut his calculations short at this point probably thinking "all opposite colored Bishop endings are drawn", or something like that.
And guess who was correct, it was the player who wins "100% of won positions", to quote a GM I have heard speaking about Carlsen.
stevefraser
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Just more evidence MC is in a class by himself, like RJF and Kasparov were.
Webbimio
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Well, not exactly 100%. Remember Paco? Remember Howell? :)
lefier
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
christos:
I think your observation on Carlsen/Nakamura is interesting, showing some of Carlsen's tactical skills. Nakamura had probably prepared for the sharpest counter-play in this opening, as Carlsen surely would go for a win. Probably Kasparov as well, when assisting Nakamura.
So Carlsen goes for something more unexpected, counter-play that is considered more drawish, but with positional challenges where he knows he may gain some advantage with Nakamura (but perhaps not with Anand/Aronian). And the opposite-coloured-bishop-ending in this game was surely not fully understood by Nakamura.
Not first time Carlsen is playing on tactics: the "magic" draw against Kramnik last year in a lost position is another example, where he afterwards admitted to some (very explicit) tactic.
Excalibur
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
stevefraser: Also include Aronian and Anand in that class.
guest09
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I hope Anand is not reading the above shameful comments
TomTom
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
When he finally accept its time to retire he should have enough time to read it.
steve
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
this forum should be called ' Troll Central '
Anthony
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Incredible! He does it again. A last round win, snatching the tournament.
Carlsen has shown incredible resilience in the last year. It is especially the second half of the tournament that he shows his unbelievable tough fighting spirit.
This tournament saw no 'strange' failures.
Two wins to take the tournament is not too much, but it is an incredibly strong field.
Pity for Aronian. He's a co winner, of course. He shows great stability in all these super strong tournaments, where he's always part of the pack. But he seldomly wins them.
The comments on Anand are silly. His reputation is strongly linked to his World Chapionship and it is natural he's not playing all out while he's preparing for a match.
In the old days Karpov and Kasparov would destroy everybody around them in between their matches, but Anand does not have that kind of domination.
He's more the Primus inter Pares that Botwinnik used to be in his time, flanked by Smyslow, Petrosian, Tal, Korchnoi.
Gelfand commands a great deal of respect. But this tournament did show he's lacking just a little when compared with the absolute top.
Nakamura was dealt a very humiliating blow. He can use it, I think he's just a little to self confident, losing objectivity sometimes. If he can reassemble his game and outlook on himself and the competition, he can become a solid top 5 player and may even have a go at the very top, but he's not there yet.
Kramnik failed badly, but he succeeded so many times it is clear that this can happen sometimes. Too bad though, I love to witness his success.
But I think it's fair to say that Carlsen is the best player in the world at this point. He's shown such incredibly stamina in all the tournaments he played in the last few years. His 'failures' were small, his victories unforgettable.
He should be able to obtain the WC title, but he's shown good judgement not to hunt it too soon. Just play the game, consolidate the no 1. position.
The crown will come in due time. Anand's era is slowly coming to an end (although it is not there yet, he'll be on top for a few more years) and Carlsen will dominate for years to come.
Unless, of course, Anish Giri will continue to copy Magnus' Elo chart.
rolla
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
bla bla bla hes not a true champion accept it
nickeur
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Why?
Does a false champion exist? ahah
Viva anand!! You are one of my best players!
Bertje
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
OH MY GOD. Anand won sooo much. Now he just had a child and is preparing for a wc-match. So obvious the results are not thrilling Atm he is the best player around together with Magnus.
A match between them is what we need
Mike
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
What we see is that MC decided to go through an imaginary way which would "show" to the chess world that the BEST is the one who wins more tournaments and has the higher rating, so he is putting ALL his energy to win games and tournaments. Some day, he would expect, that his massive tournament success will create a possible popular demand that will "force" FIDE to change the WC rules according to his preferences. But What are his preferences??? In opposition, ALL the other players accept the actual WC rules and go for them, also believing that the BEST is the Word Champion and not de "super winner" of tournaments and ratings.
Bastian
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
And on what do you base your theory? Shouldn't each chess player put as much energy as possible into the games he is playing in tournaments? Isn't it the goal of every chess player to win a tournament he participates in? Magnus Carlsen is just doing what every chess player wants, and he succeeds. I don't think this has anything to do with being accepted as a WC, or turning the rules or whatsoever. He didn't accept the WC rules that time, because FIDE was changing the rules during the ongoing circle, which he thought was wrong. He declined to play and thats it. Apart from that, not "ALL the other players" accept the rules, but "all the other players who participated in the cycle", and there was not just MC who didn't accept the new rules, the chessbase articles at that time showed that more players dropped out of the ongoing cycle.
Mike
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
"And on what do you base your theory?"
-- I base it on my observation and deduction of facts. Time will show if I'm close or distant from truth.
"Shouldn't each chess player put as much energy as possible into the games he is playing in tournaments? Isn't it the goal of every chess player to win a tournament he participates in?"
-- As I've said, It depends on player priorities. I he is committed to win the WC cycle, whatever reason (for example history values more a world champion than a tournament winner and everyone wants a place in history...) then he will put all his energy on strategic behavior, for example choosing drawish lines in his tournament games in order to study his opponents and not show his "prepared secret weapons". MC is not committed with WC or History now, and then is "playing it more freely for all"...
"not "ALL the other players" accept the rules, but "all the other players who participated in the cycle"
-- OK, at the moment, the more significant players for History...maybe the strongest...(except for MC absent..)
Bastian
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Quite simply, in my opinion I want a World Champion who wins some tournaments and shows some exciting chess. Anand is showing super-boring chess in most of the tournaments he is participating in. And it doesn't matter for me if he is hiding his preparation or whatever else might be the reason.
By no means I think that MC wants to put pressure on anyone or anything to change the rules, he is just showing the best he can, and I don't see that there is something wrong with that.
Generally I think that if a player is only playing for being WC, than he isn't a worthy champion. As a world champ, you are representing the sport, and you're not impressing people by always only choosing the save way. I was rooting for Anand some years ago and in his battles against Kramnik and Topalov, but right now I have to say that I'm rather disappointed by his performances, and I don't give anything on whether he's world champ or not.
There is no general objection against your opinion, but I think its rather bold, saying that MC is winning tournaments to put pressure on Fide or to become WC or whatsoever. Remember that in fact he helped Anand to prepare against Topalov!
Mike
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Ooops...! I just discovered the "Key Element" of this situation....Proceeding with the strategy of "winning as much as possible games and obtaining the higher possible rating" MC will be forced to show ALL his resources in all games all the time, then his opponents of an eventual future WC dispute will learn a lot about his preparations and at the same time will hide their own in order to accumulate an "Advantage Database" to be delivered at the proper time...Is this situation creating the actual drawish behavior on the stronger future opponents of MC..?
Bastian
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
You know, the good thing is that MC is going for it and not hiding behind his prep like a coward.
Bastian
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
You know, the good thing is that MC is going for it and not hiding behind his prep like a coward.
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
"he is putting ALL his energy to win games"
That is indeed a pity.
Mike
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Yes, pity, but in contrast, others are putting all their energy not just to win games, but mainly to fulfill the requirements to become World Champion according to the actual rules. For example: Guelfand: Look at what he did in this tournament and look at what he did in the candidate matches...What if you win all tournaments and never become WC??
Leo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I guess winning games is pretty much key whichever way you look at it, though :)
Mike
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
"I guess winning games is pretty much key whichever way you look at it, though..."
Maybe...Eventually MC is counting on this to put pressure on FIDE...Otherwise, History values WCs more than games or tournament winners: Compare Smislov, Tal, Euwe, Spassky with Tchogorin, Marshall, Bronstein, Keres...
niels
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I sense a healthy dose of sarcasm here as Peter Doggers wrote: "... also he [Carlsen] was in great form behind the computerscreen, as he explained his game like an experienced trainer"
Hehe - Carlsen is mostly awful to listen to and watch in post mortems, and if one thing: Carlsen DOES NOT come across as "an experienced trainer", that I guarantee you. ;-(
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I thought it was a great tournament, but since Carlsen won Monokroussos is of course unhappy and already calls it "a tournament to be forgotten" over at thechessmind. At least he didn't write that it was a shame Carlsen won this time (as when he won Wijk 2010). It's fun to read commentators that don't hide their preferences though and he has never denied that he is a big Kramnik fan.
The final report at gazeta.ru states that the tournament showed that "as predicted, not all participants played at full strength", in fact Carlsen alone played at full strength and that's why he won according to GM Smagin, who is critical of Kramnik, among other things comparing him unfavourably to the patriotic Aronian, saying that Kramnik has lost the connection to the Motherland.
http://www.gazeta.ru/sport/2011/11/a_3848762.shtml
S3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I think you are making things up again. I searched thechessmind and don't see Monokroussos writing anything like that.
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Just wait, sooner or later there will come a tournament that Carlsen doesn't win and you will be in a better mood :-) Mono calls Tal Memorial "a tournament to be forgotten" here:
http://www.thechessmind.net/blog/2011/11/25/forthcoming-events-london-wi...
Thomas Richter
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I guess Dennis Monokroussos called Tal Memorial "a tournament to be forgotten" because - to his taste - it had too many draws. And maybe (but that's my speculation) because of Nakamura's final score, safe to say from his track record that he likes Nakamura at least as much as Kramnik.
"Carlsen alone played at full strength" - does this mean that Aronian playing at full strength would have easily finished in clear first place? For example, because he wouldn't have missed a forced win against Carlsen (to be fair, it was just one moment of their seesaw game).
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Tough for the top players with London already in a week, by the way. But until then I'm not even going to look at a chess site :-)
Guru
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Aronian had one more white so the tie break favors Carlsen. However, Aronian's two wins were against Ivanchuk and Svidler, who both had better results than Gelfand and Nakamura (Carlsen's two victims) in this tournament.
Overall, Aronian played very well, obtaining favorable positions in most of his games, including in the game against Carlsen. In the process, Aronian consolidated his position in the 2800 club.
Congratulations to Carlsen for winning the tournament on tie-break but also congratulations to Aronian for the very successful tournament.
Anonymous
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Why don't you put your money where your mouth is and prove Magnus can beat Anand in a world championship match. After that there is no debate.
Anonymous
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Carlsen chickened out from a world championship match. Until he can actually beat Anand in match play, he is just one of the many promising talented players and nothing more.
Stemcell
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
All this Anand bashing is fair in some way as we are fans and then we have first amendment.
I am pretty sure at this point that the 'Weight of the crown' is getting to Anand.
This i think is a very true entity as Kramnik described. After Kramnik lost the title he felt liberated and then started playing like a free spirit with good results.
Unfortunately for Anand fans we may never see Anands 'original' play as long as he the World Champ.If he loses the title he will just fade away given his age and family commitments. If he retains the title we will continue to see uninspiring play.
Anonymous
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Indeed, Kramnik has excellent results recently, and in this tournament he once again managed to avoid last place, a truly great achievement. If only he can continue playing like a free spirit in the future...
Pages
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions