LCC R4: Wins for Nakamura, Short and McShane, who now leads with Carlsen

Luke McShane and Magnus Carlsen are sharing the lead after four rounds at the London Chess Classic. McShane, who beat his compatriot David Howell with Black on Tuesday, even has the tiebreak advantage. Carlsen drew with Vladimir Kramnik. Vishy Anand finished his long streak of draws with a loss against Hikaru Nakamura while Nigel Short got his first three points thanks to a win against Mickey Adams. In this round Levon Aronian had his rest day. There's no round on Wednesday.
Carlsen and McShane lead with five rounds to go | Photos © John Saunders, all other photos in this report © Ray Morris-Hill for the official website
|
Videos by Macauley Peterson
For iPhone/iPad users: you can access the video feed in iTunes here.
The fourth round of the London Chess Classic started about 16.15 local time, or 17.15 CET. It was scheduled for two hours later than normal because of a Chess in Schools and Communities junior tournament, which was delayed a bit at the end.

However, for the spectators, and especially those in the USA, it was worth the waiting as they would witness another great round.
Let's start with what the organizers dubbed as the first US player to beat a reigning world champion for 19 years. They probably referred to a tweet by Mig Greengard, who thinks the last time was Kamsky over Kasparov at Dortmund 1992. Hikaru Nakamura beat Vishy Anand in a King's Indian that could easily have swung the other way.
It's really live or die, and nothing in between, in Nakamura's KIDs! He explained his opening choice like this:
I didn't like the way I lost yesterday. I figured that if I lose at least I should give myself some chances. Vishy has only been playing 1.d4 for the last couple of years and he has very little experience with the King's Indian. I thought he wouldn't understand the structures as well as I did.

To the question whether this was his biggest single win, Nakamura answered
Probably overall it is. I had some better quality wins but certainly beating the World Champion... the first time you do that is something special.
Later that night he tweeted:
Live by the sword and die by the sword. Sometimes I wonder just how many of these games I can play in the KID before I die of a heart attack
Magnus Carlsen got some chances in an ending with opposite-coloured bishops and rooks against Vladimir Kramnik. The Russian wasn't happy at all with how he got out of the opening - the same in which he once beat Garry Kasparov in a blitz game.

Magnus Carlsen had to be satisfied with a draw against Vladimir Kramnik
This allowed Luke McShane to catch Carlsen in the standings.

With Black he beat David Howell, who suffered a case of chess blindness - in timetrouble he went for a tactical sequence that looked brilliant, until it turned out to be... incorrect.

During the commentary Levon Aronian said about McShane:
Luke is very gifted positionally, and works really well during the game.

Nigel Short scored his first win in three London Chess Classics against Mickey Adams, thereby also avenging his British Championship tie-break defeat.

Nigel Short washes away that nasty zero on the leaderboard with 3...h6 in a French...

...a move that prompted the legendary Viktor Korchnoi, here with Julian Hodgson in the VIP room, to say: "Switch the game!"
On Wednesday the players don't have a round. There is chess in Olympia, though, as the FIDE Open and the Women's International reach their fifth round. Besides, there's a Chessbase workshop, a Bobby Fischer Against the World screening and an astronomy lecture by Vishy Anand (!) and John Nunn.
Round 4 standings
| No. | Name | Rtg | Score/game | Tiebreak | TPR |
| 1 | McShane,L | 2671 | 8.0/4 | 2 black wins | 2942 |
| 2 | Carlsen,M | 2826 | 8.0/4 | 2 white wins | 2909 |
| 3 | Nakamura,H | 2758 | 7.0/4 | 2905 | |
| 4 | Kramnik,V | 2800 | 5.0/3 | 2886 | |
| 5 | Aronian,L | 2802 | 4.0/3 | 2709 | |
| 6 | Short,N | 2698 | 3.0/3 | 2654 | |
| 7 | Anand,V | 2811 | 2.0/3 | 2583 | |
| 8-9 | Howell,D | 2633 | 2.0/4 | 2568 | |
| 8-9 | Adams,M | 2734 | 2.0/4 | 2510 |
Round 4 standings (classical)
London Chess Classic 2011 | Schedule & results
| Round 1 | 03.12.11 | 15:00 CET | Round 2 | 04.12.11 | 15:00 CET | |
| Kramnik | ½-½ | Nakamura | Howell | ½-½ | Adams | |
| Aronian | ½-½ | McShane | McShane | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Howell | Nakamura | 1-0 | Aronian | |
| Adams | ½-½ | Anand | Short | 0-1 | Kramnik | |
| Short | bye | Assisting the commentary | Anand | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 3 | 05.12.11 | 15:00 CET | Round 4 | 06.12.11 | 17:00 CET | |
| Aronian | 1-0 | Short | Carlsen | ½-½ | Kramnik | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Nakamura | Adams | 0-1 | Short | |
| Adams | 0-1 | McShane | Anand | 0-1 | Nakamura | |
| Anand | ½-½ | Howell | Howell | 0-1 | McShane | |
| Kramnik | bye | Assisting the commentary | Aronian | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 5 | 08.12.11 | 15:00 CET | Round 6 | 09.12.11 | 15:00 CET | |
| Nakamura | - | Howell | Adams | - | Aronian | |
| Short | - | Anand | Anand | - | Kramnik | |
| Kramnik | - | Adams | Howell | - | Short | |
| Aronian | - | Carlsen | McShane | - | Nakamura | |
| McShane | bye | Assisting the commentary | Carlsen | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 7 | 10.12.11 | 15:00 CET | Round 8 | 11.12.11 | 15:00 CET | |
| Short | - | McShane | Anand | - | Carlsen | |
| Kramnik | - | Howell | Howell | - | Aronian | |
| Aronian | - | Anand | McShane | - | Kramnik | |
| Carlsen | - | Adams | Nakamura | - | Short | |
| Nakamura | bye | Assisting the commentary | Adams | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 9 | 12.12.11 | 13:00 CET | ||||
| McShane | Anand | |||||
| Nakamura | - | Adams | ||||
| Short | - | Carlsen | ||||
| Kramnik | - | Aronian | ||||
| Howell | bye | Assisting the commentary |
Latest articles
-
1 hour 10 min ago
-
10 hours 19 min ago
-
10 hours 40 min ago
-
1 day 44 min ago
-
1 day 6 hours ago
-
1 day 23 hours ago
-
2 days 7 hours ago
-
3 days 46 min ago
-
4 days 7 hours ago
-
4 days 8 hours ago
-
5 days 10 hours ago
-
6 days 27 sec ago
-
6 days 1 hour ago
-
1 week 3 hours ago
-
1 week 22 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago







Comments
Johnny
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
27-24 in Aronian's favor, according to http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?pid=17316&pid2=52948 Please note that this includes rapid games.
Morley
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I think Carlsen has 7 wins, to Aronian's 6 (classical time controls) and a gaggle of draws.
Anthony
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
With such domination in tournaments and rating it seems clear Carlsen is the best player in the world.
He seems to have gotten that nasty little simple blunders thing under control.
His next game against Aronian will be quite intriguing.
But at this point I think we must give Magnus his due: he's present AND future of chess.
Al
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I get just as much enjoyment reading these ChessVibes round comments as the actual articles themselves, great stuff :-)
Bring on the Aronian vs Carlsen game! Probably a tough fought draw but I hope for a decisive result.
The Player
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
If you win almost every tournament you play in, and if you are by far the best player in rating > then you are the best player in the World. Magnus is the best > no discussion about that!
S3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Maybe he is the best and certainly one of the most stable players, but I don't think it's that clear. Tie break wins in London, Bazna, Tal memorial, and so on (Bilbao doesn't count as he would have won without the football score). Not to mention the fact that he shied away of the wcc-which is of course very handy if you don't want to lose rating points and prestige. Nor did he play for team events like ratingwise no 2 Aronian and no 4 Karjakin. All those events can be bad for rating-I'm not sure if and how much it costs Aronian for example but its worth a thought. Also, I think plenty of guys can bring in a little extra when it matters. Not everyone is a fanatic and I am not so sure that Carlsen will be on top when the title is at stake. Others are just playing below their usual level against Carlsen atm. We will see soon enough if he is the future of chess.
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
People demand much of Carlsen though, I recall this bronk-something guy that used to post at Chessbomb during every Carlsen game. Tournament after tournament Carlsen won he went on about it proving nothing (and that Gelfand was better etc), and then at the Tal Memorial he saw his chance: after one round Carlsen was 0.5 behind Aronian, and he proudly declared that this showed that Aronian was the best player in the world. No matter that it just was one round, that Carlsen recently won the Grand Slam final where both were present (and won also Tal Memorial in the end). The funny thing is that I don't think he's trying to troll or something like that, and he does understand chess quite a bit, it's just that some are so annoyed by Carlsen that they lose all objectivity. Well, nothing wrong with that I guess, it's just a board game after all.
S3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Well, Gelfand is clearly better when it comes to qualifying for the title. But it's a bit far off saying he is the better player in general. Seems to me that both "sides" are often losing objectivity, not really surprising in sports.
T3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
But he broke even with different players, so he is always on top and sometimes someone matches him.
Sounds like Federer a few years back, by far the best player, but sometimes someone could climb above himself and even beat him! Now there are more players who reach that level, hope we can see the same in chess (Caruana and Giri?)
The Player
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
If its green, jumps, quacks and looks like a frog - its a frog! Simple as that ;)
PP (nl)
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Playing in the Olympiad is a bit pointless for him. It is a team event. The rest of his team is so weak that he would have a kill of 2400 and 2500 players all the time with maybe a few exceptions. What does he have to gain?
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Carlsen has played every Olympiad (four already) while for example Anand has been absent from the last ones. Carlsen dropped lots of rating points in the Olympiad 2010, but has declined some of the less prestigious team events.
komski
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Anand is saving his prep is obvious, but what many don't realized that Anad is drawing for a reason: to strengthen up his defensive play for the world championship match! To be a great defensive player plus knowing how to conduct an attack is what separate the best players from the rest. Anand is basically saying "give me the best attack you got and I will dissolve it." When Anand plays Gelfand his defense will be made of steel, and his attack irresistible. So that answers why he draws almost all his games, and being only human he could lose too.
guest09
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
BS
Anonymous
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
+1
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Hehe, he won't need to strengthen his defensive play to have a chance to hold draws against Gelfand, but sharpening his attacking game compared to what he showed against Nakamura wouldn't be a bad thing.
Septimus
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Anand was trying to hide nothing in this game. Unfortunately he made a few mistakes and lost. Congrats to Nakamura for hanging in there. If anything this would probably make Anand very angry and perhaps we will see a few more wins that will put him back over 2800.
Boybawang
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Decades from now, Magnus Carlsen will be remembered as the strongest uncrowned King.
MJul
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Ehhh... he just turn 21. Can we wait 20 years?
hujik
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Lets accept the fact. Anand is past his prime. This happens to every hero of an era. Time for Carlsens, karjakins, Nakamuras.
Charles Foster Kane
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
It was one game! Anyone can have a bad day. Jesus, chess fans are presumptuous.
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
It isn't just one game, Anand was lost with white against Howell as well and has +0 -3 =20 in his last games against other players than Vallejo. Not like any period earlier in his career. He has been in bad form for a while, I don't think it's just a question of one game. I wonder if he ever will play as well as he did in 2007-08 again, we'll see.
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
One funny thing with Anand-Nakamura was that after Naka won people were complaining so much about how wrong those had been that had thought Anand was winning when the top engines gave him +3 (almost sounding as if he can't have had a winning position since he blundered it away later). Naiditsch gets much praise for his commentary since he doesn't use an engine and here are some selected comments from him:
At move 14: "Nakamura is doing something unbelievable"
18: "No it is not the way to play against the World Champion"
19: "little chances to survive"
21: "Nakamura seems to be totally out of shape. This is looking very bad"
29: "Nc4? is a big blunder. 29.Bh3 with a winning position! and easy winning! Amazing mistake by Vishy"
37. "Amazing mistake by Nakamura"
40. "I can't believe my eyes, Anand is making a mistake on move 40!! 40.Rd3 would give white a win!"
Of course not right in all cases, but also GMs commenting without engines saw the position as won for Anand.
kholmov
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Federer is that downslope on grounds of age, so the false sense that others are playing the same today, even with 30 years Federer is playing better than 24 years of great players, Nadal, Murray, Djokovic, all aged 24, as a friend says, age is only able to defeat the great geniuses of the sport, so it is natural that Roger Federer does not support the pace is wHAT should have begun to happen with Anand, I believe that few question his genius.
Guillaume
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I beg your pardon?
What?
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Kholmov: Your English really...and I mean, really...SUCKS!
Go back to school and learn it properly before trying again, please!
Pages
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions