Aronian, Carlsen, Giri start with wins in Wijk aan Zee

Levon Aronian, Magnus Carlsen and Anish Giri won their games in the first round of the 74th Tata Steel Chess Tournament in Wijk aan Zee, The Netherlands. Carlsen grinded down Vugar Gashimov in an ending while Levon Aronian used a pawn sacrifice with Black to defeat Sergey Karjakin. Anish Giri was the last to finish in the A group, and won, also with the black pieces, in a double rook ending against Boris Gelfand.
|

Top favorites Magnus Carlsen and Levon Aronian are leading the 74th Tata Steel chess tournament from the very start, together with rising star Anish Giri. How fast this young star is rising will be clear in the next two weeks - can the 17-year-old Dutchman, after winning his first big event in Reggio Emilia earlier this month, fight for the top places yet again?
Well, at least after one round he can say so. Where Giri let the World Champion himself escape in a rook ending one year ago, this time he had no mercy against the Challenger. Boris Gelfand sacrifed or just dropped a pawn in the opening and somehow just couldn't get enough compensation.
Gelfand-Giri
10.Be5!? [10.Nxd5 Nxd5 11.Bd2] 10...f6 11.Bg3 Nb4 12.Qb1 Qxd4 13.Bh3 e5 and it might have been a draw somewhere, but Giri just kept on pressing. Afterwards he said:
Can't be better! I'm very happy - the game was very interesting and I think I played very well. OK, I gave him some drawing chances but he's a strong player so he deserves it!
For this victory Giri won the 500-euro “Piet Zwart Prize” for the best game of the day.

Boris Gelfand vs Anish Giri, 0-1
One of the most fascinating games of the round was played between Sergey Karjakin and Levon Aronian.
Karjakin-Aronian
19...Be6!? 20.Bxa6 c4 21.Ra4 Qc7 22.cxb4 Bxf2+ 23.Kxf2 Qa7+ 24.Be3 Qxa6 25.Kg1 Red8 26.Qc1 Rd3
and about these developments, Aronian said afterwards:
After he took on a6 I had the feeling that all these complications may be not in my favor, but give me good play. He has to play really well, he has to keep his prospects but I think my opponent underestimated the dangers for him.
The third winner of the day was Magnus Carlsen, who played on of these typical games for him. He got a very slight advantage in an ending and just kept on playing good moves, until his opponent went wrong.
Carlsen-Gashimov
Carlsen:
I was slightly better form the opening. In the endgame it looked pretty drawish but I had a passed pawn and my pieces were a little bit more active.

Magnus Carlsen starts with a win in Wijk aan Zee
It looked like Hikaru Nakamura and Vassily Ivanchuk hadn't fully shrugged off the bad vibes from Reggio Emilia (in Nakamura's own words they were "still on tilt").
In the B group, Kateryna Lahno won the 250-euro game of the day prize for a her victory over Sipke Ernst:
Lahno-Ernst
28.Nf5 gxf5 29.exf5 Bxf5 30.Bxf5 Nf7 31.Bxg7+ Kxg7 32.Qh5 Rh8 33.Be6 Bd8 34.g6 Ng5 35.gxh7 1–0

Kateryna Lahno (Ukraine) played the best game of the day in 'B'
In the C group the best game prize is worth 100 euro, which was awarded to Hans Tikkanen for his win against Elisabeth Paehtz:
P
Swedish GM Hans Tikkanen, starting his debut in Wijk aan Zee with a win
Daily video by the organizers
Games group A, round 1
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group A | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Navara | ½-½ | Topalov | Topalov | ½-½ | Van Wely | |
| Gelfand | 0-1 | Giri | Gashimov | ½-½ | Kamsky | |
| Radjabov | ½-½ | Caruana | Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Karjakin | 0-1 | Aronian | Aronian | 1-0 | Nakamura | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | Caruana | 1-0 | Karjakin | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Gashimov | Giri | ½-½ | Radjabov | |
| Kamsky | ½-½ | Van Wely | Navara | ½-½ | Gelfand | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Gelfand | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Gashimov | |
| Radjabov | - | Navara | Ivanchuk | - | Van Wely | |
| Karjakin | - | Giri | Aronian | - | Kamsky | |
| Nakamura | - | Caruana | Caruana | - | Carlsen | |
| Carlsen | - | Aronian | Giri | - | Nakamura | |
| Kamsky | - | Ivanchuk | Navara | - | Karjakin | |
| Van Wely | - | Gashimov | Gelfand | - | Radjabov | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Radjabov | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Karjakin | - | Gelfand | Aronian | - | Gashimov | |
| Nakamura | - | Navara | Caruana | - | Van Wely | |
| Carlsen | - | Giri | Giri | - | Kamsky | |
| Kamsky | - | Caruana | Navara | - | Carlsen | |
| Van Wely | - | Aronian | Gelfand | - | Nakamura | |
| Gashimov | - | Ivanchuk | Radjabov | - | Karjakin | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Karjakin | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Aronian | |
| Nakamura | - | Radjabov | Caruana | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Carlsen | - | Gelfand | Giri | - | Gashimov | |
| Kamsky | - | Navara | Navara | - | Van Wely | |
| Van Wely | - | Giri | Gelfand | - | Kamsky | |
| Gashimov | - | Caruana | Radjabov | - | Carlsen | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Aronian | Karjakin | - | Nakamura | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Nakamura | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Caruana | |
| Carlsen | - | Karjakin | Giri | - | Aronian | |
| Kamsky | - | Radjabov | Navara | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Van Wely | - | Gelfand | Gelfand | - | Gashimov | |
| Gashimov | - | Navara | Radjabov | - | Van Wely | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Giri | Karjakin | - | Kamsky | |
| Aronian | - | Caruana | Nakamura | - | Carlsen | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Carlsen | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Giri | |
| Kamsky | - | Nakamura | Navara | - | Caruana | |
| Van Wely | - | Karjakin | Gelfand | - | Aronian | |
| Gashimov | - | Radjabov | Radjabov | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Gelfand | Karjakin | - | Gashimov | |
| Aronian | - | Navara | Nakamura | - | Van Wely | |
| Caruana | - | Giri | Carlsen | - | Kamsky | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Kamsky | - | Topalov | ||||
| Van Wely | - | Carlsen | ||||
| Gashimov | - | Nakamura | ||||
| Ivanchuk | - | Karjakin | ||||
| Aronian | - | Radjabov | ||||
| Caruana | - | Gelfand | ||||
| Giri | - | Navara |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group A | Round 1 standings
Games group B, round 1
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group B | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Reinderman | ½-½ | Motylev | Motylev | ½-½ | Potkin | |
| Bruzon | 0-1 | Harikrishna | Tiviakov | 1-0 | Timman | |
| Lahno | 1-0 | Ernst | Nyzhnyk | ½-½ | l'Ami | |
| Harika | ½-½ | Vocaturo | Vocaturo | 1-0 | Cmilyte | |
| Cmilyte | 0-1 | Nyzhnyk | Ernst | ½-½ | Harika | |
| l'Ami | 1-0 | Tiviakov | Harikrishna | 1-0 | Lahno | |
| Timman | ½-½ | Potkin | Reinderman | ½-½ | Bruzon | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Bruzon | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Tiviakov | |
| Lahno | - | Reinderman | Nyzhnyk | - | Potkin | |
| Harika | - | Harikrishna | Vocaturo | - | Timman | |
| Cmilyte | - | Ernst | Ernst | - | l'Ami | |
| l'Ami | - | Vocaturo | Harikrishna | - | Cmilyte | |
| Timman | - | Nyzhnyk | Reinderman | - | Harika | |
| Potkin | - | Tiviakov | Bruzon | - | Lahno | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Lahno | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Harika | - | Bruzon | Vocaturo | - | Tiviakov | |
| Cmilyte | - | Reinderman | Ernst | - | Potkin | |
| l'Ami | - | Harikrishna | Harikrishna | - | Timman | |
| Timman | - | Ernst | Reinderman | - | l'Ami | |
| Potkin | - | Vocaturo | Bruzon | - | Cmilyte | |
| Tiviakov | - | Nyzhnyk | Lahno | - | Harika | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Harika | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Vocaturo | |
| Cmilyte | - | Lahno | Ernst | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| l'Ami | - | Bruzon | Harikrishna | - | Tiviakov | |
| Timman | - | Reinderman | Reinderman | - | Potkin | |
| Potkin | - | Harikrishna | Bruzon | - | Timman | |
| Tiviakov | - | Ernst | Lahno | - | l'Ami | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Vocaturo | Harika | - | Cmilyte | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Cmilyte | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Ernst | |
| l'Ami | - | Harika | Harikrishna | - | Vocaturo | |
| Timman | - | Lahno | Reinderman | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Potkin | - | Bruzon | Bruzon | - | Tiviakov | |
| Tiviakov | - | Reinderman | Lahno | - | Potkin | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Harikrishna | Harika | - | Timman | |
| Vocaturo | - | Ernst | Cmilyte | - | l'Ami | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| l'Ami | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Harikrishna | |
| Timman | - | Cmilyte | Reinderman | - | Ernst | |
| Potkin | - | Harika | Bruzon | - | Vocaturo | |
| Tiviakov | - | Lahno | Lahno | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Bruzon | Harika | - | Tiviakov | |
| Vocaturo | - | Reinderman | Cmilyte | - | Potkin | |
| Ernst | - | Harikrishna | l'Ami | - | Timman | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Timman | - | Motylev | ||||
| Potkin | - | l'Ami | ||||
| Tiviakov | - | Cmilyte | ||||
| Nyzhnyk | - | Harika | ||||
| Vocaturo | - | Lahno | ||||
| Ernst | - | Bruzon | ||||
| Harikrishna | - | Reinderman |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group B | Round 1 standings
Games group C, round 1
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group C | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Sadler | 1-0 | Hopman | Hopman | 0-1 | Turov | |
| Tania | ½-½ | Grover | Schut | ½-½ | Danielian | |
| Paehtz | 0-1 | Tikkanen | Haast | ½-½ | Goudriaan | |
| Brandenburg | ½-½ | Ootes | Ootes | ½-½ | Adhiban | |
| Adhiban | 1-0 | Haast | Tikkanen | ½-½ | Brandenburg | |
| Goudriaan | 1-0 | Schut | Grover | 1-0 | Paehtz | |
| Danielian | 0-1 | Turov | Sadler | ½-½ | Tania | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Tania | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Schut | |
| Paehtz | - | Sadler | Haast | - | Turov | |
| Brandenburg | - | Grover | Ootes | - | Danielian | |
| Adhiban | - | Tikkanen | Tikkanen | - | Goudriaan | |
| Goudriaan | - | Ootes | Grover | - | Adhiban | |
| Danielian | - | Haast | Sadler | - | Brandenburg | |
| Turov | - | Schut | Tania | - | Paehtz | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Paehtz | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Haast | |
| Brandenburg | - | Tania | Ootes | - | Schut | |
| Adhiban | - | Sadler | Tikkanen | - | Turov | |
| Goudriaan | - | Grover | Grover | - | Danielian | |
| Danielian | - | Tikkanen | Sadler | - | Goudriaan | |
| Turov | - | Ootes | Tania | - | Adhiban | |
| Schut | - | Haast | Paehtz | - | Brandenburg | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Brandenburg | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Ootes | |
| Adhiban | - | Paehtz | Tikkanen | - | Haast | |
| Goudriaan | - | Tania | Grover | - | Schut | |
| Danielian | - | Sadler | Sadler | - | Turov | |
| Turov | - | Grover | Tania | - | Danielian | |
| Schut | - | Tikkanen | Paehtz | - | Goudriaan | |
| Haast | - | Ootes | Brandenburg | - | Adhiban | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Adhiban | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Tikkanen | |
| Goudriaan | - | Brandenburg | Grover | - | Ootes | |
| Danielian | - | Paehtz | Sadler | - | Haast | |
| Turov | - | Tania | Tania | - | Schut | |
| Schut | - | Sadler | Paehtz | - | Turov | |
| Haast | - | Grover | Brandenburg | - | Danielian | |
| Ootes | - | Tikkanen | Adhiban | - | Goudriaan | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Goudriaan | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Grover | |
| Danielian | - | Adhiban | Sadler | - | Tikkanen | |
| Turov | - | Brandenburg | Tania | - | Ootes | |
| Schut | - | Paehtz | Paehtz | - | Haast | |
| Haast | - | Tania | Brandenburg | - | Schut | |
| Ootes | - | Sadler | Adhiban | - | Turov | |
| Tikkanen | - | Grover | Goudriaan | - | Danielian | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Danielian | - | Hopman | ||||
| Turov | - | Goudriaan | ||||
| Schut | - | Adhiban | ||||
| Haast | - | Brandenburg | ||||
| Ootes | - | Paehtz | ||||
| Tikkanen | - | Tania | ||||
| Grover | - | Sadler |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group C | Round 1 standings
Latest articles
-
14 hours 17 min ago
-
21 hours 36 min ago
-
1 day 14 hours ago
-
1 day 19 hours ago
-
1 day 19 hours ago
-
1 day 22 hours ago
-
2 days 9 hours ago
-
2 days 9 hours ago
-
3 days 11 hours ago
-
3 days 20 hours ago
-
4 days 13 hours ago
-
4 days 19 hours ago
-
5 days 12 hours ago
-
5 days 14 hours ago
-
5 days 20 hours ago
-
5 days 20 hours ago
-
6 days 10 hours ago
-
6 days 21 hours ago
-
1 week 12 hours ago
-
1 week 13 hours ago






Comments
FBardamu
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Giri for president!
phil
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
giri for barbecue stick
The Player
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Magnus for king!
KingTal
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Aronian for god!
darkergreen
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
God for Carlsen!
TomTom
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Gelfand for title!
phil
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
gelfand looks like angry bird
John
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
C-C-C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER
Zacalov Ramsay
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!
sirschratz
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
van Wely for coffee-shop :-)
nickeur
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Nakamura for queen!
Parkov
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Fishing for compliments
Anthony
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Giri has passed Gelfand on the Live rating list. He's 18 with 2734.
This is going to be a great tournament!
Ashish
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
If Giri wins all of his games, he will break into the top 5!
nickeur
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
yes, and a historical point performance...
darkergreen
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
If Giri wins all his games, then we may have a wormhole too!
aerodarts
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
WOULD YOU CARE TO PUT YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS?!
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Gelfand is The King!!!
joey
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Gelfand for wc, sure showing how good he is...
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
But he doesn't care about ratings, isn't interested in winning tournaments, and is hiding his preparation. Otherwise he would of course win instead of trying to avoid last place as usual. :-)
Interesting that he picked an opening line he had lots of experience from both as white and black. As white he had played it against Gagunashvili and Fressinett, and as black against Ponomariov twice and Bu once. Not that it helped much against Giri, Gelfand was just slowly outplayed from beginning to end in spite of being white against one of the few lower rated players in the field.
S3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Slowly outplayed..or maybe he just lost a pawn in the opening, one opening that he knows very well. That would make most people think, but not redivivo...
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
He had an OK position out of the opening, Houdini had the game as equal after 15 moves but Gelfand had a bishop pair in a rather open position and had full compensation for the pawn sacrifice. Giri just played much better chess long after preparation was a question.
Thomas Richter
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Is five games (including against considerably lower-rated oppponents, including rapid and blitz) really "lots of experience"? If so, Kramnik is a VERY experienced player in the Pirc and Scandinavian!?
I am not even sure if the pawn loss was a home-prepared sacrifice, the game went through the opening phase rather slowly. I consider Houdini's assessment just an opinion - in such positions, an engine evaluation isn't gospel truth (unless they come up with a forced repetition or a forced way to regain the pawn). Dennis Monokroussos also has, and is entitled to his opinion. As I was in Wijk aan Zee yesterday, I can add the opinion, or rather psychological assessment, of Ivan Sokolov doing the live commentary (not necessarily his exact words): "Now the game becomes concrete at an early stage, white has to justify his material investment, every single move matters and he cannot just shuffle his pieces around. I know Gelfand a bit, he probably doesn't like it, he's out of his comfort zone."
And for what it's worth my own opinion (which obviously can't compete with expert comments): Maybe white had enough for the pawn, maybe he could have held a draw, but it's hard to believe that he could ever hope for an advantage (and that's what you normally want with the white pieces!). In that sense, while Giri played well, Gelfand played poorly. In any case, I don't think we will see this line in his match against Anand.
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
"Is five games (including against considerably lower-rated oppponents, including rapid and blitz) really "lots of experience"? If so, Kramnik is a VERY experienced player in the Pirc and Scandinavian!?"
Of the 26 games ever played in this rare line, going by Chessgames.com, Gelfand is the player with by far most experience in the world since he has been involved in 5 of those games (he also played a novelty here). I wouldn't compare that to Kramnik's answering 1. e4 with d5 in the World Blitz Championship 2009, it was just a first move that has been played 6000 times only in the limited database of Chessgames.com. Credit to Giri for just playing much better chess in a line he never had played, it's never easy to win with black against players on Gelfand's level.
It isn't Gelfand's fault that he may be the comparatively weakest challenger ever. Maybe Janowski is in the same region, but at least he was strong enough to be ranked #1 by Chessmetrics a few years before the title match, at the time of the match he had fallen down to #14 though but returned to a top 10 position in 1917-18. Gelfand is #19 on the live rating list before today's game. If he loses with black he will be #24 but is probably stronger than that. I would rank him around #15-20 in the world.
Thomas Richter
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Correct but rather irrelevant IMO: 4.Qb3 (or 4.Qc2 which transposes after 4.-dc4: 5.Qc4: - which chessgames.com doesn't recognize) is a Slav sideline, there may be two or three reasons for playing it: leave the beaten track and long theoretical lines, surprise the opponent and/or (very likely here) hide prep in topical lines for forthcoming games. At all levels, players may be in a more "experimental" mood in blitz and rapid games - and don't tell me that Gelfand prepared a lot for a blitz game against Gagunashvili!
Kramnik playing the Scandinavian in blitz and rapid games (also at Zurich Champions Rapid) is a somewhat similar story - maybe he just wanted to have some fun, maybe he considered to play it also in classical games (but then didn't). It doesn't really matter that the opening is relatively popular at lower levels, all the way to a respectable subtop GM as Tiviakov who plays it regularly at all time controls.
BTW for what it's worth, Gelfand's 7.Bf4 wasn't quite a novelty - it was recently played in the high-level blitz game Mamedyarov-Le Quang Liem , World Mind Sports Games 2011 (but this one went via 4.Qc2). Giri's 7.-Nb6 is a novelty at top GM level, even this had a somewhat obscure predecessor Fedder-Juhnke, EU-Ch U20 final(B) 1969: this game continued with the same pawn sacrifice, but the way black played white got full compensation and even some advantage before it finished with a draw.
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
All the explanations concerning why Gelfand is a much better player than his results get fanciful in the long run though. He only had an equal position out of the opening, he was just a little bit more experienced than his opponent in the line, he's only in Wijk for the paycheck and isn't interested in actually playing chess, etc. To me he is overestimated for winning a knockout. Impressive to be close to top 15 after almost decades in top tournaments, but I was more impressed with him 20+ years ago when he was good enough to reach top three for a while and score top results in the toughest tournaments.
S3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
20 years ago you defenitely did not follow chess, obviously.
And you seem to forget time and time again that he won 2 knock outs, not one.
S3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
So after 15 moves he had "an ok" "equal" position a pawn down and not the slightest advantage with white. Yup, sounds about right.
AFKAM
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
What a great round ! More tournaments should have this many players and categories me thinks.
Question Offtopic> Sorry to ask here but chessbase has no forum : Why is almost everyone white in Susan Polgar's article from South Africa ? Did i miss any important new about that continent?
Daaim Shabazz
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Long story AFKAM.
kees
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I am interested too, Daaim. If you know the answer, please share it with us.
aerodarts
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
NAKAMURA FOR TEBOW!!!
fen
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Hey everybody, remember last year when the GMs did postmortems on those wooden demonstration boards? Are they doing anything like that this year? I can't find anything on the website.
Chess Fan
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
It is unbelievable how talented Carlsen, Aronian, and Giri are. Aronian beating Karjakin (of all people, as I hold him nearly the same esteem) with black makes Aronian, well, Chess God! And I am not even Armenian (though in my ancestry I might be according to my Doctor) ;-)
Looks to be a wonderful battle between these Chess Gods in this tournament. Poor Gelfand. I hope he does well for his sake.
Does anyone know when his title match with Vishy is?
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Giri's seven latest, four of them with black (and today Radjabov awaits):
vs Caruana 1-0
vs Ivanchuk 1-0
vs Moro 1/2
vs Vitiugov 1-0
vs Nakamura 1-0
vs Caruana 1/2
vs Gelfand 1-0
Monokroussos on Gelfand vs Giri:
"Gelfand's pawn sac in the opening looked pretty interesting to me, and in return his bishop pair seemed to offer some chances. As things went, though, Giri was able to absorb the pressure a bit at a time, and finally went on to win a long double rook ending"
http://www.thechessmind.net/blog/2012/1/14/wijk-aan-zee-round-1-carlsen-...
Hanseman
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
btw why is Anand not participating?
Hanseman
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
and Kramnik?
classic
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Anand-Gelfand - probably one of the least interesting wc-matches in history of chess.
Thomas Richter
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
The full story about Sokolov's reaction to Nakamura's 18.a4: As always, the commentator was on mid-stage in front of the demo boards, with Aviv Friedman sitting behind a computer to transmit the moves from the playing hall. Friedman - instead of telling the move immediately - said "you'll never guess ...". Indeed Sokolov didn't manage (another story is how seriously he tried).
He had discussed a3 for white before - the idea is to weaken the black pawn on b4, if this one falls, c3 also cannot be defended. So 18.a3 wasn't just the lesser evil ("if you accidentally touch the a-pawn, move it one square") but a rather plausible move now or later. Then 18.a4 has two disadvantages: it loses time AND the option a2-a3 is gone forever. What was the idea behind a4? Hard to believe that it was a simple fingerfehler, but this is my preferred explanation for lack of better ones ... .
VK
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Very poor collection of photos..! Why can't you let us know the reason behind uploading very less number of photos?
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions