Tata R3: Carlsen beats Aronian, takes over the lead

Magnus Carlsen is the new leader at the 74th Tata Steel Chess Tournament in Wijk aan Zee, The Netherlands. The Norwegian defeated Levon Aronian on Monday. Other victories in the A group went to Sergey Karjakin and Teimour Radjabov, who won against Anish Giri and David Navara respectively. Pentala Harikrishna and Maxim Turov maintained their lead in the B and C groups.
Carlsen won the important game between the two highest rated participants
|
A bit surprisingly, the press room was very quiet on this first week day of the tournament. Some journalists, who had visited the tournament in the first weekend, were already gone - will they return later? Others - in fact most - probably decided to come by during the second half, when everything will be decided. And so, on the day when world number one Magnus Carlsen faced tournament leader Levon Aronian, almost nobody noticed, well, at least not in Wijk aan Zee! (By the way, this is also the reason why there hasn't been one of those famous press-conferences-with-demo-board yet.)

But of course, everyone noticed. Obviously, everyone is following the games at the official website. Kudos to the organizers for picking up something that was done before by the Russian Chess Federation: Pascal Pflaum's applet for streaming the live games. The German programmer created this splendid applet for the Schachbundesliga two years ago, and at some point started licensing his software to other organizations. It was already used during e.g. last year's FIDE World Cup, and on the website WhyChess (which saw its funding terminated recently).

And so the tens of thousands of chess fans enjoyed online yet another great game by Magnus Carlsen, who slowly outplayed Levon Aronian, then let a big advantage almost slip away but eventually won a BN vs R (and only a few pawns) ending.
I was completely winning of course, then I tried to find the most accurate way and evidently I didn't. Probably it was winning til the end, but if so it was only by luck. A win is a win.

As Jan Timman explained to us last week during our interview, one of the few weakness left in Anish Giri's play is that he can be overoptimistic. It looks like this was the case also in the third round, when the Dutchman couldn't resist the anti-positional 20...f5, a move condemned by his opponent Sergey Karjakin after the game. The Moscovite added:
Finally of course I'm happy. It was difficult to recover but I managed to play a more or less good game today. It wasn't an easy win.

The third winner of the day was Teimour Radjabov, who saw his opponent going wrong already in the opening. Just when David Navara seemed to be putting up a stubborn defence, the Czech dropped a full knight.

In the B group local heros Erwin l'Ami, Jan Timman and Sergey Tiviakov won. Timman must have enjoyed the final part of his game against Ilya Nyzhnyk.

Jan Timman still attracting lots of attention at the start of the round
The 250-euro Piet Zwart Prize was awarded to Lithuania’s Viktorija Cmylite for her victory against Holland’s Sipke Ernst.

In the C-group this prize is just 100 euros, and in the third round two players had to split the money: Elisabeth Paehtz and Matthew Sadler. Their game, a Modern Defence, was indeed spectacular:

Daily video by the organizers
Games group A, round 3
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group A | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Navara | ½-½ | Topalov | Topalov | ½-½ | Van Wely | |
| Gelfand | 0-1 | Giri | Gashimov | ½-½ | Kamsky | |
| Radjabov | ½-½ | Caruana | Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Karjakin | 0-1 | Aronian | Aronian | 1-0 | Nakamura | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | Caruana | 1-0 | Karjakin | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Gashimov | Giri | ½-½ | Radjabov | |
| Kamsky | ½-½ | Van Wely | Navara | ½-½ | Gelfand | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Gelfand | ½-½ | Topalov | Topalov | - | Gashimov | |
| Radjabov | 1-0 | Navara | Ivanchuk | - | Van Wely | |
| Karjakin | 1-0 | Giri | Aronian | - | Kamsky | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Caruana | Caruana | - | Carlsen | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Aronian | Giri | - | Nakamura | |
| Kamsky | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | Navara | - | Karjakin | |
| Van Wely | ½-½ | Gashimov | Gelfand | - | Radjabov | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Radjabov | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Karjakin | - | Gelfand | Aronian | - | Gashimov | |
| Nakamura | - | Navara | Caruana | - | Van Wely | |
| Carlsen | - | Giri | Giri | - | Kamsky | |
| Kamsky | - | Caruana | Navara | - | Carlsen | |
| Van Wely | - | Aronian | Gelfand | - | Nakamura | |
| Gashimov | - | Ivanchuk | Radjabov | - | Karjakin | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Karjakin | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Aronian | |
| Nakamura | - | Radjabov | Caruana | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Carlsen | - | Gelfand | Giri | - | Gashimov | |
| Kamsky | - | Navara | Navara | - | Van Wely | |
| Van Wely | - | Giri | Gelfand | - | Kamsky | |
| Gashimov | - | Caruana | Radjabov | - | Carlsen | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Aronian | Karjakin | - | Nakamura | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Nakamura | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Caruana | |
| Carlsen | - | Karjakin | Giri | - | Aronian | |
| Kamsky | - | Radjabov | Navara | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Van Wely | - | Gelfand | Gelfand | - | Gashimov | |
| Gashimov | - | Navara | Radjabov | - | Van Wely | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Giri | Karjakin | - | Kamsky | |
| Aronian | - | Caruana | Nakamura | - | Carlsen | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Carlsen | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Giri | |
| Kamsky | - | Nakamura | Navara | - | Caruana | |
| Van Wely | - | Karjakin | Gelfand | - | Aronian | |
| Gashimov | - | Radjabov | Radjabov | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Gelfand | Karjakin | - | Gashimov | |
| Aronian | - | Navara | Nakamura | - | Van Wely | |
| Caruana | - | Giri | Carlsen | - | Kamsky | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Kamsky | - | Topalov | ||||
| Van Wely | - | Carlsen | ||||
| Gashimov | - | Nakamura | ||||
| Ivanchuk | - | Karjakin | ||||
| Aronian | - | Radjabov | ||||
| Caruana | - | Gelfand | ||||
| Giri | - | Navara |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group A | Round 3 standings
Games group B, round 3
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group B | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Reinderman | ½-½ | Motylev | Motylev | ½-½ | Potkin | |
| Bruzon | 0-1 | Harikrishna | Tiviakov | 1-0 | Timman | |
| Lahno | 1-0 | Ernst | Nyzhnyk | ½-½ | l'Ami | |
| Harika | ½-½ | Vocaturo | Vocaturo | 1-0 | Cmilyte | |
| Cmilyte | 0-1 | Nyzhnyk | Ernst | ½-½ | Harika | |
| l'Ami | 1-0 | Tiviakov | Harikrishna | 1-0 | Lahno | |
| Timman | ½-½ | Potkin | Reinderman | ½-½ | Bruzon | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Bruzon | ½-½ | Motylev | Motylev | - | Tiviakov | |
| Lahno | ½-½ | Reinderman | Nyzhnyk | - | Potkin | |
| Harika | 0-1 | Harikrishna | Vocaturo | - | Timman | |
| Cmilyte | 1-0 | Ernst | Ernst | - | l'Ami | |
| l'Ami | 1-0 | Vocaturo | Harikrishna | - | Cmilyte | |
| Timman | 1-0 | Nyzhnyk | Reinderman | - | Harika | |
| Potkin | 0-1 | Tiviakov | Bruzon | - | Lahno | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Lahno | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Harika | - | Bruzon | Vocaturo | - | Tiviakov | |
| Cmilyte | - | Reinderman | Ernst | - | Potkin | |
| l'Ami | - | Harikrishna | Harikrishna | - | Timman | |
| Timman | - | Ernst | Reinderman | - | l'Ami | |
| Potkin | - | Vocaturo | Bruzon | - | Cmilyte | |
| Tiviakov | - | Nyzhnyk | Lahno | - | Harika | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Harika | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Vocaturo | |
| Cmilyte | - | Lahno | Ernst | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| l'Ami | - | Bruzon | Harikrishna | - | Tiviakov | |
| Timman | - | Reinderman | Reinderman | - | Potkin | |
| Potkin | - | Harikrishna | Bruzon | - | Timman | |
| Tiviakov | - | Ernst | Lahno | - | l'Ami | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Vocaturo | Harika | - | Cmilyte | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Cmilyte | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Ernst | |
| l'Ami | - | Harika | Harikrishna | - | Vocaturo | |
| Timman | - | Lahno | Reinderman | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Potkin | - | Bruzon | Bruzon | - | Tiviakov | |
| Tiviakov | - | Reinderman | Lahno | - | Potkin | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Harikrishna | Harika | - | Timman | |
| Vocaturo | - | Ernst | Cmilyte | - | l'Ami | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| l'Ami | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Harikrishna | |
| Timman | - | Cmilyte | Reinderman | - | Ernst | |
| Potkin | - | Harika | Bruzon | - | Vocaturo | |
| Tiviakov | - | Lahno | Lahno | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Bruzon | Harika | - | Tiviakov | |
| Vocaturo | - | Reinderman | Cmilyte | - | Potkin | |
| Ernst | - | Harikrishna | l'Ami | - | Timman | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Timman | - | Motylev | ||||
| Potkin | - | l'Ami | ||||
| Tiviakov | - | Cmilyte | ||||
| Nyzhnyk | - | Harika | ||||
| Vocaturo | - | Lahno | ||||
| Ernst | - | Bruzon | ||||
| Harikrishna | - | Reinderman |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group B | Round 3 standings
Games group C, round 3
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group C | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Sadler | 1-0 | Hopman | Hopman | 0-1 | Turov | |
| Tania | ½-½ | Grover | Schut | ½-½ | Danielian | |
| Paehtz | 0-1 | Tikkanen | Haast | ½-½ | Goudriaan | |
| Brandenburg | ½-½ | Ootes | Ootes | ½-½ | Adhiban | |
| Adhiban | 1-0 | Haast | Tikkanen | ½-½ | Brandenburg | |
| Goudriaan | 1-0 | Schut | Grover | 1-0 | Paehtz | |
| Danielian | 0-1 | Turov | Sadler | ½-½ | Tania | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Tania | ½-½ | Hopman | Hopman | - | Schut | |
| Paehtz | ½-½ | Sadler | Haast | - | Turov | |
| Brandenburg | ½-½ | Grover | Ootes | - | Danielian | |
| Adhiban | ½-½ | Tikkanen | Tikkanen | - | Goudriaan | |
| Goudriaan | 1-0 | Ootes | Grover | - | Adhiban | |
| Danielian | ½-½ | Haast | Sadler | - | Brandenburg | |
| Turov | 1-0 | Schut | Tania | - | Paehtz | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Paehtz | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Haast | |
| Brandenburg | - | Tania | Ootes | - | Schut | |
| Adhiban | - | Sadler | Tikkanen | - | Turov | |
| Goudriaan | - | Grover | Grover | - | Danielian | |
| Danielian | - | Tikkanen | Sadler | - | Goudriaan | |
| Turov | - | Ootes | Tania | - | Adhiban | |
| Schut | - | Haast | Paehtz | - | Brandenburg | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Brandenburg | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Ootes | |
| Adhiban | - | Paehtz | Tikkanen | - | Haast | |
| Goudriaan | - | Tania | Grover | - | Schut | |
| Danielian | - | Sadler | Sadler | - | Turov | |
| Turov | - | Grover | Tania | - | Danielian | |
| Schut | - | Tikkanen | Paehtz | - | Goudriaan | |
| Haast | - | Ootes | Brandenburg | - | Adhiban | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Adhiban | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Tikkanen | |
| Goudriaan | - | Brandenburg | Grover | - | Ootes | |
| Danielian | - | Paehtz | Sadler | - | Haast | |
| Turov | - | Tania | Tania | - | Schut | |
| Schut | - | Sadler | Paehtz | - | Turov | |
| Haast | - | Grover | Brandenburg | - | Danielian | |
| Ootes | - | Tikkanen | Adhiban | - | Goudriaan | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Goudriaan | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Grover | |
| Danielian | - | Adhiban | Sadler | - | Tikkanen | |
| Turov | - | Brandenburg | Tania | - | Ootes | |
| Schut | - | Paehtz | Paehtz | - | Haast | |
| Haast | - | Tania | Brandenburg | - | Schut | |
| Ootes | - | Sadler | Adhiban | - | Turov | |
| Tikkanen | - | Grover | Goudriaan | - | Danielian | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Danielian | - | Hopman | ||||
| Turov | - | Goudriaan | ||||
| Schut | - | Adhiban | ||||
| Haast | - | Brandenburg | ||||
| Ootes | - | Paehtz | ||||
| Tikkanen | - | Tania | ||||
| Grover | - | Sadler |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group C | Round 3 standings

After the round, Veselin Topalov could be found in the bar of the venue, analyzing with his fresh new second, GM Romain Edouard from France
Latest articles
-
15 hours 38 min ago
-
20 hours 34 min ago
-
20 hours 44 min ago
-
1 day 5 min ago
-
1 day 10 hours ago
-
1 day 10 hours ago
-
2 days 12 hours ago
-
2 days 21 hours ago
-
3 days 14 hours ago
-
3 days 21 hours ago
-
4 days 14 hours ago
-
4 days 15 hours ago
-
4 days 21 hours ago
-
4 days 21 hours ago
-
5 days 12 hours ago
-
5 days 22 hours ago
-
6 days 13 hours ago
-
6 days 14 hours ago
-
6 days 14 hours ago
-
6 days 19 hours ago






Comments
Ashish
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
After three rounds, Carlsen not only has the lead, but he's already played two of his potentially toughest competitors.
noyb
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Spot on! It's a race for 2nd place...
columbo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
what a game ! I'm wasted :) Congrats to Magnus
Daaim Shabazz
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Admitted by Carlsen, the game was full of mistakes, but it was complicated. Carlsen made the win much more difficult than it actually was.
Xeno
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Lousy game and horrible play by Carlsen, these guys have nothing on the mighty Gelfand!
joey
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Carlsen - Aronian, a game for the historybooks!
classic
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
FIDE or somebody should arrange a match Carlsen-Aronian.
Probably the most interesting chess-event possible.
Daaim Shabazz
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Nah... not yet. I like Aronian... as a player and personally. Interviewed him a couple times. Let one of them pay their dues by winning the World Championship, then we can talk. None of this FIDE stuff where any one can challenge the World Champion if he has a million bucks. That was crap and we don't need to go back there. Let's be patient.
noyb
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Some of our best World Championships were played under this system and long before FIDE. I'd like to see it come back. : )
MJul
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I never get why some people think that matches are just for WCC.
It could be a match for chess fans pleasure and Carlsen and Aronian training/torture/whatever without any kind of title. Maybe a trophy, or ELO, but not something else.
The Devil
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
This could be the tournament where Carlsen passes Kasparov's 1999 all time highest record of 2851 ELO.
Al
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Carlsen - The Chosen One - Rock On!!
Since when have we seen anybody in the 2840s?? Step aside Garry, 2852 is around the corner, and I can't wait. :-)
Bobby Fiske
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
"Magnus won the opening, Aronian draw the midgame and Magnus won the endgame."
A very tense and exciting game, although slightly too one-sided to be considered "epic". One-sided in the meaning of Aronian getting on his heels already from the beginning, reducing the outcome down to a question of 1-0 or 1/2.
Magnus reaching Elo 2842.6 already now! Who would have belived that?!
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
On the subject of one-sided games not being considered epic the four most epic games may be The Game of the Century, The Immortal Game, The Evergreen Game and Morphy vs The Duke and the Count, and they were all won in the opening or early middlegame. All of them being the equivalents of watching Manchester United beat Notts County 8-0 in a training match and liking it better than Italy vs Brazil in the World Cup because there are more pretty goals against weak opposition. :-)
S3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
While most amateurs agree with you in finding those games epic the general concensus amongst stronger players is that those games are not that interesting. It's a matter of perspective I guess.
Anthony
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
You just don't know what you're talking about S3.
Strong players know Carlsen as they know Kramnik, Karpov and all the other 'profylactic', 'intuitive' types. They fear them.
It's the masses like you who only understand Bxh7 and mate.
S3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
What a mediocre game today between the world number 1 and 2. Truly dissapointing.
rogge
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Cheer up, Carlsen might lose a game later in the tournament.
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Sooner or later Carlsen's mediocre and disappointing wins will be followed by a beautiful and memorable loss like the one against Vallejo.
S3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Thanks for your feedback guys!
columbo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Can you explain to the poor ignorants we are why this game was mediocre ?
S3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
And what the hell happened to Navara? It's a pity.
calvin amari
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
He Ivanchuked.
S3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
You think it happens most to savants?
Knallo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Do you mean "idiots savants"?
S3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
That sounds so much less nice.
S3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
You think it happens most to savants?
TomTom
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Magnus Carlsen, the greatest chess talent since Capablanca.
Parkov
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
It's clear that Carlsen and Aronian are a cut above the rest, they're just going to be picking up easy points from the likes of Giri, Caruana, Navara, Gelfand, Van Wely. They should create an 'S Group' for next year. Carlsen, Aronian, Kramnik, Morozevich, Radjabov, Anand in a double round-robin, hows that for a tournament?
Thomas Richter
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Carlsen lost against Giri last year, and had to fight for a draw against Caruana the year before. (He has improved in the meantime, but - relatively - the other even younger players have improved at least as much. So even if he should beat Giri and/or Caruana, these points aren't necessarily easy ones.)
Anyway regarding your proposed "S Group": Aren't there already enough exclusive 6-player double round robins? Tata Steel is special because it gives spots, other than organizer wildcards, to somewhat weaker players - including a qualifier from the B group, this time Navara, back in 2007 noone else than Magnus Carlsen benefitted from this system. I don't mind this at all, actually I like it!
Parkov
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Let them prove their worth on the rating list
Thomas Richter
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Today Carlsen picked up an easy point against Caruana - at least it would be one point if Tata Steel used football scoring. Regarding "prove their worth on the rating list", Caruana is currently #12 on the live rating list, 5 points (basically one win) away from the top 10. In Reggio Emilia, he was tied with Morozevich whom you consider supertournament-worthy, and Giri finished ahead of them.
Inflated
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
FIDE ratings are inflated, Kasparov played against similar opponents but they had lower ratings, if this same opponents were rated like they are today, he would have be rated >2900
noyb
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Garry Kimovich noted this himself in NIC last year. Most of Carlsen's opponent are the SAME players GK played in the past 10-15 years. He's been gone for seven years now and not much has changed except for inflated ratings.
Remco Gerlich
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Yes, because nobody actually improved their chess during that decade...
Parkov
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I would say the opposite, most of their play has declined. Anand, Topalov, Shirov, Ivanchuk, these guys aren't at the same level they were 10-15+ years ago
brabo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
So for you, somebody of 35- 40 years old plays generally weaker chess than at 25 years old?
I don't see any reason for that as chess isn't a pure phsyical sport.
My experience tells me that in general from 50 years onwards a slow but continuous decline of the chessskills is happening due to growing difficulties with concentration and calculating.
Parkov
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Generally, yes. But that's not the point. It's apparent from their play that those particular players are not as good as they were, in the case of Shirov for example it's undeniable. An exception is Kramnik who I don't think has declined much if at all
brabo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
If they are not as good as they were before then they have less rating.
Your example Shirov has around 40 points less than before so of course he plays a bit less well lately. Anyway I remember Shirov's private life is quite a mess (several divorces and children) so this doesn't do well to somebodies professional career of course.
I don't agree by your statement that generally professional players are playing less good at 35-40 compared with 25. I am convinced of the opposite. 10 years experience or more isn't a small thing.
Please read once the very recent chrestbook on Polgar. Also there is a very interesting passage in which she explains that most people already wrote her off as topplayer and were very surprised that she was able after birth of her 2 children to come back at an absolute toplevel during 2011. She believes that with sufficient training that she can still achieve higher quality of games then before.
You and many others are too easily writing off (slightly) older people. I see the same happening in many companies where managers only hire young people, hereby throwing away strong talents and valuable experience.
biffmeatstick
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Why did Aronian resign? Carlsen may not know how to mate with a knight and a bishop. Has anybody ever seen him do it?
Hortensius
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
B+N mate may be difficult for ELO 1500 and below, it is totally trivial for these guys.
Harry
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
stupidest comment of the year so far
S3
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
really?
Zeblakob
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
@Harry, he is just joking, do not brutalize him ;)
Harry
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
very strange sense of joking
Knallo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I hate to say this, but this comment is really asinine.
darkergreen
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
if we both play then that can be the case:)
werner maes
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Indeed.
I also think Aronian resign way too early !!
Why not play on and see if Carlsen manages it. It's easy to make a mistake and you only have 50 moves.
James
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I agree with inflated. What is the point in all this talk of breaking kasparov's record when all know that the ratings now and then are incomparable. We are going to be subjected to a carnival of propaganda and hysteria about someone breaking 2851, when everyone actually knows it means very little....
Is there a technical reason why FIDE cannot fix inflation? Chessmetrics or something could get round this problem?
classic
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Actually, there are some convincing research that the ratings are NOT inflated.
In fact, one may measure this hypotesis with computers. The outcome is that the playing strength among the top players has increased. Not so surprising really, with the access to chess-software and internet for training and practising.
Pages
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions