Aronian rejoins Carlsen in the lead in Wijk aan Zee

Levon Aronian rejoined Magnus Carlsen in the lead at the 74th Tata Steel Chess Tournament in Wijk aan Zee, The Netherlands. On Tuesday the Armenian grandmaster defeated Gata Kamsky with White, while tournament leader Carlsen drew with the black pieces against Fabiano Caruana. After two losses Sergey Karjakin won his second consecutive game, against David Navara. Going into the first rest day, both Pentala Harikrishna (B group) and Maxim Turov (C group) are leading by a full point.
|
Perhaps it's too early to say so, but the 74th edition of the Tata Steel chess tournament in Wijk aan Zee seems destined to become a fierce and fantastic fight between the two highest rated players, Levon Aronian and Magnus Carlsen. And who will make their life more difficult, a young chap like Fabiano Caruana, Anish Giri, Sergey Karjakin, Teimour Radjabov, or perhaps Veselin Topalov, or Vassily Ivanchuk?
We'll know more after Wednesday, which is the first of three rest days in the Grandmaster Groups A, B and C. (Some of the players are intending to play some football on one of the squares in Wijk aan Zee, but unfortunately the weather doesn't seem to cooperate nicely...)
After his game against Gata Kamsky, Levon Aronian felt that he had been in the same situation as the day before - his loss against Magnus Carlsen - but this time on the other side.
I was the one who was pressing, also managed to let my opponent get away but in the end he was the last one to make a mistake.

Sergey Karjakin shares one thing with Levon Aronian: after four rounds the Russian grandmaster hasn't drawn a single game. His game on Tuesday should have been a draw, though, but in the famous Berlin Endgame, David Navara avoided a move repetition and then started to make mistakes.

The round saw a small incident, related to the game between Vassily Ivanchuk and Loek van Wely. The Ukrainian was building up a nice advantage, but then he allowed his opponent to escape:
Immediately after the game ended, it became clear that Ivanchuk was hugely disappointed about losing the advantage. The round report on the official website describes it well:
The Ukrainian, clearly disgusted over his own dismal performance, sadly shook his head, groaned audibly while signing his score sheet, then tried to rip the hair from his scalp and finally left the tournament arena after a nasty karate kick against the door guarding the players’ exit.
The video crew noticed as well, but eventually it was decided not to include their footage of the incident in the daily round video. You can see a bit of Chuky's reaction in one of the 'En Passant' videos, though.
Going into the first rest day, Pentala Harikrishna of India is a full point ahead of the rest after a 40-move draw with white against Lithuania’s Viktorija Cmilyte. The prize for best game of the round in this group went to Alexander Motylev for his victory against Sergei Tiviakov.

Maxim Turov won all four games so far in Grandmaster Group C and he's also leading by a full point. The best game was played by Baskaran Adhiban against fellow Indian Sahaj Grover.

Daily video by the organizers
Games group A, round 4
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group A | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Navara | ½-½ | Topalov | Topalov | ½-½ | Van Wely | |
| Gelfand | 0-1 | Giri | Gashimov | ½-½ | Kamsky | |
| Radjabov | ½-½ | Caruana | Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Karjakin | 0-1 | Aronian | Aronian | 1-0 | Nakamura | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | Caruana | 1-0 | Karjakin | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Gashimov | Giri | ½-½ | Radjabov | |
| Kamsky | ½-½ | Van Wely | Navara | ½-½ | Gelfand | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Gelfand | ½-½ | Topalov | Topalov | ½-½ | Gashimov | |
| Radjabov | 1-0 | Navara | Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Van Wely | |
| Karjakin | 1-0 | Giri | Aronian | 1-0 | Kamsky | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Caruana | Caruana | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Aronian | Giri | ½-½ | Nakamura | |
| Kamsky | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | Navara | 0-1 | Karjakin | |
| Van Wely | ½-½ | Gashimov | Gelfand | ½-½ | Radjabov | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Radjabov | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Karjakin | - | Gelfand | Aronian | - | Gashimov | |
| Nakamura | - | Navara | Caruana | - | Van Wely | |
| Carlsen | - | Giri | Giri | - | Kamsky | |
| Kamsky | - | Caruana | Navara | - | Carlsen | |
| Van Wely | - | Aronian | Gelfand | - | Nakamura | |
| Gashimov | - | Ivanchuk | Radjabov | - | Karjakin | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Karjakin | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Aronian | |
| Nakamura | - | Radjabov | Caruana | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Carlsen | - | Gelfand | Giri | - | Gashimov | |
| Kamsky | - | Navara | Navara | - | Van Wely | |
| Van Wely | - | Giri | Gelfand | - | Kamsky | |
| Gashimov | - | Caruana | Radjabov | - | Carlsen | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Aronian | Karjakin | - | Nakamura | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Nakamura | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Caruana | |
| Carlsen | - | Karjakin | Giri | - | Aronian | |
| Kamsky | - | Radjabov | Navara | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Van Wely | - | Gelfand | Gelfand | - | Gashimov | |
| Gashimov | - | Navara | Radjabov | - | Van Wely | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Giri | Karjakin | - | Kamsky | |
| Aronian | - | Caruana | Nakamura | - | Carlsen | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Carlsen | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Giri | |
| Kamsky | - | Nakamura | Navara | - | Caruana | |
| Van Wely | - | Karjakin | Gelfand | - | Aronian | |
| Gashimov | - | Radjabov | Radjabov | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Gelfand | Karjakin | - | Gashimov | |
| Aronian | - | Navara | Nakamura | - | Van Wely | |
| Caruana | - | Giri | Carlsen | - | Kamsky | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Kamsky | - | Topalov | ||||
| Van Wely | - | Carlsen | ||||
| Gashimov | - | Nakamura | ||||
| Ivanchuk | - | Karjakin | ||||
| Aronian | - | Radjabov | ||||
| Caruana | - | Gelfand | ||||
| Giri | - | Navara |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group A | Round 4 standings
Games group B, round 4
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group B | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Reinderman | ½-½ | Motylev | Motylev | ½-½ | Potkin | |
| Bruzon | 0-1 | Harikrishna | Tiviakov | 1-0 | Timman | |
| Lahno | 1-0 | Ernst | Nyzhnyk | ½-½ | l'Ami | |
| Harika | ½-½ | Vocaturo | Vocaturo | 1-0 | Cmilyte | |
| Cmilyte | 0-1 | Nyzhnyk | Ernst | ½-½ | Harika | |
| l'Ami | 1-0 | Tiviakov | Harikrishna | 1-0 | Lahno | |
| Timman | ½-½ | Potkin | Reinderman | ½-½ | Bruzon | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Bruzon | ½-½ | Motylev | Motylev | 1-0 | Tiviakov | |
| Lahno | ½-½ | Reinderman | Nyzhnyk | ½-½ | Potkin | |
| Harika | 0-1 | Harikrishna | Vocaturo | ½-½ | Timman | |
| Cmilyte | 1-0 | Ernst | Ernst | 1-0 | l'Ami | |
| l'Ami | 1-0 | Vocaturo | Harikrishna | ½-½ | Cmilyte | |
| Timman | 1-0 | Nyzhnyk | Reinderman | ½-½ | Harika | |
| Potkin | 0-1 | Tiviakov | Bruzon | ½-½ | Lahno | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Lahno | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Harika | - | Bruzon | Vocaturo | - | Tiviakov | |
| Cmilyte | - | Reinderman | Ernst | - | Potkin | |
| l'Ami | - | Harikrishna | Harikrishna | - | Timman | |
| Timman | - | Ernst | Reinderman | - | l'Ami | |
| Potkin | - | Vocaturo | Bruzon | - | Cmilyte | |
| Tiviakov | - | Nyzhnyk | Lahno | - | Harika | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Harika | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Vocaturo | |
| Cmilyte | - | Lahno | Ernst | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| l'Ami | - | Bruzon | Harikrishna | - | Tiviakov | |
| Timman | - | Reinderman | Reinderman | - | Potkin | |
| Potkin | - | Harikrishna | Bruzon | - | Timman | |
| Tiviakov | - | Ernst | Lahno | - | l'Ami | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Vocaturo | Harika | - | Cmilyte | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Cmilyte | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Ernst | |
| l'Ami | - | Harika | Harikrishna | - | Vocaturo | |
| Timman | - | Lahno | Reinderman | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Potkin | - | Bruzon | Bruzon | - | Tiviakov | |
| Tiviakov | - | Reinderman | Lahno | - | Potkin | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Harikrishna | Harika | - | Timman | |
| Vocaturo | - | Ernst | Cmilyte | - | l'Ami | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| l'Ami | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Harikrishna | |
| Timman | - | Cmilyte | Reinderman | - | Ernst | |
| Potkin | - | Harika | Bruzon | - | Vocaturo | |
| Tiviakov | - | Lahno | Lahno | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Bruzon | Harika | - | Tiviakov | |
| Vocaturo | - | Reinderman | Cmilyte | - | Potkin | |
| Ernst | - | Harikrishna | l'Ami | - | Timman | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Timman | - | Motylev | ||||
| Potkin | - | l'Ami | ||||
| Tiviakov | - | Cmilyte | ||||
| Nyzhnyk | - | Harika | ||||
| Vocaturo | - | Lahno | ||||
| Ernst | - | Bruzon | ||||
| Harikrishna | - | Reinderman |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group B | Round 4 standings
Games group C, round 4
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group C | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Sadler | 1-0 | Hopman | Hopman | 0-1 | Turov | |
| Tania | ½-½ | Grover | Schut | ½-½ | Danielian | |
| Paehtz | 0-1 | Tikkanen | Haast | ½-½ | Goudriaan | |
| Brandenburg | ½-½ | Ootes | Ootes | ½-½ | Adhiban | |
| Adhiban | 1-0 | Haast | Tikkanen | ½-½ | Brandenburg | |
| Goudriaan | 1-0 | Schut | Grover | 1-0 | Paehtz | |
| Danielian | 0-1 | Turov | Sadler | ½-½ | Tania | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Tania | ½-½ | Hopman | Hopman | 0-1 | Schut | |
| Paehtz | ½-½ | Sadler | Haast | 0-1 | Turov | |
| Brandenburg | ½-½ | Grover | Ootes | 1-0 | Danielian | |
| Adhiban | ½-½ | Tikkanen | Tikkanen | 1-0 | Goudriaan | |
| Goudriaan | 1-0 | Ootes | Grover | 0-1 | Adhiban | |
| Danielian | ½-½ | Haast | Sadler | ½-½ | Brandenburg | |
| Turov | 1-0 | Schut | Tania | 0-1 | Paehtz | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Paehtz | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Haast | |
| Brandenburg | - | Tania | Ootes | - | Schut | |
| Adhiban | - | Sadler | Tikkanen | - | Turov | |
| Goudriaan | - | Grover | Grover | - | Danielian | |
| Danielian | - | Tikkanen | Sadler | - | Goudriaan | |
| Turov | - | Ootes | Tania | - | Adhiban | |
| Schut | - | Haast | Paehtz | - | Brandenburg | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Brandenburg | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Ootes | |
| Adhiban | - | Paehtz | Tikkanen | - | Haast | |
| Goudriaan | - | Tania | Grover | - | Schut | |
| Danielian | - | Sadler | Sadler | - | Turov | |
| Turov | - | Grover | Tania | - | Danielian | |
| Schut | - | Tikkanen | Paehtz | - | Goudriaan | |
| Haast | - | Ootes | Brandenburg | - | Adhiban | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Adhiban | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Tikkanen | |
| Goudriaan | - | Brandenburg | Grover | - | Ootes | |
| Danielian | - | Paehtz | Sadler | - | Haast | |
| Turov | - | Tania | Tania | - | Schut | |
| Schut | - | Sadler | Paehtz | - | Turov | |
| Haast | - | Grover | Brandenburg | - | Danielian | |
| Ootes | - | Tikkanen | Adhiban | - | Goudriaan | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Goudriaan | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Grover | |
| Danielian | - | Adhiban | Sadler | - | Tikkanen | |
| Turov | - | Brandenburg | Tania | - | Ootes | |
| Schut | - | Paehtz | Paehtz | - | Haast | |
| Haast | - | Tania | Brandenburg | - | Schut | |
| Ootes | - | Sadler | Adhiban | - | Turov | |
| Tikkanen | - | Grover | Goudriaan | - | Danielian | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Danielian | - | Hopman | ||||
| Turov | - | Goudriaan | ||||
| Schut | - | Adhiban | ||||
| Haast | - | Brandenburg | ||||
| Ootes | - | Paehtz | ||||
| Tikkanen | - | Tania | ||||
| Grover | - | Sadler |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group C | Round 4 standings

Vassily Ivanchuk and Veselin Topalov chatting before their game

Grandmaster Group C at the start of the 4th round

Joint analysis with Pentala Harikrishna, Tania Sachdev, Sahaj Grover and Baskaran Adhiban of India

Ilya Nyzhnyk and Vladimir Potkin looking at their game, and Anish Giri kibitzing
Latest articles
-
7 hours 6 min ago
-
12 hours 55 min ago
-
1 day 6 hours ago
-
1 day 14 hours ago
-
2 days 7 hours ago
-
3 days 13 hours ago
-
3 days 15 hours ago
-
4 days 16 hours ago
-
5 days 6 hours ago
-
5 days 7 hours ago
-
6 days 9 hours ago
-
1 week 5 hours ago
-
1 week 8 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago







Comments
Anonymous
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
aronian spicing it up, me likey
whzyerdaddy
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Rather ungentlemanly and sarcastic tweet by Lev, suprised/disappointed.
Ruralrob
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I must admit, it made me LOL.
Knight11
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Guys, what is Aronian's Twitter Handle? What did he say?
tanc
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
"God bless America!"
It definitely made me laugh. You can follow him on: http://twitter.com/#!/LevAronian
The Devil
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I hope Aronian/Carlsen will be the next Kasparov/Karpov in terms of competition.
MiniMe
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Not sure it will be like that. Nowadays the field is more full of very competitive players, especially taking into account such a young guy as Giri. I think it will be a more diverse competition.
Parkov
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Yes, they are both head and tails above the competition. I'm not sure others such as Nakamura, Giri and Caruana have enough scope for improvement.
Excalibur
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Get over yourself. His real twitter handle is http://twitter.com/gmlevonaronian and he didn't say anything.
Knight11
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Thanks
tanc
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
You should really watch your words before you make a fool of yourself.
That is a fake twitter account and nothing to do with Levon. See: http://www.tert.am/en/news/2011/11/21/aronyan/
Knight11
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Lol. Thanks for the right account.
MiniMe
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Not sure you are right. Take a look at this news page, http://www.tert.am/en/news/2011/11/21/aronyan/
I am not sure which one is the valid still.
tanc
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
http://twitter.com/#!/LevAronian is indeed his real Twitter account. To prove it, he has also linked in recent photos of himself in his tweets (esp. his South-East Asia trip) and on his Facebook page.
fen
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Uploading photos on to a twitter account doesn't prove anything. Some of those photos are obviously publicity photos and the others easily could have been taken by a "fan" with a cell phone.
Tata Steel is following this account: https://twitter.com/#!/GMLevonAronian
so I assume it's the correct one. Unfortunately, the account has not been authenticated - something that GM Aronian definitely needs to do if someone is impersonating him.
MiniMe
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
It's nice Aronian won Nakamura and Kamsky. I think they were one of those difficult players to whom Aronian was losing from time to time.
The Devil
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
On a special sidenote, Aronian and Carlsen are neck and neck now in terms of scores against each other:
Overall record: Levon Aronian beat Magnus Carlsen 13 to 11, with 28 draws.*
calvin amari
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
The Kamsky of old would have held that endgame and the Aronian of old would not have been able to win it. Both players have evolved, however, but in different directions. During the London classic Levon noted the extent to which he has been working on endgames of this type. Speaking of endgames, it seems that Karjakin spotted and exploited a weakness -- not in Navara's position but rather in his nerves. But that's the way the game is played ....
katar
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Good point. Levon presented an award to John Nunn at the London Classic for his "Nunn's Chess Endings", and Levon shocked everyone by saying he spent a couple months studying both volumes cover to cover!!
S3
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Actually Navara could probably have drawn by repetition. An admirable and brave decision to go on. Looks to me like he just blundered/miscalculated again in the end.
Thomas Richter
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
The tournament homepage quotes Karjakin with the words "normally, he [Navara] should have agreed to a draw by repetition", implying that he (Karjakin) wouldn't have objected at this stage.
It seems that such "admirable and brave decisions" tend to backfire in Wijk aan Zee: last year Nepomniachtchi won three(!) games after the opponent declined a silent draw offer - against Wang Hao, Giri and Carlsen.
S3
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Well yeah, and I'm not saying his decision was right or wrong but as I see it his decision to play on doesn't point at a "weakness in Navara's nerves".
Btw, many people regulary complain about draws but I rarely here them compliment a player for avoiding one. On the contrary, usually if they lose they suddenly get criticised.
True Chess
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
You are so right, a Kamsky in form would hold the draw in this game. But there is something wrong with him after the candidates match against Gelfand. And then that unfortunate loss to Svidler. He kinda seems to have lost interest or he just seems he could not recover somehow. I would like to see old holy and mighty Kamsky like in Mainz with his New York cap and fighting chess spirit.
christos
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I don't think there is much, if any, difference in strength between those two. Yesterday Aronian simply got a miserable position after the opening, this can happen to anyone from time to time, even to Carlsen.
Mauricio Valdes
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Topalov is the new king of draws!
Zeblakob
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
It is better to not lose than to lose :)
Ruralrob
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Amazing lack of criticism directed at Ivanchuk for his his rather embarassing and childish antics after his draw with van Wely. Imagine if that had been Nakamura -- the entire chess world would now be raining fire and brimstone down upon his head, calling for his permanent expulsion from chess tournaments, and crowing about how terrible all "Yanks" are.
Yes I know, Ivanchuk is Ivanchuk, but... come ON. Dude needs to pull it together.
Ashish
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
There's a big perception difference between coming across a temperamental eccentric genius, and coming across as a snotty arrogant brat. It may not be fair, but society tends to accept one and not the other. (And this matters because at the end of the day, society, via corporate advertising, is paying the bills.)
senthil
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Please who criticise the world champ anand, just check his record in this tournament.
http://www.tatasteelchess.com/history/statistics/type/3
http://www.tatasteelchess.com/history/statistics/type/1
Why do u expect him win always ? He is going to retain world champship & come back with full form .
RealityCheck
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
World Champion Viswanathan Anand will undoubtably leave the young chaps a few more mile-stones to beat.
tanc
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
You can see a short post game interview with Levon here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fVX5McciiU
Harry
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Why doesnt tell somebody something about the wooden board videos???
Charles Foster Kane
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I want to see Ivanchuk the Ninja do the door in!
Coco Loco
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Does anyone know why not 26.b4 after van Wely's 25...d4?
columbo
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
i don't see Topalov nor Ivantchuk as dangerous opponents for Magnus ... Maybe Radjabov ...
christos
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I agree that Radjabov is very close to Aronian and Carlsen. People seem to be speaking of Nakamura's talent and they usually forget about the higher rated and much more successful Radjabov, who was also born in 1987 and is constantly improving (though at twenty five years of age one is certainly not considered a young chessplayer today).
Thomas Richter
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Higher-rated is a matter of give and take, come and go: in July 2011, Nakamura was 22 points ahead of Radjabov, in the September list they were almost tied. The point about Radjabov may be that he has been around in the top10 for several years already, without making further progress and even falling a bit behind for a while - not saying that it would now be too late ... .
I am completely missing another name in these discussions: Sergei Karjakin. He had a bad start in Wijk aan Zee (like Giri in Reggio Emilia!), but already showed that he can compete with the very best: Tal Memorial 2010, Bazna 2011, also +- Tal Memorial 2011.
S3
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Ratings don't matter. I think Radja's play has improved last year. He had Kramnik on the ropes in their candidates mini match and I think he worked a lot before that. At Bazna he played very well in spite of a mediocre result. I wouldn't be surprised if we see something great of him this year.
Karjakin just needs to get a bit more stable.
Thomas Richter
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Karjakin had a bad result at the World Team Championship - maybe he couldn't handle the pressure playing first board, maybe he couldn't adapt to the climate in China. At the World Cup, he had an "accident" against Polgar (great as Judit is, I don't think she could win a longer match against Karjakin). Other than that, he was rather stable and upwardly mobile in 2010 and 2011.
In any case, if Karjakin is unstable, what to say about Nakamura? I would put Nakamura in the same league as Ivanchuk, Morozevich and (if he makes another comeback) Shirov: always capable of doing very well in supertournaments, but then capable of finishing at the bottom of the table at the next occasion. Great players, but IMO unlikely to play a major role in WCh cycles - where you have to prove yourself at several events.
columbo
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Ivantchuk at the bottom ? Where and when did that happen ?
Thomas Richter
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
For example Bazna 2011 (4/10), Astrakhan GP 2010 (5.5/13), Nalchik GP 2009 (5.5/13), MTel 2009 (3/10), Corus 2009 (5.5/13), Nanjing 2008 (4/10). But he had also won Bazna, MTel and another FIDE Grand Prix event in Jermuk - not many players have such diverging results from event to event or year to year.
S3
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I think Karjakin is much better than Nakamura, but Karjakin tends to lose games in a very silly manner once in a while. You don't see that often with Anand, Carlsen and Aronian for example. Not counting Aronian's silly loss in that mediocre game a couple of days ago of course.
columbo
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
There is something else about Radjabov. MEXICO !!! he collapsed after Mexico, but seems to have recovered.
darkergreen
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I did not get why chessbase guys said that video reports were good! I was feeling terrible while waiting to see the players talk! And that footages, with "great" questions and "funny" jokes!..
madgett
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Can you tell what happened to the always enjoyable presentations of the game of the day in Wijk an Zee? Those would be nice to see.
Eric
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Peter, to the Tata Steel Group C Round 4 standings chart, please add:
Hopman 0-1 Schut
Thanks.
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions