Tata Steel R6: Sole lead again for Aronian

For the second time, it's Levon Aronian who is the sole leader at the Tata Steel tournament in Wijk aan Zee, The Netherlands. On Friday the Armenian grandmaster defeated Vugar Gashimov, while Magnus Carlsen had to be satisfied with a draw against David Navara. The other decisive results were Giri-Kamsky 1-0, Gelfand-Nakamura 0-1 and Radjabov-Karjakin 1-0.
Levon Aronian making his first move in round 6
|
It's a rare thing, to see a game between two of the world's best players finish in less than three hours and... the result not being a draw. This is what happened in Aronian vs Gashimov. Every now and then the Azerbaijani tries the slightly risky Benoni, and usually with good results. This time things went wrong at an early stage. Well, timewise, because half of the moves came on the board very quickly.
The winner of the game, and the 500-euro Piet Zwart Prize, said:
Actually I didn't really expect this line, I mean it's a very rare line and very risky. Maybe I wasn't playing precisely, but I was trying to play safe.
Well, this was enough apparently to score the full point. According to Aronian this
...can only be explained by my opponent's bad form.

And so in order to keep the pace, Magnus Carlsen needed to win with Black against David Navara, who hadn't made a very good impression so far. However, in no time a dead drawn position was reached in this game. The Norwegian played on for another few hours, because he felt the position had the "potential to be slightly better" for him.
I thought I wasn't going to be doing very much in the hotel anyway, so why not sit there for a while.
Magnus did have some advantage, according to Navara.
At least the advantage of the stronger player.

After this round Carlsen is sharing second place with Teimour Radjabov, who inflicted the third loss upon Sergey Karjakin. He felt it was a deserved win.
I kept pressing. I was slightly better all the time but to make it a point is hard.
The finish was pretty:

Just when he seemed to be doing quite well in the tournament, Boris Gelfand blundered terribly against Hikaru Nakamura. Although it still might have been a draw at the end, according to the Israeli grandmaster he played the whole game "horribly".

Anish Giri won his second game of the tournament, against Gata Kamsky. At first the Dutchman was winning, then he spoilt it but in the ending that resulted, according to Giri his opponent
misplayed it completely; allowed me too much.

After his fine game on Thursday, Jan Timman was defeated by tournament leader Pentala Harikrishna. The Indian grandmaster, who won the daily prize for this game, is a point ahead of Alexander Motylev.

In the C group Maxim Turov dropped his first half point, against the runner-up in the standings, Hans Tikkanen. A very entertaining draw was played between Matthew Sadler and Etienne Goudriaan.

Daily video by the organizers
Games group A, round 6
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group A | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Navara | ½-½ | Topalov | Topalov | ½-½ | Van Wely | |
| Gelfand | 0-1 | Giri | Gashimov | ½-½ | Kamsky | |
| Radjabov | ½-½ | Caruana | Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Karjakin | 0-1 | Aronian | Aronian | 1-0 | Nakamura | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | Caruana | 1-0 | Karjakin | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Gashimov | Giri | ½-½ | Radjabov | |
| Kamsky | ½-½ | Van Wely | Navara | ½-½ | Gelfand | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Gelfand | ½-½ | Topalov | Topalov | ½-½ | Gashimov | |
| Radjabov | 1-0 | Navara | Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Van Wely | |
| Karjakin | 1-0 | Giri | Aronian | 1-0 | Kamsky | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Caruana | Caruana | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Aronian | Giri | ½-½ | Nakamura | |
| Kamsky | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | Navara | 0-1 | Karjakin | |
| Van Wely | ½-½ | Gashimov | Gelfand | ½-½ | Radjabov | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Radjabov | ½-½ | Topalov | Topalov | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | |
| Karjakin | 0-1 | Gelfand | Aronian | 1-0 | Gashimov | |
| Nakamura | 1-0 | Navara | Caruana | ½-½ | Van Wely | |
| Carlsen | ½-½ | Giri | Giri | 1-0 | Kamsky | |
| Kamsky | ½-½ | Caruana | Navara | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Van Wely | ½-½ | Aronian | Gelfand | 0-1 | Nakamura | |
| Gashimov | 0-1 | Ivanchuk | Radjabov | 1-0 | Karjakin | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Karjakin | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Aronian | |
| Nakamura | - | Radjabov | Caruana | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Carlsen | - | Gelfand | Giri | - | Gashimov | |
| Kamsky | - | Navara | Navara | - | Van Wely | |
| Van Wely | - | Giri | Gelfand | - | Kamsky | |
| Gashimov | - | Caruana | Radjabov | - | Carlsen | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Aronian | Karjakin | - | Nakamura | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Nakamura | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Caruana | |
| Carlsen | - | Karjakin | Giri | - | Aronian | |
| Kamsky | - | Radjabov | Navara | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Van Wely | - | Gelfand | Gelfand | - | Gashimov | |
| Gashimov | - | Navara | Radjabov | - | Van Wely | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Giri | Karjakin | - | Kamsky | |
| Aronian | - | Caruana | Nakamura | - | Carlsen | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Carlsen | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Giri | |
| Kamsky | - | Nakamura | Navara | - | Caruana | |
| Van Wely | - | Karjakin | Gelfand | - | Aronian | |
| Gashimov | - | Radjabov | Radjabov | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Gelfand | Karjakin | - | Gashimov | |
| Aronian | - | Navara | Nakamura | - | Van Wely | |
| Caruana | - | Giri | Carlsen | - | Kamsky | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Kamsky | - | Topalov | ||||
| Van Wely | - | Carlsen | ||||
| Gashimov | - | Nakamura | ||||
| Ivanchuk | - | Karjakin | ||||
| Aronian | - | Radjabov | ||||
| Caruana | - | Gelfand | ||||
| Giri | - | Navara |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group A | Round 6 standings
Games group B, round 6
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group B | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Reinderman | ½-½ | Motylev | Motylev | ½-½ | Potkin | |
| Bruzon | 0-1 | Harikrishna | Tiviakov | 1-0 | Timman | |
| Lahno | 1-0 | Ernst | Nyzhnyk | ½-½ | l'Ami | |
| Harika | ½-½ | Vocaturo | Vocaturo | 1-0 | Cmilyte | |
| Cmilyte | 0-1 | Nyzhnyk | Ernst | ½-½ | Harika | |
| l'Ami | 1-0 | Tiviakov | Harikrishna | 1-0 | Lahno | |
| Timman | ½-½ | Potkin | Reinderman | ½-½ | Bruzon | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Bruzon | ½-½ | Motylev | Motylev | 1-0 | Tiviakov | |
| Lahno | ½-½ | Reinderman | Nyzhnyk | ½-½ | Potkin | |
| Harika | 0-1 | Harikrishna | Vocaturo | ½-½ | Timman | |
| Cmilyte | 1-0 | Ernst | Ernst | 1-0 | l'Ami | |
| l'Ami | 1-0 | Vocaturo | Harikrishna | ½-½ | Cmilyte | |
| Timman | 1-0 | Nyzhnyk | Reinderman | ½-½ | Harika | |
| Potkin | 0-1 | Tiviakov | Bruzon | ½-½ | Lahno | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Lahno | 0-1 | Motylev | Motylev | ½-½ | Nyzhnyk | |
| Harika | 0-1 | Bruzon | Vocaturo | ½-½ | Tiviakov | |
| Cmilyte | ½-½ | Reinderman | Ernst | 1-0 | Potkin | |
| l'Ami | ½-½ | Harikrishna | Harikrishna | 1-0 | Timman | |
| Timman | 1-0 | Ernst | Reinderman | ½-½ | l'Ami | |
| Potkin | ½-½ | Vocaturo | Bruzon | 1-0 | Cmilyte | |
| Tiviakov | ½-½ | Nyzhnyk | Lahno | ½-½ | Harika | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Harika | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Vocaturo | |
| Cmilyte | - | Lahno | Ernst | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| l'Ami | - | Bruzon | Harikrishna | - | Tiviakov | |
| Timman | - | Reinderman | Reinderman | - | Potkin | |
| Potkin | - | Harikrishna | Bruzon | - | Timman | |
| Tiviakov | - | Ernst | Lahno | - | l'Ami | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Vocaturo | Harika | - | Cmilyte | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Cmilyte | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Ernst | |
| l'Ami | - | Harika | Harikrishna | - | Vocaturo | |
| Timman | - | Lahno | Reinderman | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Potkin | - | Bruzon | Bruzon | - | Tiviakov | |
| Tiviakov | - | Reinderman | Lahno | - | Potkin | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Harikrishna | Harika | - | Timman | |
| Vocaturo | - | Ernst | Cmilyte | - | l'Ami | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| l'Ami | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Harikrishna | |
| Timman | - | Cmilyte | Reinderman | - | Ernst | |
| Potkin | - | Harika | Bruzon | - | Vocaturo | |
| Tiviakov | - | Lahno | Lahno | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Bruzon | Harika | - | Tiviakov | |
| Vocaturo | - | Reinderman | Cmilyte | - | Potkin | |
| Ernst | - | Harikrishna | l'Ami | - | Timman | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Timman | - | Motylev | ||||
| Potkin | - | l'Ami | ||||
| Tiviakov | - | Cmilyte | ||||
| Nyzhnyk | - | Harika | ||||
| Vocaturo | - | Lahno | ||||
| Ernst | - | Bruzon | ||||
| Harikrishna | - | Reinderman |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group B | Round 6 standings
Games group C, round 6
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group C | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Sadler | 1-0 | Hopman | Hopman | 0-1 | Turov | |
| Tania | ½-½ | Grover | Schut | ½-½ | Danielian | |
| Paehtz | 0-1 | Tikkanen | Haast | ½-½ | Goudriaan | |
| Brandenburg | ½-½ | Ootes | Ootes | ½-½ | Adhiban | |
| Adhiban | 1-0 | Haast | Tikkanen | ½-½ | Brandenburg | |
| Goudriaan | 1-0 | Schut | Grover | 1-0 | Paehtz | |
| Danielian | 0-1 | Turov | Sadler | ½-½ | Tania | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Tania | ½-½ | Hopman | Hopman | 0-1 | Schut | |
| Paehtz | ½-½ | Sadler | Haast | 0-1 | Turov | |
| Brandenburg | ½-½ | Grover | Ootes | 1-0 | Danielian | |
| Adhiban | ½-½ | Tikkanen | Tikkanen | 1-0 | Goudriaan | |
| Goudriaan | 1-0 | Ootes | Grover | 0-1 | Adhiban | |
| Danielian | ½-½ | Haast | Sadler | ½-½ | Brandenburg | |
| Turov | 1-0 | Schut | Tania | 0-1 | Paehtz | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Paehtz | ½-½ | Hopman | Hopman | 1-0 | Haast | |
| Brandenburg | ½-½ | Tania | Ootes | 0-1 | Schut | |
| Adhiban | ½-½ | Sadler | Tikkanen | ½-½ | Turov | |
| Goudriaan | 0-1 | Grover | Grover | ½-½ | Danielian | |
| Danielian | 0-1 | Tikkanen | Sadler | ½-½ | Goudriaan | |
| Turov | 1-0 | Ootes | Tania | ½-½ | Adhiban | |
| Schut | 1-0 | Haast | Paehtz | ½-½ | Brandenburg | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Brandenburg | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Ootes | |
| Adhiban | - | Paehtz | Tikkanen | - | Haast | |
| Goudriaan | - | Tania | Grover | - | Schut | |
| Danielian | - | Sadler | Sadler | - | Turov | |
| Turov | - | Grover | Tania | - | Danielian | |
| Schut | - | Tikkanen | Paehtz | - | Goudriaan | |
| Haast | - | Ootes | Brandenburg | - | Adhiban | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Adhiban | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Tikkanen | |
| Goudriaan | - | Brandenburg | Grover | - | Ootes | |
| Danielian | - | Paehtz | Sadler | - | Haast | |
| Turov | - | Tania | Tania | - | Schut | |
| Schut | - | Sadler | Paehtz | - | Turov | |
| Haast | - | Grover | Brandenburg | - | Danielian | |
| Ootes | - | Tikkanen | Adhiban | - | Goudriaan | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Goudriaan | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Grover | |
| Danielian | - | Adhiban | Sadler | - | Tikkanen | |
| Turov | - | Brandenburg | Tania | - | Ootes | |
| Schut | - | Paehtz | Paehtz | - | Haast | |
| Haast | - | Tania | Brandenburg | - | Schut | |
| Ootes | - | Sadler | Adhiban | - | Turov | |
| Tikkanen | - | Grover | Goudriaan | - | Danielian | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Danielian | - | Hopman | ||||
| Turov | - | Goudriaan | ||||
| Schut | - | Adhiban | ||||
| Haast | - | Brandenburg | ||||
| Ootes | - | Paehtz | ||||
| Tikkanen | - | Tania | ||||
| Grover | - | Sadler |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group C | Round 6 standings
Latest articles
-
11 hours 10 min ago
-
18 hours 55 min ago
-
1 day 15 hours ago
-
1 day 23 hours ago
-
2 days 15 hours ago
-
2 days 20 hours ago
-
2 days 20 hours ago
-
3 days 16 min ago
-
3 days 10 hours ago
-
3 days 10 hours ago
-
4 days 12 hours ago
-
4 days 22 hours ago
-
5 days 14 hours ago
-
5 days 21 hours ago
-
6 days 14 hours ago
-
6 days 16 hours ago
-
6 days 21 hours ago
-
6 days 21 hours ago
-
1 week 12 hours ago
-
1 week 22 hours ago






Comments
Nick
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Nice video. Please change the reporter
MiniMe
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Navara sounded like a robot.
stevefraser
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
More likely Asperger's syndrome.
victorhdiaz
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
What a gift from Gelfand to Nakamura, absolutely absurd.Keep an eye on Radjabov!
TomTom
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
And this guy will play for the highest title.
Chess Fan
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
That will be a different "match".
I have a feeling that Gelfand is hiding his preparation and will do substantially well against Vishy (relative to the form he is displaying in this tournament).
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
I'm certain he will continue "hiding his preparation" in all events after the match as well, since he has been doing it for more than a decade before the match :-) By the way, Linares 2010 was played two months before Topalov's title match but he was still sole winner while Gelfand finished last.
Zeblakob
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
@redivido, agree on the "hiding preparation" hysteria.
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Gelfand is a nice guy, but not the player he was 1990-95 when he scored great results every time. The last ten years he has only won two of the many round robins he has played, and in none of the two he faced a single 2700 opponent. The last time was seven years ago when he shared first with his strongest opponent (#34). He's just not World Champion material, but of course still a strong player, capable of scoring a good result once in a while.
Chess Fan
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
"Keep an eye on Radjabov!".
I agree. He is the very talented dark-horse. I would say also Karjakin but he seems to be out-classed in this particular tournament. Hope he finds his form soon.
mark vellacott
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
No - don't change the reporter.
christos
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Navara aware that he is a target: "Fortunately I had a way to equalize, but Magnus still kept some advantage. At least the advantage of the stronger player, and ok, I lost three games in a row."
Thomas Richter
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
The A group is always tough for the qualifier from the B group - unless that person happens to be a rising star who improved a lot within one year (past qualifiers include Karjakin, Carlsen, Caruana and Giri).
It will certainly be like this next year: if Harikrishna keeps pace, he might face his compatriot Anand apparently for the first time ever at Tata A 2012. So far, board 1 at the World Team Championship 2011 seems to be his strongest-ever event?
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Round 7 looks interesting: Karjakin-Topalov will either end Karjakin's all decisive streak or Topalov's draw streak, Nakamura-Radjabov could be a KID discussion between two leading experts, Carlsen-Gelfand will be a game Gelfand really doesn't want to lose while Carlsen will try hard to repeat the win from Tal Memorial. In Ivanchuk-Aronian anything can happen, and then there's the Dutch Championship van Wely-Giri.
Anthony
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
The Candidates clearly did not produce the strongest challenger and I'm not referring to Carlsen not participating.
Which means the system was inadequate.
Thomas Richter
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
It's easy (and legitimate) to criticize the format of the candidates event, but is a/any system "inadequate" because the 'wrong' person wins?
Did the strongest player win Corus 2009 (Karjakin ahead of Aronian, Carlsen, [Ivanchuk and Morozevich - top5 at the time but completely out of form])? Did the strongest player win Tata 2011 (Nakamura who had mixed results thereafter)? Did the strongest player win Reggio Emilia 2011 (Giri)? In all cases, the winner was strongest - or maybe also luckiest - _at that occasion_ ... to finish ahead of nominally stronger or more established participants.
With respect to a WCh qualifier, what would be the best solution? Several events with the same field isn't feasible, should FIDE just seed the strongest player into a match against Anand?? And (assuming for the sake of argument that Carlsen doesn't exist) who would that be when Kazan was underway - Aronian, Kramnik or Topalov?
Regarding Gelfand and all the criticism (hate?) he receives, apparently he did something wrong winning the World Cup (as a favorite) and the candidates event (as an outsider)?
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Minimatch knockouts is a useless system, one can't just state that Gelfand is unfairly criticised, and that there have been sensation also in other events. The same system had Khalifman and Kasimdzhanov winning and no one too that seriously either. Compare with the tournament candidates won by Tal, Smyslov and Petrosian and the conclusion is obvious.
Randowan
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Such rubbish. If the system is supposed to produce the strongest challenger, then the rating is the only "objective" measure and then there is no need for a qualification process at all - and hey, why even play for the world title? The entire idea of sports is that you need to play for the win every time! Greece winning the euro cup in football is probably the best example, they were not the "best" team but still won.
redivivo
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
A great argument for two game bullet candidates :-)
joey
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
Karjakin got 100% decisive games!
Chess Fan
1 year 5 months ago
Permalink
All of you here criticizing the qualification of Gelfand here are missing one critical point. He won and qualified legitimately with all the top players (except Magnus - but it was his choice), in a legitimate championship to determine the world champion challenger. FIDE needs to be commended for attempting to have a process in place and determine a challenger.
There may be other formats (for example, I can also support Aronian and Carlsen playing a 12-match format and challenging the World Champion the next year), but let us support the attempt of a regular process to select a candidate on meritocracy (where you respect the process as selecting the best candidate or not) and respect Gelfand as a challenger for that.
I still think, win or lose, Gelfand will give a very good fight to Vishy based on a formidable Israeli team and a souped-up version of Deep Junior. So, all your armchair experts, please take a breath and let the process take its course. Aronian and Magnus are free and will qualify to challenge the world champion naturally in due course.
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions