Tata R10: Aronian wins again, Ivanchuk now sole second

Levon Aronian maintained his full point lead at the Tata Steel tournament in Wijk aan Zee, The Netherlands. On a "Black Wednesday" for the A group, the Armenian grandmaster won an excellent game with Black against Anish Giri. Vassily Ivanchuk, who beat David Navara, is now in sole second place, a point behind Aronian.
|

In 2007 he won shared with Teimour Radjabov, and in 2008 together with Magnus Carlsen. Levon Aronian has excellent chances to finish first in Wijk aan Zee for the third time after winning his black game against Anish Giri on Wednesday. With the form he's in, the Armenian grandmaster might as well try to clinch his first sole victory in the Dutch coastal town.
The game he played in the 10th round was one by a great champion, one that Tigran Petrosian would have been proud of. We mention the 9th World Champion, also from Armenia, because of the positional exchange sacrifice in the game, which was analyzed by Aronian's second Arman Pashikian during the Tal Memorial in Moscow last year. According to Aronian, whose explanation of the game can be found here, computers don't understand that Black is at least equal in the resulting middlegame. A few inaccuracies by Giri quickly led to a hopeless position for White.

The other big favorite for tournament victory, Magnus Carlsen, is now 1.5 points behind after a quick draw with Hikaru Nakamura. Vassily Ivanchuk is in sole second place thanks to a win against David Navara, which earned the Ukrainian the 500-euro Piet Zwart Prize.

Teimour Radjabov shares third place with Carlsen after splitting the point with Loek van Wely. The Dutchman accepted a draw offer in a winning position!
It's important to realize that it's really not easy to see that Black is winning in the final position, because Houdini's evaluation of -5.80 is based on a number of different tactics. Besides, Van Wely didn't have much time on the clock:
He offered me a draw. I had like 50 seconds left for my last move. I was a bit suspicious when he offered me a draw; I had to make a decision. His offered seemed very reasonable to me.

"KingLoek" drew all of his games so far. However, a few years ago he actually drew 11 games in Wijk aan Zee, so he said:
I still have some work to do to break my record!
But this was not all; the A group's 10th round actually saw two more decisive games and here too the point went to Black. Fabiano Caruana is playing a fine tournament and on Wednesday he beat Veselin Topalov.

Gata Kamsky managed to beat Sergey Karjakin with Black. According to the American grandmaster, Karjakin's win over Carlsen in the previous round played a role.
I think it contributed to why he tried to win so hard. Sometimes it backfires so I was lucky I guess.

In Grandmaster Group B, Alexander Motylev won the daily prize of 250 euros for his
brilliant technical victory with white
(Ivan Sokolov) against Sipke Ernst.
Ernst was gradually pushed off the board.

Pentala Harikrishna is playing very strongly this year in Wijk aan Zee. In the 10th round he got some help from his opponent to win his sixth game:

Pentala Harikrishna is in top form this year
The C group saw a big surprise as Dutch tailender Pieter Hopman beat co-leader Hans Tikkanen in a fine game that earned him the 100-euro day prize.

Maxim Turov drew his game and is sole leader again. In the game between Tania Sachdev and Lisa Schut, Black blundered in a textbook endgame.

Lisa Schut (l.) already secured a WGM norm, but lost a drawn endgame against Tania Sachdev
Thursday is a rest day for Grandmaster Groups A, B and C as well as for all amateurs.
Games group A, round 10
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group A | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Navara | ½-½ | Topalov | Topalov | ½-½ | Van Wely | |
| Gelfand | 0-1 | Giri | Gashimov | ½-½ | Kamsky | |
| Radjabov | ½-½ | Caruana | Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Karjakin | 0-1 | Aronian | Aronian | 1-0 | Nakamura | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | Caruana | 1-0 | Karjakin | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Gashimov | Giri | ½-½ | Radjabov | |
| Kamsky | ½-½ | Van Wely | Navara | ½-½ | Gelfand | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Gelfand | ½-½ | Topalov | Topalov | ½-½ | Gashimov | |
| Radjabov | 1-0 | Navara | Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Van Wely | |
| Karjakin | 1-0 | Giri | Aronian | 1-0 | Kamsky | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Caruana | Caruana | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Aronian | Giri | ½-½ | Nakamura | |
| Kamsky | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | Navara | 0-1 | Karjakin | |
| Van Wely | ½-½ | Gashimov | Gelfand | ½-½ | Radjabov | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Radjabov | ½-½ | Topalov | Topalov | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | |
| Karjakin | 0-1 | Gelfand | Aronian | 1-0 | Gashimov | |
| Nakamura | 1-0 | Navara | Caruana | ½-½ | Van Wely | |
| Carlsen | ½-½ | Giri | Giri | 1-0 | Kamsky | |
| Kamsky | ½-½ | Caruana | Navara | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Van Wely | ½-½ | Aronian | Gelfand | 0-1 | Nakamura | |
| Gashimov | 0-1 | Ivanchuk | Radjabov | 1-0 | Karjakin | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Karjakin | 1-0 | Topalov | Topalov | ½-½ | Aronian | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Radjabov | Caruana | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Gelfand | Giri | 0-1 | Gashimov | |
| Kamsky | 1-0 | Navara | Navara | ½-½ | Van Wely | |
| Van Wely | ½-½ | Giri | Gelfand | ½-½ | Kamsky | |
| Gashimov | ½-½ | Caruana | Radjabov | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Aronian | Karjakin | ½-½ | Nakamura | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Topalov | Topalov | 0-1 | Caruana | |
| Carlsen | 0-1 | Karjakin | Giri | 0-1 | Aronian | |
| Kamsky | ½-½ | Radjabov | Navara | 0-1 | Ivanchuk | |
| Van Wely | ½-½ | Gelfand | Gelfand | ½-½ | Gashimov | |
| Gashimov | ½-½ | Navara | Radjabov | ½-½ | Van Wely | |
| Ivanchuk | 1-0 | Giri | Karjakin | 0-1 | Kamsky | |
| Aronian | 1-0 | Caruana | Nakamura | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Carlsen | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Giri | |
| Kamsky | - | Nakamura | Navara | - | Caruana | |
| Van Wely | - | Karjakin | Gelfand | - | Aronian | |
| Gashimov | - | Radjabov | Radjabov | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Gelfand | Karjakin | - | Gashimov | |
| Aronian | - | Navara | Nakamura | - | Van Wely | |
| Caruana | - | Giri | Carlsen | - | Kamsky | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Kamsky | - | Topalov | ||||
| Van Wely | - | Carlsen | ||||
| Gashimov | - | Nakamura | ||||
| Ivanchuk | - | Karjakin | ||||
| Aronian | - | Radjabov | ||||
| Caruana | - | Gelfand | ||||
| Giri | - | Navara |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group A | Round 10 standings
Games group B, round 10
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group B | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Reinderman | ½-½ | Motylev | Motylev | ½-½ | Potkin | |
| Bruzon | 0-1 | Harikrishna | Tiviakov | 1-0 | Timman | |
| Lahno | 1-0 | Ernst | Nyzhnyk | ½-½ | l'Ami | |
| Harika | ½-½ | Vocaturo | Vocaturo | 1-0 | Cmilyte | |
| Cmilyte | 0-1 | Nyzhnyk | Ernst | ½-½ | Harika | |
| l'Ami | 1-0 | Tiviakov | Harikrishna | 1-0 | Lahno | |
| Timman | ½-½ | Potkin | Reinderman | ½-½ | Bruzon | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Bruzon | ½-½ | Motylev | Motylev | 1-0 | Tiviakov | |
| Lahno | ½-½ | Reinderman | Nyzhnyk | ½-½ | Potkin | |
| Harika | 0-1 | Harikrishna | Vocaturo | ½-½ | Timman | |
| Cmilyte | 1-0 | Ernst | Ernst | 1-0 | l'Ami | |
| l'Ami | 1-0 | Vocaturo | Harikrishna | ½-½ | Cmilyte | |
| Timman | 1-0 | Nyzhnyk | Reinderman | ½-½ | Harika | |
| Potkin | 0-1 | Tiviakov | Bruzon | ½-½ | Lahno | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Lahno | 0-1 | Motylev | Motylev | ½-½ | Nyzhnyk | |
| Harika | 0-1 | Bruzon | Vocaturo | ½-½ | Tiviakov | |
| Cmilyte | ½-½ | Reinderman | Ernst | 1-0 | Potkin | |
| l'Ami | ½-½ | Harikrishna | Harikrishna | 1-0 | Timman | |
| Timman | 1-0 | Ernst | Reinderman | ½-½ | l'Ami | |
| Potkin | ½-½ | Vocaturo | Bruzon | 1-0 | Cmilyte | |
| Tiviakov | ½-½ | Nyzhnyk | Lahno | ½-½ | Harika | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Harika | ½-½ | Motylev | Motylev | 1-0 | Vocaturo | |
| Cmilyte | ½-½ | Lahno | Ernst | ½-½ | Nyzhnyk | |
| l'Ami | ½-½ | Bruzon | Harikrishna | ½-½ | Tiviakov | |
| Timman | 0-1 | Reinderman | Reinderman | 0-1 | Potkin | |
| Potkin | ½-½ | Harikrishna | Bruzon | 1-0 | Timman | |
| Tiviakov | 0-1 | Ernst | Lahno | 0-1 | l'Ami | |
| Nyzhnyk | 1-0 | Vocaturo | Harika | ½-½ | Cmilyte | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Cmilyte | ½-½ | Motylev | Motylev | 1-0 | Ernst | |
| l'Ami | 1-0 | Harika | Harikrishna | 1-0 | Vocaturo | |
| Timman | ½-½ | Lahno | Reinderman | 1-0 | Nyzhnyk | |
| Potkin | 0-1 | Bruzon | Bruzon | ½-½ | Tiviakov | |
| Tiviakov | 1-0 | Reinderman | Lahno | ½-½ | Potkin | |
| Nyzhnyk | 0-1 | Harikrishna | Harika | ½-½ | Timman | |
| Vocaturo | 1-0 | Ernst | Cmilyte | 0-1 | l'Ami | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| l'Ami | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Harikrishna | |
| Timman | - | Cmilyte | Reinderman | - | Ernst | |
| Potkin | - | Harika | Bruzon | - | Vocaturo | |
| Tiviakov | - | Lahno | Lahno | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Bruzon | Harika | - | Tiviakov | |
| Vocaturo | - | Reinderman | Cmilyte | - | Potkin | |
| Ernst | - | Harikrishna | l'Ami | - | Timman | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Timman | - | Motylev | ||||
| Potkin | - | l'Ami | ||||
| Tiviakov | - | Cmilyte | ||||
| Nyzhnyk | - | Harika | ||||
| Vocaturo | - | Lahno | ||||
| Ernst | - | Bruzon | ||||
| Harikrishna | - | Reinderman |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group B | Round 10 standings
Games group C, round 10
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group C | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Sadler | 1-0 | Hopman | Hopman | 0-1 | Turov | |
| Tania | ½-½ | Grover | Schut | ½-½ | Danielian | |
| Paehtz | 0-1 | Tikkanen | Haast | ½-½ | Goudriaan | |
| Brandenburg | ½-½ | Ootes | Ootes | ½-½ | Adhiban | |
| Adhiban | 1-0 | Haast | Tikkanen | ½-½ | Brandenburg | |
| Goudriaan | 1-0 | Schut | Grover | 1-0 | Paehtz | |
| Danielian | 0-1 | Turov | Sadler | ½-½ | Tania | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Tania | ½-½ | Hopman | Hopman | 0-1 | Schut | |
| Paehtz | ½-½ | Sadler | Haast | 0-1 | Turov | |
| Brandenburg | ½-½ | Grover | Ootes | 1-0 | Danielian | |
| Adhiban | ½-½ | Tikkanen | Tikkanen | 1-0 | Goudriaan | |
| Goudriaan | 1-0 | Ootes | Grover | 0-1 | Adhiban | |
| Danielian | ½-½ | Haast | Sadler | ½-½ | Brandenburg | |
| Turov | 1-0 | Schut | Tania | 0-1 | Paehtz | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Paehtz | ½-½ | Hopman | Hopman | 1-0 | Haast | |
| Brandenburg | ½-½ | Tania | Ootes | 0-1 | Schut | |
| Adhiban | ½-½ | Sadler | Tikkanen | ½-½ | Turov | |
| Goudriaan | 0-1 | Grover | Grover | ½-½ | Danielian | |
| Danielian | 0-1 | Tikkanen | Sadler | ½-½ | Goudriaan | |
| Turov | 1-0 | Ootes | Tania | ½-½ | Adhiban | |
| Schut | 1-0 | Haast | Paehtz | ½-½ | Brandenburg | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Brandenburg | 1-0 | Hopman | Hopman | 0-1 | Ootes | |
| Adhiban | 1-0 | Paehtz | Tikkanen | 1-0 | Haast | |
| Goudriaan | ½-½ | Tania | Grover | 1-0 | Schut | |
| Danielian | ½-½ | Sadler | Sadler | ½-½ | Turov | |
| Turov | ½-½ | Grover | Tania | ½-½ | Danielian | |
| Schut | 0-1 | Tikkanen | Paehtz | 1-0 | Goudriaan | |
| Haast | 1-0 | Ootes | Brandenburg | ½-½ | Adhiban | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Adhiban | 1-0 | Hopman | Hopman | 1-0 | Tikkanen | |
| Goudriaan | ½-½ | Brandenburg | Grover | 1-0 | Ootes | |
| Danielian | ½-½ | Paehtz | Sadler | 1-0 | Haast | |
| Turov | 1-0 | Tania | Tania | 1-0 | Schut | |
| Schut | ½-½ | Sadler | Paehtz | ½-½ | Turov | |
| Haast | 1-0 | Grover | Brandenburg | 1-0 | Danielian | |
| Ootes | 0-1 | Tikkanen | Adhiban | ½-½ | Goudriaan | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Goudriaan | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Grover | |
| Danielian | - | Adhiban | Sadler | - | Tikkanen | |
| Turov | - | Brandenburg | Tania | - | Ootes | |
| Schut | - | Paehtz | Paehtz | - | Haast | |
| Haast | - | Tania | Brandenburg | - | Schut | |
| Ootes | - | Sadler | Adhiban | - | Turov | |
| Tikkanen | - | Grover | Goudriaan | - | Danielian | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Danielian | - | Hopman | ||||
| Turov | - | Goudriaan | ||||
| Schut | - | Adhiban | ||||
| Haast | - | Brandenburg | ||||
| Ootes | - | Paehtz | ||||
| Tikkanen | - | Tania | ||||
| Grover | - | Sadler |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group C | Round 10 standings
Latest articles
-
5 hours 11 min ago
-
14 hours 19 min ago
-
14 hours 41 min ago
-
1 day 4 hours ago
-
1 day 10 hours ago
-
2 days 3 hours ago
-
2 days 11 hours ago
-
3 days 4 hours ago
-
4 days 11 hours ago
-
4 days 12 hours ago
-
5 days 14 hours ago
-
6 days 4 hours ago
-
6 days 5 hours ago
-
1 week 7 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago







Comments
christos
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Radjabov must have put on his best poker face when offering this draw to Van Wely!
And what a beautiful win by Aronian.
Bert de Bruut
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Yes, King Loek adhered a bit too strict to his plan to draw all his games and rejoin the 2700+ elite. He might have made life easier for himself, but so far he is on schedule. Keep up the good work Loek!
Speaking about plans. The tournament isn't finished yet, but no matter whether he wins the rest of his remaining games or loses them, Karjakin is the first for sure to win an invitation for next years 75 Years Jubilee Tata edition. We blame Nakamura for spoiling the near perfect execution of his plan, the opposite of Van Wely's: not to draw a single game. Bravo!
S3
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I prefer the solid Karjakin who plays good games. If you want to see blunderfests and decisive results they might as well broadcast the games of the amateur groups.
sulutas
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
The uncompromising Karjakin! He wins even when he loses! Never fails to show inconsistency!
Zeblakob
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
ya, you are right even if you are wrong. :)
Thomas
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Before the tournament, some people predicted or hoped that Carlsen will break Kasparov's rating record during the event - it won't happen (yet). After round 3 (when he beat Aronian), someone wrote that everyone else will be fighting just for second place behind Carlsen.
By now, two other things could happen:
- Aronian becomes #1 on the (live) rating list - a remote but non-zero possibility
- Someone finishes in second place ahead of Carlsen.
This isn't against Carlsen (after all, confirming his rating is a fine result, just not enough to win the tournament), but against some of his overly enthousiastic fans.
redivivo
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
So someone predicted or hoped that Carlsen would break 2851 during the tournament, and you predict or hope that someone will finish in second place ahead of Carlsen. Maybe you will predict or hope wrong, and then maybe someone will write a post about how someone predicted or hoped that someone would finish in second ahead of Carlsen but predicted or hoped wrong. Yes, that's how we can amuse ourselves at this place :-)
S3
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
It's just that Thomas knows that several things can happen whereas you and your boys think there is only one possible result.
sadtruth
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
S3 and the girls should shut up.
Thomas
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I didn't predict or hope for anything, just pointed out what _could_ happen - while others were pretty sure that something else will happen.
Xeno
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
It's a daring prediction or hope indeed to predict or hope after ten rounds that a player currently behind the top two could finish behind the top two.
Guillaume
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
In July 1999, when Kasparov reached his peak of 2851 Elo, he was 80 points ahead of the second on the rating list (Anand 2771), and 149 points ahead of the number 10 (Ivanchuk 2702). In July 1972, Fisher was 125 points ahead of the second (Spassky 2660) and 160 points ahead of the top 10 (Tal 2625). Carlsen (or anyone else) would have to pass 2900 Elo to achieve something remotely similar nowadays. There's little to be excited about the 2851 mark when the entire field is closing in on this record.
RealityCheck
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
In July 1999 bla bla bla when GK bla bla .... rating bla bla. As regards rating, there was always little to get excited about.
Parkov
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Why then, do your panties get wet at the sight of Carlsens rating rise?
The Devil
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Aronian is putting so much pressure on Carlsen on the live rating list.
Arkansaw
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Aronian is doing extremely well, with Ivanchuk just a little behind, although losing to Carlsen seems like a guarantee to Corus victory these days. Carlsen is actually doing just okay given his current rating. Nakamura will be happy to not lose to Carlsen again, but nothing really impressive so far. Gashimov and Karjakin have definitely seen better days.
Besides all that, Sadler is underperforming seriously against the lower rated players.
The Devil
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Caruana with black beat Topalov? Congrats man!
bhabatosh
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Topalov should have been out of top 10 last yaer ... he was avoiding it by not playing at all .... now we have a clean list !
Jonas
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Cheatalov was not avoiding by playing he simple didn't get invitations to top tournaments and obviously he will not get many invittions in the future, not only for his poor play but also because his poor "play" outside of the board with his managed DanaEvil.
Thomas
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
In fairness to Topalov, the reason why he didn't play much last year may have been that three events where he often participated didn't take place: Linares, MTel and Nanjing. This leaves other supertournaments where he is indeed less likely to be invited: Dortmund, Tal Memorial and London (quasi-fixed field and he doesn't get along well with Nigel Short ...).
In an interview somewhere, Topalov mentioned a forthcoming event in Romania - probably Bazna, the organizers had openly supported the "Danailov for president" campaign.
Caissa
1 year 3 months ago
Permalink
Glad to see cheatalov out of the chess scene lately, he is suffering in this tournament and hopefully he will disappear forever from elite events. This is what should happen to any one with bad habits who tries to obtain the chess crown with dirty manouvers and not with real chess.
Anonymous
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Lately Aronian has paid more attention to his physical fitness -
that seems to have made a lot of difference.
arkan
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Well just look at his girlfriend :p You need physical topshape
noyb
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
That's the kind of regimen all chess players need, hehe...
Lee
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I agree. he looks fitter and that can only be a good thing.
Harry
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Go to ICC. They have the great Levon before chessvibes. He's VERY GOOD!
Harry
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Sorry to say that, but this one video wiht the great Levon at the wooden board is better than all the interviews together!!! Even if Chucky's headdress was very nice.
rado
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
terrible tournament by Topalov, he is not himself
Abbas
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I don't understand why Topalov gave up the Queen!!
He wasn't force to.
Manu
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Out of the top ten now , what a pity . Maybe his motivation is not strong enough yet , next game against Carlsen could be very dangerous in that sense.
Aditya
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Levon Aronian, because of games like yours, it is an honor to follow Wijk Aan Zee live.
Mattovsky
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I'm very surprised that Aronian didn't get the best game prize. Wasn't that a brilliant game? Strong opening preparation, a deep exchange sacrifice, powerful middlegame play, a beautiful tactical finish... What else can you ask for? Instead the prize goes to Navara-Ivanchuk, a standard game, decided by a silly blunder. Incomprehensible.
redivivo
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Agreed, that prize is a total joke. Navara-Ivanchuk was nothing special, just another horrible game losing blunder from Navara in an equal position. Aronian's win against Giri was, just like Chessbase put it, a masterpiece with a superb exchange sacrifice and fantastic finishing combination.
Thomas
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Maybe Sokolov felt, at least subconciously, that Aronian already got enough "game of the day" prizes? And/or maybe he hesitates, again at least subconciously, to reward a win against Giri (only Gashimov was rewarded, but that was the only win in round 8)?
Another story is whether such 'arguments' should play a role ... .
Chess Fan
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
What a fine display of world class chess by Aronian. What a great lesson this Giri vs Aronian is for chess fans like me.
So, people who want to forget World Champion Anand or want to declare Magnus the "greatest ever" (it could well be true but not supported by facts at the moment), take a grip of yourselves.
Anand is the undisputed world champion, followed by two potential contenders: Magnus and Aronian. Followed by Karjakin and Radjabov. Kramnik should always be considered.
stevefraser
1 year 3 months ago
Permalink
Good comment. Thanks.
Xeno
1 year 3 months ago
Permalink
Of course no one in their right mind would declare Carlsen to be the greatest ever after just turning 21, no chess player has ever accomplished anything at that age to be considered to be anywhere close to top ten among the greatest chess players ever.
Lawrence
1 year 3 months ago
Permalink
Giri on his defeat against Aronian: "I'm getting coffeehouse positions against coffeehouse players". Yet another display of arrogance after his rude remarks on Kramnik on his blog a few months ago. Nakamura 2.0?
Luzin
1 year 3 months ago
Permalink
bah, Aronian coffehouse player?
shame on you Giri...
MJul
1 year 3 months ago
Permalink
I couldn't watch the video reports lately (and most part of chess news).
Can you tell me where can I find that statement?
Lawrence
1 year 3 months ago
Permalink
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=l0SIo_duGO4. Enjoy!
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions