Gawain Jones | February 24, 2012 18:10

Bunratty Weekender

 

Last weekend Sue and I made the trip over to Shannon airport to play in one of the big two Irish weekend tournaments (the other is Kilkenny). Thanks to Gary O’Grady’s very generous sponsorship this year’s tournament was the strongest weekender I’ve ever seen and must have been the strongest ever tournament in Ireland. Nigel Short returned and was joined by England’s number one Mickey Adams. All in all there were 10GMs and 10IMs in the 44 player Masters section.

The tournament was held in the Bunratty Castle Hotel and the organisers gave Sue and I a very pleasant suite – our most pleasant room so far :) I really enjoy the tournament but have to confess there isn’t much to do in Bunratty (with the hectic schedule of the tournament that doesn’t really matter). After checking in we went to the major meeting place of the village, Durty Nelly’s. This pub was founded in 1620 and is always the place to listen to music and meet chess players!

In the first round I was paired with my Ennis teammate, Rory Quinn. We played in the Galway tournament and there, due to road works, he arrived very late and flustered and didn’t last long. This time he decided to go into a mainline despite not knowing so much theory. He did well to come up with the most challenging moves but ran short on time and just after I came out of my theory he blundered a piece. Sue forgot her theory against Irish IM Mark Quinn and got a dodgy position out of the opening with Black. She fought long and hard but couldn’t quite salvage anything from the game.

A relatively quiet night and then an early start. Sue and I actually switched opponents for round two and managed 2/2. Mark sacrificed the exchange early but didn’t manage enough compensation. He threw in a queen sacrifice too but my queen and rook for three pieces was simply too much. Sue also got off the scoreboard with a win in the Bishop’s Opening.

With such a strong field the GMs could no longer be kept apart and round three gave me the very tough pairing of Black against top seed Mickey. He surprised me with 1.d4 and we played a Fianchetto KID. I basically equalised out of the opening but then Mickey started grinding and forced me to grovel in a rook and pawn endgame for the half point. Sue’s pointed out to me before that whenever she plays she’s invariably paired with the only other female in the tournament. So it turned out here too and she played the other WIM Natasha Regan. I haven’t actually seen the game yet but I believe Sue was in a bit of trouble out of a King’s Gambit but also held the draw.

There was yet another game on the Saturday before we could retire to the bar. I had White against Lawrence Trent – he of Full English Breakfast fame; if you haven’t listened to it before then you really should –http://thefeb.com/. I got an advantage out of the opening but then subsequently misplayed the position horribly. I reached a position with good knights vs bad bishops but he was active and I really should have sat for a draw. However, with time running short for both of us (time control was 90minutes + 15 seconds/move), I decided to complicate. I soon blundered a pawn and let his bishops in when I was completely lost but in the time scramble I tricked Loz and somehow won – definitely not our finest hour but into the tenth hour of play it was very tough. Sue had a tough pairing of White against IM Simon Ansell who played an offbeat Modern setup. I believe Sue was doing well early on but then, instead of sitting when it’s unclear if Simon had any more than a draw, Sue played an enterprising piece sacrifice that didn’t quite come off.

I stayed up reasonably late Saturday evening, first going to Durty Nelly’s with Mickey and his wife Tara, and then heading back to the hotel bar before sleeping around 2.30am. This may seem foolhardy but my opponent, the Romanian-French GM Andrei Istratescu, took this policy to extremes. I have it from reliable witnesses that he was still partaking of Bunratty’s social side at 5.30am in the morning. Unfortunately, when the game started at 9.15am he was nowhere to be seen. He eventually arrived at the board at 9.47am to be told that he had forfeited the game, as the default time was 30minutes. Harsh on him but the rules have to be upheld. This meant that I could go back to the room and sleep before the final round. Sue lost a long game where she was probably doing well with rook and many pawns for three pieces.

Up to this point Nigel had kept up a 100% score but he and Mickey shared the point on top board leaving Nigel and me in the lead on 4.5/5 with Mickey half a point back. The final round pairings were obvious. The last couple of times I’ve played Nigel he has chosen the English but this time he reverted to 1.e4. I responded with the Sicilian and he surprised me with 2.b3. I couldn’t really remember any theory on this other than a line recommended by Peter Heine-Nielsen in the Experts vs the Anti-Sicilians book. Therefore I chose 2…g6 and we had a crazy game! I was lost at various points but with little time Nigel failed to find the most convincing path and in the end I managed to grovel a draw in another rook and pawn endgame a pawn down.

PGN string

Sue finished with a win against the French while Mickey seemed to win fairly easily against Luis Galego on board two and so the three of us tied for 1st on 5/6. According to the regulations there would be a tiebreak between the top two (decided by the sum of the scores of their respective opponents) and that shunted me out to watch on the sidelines.

After a controversial draw in the first game Mickey made no mistakes in the second to pick up the trophy and title. As the chief arbiter and organiser Gerry Graham observed at the prize giving, it was always going to be tough for me to hold on to my title but I felt I gave it a good shot and am happier about my play than I have been so far this year. The chess hadn’t ended yet and after a delicious dinner at Durty Nelly’s we rushed back to the Bunratty blitz.

This is just a fun event with no prizes and lots of alcohol. We were roughly divided into groups – not exactly all equal. Mine was 5 players with just one other from the Masters, some had four and Sue’s group had six with an average rating of well above 2200. She made 3.5/5 losing to IM Loz Cooper our International Director and drawing with GM Luis Galego but unfortunately that wasn’t enough to make the top to qualify for the knockout stages.

I managed to get revenge for Sue and then knocked out GM Keith Arkell but somehow failed to win a totally winning position against yet another English GM Mark Hebden and went out in the semis. Mickey Adams scooped, winning the final with ease.

A great weekend and highly enjoyable as always. A big thanks to Gary, Gerry, Paul, Ted and all the others who put so much effort into running the tournament smoothly. Gerry has also written an article on the tournamenthttp://icu.ie/articles/display.php?id=343 with plenty of photos and games.

Share |
Gawain Jones's picture
Author: Gawain Jones

Gawain Jones is an English chess player and grandmaster.

Chess.com

Comments

Karl Walsh's picture

Great stuff indeed Gawain! I am an ex member of Limerick chess club so I know Rory and the lads very well. I even met you a few times, though I don't htink we were introduced. Very nice report from you here. Pity you didn't manage to retain your title. Any idea when your game v Adams slid from the "comfortable" to "grovelling" stage? And give us a hint...what should rank amateurs like ourselves do when paired with titled players and GMs like yourself?? We know we have no chance at least but how to at least last a bit and not be the first in the hall to resign; play some solid mainline and as safely as possible or try to mix it up?? Or some offbeat but fairly sound thing maybe?

Andrew Brett's picture

According to the regulations there would be a tiebreak between the top two (decided by the sum of the scores of their respective opponents) and that shunted me out to watch on the sidelines.

After a controversial draw in the first game Mickey made no mistakes in the second to pick up the trophy and title.
What was the controversy !?

Sue Maroroa's picture

Hi Andrew,
I don't know if you saw Mickey's update but this is what he said:

"My second game with Nigel was no prettier, I had White and ran into big trouble, facing a substantial material disadvantage but with the clock ticking relentlessly trying to avoid perpetual check my opponent erred and the material advantage reversed as I picked up a rook. Almost immediately we liquidated into a trivial 3v1 pawn ending and it was only a question of whether I could give mate with the time remaining.

The game proceeded until I gave mate (Nigel had no mating material remaining some time before ), at this stage my clock was showing zero (I think Nigel was also at zero on his clock at this point although it was clear my time elapsed first) so the result was a bit unclear. I thought I had won (although I wasn’t sure) as Nigel made no claim about the clock until after I had delivered mate which I had an idea concluded the game, I’m not sure at exactly the precise moment the clock ticked down to 0.00. Nigel also seemed uncertain as to what the correct outcome was and asked the arbiter to make a ruling.

The arbiter enquired as to whether we wanted to agree a result which seemed a bit odd, and then established not altogether surprisingly that I was hoping for a win and Nigel a

draw. He then declared the game should be a draw as my time had elapsed before mate was given.

I thought in that case he should have called the time forfeit when it occurred rather than waiting and then asking the players to agree a result first. He suggested I appeal the decision but that didn’t seem much in the spirit of the tournament. However I am a bit curious as to exactly what the rules say in such a situation."

Your comment

Comments HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions