Gelfand-Anand G6, another Chebanenko Semi-Slav, drawn after 29 moves (VIDEO with Kasparov)

Game 6 in the World Championship match between Boris Gelfand and Viswanathan Anand ended in a draw as well. Anand repeated his Chebanenko Semi-Slav and Gelfand tried something different on move 6. He won a pawn, but didn't see a way to finish his development without giving it back quickly. After a few accurate moves by Anand a drawn rook ending came on the board.
Saturday is a rest day. The score is 3-3 at half time; six more games are scheduled in the Tretyakov Gallery in Moscow.
|
The trend hasn't changed yet, and the draws just keep coming! Also in the 6th match game we didn't see fireworks, but two well prepared gentlemen playing moves on a high level and Black (Anand) putting up another good defence to hold the balance. Whether you like it or not, this is the chess that's being played between Gelfand and Anand, two players who continue to be very cautious. The nightmare scenario of twelve draws followed by a tiebreak is getting more realistic by the day...

Again a Chebanenko/Semi-Slav came on the board, and Gelfand deviated from his first two white games, by switching to 6.Qc2 instead of 6.b3. Anand sacrificed a pawn, which was most probably still part of his preparation, and then Gelfand quickly returned the favour.
I calculated some lines but I didn't see a way to bring out my pieces [and keep the pawn].
The 6th day in Moscow, however, was dominated by the presence of Garry Kasparov. It's quite telling to see that, seven years after his retirement, the 13th World Champion still attracts more attention from spectators and journalists than Anand and Gelfand. Just after the game started, Kasparov gave a 50-minute press conference and more media were present than ever before.

He started by repeating what he had said before the match: that for the first time in a long period, the World Championship match had nothing to do with a fight for the title of best player in the world. Confronted with this statement, Anand said he "didn't have time" to deal with these things. Gelfand felt that Kasparov merely wanted to remind people how good he was. You can see all this in the video below.
After the press conference, Kasparov joined the commentary team to share his thoughts on the official website. He was especially critical – or rather disappointed – of Anand.
It is not the number of tournament wins — I can't remember when Vishy last won a tournament — but the sparkle in his eyes. Even in 2010 in some games you could see the spark of genius but in most games he was struggling.
Then, Kasparov gave a simul to about twenty talented kids, very talented in fact. They had actually qualified for the simul by winning different youth events. Normally Kasparov doesn't play opponents rated above about 2000 Elo, but it was clear that several kids were actually stronger than that, and Garry Kimovich was clearly struggling.

Saturday is a rest day; on Sunday Gelfand will have White again because the colors are reversed at half-time.
Match score
Latest articles
-
15 hours 15 min ago
-
1 day 10 hours ago
-
1 day 14 hours ago
-
2 days 10 hours ago
-
3 days 12 hours ago
-
3 days 12 hours ago
-
4 days 17 min ago
-
4 days 11 hours ago
-
4 days 16 hours ago
-
4 days 21 hours ago
-
5 days 12 hours ago
-
5 days 19 hours ago
-
6 days 10 hours ago
-
6 days 19 hours ago
-
6 days 19 hours ago
-
1 week 8 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 2 days ago











Comments
Zeblakob
1 year 16 hours ago
Permalink
Everything is as expected.
stoyanof
1 year 15 hours ago
Permalink
Except the press conference of Kasparov of course see the video http://www.chessdom.com/garry-kasparov-press-conference-video/ he says the things straight
RealityCheck
1 year 11 hours ago
Permalink
During the interview did GM Kasparov (who is too quick to criticize, so slow to compliment) mention DRAWng his first EIGHT GAMES and losing the the 9th to Wch Anand in the1995 WCC?
Al Hughes
1 year 8 hours ago
Permalink
Good memory and I was surprised no-one else had brought that up yet. Of course that WCC was massively helped by top chess pundit Peter Snow repeatedly asking everyone he could find, 'is this boring?...another draw, this must be boring, no?....draw again, is this BORING, BORING, BORING yet?'.
archimedes
12 months 4 days ago
Permalink
A draw and fighting brilliant chess are not mutually exclusive.
Anonymous
1 year 7 hours ago
Permalink
Thanks so much for the link to the GK interview video. It was very interesting.
Taiman
1 year 14 hours ago
Permalink
Right. It sucks ... a fiitting conclusion to a dreadfully conceived candidate cycle that resulted in the same type of pathetic disgust. In practical terms, this is a match between someone near bottom of the top ten against someone near the bottom of the top 20. Anand, sadly, is well past his brilliant peak. Anyone who disputes that Carlsen and Aronian would be scoring some full points against either of these contenders is in a strenuous state of denial of the obvious. Kramnic too is in better form than Anand, is far more talented than Gelfand and, in general, Vlad is playing more imaginatively these days than either of these contenders.
mdamien
12 months 4 days ago
Permalink
I am a big fan of Carslen and Aronian, but there's no reason to expect that they'd do any better in this match. For one thing, they have little match experience. Higher ratings reflect that they're better at beating weaker players in tournaments, but a match is a different story -- and for that matter, it's a better story. In terms of a "strenuous state of denial," we are in very recent history where Aronian drew Kramnik in a very short, carefree match, and Kramnik lost a relatively short, for-the-marbles match against Anand.
archimedes
12 months 4 days ago
Permalink
"Higher ratings reflect that they're better at beating weaker players in tournaments.."
Not at all. Carlsen and Aronion both have stellar records against the very best in the world.
archimedes
12 months 4 days ago
Permalink
"Higher ratings reflect that they're better at beating weaker players in tournaments.."
Not at all. Carlsen and Aronion both have stellar records against the very best in the world.
Anonymous
1 year 16 hours ago
Permalink
I suggest to stop the match here, give both players $ 1000 and flip a coin to decide the winner. Then we ask Carlsen and Aronian to play a 6 game match with the rest of the prize money at stake.
Zeblakob
1 year 16 hours ago
Permalink
Not a bad idea ... I have to think ...
Thomas
1 year 16 hours ago
Permalink
To avoid such a scenario, we could ask Gelfand and Anand to exchange blunders in the next two games: some people are sooo desperate for decisive results.
visy
1 year 15 hours ago
Permalink
what is the rapid games format if all the classical matches are draw?
catfish
1 year 14 hours ago
Permalink
Neither one of them has earned the right to play for the championship!
What's Next?
1 year 13 hours ago
Permalink
You have not earned the right to speak rubbish, as you do now...
Chris
1 year 16 hours ago
Permalink
What is the probability that 7th game will be a draw when 6 previous games were draws. :)
dmitry
1 year 16 hours ago
Permalink
In a recent interview Kramnik jockingly said that the only way he could beat Anand in their 2009 match, being as out-prepared as he was , was maybe drawing all games to the 10th, the game he won. Gelfand saw that and thought "Bingo! Thank you Volodya!" , threw a party in celebration to finding Anand's fatal weakness and came to this match armed with draws! :PP
Aidin
1 year 16 hours ago
Permalink
I was following the game via official website along with houdini's analysis. Amazing is that both players play exact lines as houdini predicts at 20-25 depthes ! How can they do that ?!
mdamien
1 year 16 hours ago
Permalink
It must be because they are not as strong as Carlsen and Aronian.
I'm kidding, of course.
redivivo
1 year 15 hours ago
Permalink
Because the game followed home preparation and was a dead draw before the 20th move, Anand would have used more than ten minutes by then if he wasn't just following a prepared line, while Gelfand is happy to get a risk free position that gets him closer to a tiebreak.
Fireblade
1 year 13 hours ago
Permalink
The match has been fixed and the players are just playing out moves that have been agreed upon the night before !
What's Next?
1 year 12 hours ago
Permalink
Because they are both - surprise - strong players.
Anonymous
1 year 12 hours ago
Permalink
Because top grandmasters can easily memorize opening lines to that depth.
Zeblakob
1 year 16 hours ago
Permalink
Something is wrong with chess, and I can not tell you what is it (for the moment).
Anonymous
1 year 12 hours ago
Permalink
@zeblakov But, I can tell you what's wrong with chess. its people like you who follow it and litter decent blogs like this with your rubbish.
Chess would be better off with out you, w/out the likes of you. :-)
Zeblakob
1 year 9 hours ago
Permalink
I recommend that you use your brain ...
Anonymous
1 year 7 hours ago
Permalink
The top players play not to lose with black, a problem when most opennings have been analyzed deep into the middlegame.
Celso
1 year 16 hours ago
Permalink
Tomorrow is a rest day. They must be very tired indeed!
Harish Srinivasan
1 year 16 hours ago
Permalink
Levon Aronian's tweet was interesting and very apt, "World Championship matches should be taken as a single game of chess.First you develop, then you try to find a weak spot, then you attack."
mdamien
1 year 15 hours ago
Permalink
Nice quote. In such a short match it also will probably hold true that a single "mistake" will cost you the "game."
PurpleCalx
1 year 15 hours ago
Permalink
Who would win in a match between Gata Kamsky and Boris Gelfand?
Anonymous
1 year 12 hours ago
Permalink
Kamsky is more imaginative but if Gelfand wants to draw ...
redivivo
1 year 15 hours ago
Permalink
It couldn't get more dull than this, what a relief that there's Tal Memorial to look forward to.
tijsijs
1 year 15 hours ago
Permalink
Yesterday I played some great games in the local pub.
Mediocre people do exceptional things all the time.
Synrise
1 year 15 hours ago
Permalink
I didn't really care that much or look forward to this match and now I know why...
Thomas
1 year 14 hours ago
Permalink
If you don't care, why do you (maybe) read the report and post a comment? In general, people complain about a boring match but each game thread gets 50+ comments. How many would we have if the games were crowd-pleasing and decisive? Quite possibly less, there would be no recurrent "Sofia rules needed", "We want Carlsen and Aronian" and "The US Championship is far more exciting" ... .
Empirical evidence: Game 3, the most interesting one so far, got the lowest number of comments.
Bronkenstein
1 year 7 hours ago
Permalink
Good observation , Thomas. Obviously , the temptation to whine is too strong , if only they could vary that old tune a bit. Extremely repetitive stuff.
Taiman
1 year 3 hours ago
Permalink
Another piece of blowhard analysis from this self professed mastermind....must have had a hemorage thinking this one up...about as backwards as everything else he spouts.
Taiman
1 year 3 hours ago
Permalink
Another piece of blowhard analysis from this self professed mastermind....must have had a hemorage thinking this one up...about as backwards as everything else he spouts.
Harish Srinivasan
1 year 15 hours ago
Permalink
It seems to me that the 4.e3 line or for the matter 4.Nf3 e6 5.e3 might go completely out of fashion due to this hybrid semi-slav-chebanenko variation. Gelfand might just be forced to get his Bc1 out to g5 and attempt the Moscow, Botvinnik or the Anti-Moscow lines. We might just see that on Sunday, unless Gelfands want to completely abandon 1.d4.
S3
1 year 13 hours ago
Permalink
He could try 6.c5 but I see no reason for him to change the opening at this point.
Matt
1 year 15 hours ago
Permalink
W-ch matches have to be longer, otherwise there's the risk of players 'not taking any risks' as in this match. 12 games is too short.
FIDE shouldn't have fixed what wasn't broken
mdamien
12 months 4 days ago
Permalink
I think you've pinpointed the problem.
Septimus
12 months 4 days ago
Permalink
I agree. A minimum of 18 games is necessary. 24 would be ideal.
visy
1 year 15 hours ago
Permalink
i think they both are playing accuratley. like two computers playing..
Sligunner
1 year 14 hours ago
Permalink
Someone, please, step in and stop this match right now. It's a yawnfest that's going to destroy the reputations of these two players forever. Anand will be viewed as the worst word champion ever for this insipid stuff. Gelfand? He's a journeyman, nothing more.
Zarathoustra
1 year 14 hours ago
Permalink
To beat Anand, Gelfand should inspire himself with this link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuiCB7njZvw&feature=g-vrec
Mister Doggers, as you are on scene, could you please ask the players if they are embarrassed towards spectators with their play so far?
JM
1 year 13 hours ago
Permalink
Superb game by Morozevich!!!
Mike
1 year 14 hours ago
Permalink
In case of a match draw after G12, the WC should maintain his title, and not to play some more rapid matches. Then the challenger would be forced to play for win and take more risks, instead of presenting at the board just the result of his computer home prep.
Pages
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions