London R8: Kasimdzhanov beats Adams, Nakamura loses again

On Saturday Hikaru Nakamura lost his third consecutive game in London. The American grandmaster played the Exchange Ruy Lopez against Vassily Ivanchuk, who won the ending after 58 moves and 6 hours of play. Rustam Kasimdzhanov beat Michael Adams and as all other games were drawn, Boris Gelfand is still leading the pack at the FIDE Grand Prix.
Three losses in a row for top seed Hikaru Nakamura | Photo © Ray Morris-Hill
|
“So far so good” were the words of Boris Gelfand when he left the playing venue Saturday evening. Even though he couldn't win a slightly better ending against Anish Giri, the Israeli grandmaster had enough reasons to be satisfied. He's still hasn't given up his half point lead, and can regain energy on the second and last rest day to defend it over the last three rounds.
Hikaru Nakamura, the number one grandmaster from the USA, surely won't be satisfied. As the pre-tournament favorite he must have had the intention to win the tournament, but with three rounds to go he is in last place, having lost his last three games. The same happened to him in the last three rounds at the Reggio Emilia tournament in early January this year. As Thomas notes, it seems that the American belongs to the group of players like Vassily Ivanchuk, Alexei Shirov and Alexander Morozevich (no bad company!) whose can have huge form swings, even during a tournament.
Let's start with the leader of the pack, the man who played 6-6 in classical games back in May against the World Champ, and continues to show good form. Gelfand faced Anish Giri, who played a slightly surprising opening: the King's Indian! In New in Chess Magazine 2012/06 the Dutchman wrote:
The KID is sort of back in fashion these days. For some reason, no one bothers to take it seriously and refute it once and for all.
Well, the fact that Giri played it himself against none other than Gelfand proves that this remark was mostly tongue-in-cheek. Besides, most top players these days play a lot of openings, and because Giri faced it quite a few times with White recently, he probably just feels comfortable in these Bayonet structures at the moment. And, as he explains in the video, he already analysed this line when he was 14! (Which, in his case, is only 4 years ago...) Both players felt that Black was lost at some point.
Videos by Macauley Peterson
The round started with a quick draw (though not as quick as Ivanchuk-Kasimdzhanov!) between Veselin Topalov and Shakhriyar Mamedyarov. As the Bulgarian pointed out, everyone is well prepared in this tournament and because his opponent played very accurately, Topalov had to repeat moves at an early stage.
Kasimdzhanov put some pressure on Adams by playing relatively fast, to avoid timetrouble. This strategy worked, because Adams did get in slight timetrouble and couldn't find the accurate moves in a drawn QN vs QN ending.
Leko and Grischuk played a long theoretical line in the Sicilian, English Attack. At move 18 Grischuk couldn't remember the right move which had been played earlier this year by Alexander Khalifman, and Leko got a close to winning advantage. The Hungarian then let it slip away with a "one-move blunder".
Dominguez reached a very good ending against Wang Hao but failed to win it. In the video below both players give comments in their native language, unfortunately without subtitles.
Again Hikaru Nakamura was involved in the longest game and again... he lost it. He played one of Bobby Fischer's favorite lines, the Exchange variation of the Ruy Lopez, but not à l Fischer (who played 7.Nxd4 against Portisch in 1966 and twice against Spassky in the 1992 match). After a series of exchanges Black was slightly more comfortable, especially when he could fix White's queenside pawns on light squares. Somehow things got from bad to worse for Nakamura, who had to throw in the towel at move 58.
Schedule & pairings
| Round 1 | 15:00 CET | 21.09.12 | Round 2 | 15:00 CET | 22.09.12 | |
| Kasimdzhanov | ½-½ | Leko | Leko | 1-0 | Ivanchuk | |
| Nakamura | 0-1 | Gelfand | Adams | ½-½ | Mamedyarov | |
| Topalov | ½-½ | Grischuk | Giri | ½-½ | Wang Hao | |
| Dominguez | ½-½ | Giri | Grischuk | ½-½ | Dominguez | |
| Wang Hao | ½-½ | Adams | Gelfand | ½-½ | Topalov | |
| Mamedyarov | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | Kasimdzhanov | 0-1 | Nakamura | |
| Round 3 | 15:00 CET | 23.09.12 | Round 4 | 15:00 CET | 24.09.12 | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Leko | Leko | ½-½ | Adams | |
| Topalov | ½-½ | Kasimdzhanov | Giri | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | |
| Dominguez | ½-½ | Gelfand | Grischuk | 1-0 | Mamedyarov | |
| Wang Hao | ½-½ | Grischuk | Gelfand | 1-0 | Wang Hao | |
| Mamedyarov | 1-0 | Giri | Kasimdzhanov | ½-½ | Dominguez | |
| Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Adams | Nakamura | ½-½ | Topalov | |
| Round 5 | 15:00 CET | 25.09.12 | Round 6 | 15:00 CET | 27.09.12 | |
| Topalov | ½-½ | Leko | Leko | ½-½ | Giri | |
| Dominguez | ½-½ | Nakamura | Grischuk | ½-½ | Adams | |
| Wang Hao | ½-½ | Kasimdzhanov | Gelfand | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | |
| Mamedyarov | ½-½ | Gelfand | Kasimdzhanov | 0-1 | Mamedyarov | |
| Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Grischuk | Nakamura | 0-1 | Wang Hao | |
| Adams | ½-½ | Giri | Topalov | 1-0 | Dominguez | |
| Round 7 | 15:00 CET | 28.09.12 | Round 8 | 15:00 CET | 29.09.12 | |
| Dominguez | ½-½ | Leko | Leko | ½-½ | Grischuk | |
| Wang Hao | ½-½ | Topalov | Gelfand | ½-½ | Giri | |
| Mamedyarov | 1-0 | Nakamura | Kasimdzhanov | 1-0 | Adams | |
| Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Kasimdzhanov | Nakamura | 0-1 | Ivanchuk | |
| Adams | 0-1 | Gelfand | Topalov | ½-½ | Mamedyarov | |
| Giri | ½-½ | Grischuk | Dominguez | ½-½ | Wang Hao | |
| Round 9 | 15:00 CET | 01.10.12 | Round 10 | 15:00 CET | 02.10.12 | |
| Wang Hao | - | Leko | Leko | - | Gelfand | |
| Mamedyarov | - | Dominguez | Kasimdzhanov | - | Grischuk | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Topalov | Nakamura | - | Giri | |
| Adams | - | Nakamura | Topalov | - | Adams | |
| Giri | - | Kasimdzhanov | Dominguez | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Grischuk | - | Gelfand | Wang Hao | - | Mamedyarov | |
| Round 11 | 12:00 CET | 03.10.12 | ||||
| Mamedyarov | - | Leko | ||||
| Ivanchuk | - | Wang Hao | ||||
| Adams | - | Dominguez | ||||
| Giri | - | Topalov | ||||
| Grischuk | - | Nakamura | ||||
| Gelfand | - | Kasimdzhanov |
London GP 2012 | Round 8 standings
Latest articles
-
2 hours 53 min ago
-
8 hours 43 min ago
-
1 day 2 hours ago
-
1 day 9 hours ago
-
2 days 2 hours ago
-
3 days 9 hours ago
-
3 days 10 hours ago
-
4 days 12 hours ago
-
5 days 2 hours ago
-
5 days 3 hours ago
-
6 days 5 hours ago
-
1 week 1 hour ago
-
1 week 4 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago







Comments
sen
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Nakamura has still left to play against Adams,giri,Grischuk.My prediction will be nakaumra might win against adam.He might lose against giri and grischuk.If he loose all 3 matches will he go out of top10 in live ratings ?
columbo
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
just make your own maths on 2700chess, the answer is not that difficult to come up with
Anonymous
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
"If he loses all his remaining matches" .. will he? hopefully? ... oh yeah, so many of you so wish for that ;-) I'm so afraid, he is not going to do you the favour, rest assured ;-))
And noe just think for a change and understand that your hero world champion doesn't win any games just because Naka has a bad losing streak.
sen
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Anand has come back from long layoff ,he will take time to get into to his top form.Draw is not at all bad result.Last two years anand was quite busy with his new fatherhood phase, it is quite understandable the impact of his personal life on his the chess preperation.BTW probability of naka doing the favour is very high :-)
choufleur
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Naka 2800+ by the end of the year ?
Anonymous
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Naka hates to disappoint you, but as things stand for now, his goal will only be reached by the end of 2013. He has all the time in the world.
columbo
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
2800 is extremely difficult to reach ... More difficult that it seems even for super GM. Most of them falls down as soon as they go as far as 2780.
Zacalov
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
LOL!!! You ask this in every single article. I must admit, I rolled around in laughter when I just read it, but give up, your unjustified hate for Nakamura is sad and pathetic...move along now...
AK
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Naka is obviously a very strong player, but his rating is/was a inflated. He has never been as strong as his current rating might suggest. And he is massively favored by the organizers, because he is from USA.
How many strong international tournaments he has won? And yet, he gets to play in pretty much every elite tournament he wishes. While at the same time many strong players are not getting their chance. Look at Grischuk for example... a lot more achievements than Naka, but rarely plays in elite tournaments, because he is a Russian. Same thing with Svidler and even Gelfand.
Chris
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Reason for Naka invitations is differrent. He is fighting in every game in every tournament, practicly. Not as Grischuk, Svidler etc.
anna
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
I think nakamura has too much girls in his mind. That's my point of view!! Stability is a good word. I miss nobody Don't forget
anna
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
He'll come be back and stronger than ever.
NN
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
I don't understand why Leko and Grischuk say 18...Ng4 was "the correct move" and "everybody knows it". Houdini gave several other options for black at this point, all not far from equality, e.g. 18...Ng8, 18...d3, perhaps even 18...Nc5. Just not 18...b3 which is very dubious.
Wlad
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
You should stop being naive and believing in analysis on chessbomb.com. At the depth that they use there Houdini is good for spotting the blunders only.
Esalen
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Naka will leave top 10 now. Ivanchuk will join, and continue to stay there. He is just a class player, and is so in every part of the game, and has been so in every part of his life. Nakamura is good at speed chess, very fast, and against weaker players.
Chris
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Does it mean that Kramnik is one of thouse weak players? :)
bhabatosh
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
many pundits told WC between Gelfands qualification to WCh was a result of FiDE's error in how they setup cycle ..... How many times he will prove u wrong ??
redivivo
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Gelfand leading a tournament doesn't mean that the World Championship cycle was arranged as it should have been.
Septimus
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Nakamura is really out of form. It happens to everybody, but this is more like Morozevich or Ivanchuck, where the collapse is pretty wild. I don't think he is suited for slow positional maneuvering. Best stick with the KID or Dutch.
Mike Magnan
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
I think Nakamura is just having a crappy tournament. Nothing more to read into it than that.
sen
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
I don't understand why so much into nakumura performance.He is an ordinary player. He used to play well in odd tournaments nothing more than that.lets forget about nakurmura and dicuss about worthy players who are playing well in this tournament.
Chris
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Naka is an extraordinary player - fighter.
Raj
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
This Chess Vibes page is the most informative page with optimum content : match round report, brief analysis, actual games that can be played, impromptu videos of the players and their comments - and all available so quickly to Chess Vibe site visitors. Remarkable content and deserves top marks for chess reporting in this information age with just enough content to keep you interested and keep coming back more more.
Peter Doggers
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Thanks! :-)
noyb
7 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
A pity that Nakamura struggles with his form. But when you play the style of chess that he does, these things will happen. He needs to use more solid openings if he wants more solid results.
Pages
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions