A video interview with Hikaru Nakamura

Here's our video interview with Hikaru Nakamura, conducted right after his victory at the Univé Chess Tournament in Hoogeveen, The Netherlands where he finished ahead of Sergey Tiviakov, Anish Giri and Hou Yifan. The American top grandmaster speaks about his strategy for his last round game, his overall performance in Hoogeveen, his previous events, his current approach to chess, the ICC and... the tie he wore on the last day. :-)
Latest articles
-
2 hours 32 min ago
-
4 hours 46 sec ago
-
1 day 5 hours ago
-
1 day 19 hours ago
-
1 day 20 hours ago
-
2 days 22 hours ago
-
3 days 18 hours ago
-
3 days 21 hours ago
-
4 days 17 hours ago
-
5 days 19 hours ago
-
5 days 20 hours ago
-
6 days 7 hours ago
-
6 days 18 hours ago
-
6 days 23 hours ago
-
1 week 5 hours ago
-
1 week 19 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 2 days ago











Comments
killabeechess
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
starting to like Nakamura
arkan
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Already liked him.. he's being ''dishonest'' though about ICC! he still has hours and hours of bulletsessions per day sometimes, an enjoyment to watch.
I bet in the months off he mentioned he will be online 24/7 as usual , can't wait
Anonymous
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Sorry to hurt Nakamura's fanboys but he isn't as good as Carlsen. Carlsen is rated 2847! Nakamura ia a 2750-ish player.
anon
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Sorry but Nakamura is not a Carlsen. Winning a tournament with 2600 players is a shame; Carlsen would never beat weaker players for rating points.
jsy
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Nakamura could only play against whom the organizers invited. Unfortunately, they couldn't bring back Kramnik and Polgar. In any case, you still have to beat the 2650ish player (it's not easy - don't believe me? - check out the hurting the 2650 Giri and McShane inflicted on Magnus - not too long ago)
noyb
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
What an inane comment. Carlsen can't help but beat weaker players for rating points, EVERYONE is rated lower. You obviously type before you think...
Nigel P
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
I believe you may have missed a joke...
Thomas
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
One could argue that Carlsen winning Biel last year, and not even winning this year was also beating weaker players for rating points (both times he actually invited himself). I wouldn't call it a shame that a top player accepts to face weaker opposition and participates in an event where he is clear favorite - I just mean to imply that anon is talking nonsense [and I am certainly neither a Carlsen nor a Nakamura fanboy!].
Another story is whether Nakamura's win in Hoogeveen means that he has regained his form - he might have beaten such players also in London despite his supposedly terrible form - actually he did beat Giri.
Hypothetically (well not quite) would anyone praise Nakamura for winning an event where the other players are below 2500? In a way, that's what he did at the European Club Cup after his first-round loss against Andreikin - but +4=2 against Karttunen, Popilski, Leer-Salvesen, Moen, Williams and Raznikov actually cost him a few rating points ... .
Mike Magnan
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
\\\\\\well, the kid seems to have shaken off his bad form. Good for him. I hope he can keep it up. That last game was a fine piece of work.
anon
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Bad form?! What a silly excuse! Carlsen has bad forms too but still win 2730-ish tournaments; and you don't see Carlsen picking up ratings points by beating 2600 rated players for his "bad form."
anon
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Nakamura is a joke. So he loses rating points from the Big Boys and then goes on to play 2600 tournaments to pick up the lost points!
Anonymous
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Nakamura is not a joke. You are.
boardgame
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Stop whining. Naka for president! ;)
Septimus
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
What is wrong with beating up weak players. Weak players should be beaten to within an inch of their life, buried in the sand and beaten again with a wet noodle.
Anand should stop hiding his preparation and give it a try.
anon
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Carlsen will dethrone Anand soon.
RealityCheck
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
@anon Don't count your chickens before they hatch.
jambow
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Nakamura played nice chess especially the last game.
As far as Nakamura being 2750ish and Carlsen being a 2847 well if you are mathimatically impaired that might make sense you can compare peak to peak ratings of 2785 vs 2847 which is vary fair, or probably their maintained average elo of approx 2770 vs 2830 is even more representative of reallity without doing the actual math. So yes a real 60 elo exists between them but Carlsen is the best player in the world today and being on average about 6th or 7th in the world is rather exceptional imho.
Then again I don't take the comments too seriously as they appear to be nonsensical simply to draw a response and so they have. For example Nakamura is at least willing to play players better than he is while Carlsen only gains elo from weaker players. Oh well its the internet after all its not like you have to take an iq test to participate, just internet access and a computer.
nakashima
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
strange choice of tie for a Japanese
Anonymous
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Yes he was born in Hirakata, Osaka to a Japanese father and an American mother but he went to the United States at only 2 years old. I wonder if he has toured much in Japan and how popular he is there. Is he more popular in Japan than shogi stars?
blueofnoon
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
I am from Japan, and as far as I know Nakamura is not known beyond chess community in Japan, and chess community here is very small as Shogi and Go are much more popular.
That being said, most of chess fans here follow Nakamura's games keenly, because we believe he is one of the most interesting contemporary chess players style-wise, and he has played several tournaments in Japan.
We hope this tournament is his first step of recovery from his recent bad form.
kamalakanta
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Is he fluent in Japanese?
blueofnoon
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
No. In that respect Anish Giri is more "Japanese", as he spent full 2 years in Japan as a schoolboy and he is OK with daily conversation in Japanese.
MagnusFan
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Thanks for sharing!
Can you give us a few words about chess i Japan?
What do yourself find in international chess which you don't already get in Shogi or Go?
Has Habu been a part of your community, or is he just too big a star? His 2400-rating is impressive anyway.
Fascinating that Japan and China are extremely strong chess-nations, but in the "wrong" forms of chess. I would have loved a match between Habu and Magnus on "common ground"!
Daaim Shabazz
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Habu has played in a couple of World Opens. I actually interviewed him. Very nice fellow!
welwitchia
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Its will take Carlsen years before he can dethrone Anand. There is just a big gap in overall chess understanding. Anand is a walking chess encyclopedia
redivivo
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
"There is just a big gap in overall chess understanding"
If Gelfand and Topalov came an inch from beating Anand I doubt that the gap is all that huge between Anand and Carlsen (at least if we are talking about to Anand's advantage).
Anonymous
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
His lack of chess understanding can be nullified by greater practical skills and things like a better memory or greater endurance. Carlsen f.i. had some lucky escapes and wins against Kramnik in 5th hour of play and coincidentally he has a relatively bad score against young players. I'm sure he could tire Anand into submission, especially since Anand has adopted a draw mode.
redivivo
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
I don't think Carlsen's lack of chess understanding is as big as is often proclaimed on these pages, or that it's more a question of endurance or tiring opponents into submission in his case. To me the "lucky escapes" usually have more to do with Carlsen's openings being far worse than that of some other top players, and it's not that these opponents tire later as much as actual chess understanding coming into play more than it does in the opening.
Anonymous
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Incredible. This interview is enough reason for the Carlsen brigade to start talking about him and the problems of Anand. What a bunch of losers when they can't stand another player being in the spotlight.
boardgame
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Why always this discussion of who is better? Just look at the rating list. Despite its flaws, that is how we chess players compare each other and what we agree to by playing under FIDE rules. I like Naka, he is a fighter as Carlsen is too. The humbleness displayed in the video suits Naka well. He seems to grow up. We'll see after his next big win, though ;) He'll be back in the top 10 for sure. Keep going Naka!
nero
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Carthago should be destroyed
Anonymous
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Nice interview...thanks Peter.
Anonymous
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
"...originally I thought I would be playing who..."
What does he mean by that?!! He should at least have enough respect for his opponents to remember their name! Besides his grammar isn't even right. Correct would be; "...originally I thought I would be playing (who was that?)..." Just because Japan and China have their 'differences' as he put it doesn't mean that he can't show proper respect to his colleagues. You would think that a player at his level who could remember so many variations could remember the name of his opponent instead of saying "who". Disgraceful!
Samsom
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Except when someone's name just sounded like 'who'...
Zacalov Ramsay
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
He is saying "Hou" (as in "Hou Yifan") in an American accent. It is rather obvious. Your stupidity and unjustified hate for Nakamura is incredibly sad.
Anonymous
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
It was just a bad joke son. Hou's on first?
uschess
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
i think naka is actually very respectful of hou and i have heard her name pronounced "who" by others, although i wont trust either way til i hear her pronounce it herself. anyway he paid her the highest of compliments when he admitted to being worse and missing her tactical shot in their second game, and seemed gracious in their post-mortem staying a good while to talk over the game with her.
Macauley
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
You can hear Hou pronounce her own name in episode 17 of The FEB: http://thefeb.com/2012/02/15/017-rock-aronian-hou-risin/
jambow
6 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
"strange choice of tie for a Japanese"
Sure but not bad at all for an American ;o]
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions