Etienne Bacrot wins Corsica Masters

Etienne Bacrot won the Corsica Masters on Wednesday in Ajaccio. In the final, the French grandmaster defeated his compatriot Laurent Fressinet 2-0. Maxime Vachier-Lagrave and Nigel Short were eliminated in the semi-finals on Monday.
Etienne Bacrot, the winner in Ajaccio
|
|
While most of the action took place in Bastia, the final of the 16th Corsica Circuit chess festival took place in Corsica's capital Ajaccio. Once the birthplace of Napoleon Bonaparte (or rather Nabulione Buonaparte), Ajaccio has a population of about 65,000 and is located on the west coast of the island of Corsica, 390 km southeast of Marseille.
Ajaccio's Palais des Congrès was the venue for the final between Etienne Bacrot and Laurent Fressinet. They had qualified by beating Maxime Vachier-Lagrave and Nigel Short respectively on Monday in Bastia, where the lion's share of the festival took place. The tournament was the climax of this year's Grand Prix organized by the French Chess Federation, which we covered two times here at ChessVibes.
The final was a short affair. The rate of play was 15 minutes + 3 seconds increment per move, and because Bacrot won both games the whole thing must have lasted less than an hour. In the first game Fressinet never got enough compensation for the sacrificed pawns.
The second game was equal all the time, until Fressinet blundered his knight:
Latest articles
-
22 hours 3 min ago
-
1 day 12 hours ago
-
1 day 13 hours ago
-
2 days 15 hours ago
-
3 days 10 hours ago
-
3 days 14 hours ago
-
4 days 10 hours ago
-
5 days 12 hours ago
-
5 days 12 hours ago
-
6 days 18 min ago
-
6 days 11 hours ago
-
6 days 16 hours ago
-
6 days 21 hours ago
-
1 week 12 hours ago
-
1 week 19 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago










Comments
choufleur
6 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Congratulations Etienne !
Niima
6 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
"Black is sacrificing two pawns, but his compensation is worth only one."
A computer evaluation if I ever saw one!
One would expect a more meaningful, human comment from you Peter :-)
Peter Doggers
6 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Isn't that the human way of describing its evaluation?
Niima
6 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
I guess these days, with computers such an intricate part of our lives, you may be right. But on its own the comment seems meaningless to me. It is early morning here. Maybe that is the reason. :-)
Anonymous
6 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
I see your point. Which pawn for example, and why?
AAR
6 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Please set minimum tolerance level.
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions