Ivanchuk wins Kings Tournament after rapid tie-break

Bucharest - Both games ended in a draw in the sixth and final round on Tuesday, leaving Veselin Topalov and Vassily Ivanchuk tied with 3.5/6.
A two-game rapid match was played to break the tie, won by Ivanchuk, who qualifies for the next Bilbao Masters Final, and re-enters the Top 10.
Ivanchuk and Topalov, Round 6 | Photos by Macauley Peterson, more here
|
|
Round 6 Report
by GM Dorian Rogozenco
The last round in Bucharest didn’t establish the winner, since the leaders’ encounter Ivanchuk-Topalov finished in a draw after a short, but interesting game, marked by the fight for the initiative. Everything ended with a small combination from Ivanchuk which led to perpetual.
Nisipeanu, with white against Caruana, played the apparently harmless Four Knights Variation and achieved a promising position. The Italian had to sac a pawn in order to free himself from White’s pressure. The Romanian Grandmaster overestimated his chances and instead of slowly improving the position with an extra pawn, he started direct actions, but failed to increase the initiative and in the end the position only simplified. Soon the players agreed to a draw.
Thus, after the final round Topalov and Ivanchuk shared the victory with 3.5 points, followed by Caruana, 3 points and Nisipeanu, 2 points.
The tie-break match to establish the winner of the tournament consisted of two rapid games with the following time-control: 15 minutes for each player per game with increment of 3 seconds per move. In the first game something quite unusual happened: being a pawn up in a simple endgame with large advantage, Veselin Topalov lost on time. In the second game Ivanchuk with White didn’t have problems to keep his leading position and thus having won the rapid match with a score of 1,5-0,5 Ivanchuk became the winner of the 6th edition of Kings Tournament.
Videos produced by Macauley Peterson
iPhone/iPad users can watch the videos here
Kings Tournament 2012 | Pairings & results
| Round 1 | 7 November 2012 | 14:30 CET | ||||||
| SNr | Name | Elo | Name | Elo | SNr | |||
| 1 | GM | Topalov Veselin | 2769 | ½-½ | GM | Caruana Fabiano | 2786 | 4 |
| 2 | GM | Ivanchuk Vassily | 2763 | 1-0 | GM | Nisipeanu Liviu-Dieter | 2668 | 3 |
| Round 2 | 8 November 2012 | 14:30 CET | ||||||
| SNr | Name | Elo | Name | Elo | SNr | |||
| 4 | GM | Caruana Fabiano | 2786 | ½-½ | GM | Nisipeanu Liviu-Dieter | 2668 | 3 |
| 1 | GM | Topalov Veselin | 2769 | ½-½ | GM | Ivanchuk Vassily | 2763 | 2 |
| Round 3 | 9 November 2012 | 14:30 CET | ||||||
| SNr | Name | Elo | Name | Elo | SNr | |||
| 2 | GM | Ivanchuk Vassily | 2763 | ½-½ | GM | Caruana Fabiano | 2786 | 4 |
| 3 | GM | Nisipeanu Liviu-Dieter | 2668 | ½-½ | GM | Topalov Veselin | 2769 | 1 |
| Round 4 | 11 November 2012 | 14:30 CET | ||||||
| SNr | Name | Elo | Name | Elo | SNr | |||
| 4 | GM | Caruana Fabiano | 2786 | ½-½ | GM | Topalov Veselin | 2769 | 1 |
| 3 | GM | Nisipeanu Liviu-Dieter | 2668 | ½-½ | GM | Ivanchuk Vassily | 2763 | 2 |
| Round 5 | 12 November 2012 | 14:30 CET | ||||||
| SNr | Name | Elo | Name | Elo | SNr | |||
| 4 | GM | Caruana Fabiano | 2786 | ½-½ | GM | Ivanchuk Vassily | 2763 | 2 |
| 1 | GM | Topalov Veselin | 2769 | 1-0 | GM | Nisipeanu Liviu-Dieter | 2668 | 3 |
| Round 6 | 13 November 2012 | 14:30 CET | ||||||
| SNr | Name | Elo | Name | Elo | SNr | |||
| 3 | GM | Nisipeanu Liviu-Dieter | 2668 | ½-½ | GM | Caruana Fabiano | 2786 | 4 |
| 2 | GM | Ivanchuk Vassily | 2763 | ½-½ | GM | Topalov Veselin | 2769 | 1 |
Kings Tournament 2012 | Final standings
Latest articles
-
3 hours 5 min ago
-
17 hours 3 min ago
-
18 hours 16 min ago
-
1 day 20 hours ago
-
2 days 16 hours ago
-
2 days 19 hours ago
-
3 days 15 hours ago
-
4 days 17 hours ago
-
4 days 18 hours ago
-
5 days 5 hours ago
-
5 days 16 hours ago
-
5 days 21 hours ago
-
6 days 2 hours ago
-
6 days 17 hours ago
-
1 week 9 min ago
-
1 week 15 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago










Comments
redivivo
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
The tiebreak once again showed how ludicrous it is with this way to decide things.
Anonymous
6 months 6 days ago
Permalink
I agree, it's a good way to decide on the Bilbao ticket only. Such a short tournament is bound to be a little random anyway, Caruana was very close to finish first as well if he hadn't spoiled some promising positions. All in all still deserved winners and the last round draw between Chucky and Topa was great fun.
RG13
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
How else should they decide who qualifies for the Bilbao Masters Final?
redivivo
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Coin toss? Roulette wheel? Tiddlywinks?
RG13
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
A two game rapid match is definitely unsatisfying but I think a coin toss would actually be worse.
Thomas
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Yep, they needed a sole official winner and Bilbao qualifier - even if they may end up inviting both Ivanchuk and Topalov (provided that Topalov is interested, he had declined several Bilbao invitations).
What's the near future of the Grand Slam? Tata Steel will take place, will there be another edition of the Kings Tournament at its usual spot in late spring to early summer 2013? Will there be a revival of Nanjing, Linares and/or MTel?
"Ivanchuk ... re-enters the Top 10" - true for the time being and for the forthcoming December 2012 list. But on the live rating list, both Mamedyarov and Kamsky could overtake him already after the first round of the Tashkent Grand Prix starting in a week.
Bob
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Hooray for Ivanchuk!
spirit 74
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
That was a disappointing final report :(
boardgame
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Did you see you the words "MORE LATER..." ?
Anonymous
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
final standing
1.Ivanchuk
2.topalov
Leon
6 months 6 days ago
Permalink
It's sad to see all those empty seats in a tournament like this. Ivanchuk is very popular,charismatic and very creative player,Topalov is an ex-world champion,Caruana is having a great year and also you have the local hero Nisipeanu. I understand that the first line-up with Carlsen,Radjabov,etc.etc. was stronger but this second group was at least for me ok to catch more public. It's hard to see it from a sponsor's point of view how to support chess with empty venues like in this tournament.
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions