London R4: Carlsen in sole lead after another win, epic fight McShane-Aronian

Magnus Carlsen is the sole leader after four rounds at the London Chess Classic. In round 4 the Norwegian beat Gawain Jones with white using the rare 4.Qxd4 in the Sicilian. The game of the round (tournament? Year?), however, was the epic fight between Luke McShane and Levon Aronian. At the end there were two queens for Black and White promoted to a knight! Anand-Kramnik and Nakamura-Adams ended in draws. Wednesday is a rest day.
Jones-Carlsen and McShane-Aronian in round 4 | Photos © Ray Morris-Hill
|
After three days full of exciting chess, round 4 of the London Chess Classic "finally" saw a game that can be dubbed as a boring draw. World Champions Vishy Anand and Vladimir Kramnik got a Berlin with 4.d3 and 5.Bxc6 and followed a recent game Carlsen-Aronian for a while. After lots of manoeuvring, just before the time control the position became very static and neither side had anything left to do.

Luckily the other three games were good fun (with a queen sacrifice in two of them!), so nobody was really bothered about this friendly meeting between Vishy and Vlad. The first to give up his queen was Gawain Jones.
I thought I might as well sacrifice my queen against the world's number one if I'm going to do it against anyone.
It was a great, creative, brave decision, and probably correct – Carlsen called it "a serious move". If Black had played differently on move 21, the Norwegian wasn't sure how to continue. Besides, even in the game there were many tricks, as became clear at the post-mortem.

It's no surprise that in Norway everyone is talking about one thing only: Carlsen beating Kasparov's rating record. In several newspapers it was reported yesterday that the world's number one now has a live rating of 2857.4, which is probably more than Kasparov's highest "live rating" ever, which has been calculated at 2856.7. For now we'll just repeat that Carlsen needs to score 2.5/4 in the remainder of the tournament to make not an IM norm, not a GM norm, but a "history norm". :-)
Hikaru Nakamura was better throughout his game with Mickey Adams, but the Englishman just refused to stumble. At move 35 an ending BB vs BN with four pawns each came on the board, 20 moves later White finally was a pawn up but at move 69 only two kings were left.

We've saved the best for last: the game between Luke McShane and Levon Aronian. At the end there were two queens for Black and White promoted to a knight!

We'll finish with reminding you that Wednesday is a rest day in London.
Commentary videos (produced by Macauley Peterson)
Pairings & results
| Round 1 | 01.12.12 | 15:00 CET | Round 2 | 0212.12 | 15:00 CET | |
| McShane | 0-3 | Carlsen | Polgar | 1-1 | Jones | |
| Aronian | 0-3 | Nakamura | Nakamura | 0-3 | Kramnik | |
| Kramnik | 3-0 | Polgar | Carlsen | 3-0 | Aronian | |
| Jones | 0-3 | Adams | Anand | 1-1 | McShane | |
| Anand | bye | Assisting the commentary | Adams | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 3 | 0312.12 | 15:00 CET | Round 4 | 04.12.12 | 17:00 CET | |
| Aronian | 1-1 | Anand | Nakamura | 1-1 | Adams | |
| Kramnik | 1-1 | Carlsen | Carlsen | 3-0 | Jones | |
| Jones | 1-1 | Nakamura | Anand | 1-1 | Kramnik | |
| Adams | 3-0 | Polgar | McShane | 0-3 | Aronian | |
| McShane | bye | Assisting the commentary | Polgar | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 5 | 06.12.12 | 15:00 CET | Round 6 | 07.12.12 | 15:00 CET | |
| Kramnik | - | McShane | Carlsen | - | Polgar | |
| Jones | - | Anand | Anand | - | Adams | |
| Adams | - | Carlsen | McShane | - | Jones | |
| Polgar | - | Nakamura | Aronian | - | Kramnik | |
| Aronian | bye | Assisting the commentary | Nakamura | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 7 | 08.12.12 | 15:00 CET | Round 8 | 09.12.12 | 15:00 CET | |
| Jones | - | Aronian | Anand | - | Nakamura | |
| Adams | - | McShane | McShane | - | Polgar | |
| Polgar | - | Anand | Aronian | - | Adams | |
| Nakamura | - | Carlsen | Kramnik | - | Jones | |
| Kramnik | bye | Assisting the commentary | Carlsen | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 9 | 10.12.12 | 13:00 CET | ||||
| Adams | Kramnik | |||||
| Polgar | - | Aronian | ||||
| Nakamura | - | McShane | ||||
| Carlsen | - | Anand | ||||
| Jones | bye | Assisting the commentary |
London Chess Classic 2012 | Round 4 standings (football)
London Chess Classic 2012 | Round 4 standings (classical)
Latest articles
-
15 hours 30 min ago
-
1 day 11 hours ago
-
1 day 14 hours ago
-
2 days 10 hours ago
-
3 days 12 hours ago
-
3 days 13 hours ago
-
4 days 32 min ago
-
4 days 11 hours ago
-
4 days 16 hours ago
-
4 days 22 hours ago
-
5 days 12 hours ago
-
5 days 19 hours ago
-
6 days 10 hours ago
-
6 days 19 hours ago
-
6 days 19 hours ago
-
1 week 8 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 2 days ago











Comments
killabeechess
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
will be interesting to see if an in form Mickey can do something about Carlsen
Anonymous
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
specially when you know that adams / carlsen : two draws and one win for adams in classical ... But Carlsen must have wings in his back right now, he will be extremely difficult to beat in this tournament
elgransenor1
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
As far as i'm aware carlsen has a plus score against adams in classical chess.
rogge
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Of course, 6 to 1.
Thomas
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Yeah but it's 6-0 for Carlsen with the white pieces, and 1-0 (with 3 draws) for Adams when he has white. Tomorrow Adams will have the white pieces.
rogge
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Well, don't count on Carlsen playing the Norwegian gambit like he did when Adams won.
Btw, no mention of Luke's queen sac against Aronian. I guess it was sound (as it wasn't played against Carlsen).
Anonymous
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
S3, Norwegian defense, not gambit.
rogge
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
S3 = Anonymous? We knew that.
Norwegian defense, Norwegian gambit
http://www.chess.com/opening/eco/B06_Modern_Defense_Norwegian_Defense_No...
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1594446
S3
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Norwegian defense, not gambit.
Thomas
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
OK, then (given their past record) a draw would be the most likely result if Carlsen doesn't play the Norwegian defense or something similarly weird.
McShane probably didn't deliberately (at least not 'actively') sacrifice his queen but lost material - either queen against rook and minor piece or, worse in the given case, two minor pieces against a rook. Of course it wasn't sound, and the game only became exciting because Aronian continued inaccurately. Whether such a game qualifies for "game of the year" is another story - I could name a few other candidate games.
elgransenor1
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
I thought it was called the north sea defence.
S3
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
That's right elgransenor, if we hold on to NIC's nomenclature instead of Rogge's chess.com
Anonymous
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Adams with white against Carlsen has a plus 1 in classical
Bobby Fiske
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Historic day!
Today, after beating Jones, Magnus reached live rating of Elo 2857,4, breaking Kasparovs old record from February 2000. (These numbers are unofficial live rating).
RealityCheck
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
An historic day it was. Prosit! Gawain C. B. Jones. You'll always be remembered, in the annals of chess history, as the young lad who gifted Magnus Carlsen his Queen and the few remaining Elo points needed to top Garry Kasparov's record on the live rating list.
Happy Holidays!
Anonymous
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Gifted his queen ? Tell us more about it ! Unlight us oh reality
RealityCheck
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
My english often terrible. Thx for pointing that out.
* Gawain donated his Queen and a few Elo points Magnus needed to... is that worded better grand master anonymous?
Anonymous
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
We're not talking about your English, we're talking about your chess capacities ... Can you explain why you think Gawain donated his queen ??? the situation after the EXCHANGE is not lost ... Don't you think ? OH REALITY
Anonymous
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
whychess (usually well informed) seems to agree with RC
redivivo
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
In my opinion Whychess is quite obsessed with declaring what a bad chessplayer Carlsen is. Just a few quotes from recent articles:
Carlsen is "taking the path of least resistance and impoverishing himself in purely chess terms". His games "doesn’t open our eyes to a new approach to chess. It doesn’t make a bold aesthetic impression", "he’s emphatically left the chess mainstream, which is something you can’t do even if you possess his talent – it’s a road to nowhere", he “prefers to wait for his opponent to make a mistake rather than try to outplay him as real chess players do”. Carlsen "isn't capable of finding new ideas", he is "a product of computerization", "it's precisely against Carlsen people play their worst chess, certainly below what they are capable of", and "it's unlikely he'll ever become World Champion" unless he changes his approach", Carlsen's chess "is disappointing" etc etc.
I find it weird that such a talented player is being so massively criticized at the site, so I stopped looking at their articles, they were just too weak.
RealityCheck
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
@redvivo Is that why you're always here, hanging out with the MC fanboys. They make you feel strong. Your buddies often pat you on the back remind you how clever you are?
Weird that you find the other site to be overtly critical of MC and in the same breath you (seem to) rejoice in the massive attacks on WCh VC here at this blog.
Tip. Read the interviews at the other site with Anand, Kramnik, Gelfand, Gritschuk, and Carlsen among others. You might learn something.
redivivo
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
"Is that why you're always here, hanging out with the MC fanboys. They make you feel strong. Your buddies often pat you on the back remind you how clever you are?"
Yes, that's why.
Anonymous
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Redivivo those quotes, if they are quotes, mean nothing without context. Whychess is balanced but they don't censor people who have a different opinion than yours.
At any rate the writer doesn't criticize Carlsen's play but that of Jones. Just like Houdini.
redivivo
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
"those quotes, if they are quotes, mean nothing without context. Whychess is balanced but they don't censor people who have a different opinion than yours"
"If they are quotes" as in if I didn't just make them up? Posting the whole articles is rather difficult, but most of the quotes were taken from the reports written during Biel by Atarov and Tkachiev, who are the guys behind the site (one or two are from interviews with Russian players, posted mainly because their opinions of Carlsen are so negative). I find their tone quite ridiculous considering that they discuss a player that has had unbelievable results over the last years and played excellent chess on a level no one else has come close. The site is certainly not balanced, I don't think any serious site repeatedly would use such extremely negative words towards any player, and they did it during a tournament where Carlsen performed 2878 after an undefeated +4 score.
Thomas
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Whychess is provocative, and such statements are opinions diverging from the mainstream - at least the western mainstream, I think we can consider Whychess a Russian site. Some statements are over the top (like quite a few in favor of Carlsen). The quote about Carlsen waiting for mistakes rather than outplaying the opponent is from former world-top player Dreev comparing Carlsen with Karjakin - who has a somewhat similar style but is a "real chess player" according to Dreev. It's an opinion, but Dreev's chess understanding is certainly superior to redivivo's, mine and that of most others commenting here.
redivivo
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Another example of how obvious the agenda of that site is: in Biel Nakamura chose a drawish setup with white and Carlsen complained that he had failed to find anything more active than the easy draw he got with black. Atarov/Tkachiev/Whychess boldly stated in their report that Carlsen's drawing the game was "in no way justified". Now that's pretty strong words, no one else was even close to come to that conclusion. They also declared that Carlsen's chess is in "systematic crisis" in 2012. Having read an endless amount of such descriptions of Carlsen and his chess I just concluded that the site is better suited for S3, RC and Thomas than for me :-)
Anonymous
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
If you don't like different opinions than indeed whychess is not a fun site. They are also more critical about all players than most other sites.
But you shouldn't mistake the opinion of f.i. Dreev for that of whychess; the views expressed in an interview don't have to correspond to the view of the authors.
And that is also why I object to your contextless quotes and their use to intentionally misrepresent the facts.
RealityCheck
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Who are you? Who's "we"? You speak in the plural like some tragically devided nut. @Anonymous
It's clear my chess capacities exceed yours because you can't see through the hoax; even with your high speed chess program you still blind.
Listen, no one in their right mind goes coffee house against one of the worlds top players in a serious game. End of story.
Anonymous
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
what an answer ! no explanation, pure emptiness, talking about croissant and coffee ?!?!?!? URGHHH !!! come back when you can tell us why Gawain made a blunder by exchanging his queen ...
RealityCheck
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
@Anonymous Just for you but face empty heads. So, you've never heard the sound of one hand clapping. No surprise.
Anyone taking such an un-serious approach (two minor pieces for the queen with no clear plan of attack--straight up coffee house chess) playing his first big tournament against one of the top dogs would lead any rational person to think he's either stupid or he threw the game to help a buddy achieve his goal.
That's what you wanted to hear isn't it?
Saji
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
But Carlsen said serious moves. I don't know why?
Anonymous
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Carlsen is 2857,4 Elo
THAT'S WHAT YOU NEED TO HEAR
AND NOW CLAP YOUR HAND !!!
Anonymous
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
And bang your head with the bible, you are very good at that too it seems... Fact is you always try to pit Carlsen down. It' s ridiculous, soon the ulcer ?
The Golden Knight
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Carlsen makes history: 2857,4!!!
RealityCheck is probably banging his head against a concrete wall :))
Me
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
That is too much to hope for...:-)
Zeblakob
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Or he is working out the last details of the "inflation theory".
Thomas
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
I am kidding, but it almost seems as if the English players were instructed to lose against Carlsen to make this happen: McShane blowing a promising position is something that can happen, but Gawain Jones' queen sacrifice is hard to believe!?
Of course he might still have lost in a 'normal' way, and Carlsen fans will probably say that he was under tremendous pressure from Magnus blablabla.
Anonymous
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Today was a historic day. It will also be a historic day the day Thomas actually praises Magnus instead of whining about how bad his opponents play.
Ray
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
:-)
S3
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Hi guys! Thomas is right. Not about the queen sac, which was quite reasonable, but right about the english lads who did get in awful time trouble. Jones had to play 20 moves in 20 minutes after he sack'd the queen (Carlsen had 1,5 hour ) and McShane helped a lot to destroyed himself. I don't think Carlsens wins were very special for a top GM, and his rating is more a reflection of his superior stability than superior chess skills over players like Kramnik, Aronian, Anand when they are in form. ..Admitedly, Anand is perhaps not often in form but luckily for him he only has to be once every couple of years.
Zeblakob
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
@S3, you argument is unfalsifiable (always true!!?). It might happen that MC beat Anand, Kramnik and Aronian because they are all in bad form. Thus MC has no credit and S3 remains right.
redivivo
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Never gonna happen.
logicmofo
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
A conspiracy to let Magnus Carlsen win against 2600something players is probably impossible to proof without alien support.
redivivo
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
I don't know, I think bronkenstein posts on every Carlsen game since time immemorial that his actual rating isn't even in the higher 2650s (over at Chessbomb). This is "proved by science" since another guy that doesn't like Carlsen claimed this in a blog list without giving any reasoning behind it whatsoever. I wonder if that makes Anand and Gelfand lower 2500s?
bondegnasker
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
"Carlsen fans will probably say that he was under tremendous pressure from Magnus blablabla"
- Yep, that would clearly be rubbish. You'd have to be a delusional Carlsen fan to come up with something like that.
Thomas, let go of your hatred. It takes you to the dark side :-)
Anonymous
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
forget the Magnus FAN !!! and watch the EELO RATING LIST
2857 IT IS A HISTORICAL DAY
END OF THE QUESTIONZZZZZZZZ
Tom Servo
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Yes you are right, the English players were instructed by God himself to lose against Carlsen. True story!
Tom Servo
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Yes you are right, the English players were instructed by God himself to lose against Carlsen. True story!
harvey
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Elo 2857,4 - he may become good this kid.
Gary's widow
5 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
2857,4!!!! Waaaaaa.....waaaa.....
Pages
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions