Kramnik and Polgar winners in 8th round London Classic

The London Chess Classic will see an exciting last round on Monday. Magnus Carlsen, who didn't play but joined the commentators on Sunday, is leading by just two points as Vladimir Kramnik defeated Gawain Jones. Judit Polgar won her first game in the penultimate round. Luke McShane didn't handle the Symmetrical English middlegame very well, and this was punished with some powerful moves by the Hungarian lady. The other two games ended in draws, and especially Anand-Nakamura was an epic fight.
Judit Polgar beats Luke McShane at the London Chess Classic | Photos © Ray Morris-Hill
|
The 4th London Chess Classic continues to amaze with wonderfully exciting games played in just about every round. Judit Polgar finally found some form and won a good game, her first, against Luke McShane. Vladimir Kramnik kept chances for tournament victory thanks to a smooth win against Gawain Jones, who has now finished his tournament. (He'll be giving commentary during the final round). Crazy things happened in Anand-Nakamura, but just like the more quiet game Aronian-Adams the result was a draw.
Kramnik surprised with his opening moves 1.Nf3 and 2.b3. At the press conference he said:
I wanted a slow game. I really needed a win today to try and fight for first place.

Jones' tournament is now over, and at the press conference the Englishman looked back:
It's been a great experience playing this tournament. To play players like Kramnik, Anand, Carlsen... I picked up a lot of experience from it. It's a huge different level. Your concentration needs to be so high!
Judit Polgar finally won a game, and a good one. She basically pointed out what was wrong with McShane's doubtful and uncertain moves in the early middlegame.

Anand-Nakamura was an epic fight which included a complicated tactical sequence of moves in the middle game which eventually led to a highly complicated endgame. In the final phase, the evaluation of the position went a bit up and down as the players made a few errors that seemed almost inevitable.

Levon Aronian went for a King's Indian attack but didn't get anything out of the opening. Just before the time control it got worse, and Mickey Adams won a healthy pawn. The presence of opposite-coloured bishops helped the Armenian to save the draw.

Tomorrow we'll have Adams-Kramnik, Polgar-Aronian, Nakamura-McShane and Carlsen-Anand. Kramnik said:
It's goint to be a very interesting last round. It would be a pity if Magnus, not for him but for the spectators, would be already the winner after today.
If Carlsen draws and Kramnik beats Adams the two will both finish on 18 points. In fact their tie-break will be exactly the same as well:
- Number of games won.
- Number of games won with Black.
- Result of the game(s) between the tied players.
In this case the players will play an Armageddon game to decide the winner of the tournament. White will get 6 minutes + 2 seconds per move while Black will get 5 minutes + 2 seconds per move, with draw odds.
Commentary videos (produced by Macauley Peterson)
Pairings & results
| Round 1 | 01.12.12 | 15:00 CET | Round 2 | 0212.12 | 15:00 CET | |
| McShane | 0-3 | Carlsen | Polgar | 1-1 | Jones | |
| Aronian | 0-3 | Nakamura | Nakamura | 0-3 | Kramnik | |
| Kramnik | 3-0 | Polgar | Carlsen | 3-0 | Aronian | |
| Jones | 0-3 | Adams | Anand | 1-1 | McShane | |
| Anand | bye | Assisting the commentary | Adams | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 3 | 0312.12 | 15:00 CET | Round 4 | 04.12.12 | 17:00 CET | |
| Aronian | 1-1 | Anand | Nakamura | 1-1 | Adams | |
| Kramnik | 1-1 | Carlsen | Carlsen | 3-0 | Jones | |
| Jones | 1-1 | Nakamura | Anand | 1-1 | Kramnik | |
| Adams | 3-0 | Polgar | McShane | 0-3 | Aronian | |
| McShane | bye | Assisting the commentary | Polgar | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 5 | 06.12.12 | 15:00 CET | Round 6 | 07.12.12 | 15:00 CET | |
| Kramnik | 3-0 | McShane | Carlsen | 3-0 | Polgar | |
| Jones | 0-3 | Anand | Anand | 0-3 | Adams | |
| Adams | 0-3 | Carlsen | McShane | 3-0 | Jones | |
| Polgar | 0-3 | Nakamura | Aronian | 1-1 | Kramnik | |
| Aronian | bye | Assisting the commentary | Nakamura | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 7 | 08.12.12 | 15:00 CET | Round 8 | 09.12.12 | 15:00 CET | |
| Jones | 1-1 | Aronian | Anand | 1-1 | Nakamura | |
| Adams | 1-1 | McShane | McShane | 0-3 | Polgar | |
| Polgar | 1-1 | Anand | Aronian | 1-1 | Adams | |
| Nakamura | 1-1 | Carlsen | Kramnik | 3-0 | Jones | |
| Kramnik | bye | Assisting the commentary | Carlsen | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 9 | 10.12.12 | 13:00 CET | ||||
| Adams | Kramnik | |||||
| Polgar | - | Aronian | ||||
| Nakamura | - | McShane | ||||
| Carlsen | - | Anand | ||||
| Jones | bye | Assisting the commentary |
London Chess Classic 2012 | Round 8 standings (football)
London Chess Classic 2012 | Round 8 standings (classical)
Latest articles
-
1 hour 54 min ago
-
21 hours 35 min ago
-
1 day 57 min ago
-
1 day 20 hours ago
-
2 days 23 hours ago
-
2 days 23 hours ago
-
3 days 10 hours ago
-
3 days 21 hours ago
-
4 days 2 hours ago
-
4 days 8 hours ago
-
4 days 23 hours ago
-
5 days 5 hours ago
-
5 days 20 hours ago
-
6 days 6 hours ago
-
6 days 6 hours ago
-
6 days 18 hours ago
-
1 week 23 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago











Comments
The Golden Knight
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Carlsen will beat Anand tomorrow:)
RealityCheck
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
All in. Anand will spank Carlsen to-morrow!
The Golden Knight
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Carlsen will be on fire, so you will have another bad day RC ;))
Anónimo
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
As if you didn't know that yet another draw is coming guys!
Anonymous
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Carlsen will spank RC till the end of times
hichcock
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
You just knew that McShane-Polgar would be a game that excites and it did not disappoint. Most entertaining.
Somewhat ugly win for Kramnik today, and Anand remains unimpressive and stands to finish at .500 or less.
S3
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
I kinda liked Kramnik's win today. What was so ugly?
bronkenstein
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
But...Vlad´s walk in the park...err, game looked quite smooth today (pretty much as expected) and Vishy - Naka was an excellent game imNSHo, the essence of fighting chess. OFC your computer might ´describe´ it as rubbish.
I believe that Anand will, in the long run, psychologically benefit much more from such high tension encounters (including drawn or even lost ones).
eric
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
What happened in the Anand-Nakamura game? Vishy was going really good after the knight sac. but he could just wait for the last couple of moves before the time control. He rushed 40. Re8, I do not think it was necessary. After that 44.g6? I was just thinking Rb6 to cut off the black king then tie Naka's pawns. You can even go with the king to stop the pawns. But Vishy just made unnecessary pawn moves and let Naka to push his pawns. After that Naka was about to win, he even got the queen! Both of them must be tired, there is nothing to explain this ups and downs in the game. But anyway I enjoyed the game! Sorry about Vishy though, he is kind of losing his killer instinct.
Morley
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Wow, Judit really crushed McShane. Shortest game of the tournament? McShane has been quite disappointing at this LCC.
Anand-Nakamura was really entertaining. A great game to watch, even if both players let the win slip away. The feisty Anand in the post-game was great as well ... the "pull a Garry" comment was hilarious, if a tad unprofessional for Anand.
Kramnik continues his great run. Jones never really stood a chance, did he?
Carlsen was great in the commentary room. His off the cuff knowledge of opening theory and chess history was pretty amazing. I look forward to seeing the battle between the world no.1 and WC tomorrow ... a fitting end.
choufleur
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Waw Anand-Nakamura, what a game !
Bartleby
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Yes, a knight sacrifice that worked beautifully. Anand took over the initiative. Nakamura had to dig deep to find a way to mobilize his center pawns and avoid being pressed into passive defense. And it all led into a fantastic, complicated kind of pawn race where both had winning chances and nobody could calculate it precisely to the end.
NN
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
After watching live streaming, I am simply amazed with how brilliant Carlsen is. His memory is quite extraordinary, he remembers games (including blitz games), when and where they were played, and even related trivia, like "in this blitz game the clocks stopped and they had to adjourn it" or what Korchnoi said about Short's play after their 1996 game (Short himself had no idea). And by the way, Short is a clown-grandmaster.
The Golden Knight
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Yes - really enjoyed it! I think he remembers 10.000 games in his head...
valg321
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
well since i've had the misfortune to meet him i can tell you for a fact that Mr. Short is not a clown-GM. He's a clown, period.
Thomas
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
It won't surprise people that I disagree: Memory isn't the same as brilliancy, and Carlsen was rather showing off (quoting 'ancient' games isn't the same as providing chessic insights). As to "in this blitz game the clocks stopped ..." - that was a fairly recent and rather important game from the Kramnik-Radjabov tiebreak in Kazan, anyone who follows chess closely can remember it!?
Most annoying or unwarranted was Carlsen's comment on Aronian's opening - "he played like this when he was young and didn't take chess seriously". Huh 1: conceptually it isn't that different from Carlsen's own 1.e4 e6 2.d3 !? Huh 2: three games from the round had somewhat similar white setups. Kramnik eventually won quite convincingly (well, he had the weakest opponent and the one least familiar or comfortable with such a game), McShane and Aronian got into troubles which may or may not have been sirectly related to their openings.
I for one preferred Kramnik's live commentary, and I am not all alone (there was at least one such tweet during yesterday's round). In foresight as well as hindsight, I put a question mark on a quote from the previous Chessvibes report: "more than ever, the Livestream page ... is worth visiting!" (because Carlsen was part of the show).
brabo
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
I wouldn't put too much importance to live comments. Afterall it is often done without serious thinking so you quickly regret afterwards what you said.
trollaras
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Carlsen is a phenomenal player but a mediocre commentator.
Jambow
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
I enjoyed the Nakamura Anand game too, I havent looked at the Polgar McShane game yet and look forward to going over it.
Kramnik now at his former peak elo and probably will go beyond it and play as well or better than ever which is a monumental task.
Jambow
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Ok Polgar McShane game was good also but as it was lopsided and she trounced Luke I like the Anand Nakamura game better. Stll nice to see Judit play so crisp making Luke look like a club player.
Wallace
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Wow, incredible. In a field this strong 6/7 and still not sure to win the tournament... Normally +3 should be adequate! Great performances by Carlsen ánd Kramnik. Can't wait for the last round and the next tournament they will both participate.
Definitely the top 2 of the world today!!
The Devil
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Armageddon to determine the winner of Kramnik wins and Carlsen draws tomorrow? That's such a stupid mode IMO. Even just playing Blitz until someone wins is better.
jussu
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
I simply don't understand what is wrong with shared victories. Anyways, Adams has played a strong tournament and I don't expect him to lose with white today, not even against Kramnik.
redivivo
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Adams has been a rather difficult opponent for Kramnik, with white Adams is actually 3-0 after the loss in Wijk 1998, but the wins came when he was significantly stronger than today.
Thomas
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Unless Adams has a "sense of justice" and blunders in an equal or favorable position against Kramnik the way he blundered against Carlsen? With football scoring he would then get what he deserves from his three games against Carlsen, Anand and Kramnik - three points (but +1-2 rather than =3).
Zeblakob
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
As usual, Anand was completely trolled by Naka. But Anand showed in the press conference that he has calculated very long sharp lines in a short period of time. A true world champion. For instance he considered 32.Raf1 in a fraction of a second, evaluated it very quickly, then played something else.
redivivo
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Both McShane and Nakamura missed several wins against Anand, but even beating Carlsen with black would probably not lead to a higher finish than 5th of 9. Another unimpressive tournament by Anand added to this sequence:
Bilbao 2011: 3-5th of 6, =
Tal Memorial 2011: 6-7th of 10, =
London 2011: 5-6th of 9, =
Bilbao 2012: 5th of 6, -1
London 2012, 5th of 9, = (one round left)
Also even scores in rated games in: Bundesliga 2012 and the Gelfand match 2012.
It is more than two years since Anand won a single game against an opponent rated higher than 2727.
redivivo
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Correction, next month it will be two years since the win against 2735 Shirov, and in these years the clearly highest rated opponent Anand has beaten is Gelfand (2727).
Thomas
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Anand also missed a win against Nakamura, so the draw might be considered a 'fair' result after all? In any case, he (and Nakamura) played an impressive game in an arguably for him unimpressive event.
Altogether I would say Anand showed progress in terms of ambition - compared to some events where he seemed to be perfectly happy with a series of draws. He also tried against McShane, just wasn't successful but got himself into trouble.
Anonymous
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
yet still no one managed to dethrone him
Anonymous
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
That would be impressive results for a player like, say, van Wely.
redivivo
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
In a few months Anand will have a decent chance to win his first tournament in five years though. In Zurich he will only have three opponents, and two of them play the Candidates a couple of weeks later and won't take the event particularly seriously (Gelfand and Kramnik). That leaves Caruana as the man to beat, but that might be difficult enough, he has improved a lot lately.
Bob
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
SAVE us from Armageddon nonsense. Why not shared first??
valg321
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
publicity gimmick..yet another in a long series in the London classic. Armageddon my @ss
chesshire cat
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Kramnik has played very well this tournament. But, when he might have tried for a win and perhaps tie for first, he chooses the Berlin, Adams chooses a harmless variation, and now the game is dead. Why not try for more? I think Kramnik needs some secondary openings to use when he wants/needs to win; but NOT the Pirc, please. This was also evident in the Candidate's! He is more than capable of playing sharply when required, he just needs to expand his repertoire to tale this into account.
Thomas
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
To some extent I agree: Kramnik doesn't have a more dynamic weapon against 1.e4 (he is more flexible recently against 1.d4). Or maybe he has one to use, in case of need, during the candidates event?
On the other hand, "Adams chooses a harmless variation" is also part of the picture - given that he was primarily aiming for a draw he might have done the same against a Sicilian? Actually he did, initially, earlier in the tournament against Polgar. And then it's also hard to make progress with black without taking excessive risks to, in Vlad's own words, risk losing like an idiot.
Adams also apologized for "what he did against Carlsen", suggesting that it might have been unfair to Kramnik .... .
Finally on 1.e4 e6 2.d3: I didn't call it bad or second-rate, I just said it's conceptually similar to Aronian's Reti setup (actually pretty similar to what then happened in that game). I actually played it myself recently in a club game, got tired of earlier theoretical duels against the same opponent where he knows a bit too much for my taste :) .
chesshire cat
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
And while I'm at it, why the widespread ignorance of 1.e4 e6 2. d3? This move has long been known and respected, used by many great players including Fischer and Smyslov. It is not second-rate by any means, just another approach.
1-pac
5 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Somebody got his pants back in Round 8: he uses a crown that doesn't fit.
Congratulations to you, old fighting tiger.
It made my day infinitely better...
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions