Carlsen wins 4th London Chess Classic

Magnus Carlsen won the 4th London Chess Classic on Monday, finishing two points ahead of Vladimir Kramnik. In the last round the top of the standings didn't change as Adams-Kramnik, Carlsen-Anand and Polgar-Aronian ended in draws. Hikaru Nakamura beat Luke McShane.
Magnus Carlsen, the winner of the 4th London Chess Classic | Photos © Ray Morris-Hill
|
A really great tournament in London finished with a slight anti-climax as three of the four games ended in draws. This way Carlsen kept his two-point lead and won without having to play an Armageddon game, while Kramnik, with the same score as last year, had to be satisfied with second place this time. Nakamura and Adams did pretty well too but Anand's score was mediocre and his games included too many big mistakes. Aronian and Polgar played below their standard and in fact the two locals, McShane and Jones, did so too, with TPRs in the 2500.
Polgar and Aronian seemed to be quite happy to be able to finish their tournament with a short draw, to get it over with. They cheerfully analysed their game a bit at the press conference even though it wasn't too interesting and the first 22 moves had been played before.

Polgar:
After the beginning I was not even hoping that I will somehow recover as much as I did. Obviously this level is not exactly what I'm prepared for, doing other things in my life. One of the biggest problems I felt that I have that simply my mind was not focused on the tournament. Besides that, of course some lack of preparation was there. For chess unfortunately you need a clear mind and a lot of energy which none of them I had much had too much of. And obviously they're great players.
Aronian:
I was playing my usual but my opponents were not, they were playing much better than usual! Tomorrow I'm going to Beijing to play the Mind Games. It's the best thing, that you can have another tournament when you have been playing chess in this manner. I'm sure I'm going to do better there.
Not long after, Adams-Kramnik also ended in a draw which meant that the tournament had been decided. Kramnik needed to win his game against Adams but decided to follow his opening repertoire anyway. About this he said:
When you're playing Black against such a strong player you cannot really count on winning. Actually the last time I managed to win with Black against Mickey was in January 1998! Of course there was the choice of playing some very rare, random openings and I looked at the games of Mickey and he's scoring incredibly well there. He knows exactly what to do against any kind of random opening. I'm quite experienced and usually what happens in such cases you lose the game like an idiot; you get a worse position and you lose. So I decided to play my repertoire and I see what Mickey is doing. He's playing many lines against Berlin, with d3, and we can get a complicated game with a lot of pieces like my game against Anand.

Adams:
I think in the end some games could have gone better, some games could have gone worse but in the end my score is about right, so obviously I'm very happy to have a decent score, really. I would be absolutely over the moon if someone told me before the tournament I could get this.
Kramnik repeated exactly his performance of 2011 with four wins and four draws.
That time it was enough to be clear first and actually the tournament was more or less of the same strength. This time unfortunately it's only enough to be clear second but of course. It seems that the only chance to win this tournament was to win the direct encounter against [Carlsen] and I was close but he defended very well. But I was really happy with my play; I was playing really well, better than last year. My form was close to optimal. I don't think I can play much better than I did here. If I get a little bit more luck I will get some chances to win the Candidates Tournament and actually I am now number two in the world and also exactly twenty years in the top 10. It's a good way to celebrate that I am number two in January, you can almost say number one because Magnus is not here, he is in the space. Between humans I'm the best probably!
Nakamura got a belated birthday present from McShane, who dropped a full piece.
Nakamura:
Except for today's game and the one against Kramnik where I got completely outplayed, overall I played very well. It's always nice to do well here in London.
Tomorrow I fly to China for the World Mind Sports Games, another strong event, and after that I will be playing in Wijk aan Zee in January.
For McShane it wasn't the best of finishes. He said:
I think I played quite a few interesting games here. I think I had a pretty tough time from the first four rounds to come away with only half a point because the games were quite interesting and a couple of them could have been different but of course it's always difficult when you're playing against the best players in the world so that's the way it goes. After that I thought I played reasonably well against Gawain, that was a good game, but the last couple of rounds I don't seem to have been showing particularly good chess.
When Vishy Anand arrived at the last press conference (while Magnus Carlsen was delayed as he was giving an interview to Norwegian media) he seemed quite frustrated about his play. He started by saying
It's completely ridiculous. Every day I have positions I should draw in my sleep and I'm sitting there awake and I just blunder and blunder and blunder.

After the post-mortem Anand said:
I would say it's more or less catastrophic. It was the same last year and it has been the same for a while. I really had hopes that it would go better this time but somehow they were not realized. It seems to just go from bad to worse. The only thing I can say is that yesterday and today I actually played "fun" chess, maybe that's a kind of compensation.
It's a real pity to see the World Champ struggling with his form for not just one or two tournaments, but for longer than a year now and we certainly hope that he'll find it back in time to be able to fight for the top places in Wijk aan Zee next month!
As a compliment to the organizers we'll finish off by referring to their charity Chess in Schools & Communities. We strongly suggest you to donate (we did!) which will also help to create the 5th edition of the Classic.
Commentary videos (produced by Macauley Peterson)
Pairings & results
| Round 1 | 01.12.12 | 15:00 CET | Round 2 | 0212.12 | 15:00 CET | |
| McShane | 0-3 | Carlsen | Polgar | 1-1 | Jones | |
| Aronian | 0-3 | Nakamura | Nakamura | 0-3 | Kramnik | |
| Kramnik | 3-0 | Polgar | Carlsen | 3-0 | Aronian | |
| Jones | 0-3 | Adams | Anand | 1-1 | McShane | |
| Anand | bye | Assisting the commentary | Adams | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 3 | 0312.12 | 15:00 CET | Round 4 | 04.12.12 | 17:00 CET | |
| Aronian | 1-1 | Anand | Nakamura | 1-1 | Adams | |
| Kramnik | 1-1 | Carlsen | Carlsen | 3-0 | Jones | |
| Jones | 1-1 | Nakamura | Anand | 1-1 | Kramnik | |
| Adams | 3-0 | Polgar | McShane | 0-3 | Aronian | |
| McShane | bye | Assisting the commentary | Polgar | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 5 | 06.12.12 | 15:00 CET | Round 6 | 07.12.12 | 15:00 CET | |
| Kramnik | 3-0 | McShane | Carlsen | 3-0 | Polgar | |
| Jones | 0-3 | Anand | Anand | 0-3 | Adams | |
| Adams | 0-3 | Carlsen | McShane | 3-0 | Jones | |
| Polgar | 0-3 | Nakamura | Aronian | 1-1 | Kramnik | |
| Aronian | bye | Assisting the commentary | Nakamura | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 7 | 08.12.12 | 15:00 CET | Round 8 | 09.12.12 | 15:00 CET | |
| Jones | 1-1 | Aronian | Anand | 1-1 | Nakamura | |
| Adams | 1-1 | McShane | McShane | 0-3 | Polgar | |
| Polgar | 1-1 | Anand | Aronian | 1-1 | Adams | |
| Nakamura | 1-1 | Carlsen | Kramnik | 3-0 | Jones | |
| Kramnik | bye | Assisting the commentary | Carlsen | bye | Assisting the commentary | |
| Round 9 | 10.12.12 | 13:00 CET | ||||
| Adams | 1-1 | Kramnik | ||||
| Polgar | 1-1 | Aronian | ||||
| Nakamura | 3-0 | McShane | ||||
| Carlsen | 1-1 | Anand | ||||
| Jones | bye | Assisting the commentary |
London Chess Classic 2012 | Final standings (football)
London Chess Classic 2012 | Final standings (classical)
Latest articles
-
8 hours 28 min ago
-
16 hours 13 min ago
-
1 day 13 hours ago
-
1 day 20 hours ago
-
2 days 13 hours ago
-
2 days 18 hours ago
-
2 days 18 hours ago
-
2 days 21 hours ago
-
3 days 8 hours ago
-
3 days 8 hours ago
-
4 days 10 hours ago
-
4 days 19 hours ago
-
5 days 12 hours ago
-
5 days 18 hours ago
-
6 days 11 hours ago
-
6 days 13 hours ago
-
6 days 18 hours ago
-
6 days 19 hours ago
-
1 week 9 hours ago
-
1 week 20 hours ago






Comments
boardgame
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
1. Carlsen: Thor’s hammer crushes through making history!
2. Kramnik: Prussian virtues pay off.
3. Nakamura: America’s slow recovery from the recession.
4. Adams: Some prey is even too big for a boa constrictor.
5. Anand: Long live the toothless Tiger of Madras!
6. Aronian: Home is where the heart is.
7. Polgar: This is a maaaan’s world!
8. McShane: Banker on holiday loses track of time adoring Caissa.
9. Jones: Fireworks gone wrong.
Morley
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Nice :-)
Anonymous
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
>> 7. Polgar: This is a maaaan’s world!
Really?? Of all the witty things possible, you used her gender?? Hmm...try competing with the elite with 2 kids back @ home & no time to prepare (unlike the "men")!!
Andreas
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
boardgames' list is creative and inspired - but there will always be crabbers like you who like to mathematically prove there's something wrong with it.
Anonymous
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
you can also have a great sens of humor, it helps a lot, espaecially with two kids back home
Daaim Shabazz
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Of course you're right about gender, but one sexist comment does NOT deserve another. Male players at the tournament have kids at home too. You cannot use domestic reasons in chess... no more than you can use other personal factors. You play or not play... your choice. Besides... the writer above seems to be is referring to a famous James Brown song that says "this is a man's world, but it would be nothing without a woman or a girl." Lighten up.
valg321
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
well said sir, you beat me to it actually, i got nothing more to add
valg321
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
well said sir, you beat me to it actually, i got nothing more to add
Thomas
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Having kids at home seems to be a slight disadvantage: Players with kids at home finished in second, fifth and seventh place, while players without kids took first, shared third and sixth place. I dunno about the three other players.
[This comment is meant to be tongue-in-cheek]
boardgame
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
@Daaim: you got it ... nothing without a woman or a girl!
@Anonymous: sorry for rubbing salt into the wound...
eric
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
-"2 kids back @n home"
you are also using the gender! in your modern way of thinking woman does all cleaning, cooking or taking care of babies. so she could not have enough time to prepare.
-"no time to prepare"
come on, how do you know that?? did she say something about that?
...
so she did have a bad performance because she is lack of this high level of experience recently. or she just had a bad tournament like aronian or luke etc. not "2 kids @ home" :))
Anonymous
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Wake me when there are no longer "women's" tournaments, WM and WGM titles and a "Woman's World Champion"...the last time i played, physical strength, quick reaction times and overpowering physical endurance didn't seem to have any bearing on the outcome of any of the chess games i played or witnessed.
Calvin Amari
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
BTW, before this fine event is forgotten, I hope others will go to the event's main site and donate to the Chess-in-Schools charity that sponsored it. These folks not only teach thousands of kids, they pull off the best managed and best presented tournament of the year. Donating also proves to others that a sponsoring a high-profile chess event is an excellent way to bring attention to a cause (or a product, service, business, etc).
bronkenstein
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Hehe nice one =)
Bobby Fiske
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Funny! And I cant wait for the cartoon. I bet Jose Diaz will outdo himself. This years LCC carries all his favourite elements, including Kasparov! (Only the Martian missing for complete family photo). LOL
The Golden Knight
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
And now we are waiting for RealityCheck, Thomas & CO to tell us all WHY Carlsen is NOT the best chessplayer. Get ready for another BLABLABLA from these "chessmasters" ;)
Congratulations Magnus - you are the best ever!!!
Anonymous
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
1.Carlsen : Reality Check Nightmare
2.Carlsen : Reality Check Nightmare
3.Carlsen : Reality Check Nightmare
4.Carlsen : Reality Check Nightmare
....
10.Carlsen : Reality Check Nightmare
S3
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Interesting interview with Adams and Kramnik after their rather dull game.
Adams apologized to Kramnik for his "gift" to Magnus and said that if he had played normal the tournament would have been different for Kramnik.
Kramnik said that he thinks he has good chances to win the candidates tournament if he can keep his current form.
It will be interesting to see if the redivivos, calvins, rogges, guillames and so on will attack them just like they tried to insult people with similar ideas.
About the tournament, two guys were playing at another level but Jones,Mc Shane and Polgar were just much to weak for this field.
Carlsen was the fighter, bouncing back from worse positions,tiring and tricking opponents. Kramnik played easily and his chess made a great impression. I don't know what type of chess will gain more points against the stronger competition in the candidates but it will surely be a lot harder on both of m.
Thomas
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
The interview with Adams and Kramnik was also interesting (to me) because they pointed out quite some hidden subtleties in a seemingly dull game.
As to the candidates event: I will be surprised if anyone scores +4 or +5. If Aronian finds back his form he can also compete for first place (and the biggest uncertainty is which Ivanchuk will show up).
I think you are a bit too harsh on the tailenders. It was rather clear beforehand that the event will be tough for Jones, but Polgar and McShane demonstrated at earlier occasions that they can put up a fight against the world elite. Those days may be gone for Polgar, but for McShane they aren't that long ago (Tal Memorial 2012 !).
Guillaume
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
@S3: You're still beating straw men (and misspelling their names). Kramnik happens to be my favorite player. His comments on his own games in the commentary room are masterclasses.
Anonymous
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Indeed, you are WAITING for it to happen and asking for it with your equally silly "you are the best ever". Kid's play...
Calvin Amari
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
That is inevitable.
Kramnik today said that, as the new number 2 on the rating list, he holds the position as best human, with Carlsen standing alone in the superhuman category. Vlad has not always extended his characteristic graciousness to Magnus, but he has now cleary dropped his prior claims of parity among the very top players.
Throughout this tournament, Vlad has also declined at every turn from absurdly suggesting that his perfomance was the equal or better than Magnus's. One has to read the aforementioned mastermind commenters to find such delusions.
Anonymous
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
I guess your lies are a step forward compared to earlier insults calvin :-)
barry
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
I heard the interview and that is exactly what kranmick said.
RealityCheck
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Typ Typ typical @Calvin Amari You intentionally forgot to mention that Kramnik said what he'd said in jest.
Second, Magnus Carlsen also declined suggesting, at every prompt from the boot licking commentators, that his performance was beyond reproach; that he stands head over heals above the rest.
Good day,
Thomas
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Hey, a Carlsen fan quoting Kramnik for supposed truth - but it's a selective quote for a selective truth. Kramnik said that the rating gap cannot be overcome in the foreseeable future, but does give himself chances to win the candidates event. "Prior claims of parity among the very top players" were during a period when Carlsen's rating edge was small, and when he had a minus score against Kramnik.
Carlsen's performance (i.e. TPR) was better than Kramnik's, but Vlad's repeated "I am satisfied with the result AND the quality of my play" could be interpreted also as a reference to Carlsen's play. On the other hand, such comparisons aren't his job - I actually wonder how closely he would follow Carlsen's games during the event.
P.S.: Adams' 'I feel sorry about what I did against Carlsen, it was unfair to Kramnik' could have been mentioned in the report !? But even journalists - not just Peter Doggers - refrain from anything that could put Carlsen's result in context ... .
rogge
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Ha ha ha.
I think I'll stick to what Kramnik actually said during the tournament:
"...you can almost say number one because Magnus is not here, he is in the space. Between humans I'm the best probably!"
" The position is dead even, so Magnus will win"
"Magnus is not god, he's close, but he's not god".
Let it go, hater. Kramnik's all right, but some of his fanboys are unbearable :-)
Good luck to Kramnik, he's Carlsen's toughest opponent, and a Kramnik-Carlsen match would've been great. Sadly, most likely it won't happen.
Thomas
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Kramnik also said what I quoted (but what you seem to deny or ignore). "Your quotes" are so over the top that they seem clearly tongue in cheek, maybe a parody on all the hype around Carlsen and/or an attempt to please the organizers.
That's easier for Carlsen, he just has to say something. Even if he recited a children's rhyme, the response might be "thanks Magnus, that was BRILLIANT !" :) or :(
rogge
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Ha ha ha :-)
Why would I deny that Kramnik said: "I am satisfied with the result and the quality of my play" ?
A fair description of his tournament performance :-)
Like I said, pay attention to what your hero actually said, don't twist his words in order to fit your agenda :-)
redivivo
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
"even journalists - not just Peter Doggers - refrain from anything that could put Carlsen's result in context"
Haha, poor Doggers no longer fit to be called a journalist for not being negative enough about Carlsen :-)
Thomas
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Oops, this was wrongly or misleadingly phrased, what I meant is "Peter Doggers and other journalists" (I hope and trust that Peter himself understood what I meant).
The point isn't not negative enough but rather too positive. Earlier examples, also by Peter and several others, include
- the description of Carlsen's loss against Caruana in Sao Paulo (for example, not at all mentioning that Carlsen was much worse out of the opening)
- not asking any questions on how Carlsen could replace Dominguez in Biel
rogge
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
"not at all mentioning that Carlsen was much worse out of the opening"
Ha ha ha :-) That's terrible. How dare they :-)
redivivo
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Reminds me of the scandal in Baden Baden 1925, when a journalist from the Frankfurter Allgemeine wrote some positive comments on Alekhine's winning the tournament that he had played the opening slightly inaccurately in one of his games.
redivivo
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Reminds me of the scandal in Baden Baden 1925, when a journalist from the Frankfurter Allgemeine wrote some positive comments on Alekhine's winning the tournament without even mentioning that he had played the opening slightly inaccurately in one of his games (some words were lost in the previous version)
Anonymous
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Wasn't it redivivo who dismissed whychess and it's pack of GM journalists as bad reporters because they did not share his opinion? Rogge and redivivo have a lot in common with religious fundamentalists, they don't understand humor and get angry when they hear another opinion.
Thomas
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
In the last Whychess report on London, "they" (author is Sergey Kim) may have corrected 'past sins':
"In London, the young and nenergetic Carlsen and nakamura have once again shown that they will not give the chess world a peaceful life, at any cost!"
Old guys like Kramnik and also Adams weren't worthwhile mentioning?!
redivivo
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
"Wasn't it redivivo who dismissed whychess and it's pack of GM journalists as bad reporters because they did not share his opinion? Rogge and redivivo have a lot in common with religious fundamentalists, they don't understand humor and get angry when they hear another opinion"
I don't think they are bad journalists for not sharing my opinion, and don't feel like a religious fundamentalist for pointing out that descriptions like these of Carlsen's chess this year seem unnecessarily negative, especially considering that they were made during a tournament where he played excellent chess and performed close to 2900:
Carlsen is "taking the path of least resistance and impoverishing himself in purely chess terms". He "doesn’t open our eyes to a new approach to chess. It doesn’t make a bold aesthetic impression", "he’s emphatically left the chess mainstream, which is something you can’t do even if you possess his talent – it’s a road to nowhere". Carlsen "isn't capable of finding new ideas", he is "a product of computerization", "it's precisely against Carlsen people play their worst chess, certainly below what they are capable of", and "it's unlikely he'll ever become World Champion" unless he changes his approach, Carlsen's chess "is disappointing" etc.
It's rare to see these types of extremely negative descriptions of such a strong player from the editors of a big chess site.
abhi
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
+1 Carlsen haters take a breat :)
Anonymous
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Yup,....and Kramnik's comment re the level of Carlsen's chess certainly confirms Kasparov's statement a few years ago that the future of chess is in Carlsen's hands. A very exciting time to be following pro chess....I remember a similar feeling whenever Bobby F.would play in a tournament.
john
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
any next super tournament coming consisting these gentlemen?
Morley
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Yes. Carlsen, Aronian, Caruana, Anand, Karjakin, Nakamura, Wang Hao, Leko, and Giri will be playing in Tata Steel which begins January 12th.
Then Carlsen, Aronian, Kramnik, Radjabov, Gelfand, Svidler, Grischuk, and Ivanchuk will play in the Candidates Tournament, which will be held in March.
Thomas
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
It's just rapid, blindfold and blitz but the World Mind Games start already next week - Aronian wasn't sure about the format(!?) but said that he travels from London directly to Beijing. I couldn't find much info on the event, nothing on the other participants (except that Hou Yifan is ambassador of the chess event). I remember that an earlier edition was almost comparable to the Amber events (but then overlapped with London).
And if Adams and Short are also gentlemen: they will play Gibraltar starting Jan 22nd with, among others, Ivanchuk, Kamsky, Wojtaszek and Shirov.
Morley
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Here is the list of participants and the schedule:
http://www.chess.com/news/sportaccord-mind-games-2012-9849
Looks like a twist on the Amber events ... Rapid, Blitz, and Blindfold.
Anonymous
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Thanks.
Morley
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Great tournament. Some fascinating games (most of which involved the luckless McShane). Carlsen, of course, was the main feature, notching his thirteenth consecutive tournament performance rating of 2815+ and winning yet another super tournament. Few players seem able to contend with him at this point.
Kramnik played outstanding chess, and said he has been preparing intensely for the Candidates for over a year. That will be a sight to behold.
Polgar and McShane drop out of the 2700s, and Aronian almost out of the 2800s. Nakamura is back in the top 10 (it was bound to happen, in my opinion).
Anand was clearly unhappy with his play this tournament. He was very critical of his play during his comments after the game today with Magnus, and was uncharacteristically short with the commentators on several occasions. Hopefully he gets his mojo back and comes looking to kill at Tata!
elgransenor1
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
that may be true but I believe that vishy showed some signs of a return to form in this event. at least his games were more interesting in general showed some signs of life that had been worryingly absent during the last few years.
Iraqi Master
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Please, can anyone tells me when the last time the "world champion" won a major tournment ?
Morley
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
The last time Anand won a super tournament was Linares 2008, I think.
Anonymous
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
Can you pleeze tells mees when iraq won a major war?
Niima
6 months 1 week ago
Permalink
@ Anonymous
You are unbelievably rude. It did not occur to you that the question posed was sincere and not meant to be sarcastic? Even if it was, such a distasteful reply was out of place.
Pages
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions