Comments for Chess news by ChessVibes

Comment on Carlsen takes over the lead in Nice by noyb

noyb — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:57:29 +0000

Wow, great video and interviews with two gentlemen! Find ambassors for Chess. Aronian was incredibly polite and magnimous in defeat. All players should exhibit such manners and professionalism! He’s a credit to the game.

Comment on Carlsen takes over the lead in Nice by Bert Oskelhaar

Bert Oskelhaar — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:23:06 +0000

Damn! the svidler sweep movie is sooo good entertainment. I can only say chessvibes your the best. I check your site everyday and i keep being amazed by it!!!

THANKS!

Comment on Silvio Danailov: “Only during the game” by Guillaume

Guillaume — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:01:02 +0000

I know very well what I said. Repeating it is pretty pointless if you don’t try to understand it yourself. Based on what? Read again: “He has already done it before”. He is in fact doing it again just now. As to the offensive statement, spot on, you found it: “they show no respect to the organizers, the sponsors and the city of Sofia.”

Comment on Carlsen takes over the lead in Nice by Rini Luyks

Rini Luyks — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:34:24 +0000

The fifth 2-0 for Carlsen if you include his 0-2 against Ivanchuk in the 1st round

Comment on Carlsen takes over the lead in Nice by Radical Caveman

Radical Caveman — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:31:45 +0000

Aronian is such a great guy! Who else can be so philosophical about losing?

But in one of the older videos, Ivanchuk needs to check if the camera’s on him before he picks his nose!

Comment on Silvio Danailov: “Only during the game” by Sherman

Sherman — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:28:59 +0000

@jhoro Thank you, man! You just told what I think on right English. I cant explain so well the right position! Accept my greetings!

Comment on Silvio Danailov: “Only during the game” by jhoro

jhoro — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:15:40 +0000

@Guillaume: First off I never said who he’s insulting. That was you. You said “he is insulting Anand’s wife”, which I can’t really see, so please explain it to me. Then you went on to say “It should be quite clear that Danailov will not stop here. He will find ways to force Anand to stop playing during the match. He has done it before with Kramnik. If he cannot offend Anand directly, he will simply insult his wife more explicitly.”. Based on what? Your psychic abilities?

The only part that might sound offensive to some overly sensitive people is the “they show no respect” stupidity, but I think I know where Danailov is coming from. He feels personally offended over the “Sofia rules”. They are his idea and he wanted to use it in this match and perhaps it would have been of some value to the organizers too, as branding. He and Anand know that the “Sofia Rules” do not make much sense for a match, when one of the players can kill it, so he was hoping that Anand will go along as it costs him pretty much nothing. Anand’s team turned him down. He does not get it why, when Danailov to a great degree is responsible for the one million Euro Anand is going to collect in May (provided the organizers come up with the money).

Comment on Silvio Danailov: “Only during the game” by Guillaume

Guillaume — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:25:19 +0000

@jhoro: So, Danailov “has serious problems communicating”, he “severely lacks tact”, and yet he is not insulting anyone? I guess he is just being candid and a victim of his poor command of English, is that it? I guess that would also explain the toilet gate and the handshake gate.

Comment on Silvio Danailov: “Only during the game” by Antichrist

Antichrist — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:50:00 +0000

We could settle this match problem easily with a nice game of ChessBoxing…put on the gloves Toppy, Kramnik’s the arbiter

Comment on Silvio Danailov: “Only during the game” by Jo

Jo — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:34:22 +0000

Aruna 1 – Danailov in the crapper. IM can’t match the Grand Mistress