Carlsen, Gashimov & Wang Yue win Baku
5 May 2008 16:22 PM | Last modified: 23:40
By beating Bacrot, Carlsen caught the tournament leaders and together with the two surprises of the tournament, Gashimov & Wang Yue, he won Baku 2008.
The three winners share money and Grand Prix points, and so Gashimov is only the moral winner on tiebreak.
Baku GP 2008 Final Standings
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||||
| 1-3 | Gashimov,Vugar | 2679 | +122 | * | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 8.0 | 51.50 |
| 1-3 | Wang,Yue | 2689 | +112 | ½ | * | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 8.0 | 50.50 |
| 1-3 | Carlsen,Magnus | 2765 | +30 | ½ | ½ | * | 0 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | 8.0 | 49.00 |
| 4-5 | Mamedyarov,Shakhriyar | 2752 | +16 | ½ | ½ | 1 | * | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7.5 | 48.75 |
| 4-55 | Grischuk,Alexander | 2716 | +55 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | * | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 7.5 | 45.75 |
| 6-7 | Adams,Michael | 2729 | -12 | ½ | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | * | 1 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 6.5 | 41.00 |
| 6-7 | Svidler,Peter | 2746 | -30 | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 0 | * | ½ | 1 | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 6.5 | 39.50 |
| 8-10 | Radjabov,Teimour | 2751 | -63 | ½ | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | * | 1 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 1 | ½ | 6.0 | 38.50 |
| 8-10 | Kamsky,Gata | 2726 | -36 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 0 | 0 | * | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 6.0 | 38.00 |
| 8-10 | Karjakin,Sergey | 2732 | -42 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 1 | 0 | ½ | ½ | * | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 6.0 | 37.25 |
| 11-12 | Cheparinov,Ivan | 2696 | -30 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 1 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | * | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.5 | 35.75 |
| 11-12 | Navara,David | 2672 | -5 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | 1 | * | ½ | 0 | 5.5 | 35.25 |
| 13-14 | Bacrot,Etienne | 2705 | -68 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | * | 0 | 5.0 | 32.50 |
| 13-14 | Inarkiev,Ernesto | 2684 | -45 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 1 | 0 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | * | 5.0 | 32.25 |

The first game that ended was Grischuk-Radjabov; a draw. From a g3 King’s Indian the players quickly went into an endgame where White seemed slightly better all the time. "7.b3 looked a bit strange but it’s all theory," Grischuk said, "and 11…Na6 was a rare move; I think the idea was 12…Bf5 13.Bd6 Ne4 so I played 12.Bd6 immediately." Radjabov described 11…Na6 as "quite natural" and he also liked his 12…Ng4: "the best move". Both players thought that White was clearly better after 17.Nd2 but Radjabov found a series of only moves (17…Rd8!, 21…Rb8!) that saved the game.
Navara eventually managed to leave Baku with two victories; in the last round he beat Cheparinov in a Slav Defence with White. "He played some strange moves in the opening," the Czech said, "and I was a bit better thanks to the bishop pair. But then I spoilt it again; I missed that 23…Bxd2 was possible. I was lucky to have the move 24.h5, but I heard that the computer says Black is winning after 25…Kd7 instead of 25…Qe4+." Cheparinov just "couldn’t see this …Kd7 move, it’s not so easy to find."
Gashimov, one of the tournament leaders, managed to draw his game with Black against Adams without too much problems. According to Adams it was good for Black to exchange the light-squared bishops, but "he should have kept the other bishops on the board". Gashimov agreed and so Black was slightly worse in the ending with heavy pieces, but he "played well" there, and "36…Qe4 was very strong, it’s bad for Black if I don’t play this."
Another draw was reached in Karjakin-Kamsky. "Right after the opening I blundered," Karjakin said, referring to 20.Bd3, which allowed 20…Nbxd5. "Afterwards I was worse, but I then played precisely. Maybe 29…Qc5 was better than 29…Qa8." Kamsky, obviously not happy with his second half of the tournament, more or less summarized his opponent’s version of the game at the press conference.
Like Navara, Svidler managed to win his last two games, finishing on a reasonable fifty percent score. Today he beat his compatriot Inarkiev. "The two games I won with White, I played 1.d4, so perhaps there’s a lesson there," he started the press conference. "I have started playing the King’s Indian myself and I had looked at some of Ernesto’s games, the master in these positions. After 13…e5 White is slightly better but 14.a3 was inaccurate, losing a temp and weakening b3. Two moves later I blundered and allowed 16…Nxb3, but 18…axb5 is a big mistake – Black shouldn’t exchange these knights. Afterwards I had many attractive possibilities and I chose the one that seemed to give me the most chances." Inarkiev said he played a "very bad game". His best chance was 36…Rxa7 37.bxa7 Qa5! but he just didn’t see it. "But I think White should be winning there too."
Bacrot-Carlsen was won by the Norwegian, and so in the end the number one seed became one of the tournament winners. "Out of the opening we got a very complicated position but I think Black was OK. Then he made a mistake with 24.Qa4 which allowed 24…Re3 with the idea to take on d3 at some point. There I was slightly better but he could have defended better. I could also have played stronger. The opposite-coloured bishop ending is won I think." Bacrot: "It was a good game by Magnus. I just missed this Rxd3 idea."
The last game of the round, and of the tournament, was Wang Yue-Gashimov, and quite an important one for the standings. Mamedyarov, true to his style here in Baku, went for the 6…b5 pawn sacrifice in the Nimzo-Indian. Wang Yue didn’t accept it but decided to play solidly instead. "I was a but better but he played very well," co-winner Wang Yue said, "Those a6, b5 and d6 pawns are bad. But then I missed his 15…Nh5 and 19…Rab8." Mamedyarov obviously wasn’t satisfied; he said he "always plays for a win for this home crowd" but he didn’t like his game of today. "But I defended well."











interesting that +3 was enough to win both this tournament and the WCC tournament that Anand won. every extra 1/2 point is extremely important.
+4 I mean, to win alone.
Thank you for the superior coverage of Baku, Peter, especially your clear voice on the video reports and your textual comments too. I hope that GM Mamedyarov wins the Dortmund June 28th-July 6th tournament as his form seems to be returning, and I hope that Chessvibes will ask you to go to there to report on it
Espectacular resultado de Gashimov y Yue
Carlsen suma y sigue.
Carlsen is doing extremely well, Its really interesting to see at what level he’ll be in 2 years………………………………
Agree with Carl, Carlsen is awesome in results. Although I still have to see ‘classic’ games from him (like Kramnik-Anand Wijk aan Zee 2006, or Kasparov-Topalov at the same place).
Yes. Carlsen needs to produce an immortal game to really show his ability.=)
Still, mark, it seems to me Ron has a point, even though it’s not a fair one towards Carlsen. But it’s true chess lovers are more interested in games than in players.
For instance, what do you know of the classic tournament of Hastings 1895: who actually won it, or its most famous game (Steinitz-Von Bardeleben)?