I appreciate when the annotator points out what is his analysis made of -how much of his own brain has been used and what's the engine share. Every time the former dominates, it makes for entertaining study. Alas,nowadays you get it less and less often.
Gawain's analysis is full of human insights, he talks to the reader and carefully points out machine intervention. That makes his Caruana battle a reader-welcome and wortwhile experience.

very good game

while i was following the game online, i saw someone suggesting 18. ... Nd5 (19. Nxd7 Qxd7 20. exd5 Bh6 eventually winning back the pinned bishop while getting a better position) which turns out to be correct and better for black. it would've turned a good game into a great game.
anyway, interesting annotations.

Well done for signing Gawain up for a blog. He's a really interesting player (he beat me once in an open!). He likes playing Texas hold 'em in his spare moments, and he also uses Italian notation (he lived in Italy for a while as a teenager).