Aronian wins first game in Zurich

Levon Aronian has won the first game in his 6-game match against Vladimir Kramnik. Grabbing a lead with the black pieces, the Armenian couldn't have had a better start in Zurich. The second game will be played on Sunday.
Vladimir Kramnik and Levon Aronian during the opening ceremony | Photo courtesy of the official website
|
Live commentary
Sergey Shipov is a highly acclaimed Russian grandmaster, coach, author and commentator. His Russian annotations at Crestbook are being translated by Colin McGourty, who did this many times before on his own site Chess in Translation. More information on the match can be found here. Below is Shipov's commentary of game 1.
[Commentary by GM Sergey Shipov - original in Russian at Crestbook]
Video commentary
Schedule
Saturday, 21 April: 15:00 Round 1
Sunday, 22 April: 15:00 Round 2
Monday, 23 April: Rest Day
Tuesday, 24 April: 15:00 Round 3
Wednesday, 25 April: 15:00 Round 4
Thursday, 26 April: Rest Day
Friday, 27 April: 15:00 Round 5
Saturday, 28 April: 13:00 Round 6
Latest articles
-
3 hours 46 min ago
-
4 hours 8 min ago
-
18 hours 12 min ago
-
1 day 2 min ago
-
1 day 17 hours ago
-
2 days 1 hour ago
-
2 days 18 hours ago
-
4 days 40 min ago
-
4 days 2 hours ago
-
5 days 3 hours ago
-
5 days 17 hours ago
-
5 days 18 hours ago
-
6 days 20 hours ago
-
1 week 16 hours ago
-
1 week 19 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago







Comments
Daniel
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Nice coverage!
RealityCheck
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Great commentary. Serge Shipov is ( "Aronian's a wonderful attacker, who can find fighting resources that even escape the electronic eye...") our Howard Cosell.
Hernan
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Nice! Great commentary! Very instructive!
Takis
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Great commentary, GM Shipov! Thanks so much!
Bob
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Yes, very entertaining work by GM Shipov! Thanks!
A technical question: can the board be made to self-reload, rather than manual refresh?
Chip
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Thank you both. Nice game and enjoyable commentary.
grakkel santos
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Hats off to Mr. Shipov for guiding me understand the nuances of this 1st game of the match; I can't recall 'playing' move by move with complete absorption of what is given than going through this game! It made me feel that chess should be played by concept first then whatever happens, win or lose, one played it the 'manner', not necessarily the 'right way'. This game has given me hindsight about: 1)how difficult d4 opening is, 2) The concept on attack and counter-attack, and 3) importance of solid pawn formation.
Aronian seems to be at the peak of his chess career at this point! It was just one inaccuracy on the part of Vladimir but move after move, the impact of such was clearly instituted by Levon, grounding Kramnik's position from active to passive to resignation phase.
RuralRob
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Is this tournament FIDE rated? I've seen comments saying that it is not (due to its being a "friendly match"), but the players' live ratings are being updated.
MiniMe
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
The 2800 club narrows down to two.
redivivo
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
The funny thing with the press conference was that it turned out that Kramnik was the only one of the two to know of the game with which Gunina won the European Championship last month. As had been pointed out in analysis immediately after that game Muzychuk had the advantage but missed playing 16. ... Qe6. Kramnik said that he hadn't even looked at the position with an engine but trusted (the 300 points lower rated) Gunina's preparation. Aronian didn't know of the game but had no problems finding Qe6 and from then on Kramnik was just outplayed.
Brian Smith
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
I followed both Shipov and Naiditsch's commentary and Shipovs was MUCH more informative. And he wasn't contantly hawking a certain weekly newsletter...
adriano
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
It was superb game of Aronian, Kramnik has no chance playing with him and Carlsen.
The real match for the crown is Aronian - Carlsen.
Anand is weak as Kramnik, he should play with Gelfand for the title - the best player of the wrong side of the age=
syzygy
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
'Anand is weak as Kramnik, he should play with Gelfand for the title - the best player of the wrong side of the age='
'as weak as'?! Fourth by rating (not long ago first) and world champion?! By what token is he 'weak'?!
Anonymous
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
By Aronian and Carlsen, Anand and Kramnik are weak, or not so strong, ect. Ect . There is no need to be big expert to see that. The real champion should be the winner of Aronian - Carlsen match.
MiniMe
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Anand probably can beat Carlsen, Carlsen most likely will beat Aronian, and Aronian has good chances of beating Anand.
Thomas
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Amazing conclusions based on a single game which happens to support adriano's preconceived opinions or prejudices about Kramnik. At other occasions, he did have his chances against both Aronian and Carlsen.
cmling
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Excellent commentary by GM Shipov!
And it is nice to see two perfect gentlemen playing.
Jeff Hall
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Yes, I do not care who wins the WC match, Aronian and Carlsen are clearly the world's two strongest players.
MiniMe
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Carlsen is the strongest, Aronian or Anand - second place.
grupa kreatywna
12 hours 35 min ago
Permalink
Hello there! Quick question that's completely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My website looks weird when browsing from my iphone. I'm trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able to resolve this issue.
If you have any suggestions, please share. Thanks!
Anonymous
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
SINCE HE HAS GOTTEN INTO PHYSICAL SHAPE, ARONIAN MAY NOW BE STRONGER THAN CARLSEN!
PP (nl)
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Great game!
One more win for Aronian and he should be about equal to Carlsen on the live ratings I assume?
Rocky
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
"Women weaken legs!"
That;s the reason of Kramnik and Topalov poor quality games.
bhabatosh
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Ya ya ... Aronian is super strong, best in the world .. bla bla.. ... did not he play Candidates ?? for WC you have to beat everyone in candidates and then play for Championship. And the other guy simply scared to loose so stepped away from the challenge. And these guys are referred as best players !! Well you like them that is a separate story , we all have our personal preferences. Thinking Anand/kramnik weaker is complete non-sense. let's not forget it is a friendly game and there is nothing at stake. When there is something at stake then nerve comes to picture and lots of other thing . That's is exactly where someone is judged as best . And the name of such game is World Championship.
Anonymous
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
You should look at your man's performance in the German league.
adriano
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
You are wrong Kramnik had never won candidates to play in World Championship. In 1999 the winner was Alex Shirov.
redivivo
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
There were no Candidates in the cycle where Anand won the title in 2007 either, the last 40 years Kasparov alone won both Candidates and title match in the cycle where he won the title, and that was 30 years ago.
Anonymous
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
you are wrong. Shirov beat Kramnik, but after that the loser played with Kasparov. Imagine nowadays Anand play with Grishtuk, not with Gelfand.
Mher Aghajanyan
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
thanks ,very nice coverage !!
The Devil
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
A big thanks to Sergey Shipov for the commentary
A bigger thanks to Colin McGourty for translating the commentary!
A biggest thanks to Aronian and Kramnik for playing such an awesome match!
Rocky
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
~~~~~~▄ ▐▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▌
~~~▄▄██▌ ▌ Chess/computers
▄▄▄▌▐██▌.▌ Destination: Trash can/End
███████▌.▌▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▌
▀(O)▀▀▀▀▀▀▀(O)(O)▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀(@)(@)▀▀▘
Zeblakob
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
ohhh very nice ..
b3wins
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
There seems to be a typo in the comment to White's 32nd move. The correct version should be: "The key variation is 32. Nxg6? Bd4+ 33. Kh1 Rff2 and Black wins too easily." Instead, the move 33...Rf3 isn't as immediate.
Overall, excellent commentary and translation!
Colin McGourty
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Thanks! Changed it.
iron man 4000 inversion table
6 days 17 hours ago
Permalink
I simply wanted to thank you a lot more for your amazing website you have
developed here. It's full of helpfultips for those who are actually interested in this specific subject, mainly this post.
Geekchess
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Just to add my thanks for an excellent lucid commentary. As a weak player it's a rare privilege to feel so involved when going through a top game (nice web player too). Thanks to all concerned!!
Peter Grahn
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
I think Ivanchuck has the ability to beat both Aronian and Carlsen when he is in best form!!
redivivo
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
It doesn't happen that often though: "Classical games: Magnus Carlsen beat Vassily Ivanchuk 8 to 2, with 13 draws"
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?yearcomp=exactly&year=&playercom...
gentlekowloon
1 year 1 month ago
Permalink
Excellent analysis, GM Shipov!
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions