V. Kramnik (2788) - P. Leko (2741) [E15]
Sparkassen/Dortmund GER (4) 2008
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Ba6 5. Qc2 c5 6. d5 exd5 7. cxd5 Bb7 8. Bg2 Nxd5 9. Qb3!? 9.
Shipov
12. Qa4+
A new move that took Kramnik some minutes on the clock.
12. Bf4
)
19. f4 Neg4 20. Nb5 Rd7 21. Bc6 Qc8 22. Bxd7 Qxd7 23. Qc4 Ne4
Landa
18... Nc6 Unfortunately this theoretically interesting game now ends in a repetition of moves. If anyone, it's Leko who should be blamed, because he has alternative moves here:
18... Re8!? 19. Bf4 Bf8
18... d3 19. Bf4 Ng6 (also possible is 19... dxe2
20. Rfe1 Nd3 21. Rxe2 Nxf4 22. gxf4 Qd3 23. Nc3 Bd8)
20. Bc7 Qd7 21. a4 dxe2 22. Rfe1 Qd2 23. Bf3 Landa 23... Qxb2 24. Bxb6
19. Qb7 Na5 20. Qa7 Kramnik couldn't really chose to play on: 20. Qa6?! Nd5 21. Bxd5 Qxd5 22. Qxb6 Bd8 23. Qd6 Qc4 24. Qd7 Rc6 25. a4 Re6 with excellent compensation (Landa). Here, best seems 26. b4 cxb4 27. Qxd4
20... Nc6 21. Qb7 Na5 22. Qa7 Nc6 23. Qb7 1/2-1/2
I. Nepomniachtchi (2634) - L. Van Wely (2677) [B90]
Sparkassen/Dortmund GER (4) 2008
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be3 e5 7. Nb3 Be6 8. Qd2 Nbd7 9.
14. Qe1 is what Nisipeanu played against Van Wely only twenty days ago, at the Aerosvit Tournament in Foris. White won, but surely Van Wely has found an improvement. He doesn't get a chance to show it, since Nepomniachtchi has found something subtle himself.
14... b4 15. Na4 Qc6 At first sight this looks like a clear refutation since the knight has nowhere to go.
16. f5! Of course that was the idea. White will get great play on the white squares.
16... Bxf5 16... Qxa4 17. fxe6 fxe6 18. Qg4 (or 18. Bh3 with excellent compensation.)
17. exf5 Qxa4 17... Qxh1? 18. Bg2 Qxh2 19. Rh1
18. Bg2 Here too it's the white squares, as we often see in the Najdorf and Sveshnikov, that are worth a pawn.
18...
36. a4 Re1+ 36... Re5 37. Rxe5 Nxe5 38. Rf5 Nf3 39. Rxh5 g3 40. Rh3
36... Ne5 37. Rxa5 g3 38. Rf5
37. Ka2 Rh1 38. Rxa5 Kh7 39. Rd5 Kg6 40. a5 Re1 41. a6 Re8 42. a7 Ra8 43. Ra5 Nh2 44. Rxb4 g3 45. Rb8 Rxa7 46. Rg8+ Kxf6 47. Rxa7 Ng4 48. Ra3 1-0
[Peter ]
J. Gustafsson (2603) - V. Ivanchuk (2740) [D44]
Sparkassen/Dortmund GER (4) 2008
1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. c4 d5 4. Nc3 dxc4 5. e4 Bb4 6. Bg5 b5 7. a4 c6 8. e5 h6 9. exf6 hxg5 10. fxg7 Rg8 11. g3 g4 A young Van Wely once tried 11... Bb7 12. Bg2 c5 13.
Jussupow-Van Wely, Groningen 1994
12. Nh4 12. Ne5 Qd5! 13. Nxg4 Qe4+! (13... Qxh1 14. Nf6+)
14. Qe2 Qxd4
Tyomkin
12... Bb7
12... c5 13. Bg2 cxd4 14.
14. Bxa8 dxc3 15. Qxd8+ Kxd8 16.
Tyomkin)
14... dxc3 15. Qxg4 cxb2 16. Rad1 (16. Rab1!?)
16... Qc7! 17. Bxa8 bxa4! Tyomkin-Gonzalez de la Torre, Andorra 2000 and now according to Tyomkin White should have played 18. Qh5! Bc3 (18... Nd7 19. Rxd7!)
19. Nf5! exf5 20. Rfe1+!! Bxe1 21. Rxe1+ Qe7 (21... Be6 22. Qh8!)
22. Rxe7+ Kxe7 23. Qe2+ Be6 24. Qxb2
13. Bg2 13. Qxg4 also seems possible 13... c5 14. Bg2 Bxg2 15. Nxg2 cxd4 16. Rd1 Nc6 17.
13... Rxg7 14. axb5 Qb6 15. bxc6 Nxc6 16.
18... Kf8 But hey, against the great Chuky a draw is fine of course, and that's what he forces with the following moves.
19. Na4 Qc7 20. Qxc7 Rxc7 21. Bxb7 Rxb7 22. Rfc1 Rc7 23. Nc5 c3 24. bxc3 Bxc5 25. dxc5 Rg5 26. Ra4 Nc6 27. Kg2 Rb7 28. Rc2 Rb5 29. f3 gxf3+ 30. Nxf3 Rgxc5 31. Nd4 1/2-1/2
A. Naiditsch (2624) - S. Mamedyarov (2752) [B46]
Sparkassen/Dortmund GER (4) 2008
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nc6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Nxc6 bxc6 7. Bd3 d5 8.
16. Re3 Bc6 17. Qf4 Qc7 (17... Bxa4 18. Rf3