Carlsen a point ahead of Aronian after Tata Steel's 11th round

With a quick draw against Wang Hao on Friday Magnus Carlsen got a bit closer to tournament victory in Wijk aan Zee. The Norwegian's lead in Tata Steel's A group decreased to a point as Levon Aronian won his game against Hikaru Nakamura. Fabiano Caruana is not having a great tournament and in this round the Italian got crushed by Anish Giri. Peter Leko defeated Loek van Wely in a rook ending and Ivan Sokolov got his queen trapped against Sergey Karjakin.
After his draw against Wang Hao, Magnus Carlsen still leads by a point | Photo © Tata Steel
In the B group Arkadij Naiditsch took over the lead from Richard Rapport by beating the Hungarian in a direct confrontation. The German grandmaster is on 7.5/11 just like Sergey Movsesian, who drew quickly with Jan Smeets. In C the fight for victory was and is still going between two players: Fernando Peralta and Sabino Brunello. Both are on 9/11 and two points ahead of the rest.
|
After the third and last rest day play resumed on Friday in Wijk aan Zee, where only three rounds are left, time flies! In order to have a really exciting weekend Carlsen basically had to lose, and at least one of his closest rivals, Anand, Aronian or Nakamura, had to win.
The second part of this scenario did occur: Levon Aronian won his game and so he got half a point closer to Carlsen in the standings. For a brief moment the first part seemed realistic as well, since Wang Hao got a clear advantage out of the opening against the tournament leader. However, actually winning the ending was not easy and as soon as he got the chance, Carlsen equalize immediately.
Videos by Freshmen media
After winning last year's event, Levon Aronian is not doing badly either this year. In this 11th round he beat Hikaru Nakamura with the black pieces from a Chebanenko Slav. Afterwards the Armenian said that the start of the ending was already unpleasant for White, and that his preparation had paid off.

Levon Aronian still has some chances to catch up with Magnus Carlsen
Vishy Anand seemed to be following suit; the World Champion won a pawn in the opening and eventually reached a knight ending that should have been winning. However, the World Champion messed up somewhere.

Vishy Anand must have miscalculated in the knight ending
Sergey Karjakin had an easy day at the office. As he said himself, Ivan Sokolov isn't having a great tournament, and he played this game below his usual standard. Karjakin didn't have to do anything special to win. Still, the win came a bit sudden when the black queen got trapped.

An easy win for Sergey Karjakin
Fabiano Caruana is another player who isn't having his tournament. The world's number 5 in fact dropped out of the live top 10 today after getting crushed by a player from his generation: Anish Giri.
Peter Leko moved to "plus two" by beating Loek van Wely, who went for the Sicilian Dragon. Not expecting this opening, the Hungarian didn't go for the sharp 9.Bc4 but for 9.0-0-0 instead. His endgame advantage wasn't much, and the game should have ended in a draw, but after a tiny inaccuracy by Van Wely, Leko did get a slight advantage and after that the technique he showed was just splendid.
The game l'Ami vs Harikrishna followed an old line in the Queen's Indian which in fact leads to a kind of Grünfeld structure. The players reached an ending with BB vs BB and a passed a-pawn for Black against an extra pawn in the centre for White. Not much really happened until the players shook hands at move 54.
B group
The big game in the B group was of course Arkadij Naiditsch, the highest rated player there, against Hungarian talent and co-leader Richard Rapport. The German grandmaster played a quiet game but a great one, in the style of Capablanca – the computers only understand that Black is lost a few moves before the end!

Naiditsch vs Rapport, an instructive endgame
After two losses Jan Timman returned to his good form with an excellent win over Predrag Nikolic. Daniil Dubov crushed Sergey Tiviakov and both Romain Edouard and Sipke Ernst won their games with Black.
C group
In a so far disappointing tournament, Lisa Schut won her second game; the 18-year-old WIM managed beat IM Mark van der Werf who is now in last place instead of her. Fernando Peralta could have gotten into trouble if Miguoel Admiraal had found the zwischenzug 36.b5 but instead the Dutch FM lost himself in the complications. Sabino Brunello was held to a draw by Twan Burg in a Caro-Kann with Fischer's 5.Nc5!?.

Lisa Schut beat Mark van der Werf
Tata Steel 2013 | Grandmaster Group A | Round 11 standings
Tata Steel 2013 | Grandmaster Group A | Pairings
| Round 1 | 12.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 13.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Aronian | ½-½ | Van Wely | Van Wely | ½-½ | Hou Yifan | |
| Carlsen | ½-½ | Caruana | l'Ami | ½-½ | Karjakin | |
| Harikrishna | 1-0 | Giri | Wang Hao | ½-½ | Leko | |
| Anand | ½-½ | Nakamura | Nakamura | ½-½ | Sokolov | |
| Sokolov | ½-½ | Wang Hao | Giri | ½-½ | Anand | |
| Leko | ½-½ | l'Ami | Caruana | ½-½ | Harikrishna | |
| Karjakin | 1-0 | Hou Yifan | Aronian | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Round 3 | 14.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 15.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Van Wely | Van Wely | 1-0 | l'Ami | |
| Harikrishna | ½-½ | Aronian | Wang Hao | 1-0 | Hou Yifan | |
| Anand | 1-0 | Caruana | Nakamura | ½-½ | Karjakin | |
| Sokolov | ½-½ | Giri | Giri | ½-½ | Leko | |
| Leko | ½-½ | Nakamura | Caruana | 1-0 | Sokolov | |
| Karjakin | 1-0 | Wang Hao | Aronian | 0-1 | Anand | |
| Hou Yifan | ½-½ | l'Ami | Carlsen | 1-0 | Harikrishna | |
| Round 5 | 17.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 18.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Harikrishna | 1-0 | Van Wely | Van Wely | 1-0 | Wang Hao | |
| Anand | ½-½ | Carlsen | Nakamura | ½-½ | l'Ami | |
| Sokolov | 0-1 | Aronian | Giri | 0-1 | Hou Yifan | |
| Leko | 1-0 | Caruana | Caruana | ½-½ | Karjakin | |
| Karjakin | ½-½ | Giri | Aronian | 1-0 | Leko | |
| Hou Yifan | 0-1 | Nakamura | Carlsen | 1-0 | Sokolov | |
| l'Ami | 0-1 | Wang Hao | Harikrishna | ½-½ | Anand | |
| Round 7 | 19.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 20.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Anand | 1-0 | Van Wely | Van Wely | ½-½ | Nakamura | |
| Sokolov | ½-½ | Harikrishna | Giri | ½-½ | Wang Hao | |
| Leko | ½-½ | Carlsen | Caruana | 1-0 | l'Ami | |
| Karjakin | ½-½ | Aronian | Aronian | 1-0 | Hou Yifan | |
| Hou Yifan | ½-½ | Caruana | Carlsen | 1-0 | Karjakin | |
| l'Ami | ½-½ | Giri | Harikrishna | ½-½ | Leko | |
| Wang Hao | 0-1 | Nakamura | Anand | ½-½ | Sokolov | |
| Round 9 | 22.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 23.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Sokolov | 0-1 | Van Wely | Van Wely | ½-½ | Giri | |
| Leko | ½-½ | Anand | Caruana | 0-1 | Nakamura | |
| Karjakin | ½-½ | Harikrishna | Aronian | 1-0 | Wang Hao | |
| Hou Yifan | 0-1 | Carlsen | Carlsen | 1-0 | l'Ami | |
| l'Ami | ½-½ | Aronian | Harikrishna | 0-1 | Hou Yifan | |
| Wang Hao | ½-½ | Caruana | Anand | ½-½ | Karjakin | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Giri | Sokolov | 0-1 | Leko | |
| Round 11 | 25.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 26.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Leko | 1-0 | Van Wely | Van Wely | - | Caruana | |
| Karjakin | 1-0 | Sokolov | Aronian | - | Giri | |
| Hou Yifan | ½-½ | Anand | Carlsen | - | Nakamura | |
| l'Ami | ½-½ | Harikrishna | Harikrishna | - | Wang Hao | |
| Wang Hao | ½-½ | Carlsen | Anand | - | l'Ami | |
| Nakamura | 0-1 | Aronian | Sokolov | - | Hou Yifan | |
| Giri | 1-0 | Caruana | Leko | - | Karjakin | |
| Round 13 | 27.01.13 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Karjakin | - | Van Wely | ||||
| Hou Yifan | - | Leko | ||||
| l'Ami | - | Sokolov | ||||
| Wang Hao | - | Anand | ||||
| Nakamura | - | Harikrishna | ||||
| Giri | - | Carlsen | ||||
| Caruana | - | Aronian |
Tata Steel 2013 | Grandmaster Group B | Round 11 standings
Tata Steel 2013 | Grandmaster Group B | Pairings
| Round 1 | 12.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 13.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Rapport | ½-½ | Van Kampen | Van Kampen | ½-½ | Smeets | |
| Edouard | ½-½ | Nikolic | Grandelius | ½-½ | Dubov | |
| Ernst | 0-1 | Timman | Ipatov | ½-½ | Turov | |
| Movsesian | ½-½ | Naiditsch | Naiditsch | 0-1 | Tiviakov | |
| Tiviakov | 1-0 | Ipatov | Timman | ½-½ | Movsesian | |
| Turov | ½-½ | Grandelius | Nikolic | 1-0 | Ernst | |
| Dubov | ½-½ | Smeets | Rapport | 1-0 | Edouard | |
| Round 3 | 14.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 15.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Edouard | 1-0 | Van Kampen | Van Kampen | 0-1 | Grandelius | |
| Ernst | 0-1 | Rapport | Ipatov | ½-½ | Smeets | |
| Movsesian | 1-0 | Nikolic | Naiditsch | ½-½ | Dubov | |
| Tiviakov | ½-½ | Timman | Timman | ½-½ | Turov | |
| Turov | 0-1 | Naiditsch | Nikolic | 0-1 | Tiviakov | |
| Dubov | ½-½ | Ipatov | Rapport | 1-0 | Movsesian | |
| Smeets | 1-0 | Grandelius | Edouard | 0-1 | Ernst | |
| Round 5 | 17.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 18.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Ernst | 0-1 | Van Kampen | Van Kampen | ½-½ | Ipatov | |
| Movsesian | 1-0 | Edouard | Naiditsch | 1-0 | Grandelius | |
| Tiviakov | 0-1 | Rapport | Timman | 1-0 | Smeets | |
| Turov | ½-½ | Nikolic | Nikolic | 0-1 | Dubov | |
| Dubov | 1-0 | Timman | Rapport | ½-½ | Turov | |
| Smeets | 0-1 | Naiditsch | Edouard | 1-0 | Tiviakov | |
| Grandelius | 1-0 | Ipatov | Ernst | 0-1 | Movsesian | |
| Round 7 | 19.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 20.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Movsesian | 1-0 | Van Kampen | Van Kampen | 1-0 | Naiditsch | |
| Tiviakov | 0-1 | Ernst | Timman | 1-0 | Ipatov | |
| Turov | ½-½ | Edouard | Nikolic | 1-0 | Grandelius | |
| Dubov | ½-½ | Rapport | Rapport | 0-1 | Smeets | |
| Smeets | 1-0 | Nikolic | Edouard | 1-0 | Dubov | |
| Grandelius | 0-1 | Timman | Ernst | 0-1 | Turov | |
| Ipatov | 0-1 | Naiditsch | Movsesian | ½-½ | Tiviakov | |
| Round 9 | 22.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 23.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Tiviakov | 1-0 | Van Kampen | Van Kampen | 1-0 | Timman | |
| Turov | 0-1 | Movsesian | Nikolic | ½-½ | Naiditsch | |
| Dubov | 1-0 | Ernst | Rapport | 1-0 | Ipatov | |
| Smeets | 1-0 | Edouard | Edouard | 1-0 | Grandelius | |
| Grandelius | ½-½ | Rapport | Ernst | 0-1 | Smeets | |
| Ipatov | 1-0 | Nikolic | Movsesian | ½-½ | Dubov | |
| Naiditsch | 1-0 | Timman | Tiviakov | ½-½ | Turov | |
| Round 11 | 25.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 26.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Turov | ½-½ | Van Kampen | Van Kampen | - | Nikolic | |
| Dubov | 1-0 | Tiviakov | Rapport | - | Timman | |
| Smeets | ½-½ | Movsesian | Edouard | - | Naiditsch | |
| Grandelius | 0-1 | Ernst | Ernst | - | Ipatov | |
| Ipatov | 0-1 | Edouard | Movsesian | - | Grandelius | |
| Naiditsch | 1-0 | Rapport | Tiviakov | - | Smeets | |
| Timman | 1-0 | Nikolic | Turov | - | Dubov | |
| Round 13 | 27.01.13 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Dubov | - | Van Kampen | ||||
| Smeets | - | Turov | ||||
| Grandelius | - | Tiviakov | ||||
| Ipatov | - | Movsesian | ||||
| Naiditsch | - | Ernst | ||||
| Timman | - | Edouard | ||||
| Nikolic | - | Rapport |
Tata Steel 2013 | Grandmaster Group C | Round 11 standings
Tata Steel 2013 | Grandmaster Group C | Pairings
| Round 1 | 12.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 13.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Peralta | 1-0 | Goryachkina | Goryachkina | ½-½ | Van der Werf | |
| Swinkels | ½-½ | Kovchan | Burg | 0-1 | Gretarsson | |
| Brunello | 1-0 | Klein | Romanishin | ½-½ | Mekhitarian | |
| Schut | ½-½ | Admiraal | Admiraal | ½-½ | Bitensky | |
| Bitensky | ½-½ | Romanishin | Klein | 1-0 | Schut | |
| Mekhitarian | 1-0 | Burg | Kovchan | 0-1 | Brunello | |
| Gretarsson | ½-½ | Van der Werf | Peralta | 1-0 | Swinkels | |
| Round 3 | 14.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 15.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Swinkels | 1-0 | Goryachkina | Goryachkina | ½-½ | Burg | |
| Brunello | ½-½ | Peralta | Romanishin | 1-0 | Van der Werf | |
| Schut | 0-1 | Kovchan | Admiraal | ½-½ | Gretarsson | |
| Bitensky | 1-0 | Klein | Klein | 1-0 | Mekhitarian | |
| Mekhitarian | 1-0 | Admiraal | Kovchan | 1-0 | Bitensky | |
| Gretarsson | 1-0 | Romanishin | Peralta | 1-0 | Schut | |
| Van der Werf | 0-1 | Burg | Swinkels | ½-½ | Brunello | |
| Round 5 | 17.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 18.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Brunello | 1-0 | Goryachkina | Goryachkina | ½-½ | Romanishin | |
| Schut | 0-1 | Swinkels | Admiraal | ½-½ | Burg | |
| Bitensky | 0-1 | Peralta | Klein | 1-0 | Van der Werf | |
| Mekhitarian | ½-½ | Kovchan | Kovchan | ½-½ | Gretarsson | |
| Gretarsson | 0-1 | Klein | Peralta | ½-½ | Mekhitarian | |
| Van der Werf | ½-½ | Admiraal | Swinkels | ½-½ | Bitensky | |
| Burg | 1-0 | Romanishin | Brunello | 1-0 | Schut | |
| Round 7 | 19.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 20.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Schut | ½-½ | Goryachkina | Goryachkina | 1-0 | Admiraal | |
| Bitensky | ½-½ | Brunello | Klein | 1-0 | Romanishin | |
| Mekhitarian | ½-½ | Swinkels | Kovchan | ½-½ | Burg | |
| Gretarsson | 0-1 | Peralta | Peralta | ½-½ | Van der Werf | |
| Van der Werf | ½-½ | Kovchan | Swinkels | ½-½ | Gretarsson | |
| Burg | ½-½ | Klein | Brunello | 1-0 | Mekhitarian | |
| Romanishin | 1-0 | Admiraal | Schut | 1-0 | Bitensky | |
| Round 9 | 22.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 22.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Bitensky | 1-0 | Goryachkina | Goryachkina | 0-1 | Klein | |
| Mekhitarian | 1-0 | Schut | Kovchan | ½-½ | Admiraal | |
| Gretarsson | 0-1 | Brunello | Peralta | 1-0 | Romanishin | |
| Van der Werf | 0-1 | Swinkels | Swinkels | 1-0 | Burg | |
| Burg | ½-½ | Peralta | Brunello | 1-0 | Van der Werf | |
| Romanishin | ½-½ | Kovchan | Schut | 0-1 | Gretarsson | |
| Admiraal | 1-0 | Klein | Bitensky | 1-0 | Mekhitarian | |
| Round 11 | 25.01.13 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 26.01.13 | 13.30 CET | |
| Mekhitarian | 1-0 | Goryachkina | Goryachkina | - | Kovchan | |
| Gretarsson | 1-0 | Bitensky | Peralta | - | Klein | |
| Van der Werf | 0-1 | Schut | Swinkels | - | Admiraal | |
| Burg | ½-½ | Brunello | Brunello | - | Romanishin | |
| Romanishin | ½-½ | Swinkels | Schut | - | Burg | |
| Admiraal | 0-1 | Peralta | Bitensky | - | Van der Werf | |
| Klein | ½-½ | Kovchan | Mekhitarian | - | Gretarsson | |
| Round 13 | 27.01.13 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Gretarsson | Goryachkina | |||||
| Van der Werf | Mekhitarian | |||||
| Burg | Bitensky | |||||
| Romanishin | Schut | |||||
| Admiraal | Brunello | |||||
| Klein | Swinkels | |||||
| Kovchan | Peralta |
Latest articles
-
12 hours 7 min ago
-
21 hours 15 min ago
-
21 hours 37 min ago
-
1 day 11 hours ago
-
1 day 17 hours ago
-
2 days 10 hours ago
-
2 days 18 hours ago
-
3 days 11 hours ago
-
4 days 18 hours ago
-
4 days 19 hours ago
-
5 days 20 hours ago
-
6 days 10 hours ago
-
6 days 12 hours ago
-
1 week 14 hours ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
1 week 3 days ago







Comments
FlatEarth
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
Ha! Aronian and Karjakin were able to beat Wang Hao whereas Carlsen made no headway against him whatsoever, which of course is a very telling comparison indeed. Plus, if you combine Anand’s first part of this tournament with Aronian’s impressive recent rounds they would equal or better Carlsen’s performance, which likewise establishes that Magnus is in no way superior to either of these two great players. Anand’s missed win today doesn’t really matter. There is no concrete evidence proving that Carlsen could have done a better job in that Pawn & Knight endgame or that Carlsen would not have equally misread the King & Pawn endgame after the voluntary exchange of knights. In any event, as Vishy conceded at the end of the last round, Magnus may well be doing better at “converting points” against lower rated players. But, as I think the Undisputed-World-Champion implied, that is not really the most critical or worthwhile skill – it’s more like a cheap party trick that does little more than impress the fanboys. In any event, there obviously is little or no difference between drawing against Wang Hao and drawing against Hou Yifan. Therefore, Anand cannot be criticized without equally criticizing Carlsen. In fact, objectively speaking, equating their respective performances this round would not really be fair to Anand. Vishy’s game today was unquestionably of superior quality in every respect. Carlsen’s game was short and drawish and Magnus was too chicken to take any risks against a normal edge for White whereas Vishy’s game had some exciting imbalances for which he deserves full credit. Vishy had a won position at move 40. So enough said: advantage Anand yet again.
Jarvis
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
If you also believe in a flat earth, yes.
Septimus
4 months 3 hours ago
Permalink
That was exactly what I was going to say.
Flat Earth: You are an idiot and nothing in that blob of text makes any sense. First off, Carlsen is the tournament leader. Just because he had some issues against Wang by choosing a strange Sicilian setup does not mean he sucks. On the contrary, I think anybody else in this position would have lost very quickly.
If anything, Carlsen is proving that there is no such thing as an automatic loss solely based on opening choice.
RG13
4 months 1 hour ago
Permalink
Septimus, he is not "an idiot" but rather an artist. He is speaking in character and so if you are familiar with the irony of 'damning with faint praise' then you will be able to understand him.
Ray
3 months 4 weeks ago
Permalink
Exactly! You have to love FlatEarth's tongue-in-cheek ad absurdum logic.
Of course the average internet kibitzer is so unused to this type of subtle rhetoric that he will immediately confront the perceived "troll" or "idiot"... But it's never too late to learn! ;-)
slymnlts
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
So, what I understand from what you say:
Anand draws = Dog bites man
Carlsen draws = Man bites dog
I guess this simply shows who is the best...
pilto
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
rather deep irony this...
eric
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
Earth is not flat Dude! Just put your self together, than I will read your comment!
NOSTRADAMUS
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
You are evil man.....
NOSTRADAMUS
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
@Flat Earth you are evil....
Kronsteen
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
Indeed. Magnus seems to do well in Rook endings, which is another way of saying that he is scared of playing with Knights. Given this phobia - something to do with his Viking forebears? - there's every reason to think that he might have lost the ending against Hou Yifan. By holding the draw, Vishy once again demonstrates his superiority over the Kid.
FlatEarth
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
I see your point. Much appreciated. In fact one of the hallmarks of the UndisputedWorldChamption is that he is a wizard with Knights. Voluntarily giving up his Knight today to get the resulting King&Pawn ending shows yet again what a gentleman Vishy is, effectively declaring that he would be willing to fight the rest of the battle with one arm tied behind his back.
Kronsteen
4 months 7 hours ago
Permalink
Chivalry is not dead!
Guillaume
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
I wouldn't take FlatEarth seriously. I doubt he believes a single word he is writing. He's not for real.
RealityCheck
4 months 7 hours ago
Permalink
Yeah, a fool can see the sarcasm dripping from his, @flatearth's, brutish lips.
Septimus
4 months 2 hours ago
Permalink
FlatEarth and S3 are the same person. In fact anybody trolling Carlsen is S3 in disguise.
ff2017
4 months 7 hours ago
Permalink
This is quite excellent analysis. I went deeper and in fact if you combine the wins from the following specific players for the exact rounds in question, even including round 2 where everyone drew. You'd have a multiheaded monster that is 10.5/11!!! With a performance better than anyone in history!!! Simply Amazing!
1 Harikrishna
3 Karjakin
4 Van Wely
5 Leko
6 Hou Yifan
7 Nakamura
8 Caruana
9 Van Wely
10 Hou Yifan
11 Giri
So what flatearth is saying, taking the best partial results of 2 people you get better results that the average performance of 1 person who is doing better. Thanks for letting us know .75+.75 > 1.
NOSTRADAMUS
4 months 7 hours ago
Permalink
@FlatEarth Magnus will soon convert many "cheap points" against Anand and I am pretty sure that then the Earth will be no flat anymore.
Anónimo
4 months 7 hours ago
Permalink
If you still harbor doubts that FlatEarth is just being sarcastic you might do well in reading his comment on the Bilbao-FIDE row in this same website. You will know by then that he is just trying to ridicule here some of the most nonsensical comments by Carlsen's anti-fans.
Anonymous
4 months 7 hours ago
Permalink
incredible the way Anand played his end game
in a WC match i would never give a chance to Carlsen, he should never think of going there with the sublime tiger
better make some elo points, and wait for inflation rating
strana
4 months 6 hours ago
Permalink
Very precise, FlatEarth !! Carlsen has no rivals in beating weak players, like many in Wijk aan Zee. That is the reason why he won tournaments before and will continue to do so. But in Candidates, there will be another story. If Ivanchuk do not suffer a colapse, only strong players will be participating, so Carlsen will suffer to score. He is a Svidler customer, has also a negative score against Kramnik, is just +1 against the "old" Gelfand in about 10 games and can not dominate Grischuk ( who had beaten Carlsen many times in rapid and blitz) or Aronian. Only Radja has a bad score against Carlsen, but the azeri has the power to change it.... . So, Kramnik is the clear favourite to win. Another point: Carlsen had 3 bad positions ( Aronian, Leko and Wang Hao) untill now in Wijk, Anand had NONE !!!
All these many weak player are really decisive to define Wijk winner !!!
FlatEarth
4 months 6 hours ago
Permalink
All good points, strana. Given that Carlsen's happens to have a tendency to "convert points," neither his rating nor his technically "official" scores in major tournaments is any indication whatsoever of how he will do the in the Candidates tournament. Pretty much everyone else in the Candidates event is demonstrably better than Carlsen when you look at it closely. And of course your are also right about the unimpressive positions Carlsen has gotten here at Wijk. As I have already explained, a full analysis of the underlying games, and not the mere facile counting of bare "points" is the only way to accurately assess the relative performance of the participants. When one does that (for example pointing out how Anand outperformed Magnus today), then Carlsen sadly lags behind several of the others at this event, which is hardly surprising to longterm observers who see Carlsen for the pretender that he so clearly is.
GM Grand
4 months 6 hours ago
Permalink
Flatearth. Thanks for not believing the hype. Wake up chess world. Everything is not black or white. There are hispanics as well.
FlatEarth
4 months 5 hours ago
Permalink
GMGrand: Only a fool would believe ELO ratings (number one on the list, highest rating ever, blah blah blah) and so-called “official” tournament scores. The many other aspects of the hype-machine also have to be looked at with a clear-eyed view -- like those Russians who give Carlsen the Chess Oscar every year. They obviously can’t be trusted as their standards are ADMITTEDLY completely subjective rather than empirical, leading to all sorts of bias that naturally cuts in Carlsen’s favor. By the gleeful reaction of his many fanboys, you would think that all the (undeserved) press attention Carlsen gets is actually good for the game of chess rather than the grotesque distortion that quite often can be.
Dudio
3 months 4 weeks ago
Permalink
"Those Russians" are creating the list for the Oscar by asking dozens of international journalists and organizers to give their top 10.
GM Grand
3 months 4 weeks ago
Permalink
FlatEarth: Aha. You too have heard about the "official" and "unofficial" tournament scores. The conspiracy is starting to unravel. When will people realize that winning is not the same as being the best?
redivivo
3 months 4 weeks ago
Permalink
This is just getting more and more hilarious every time it is repeated :-) Carlsen is a "Svidler customer" because he lost against him for the second and last time when he was 16 years 1 month and 2 weeks old.
He is "just +1" against Gelfand, but lost when he was 15 and has won the last games between them.
Grischuk has "beaten Carlsen many times in rapid and blitz" = Carlsen has a plus in rapid/blitz (as clear as 7-2 after 2008). Grischuk has never beaten Carlsen in classical.
Kramnik has a plus score against Carlsen = 4-3 in classical, 3-3 after Carlsen turned 17 (and Carlsen has 5-1 in rapid/blitz after 2008).
Aronian's score against Carlsen is 4-7 in classical.
"Only Radja has a bad score against Carlsen" but Ivanchuk is 2-8 in classical. Carlsen is 6-1 against Radjabov.
Anonymous
4 months 6 hours ago
Permalink
You amuse me FlatEarth.
Sure, you're just an agitator looking to get a rise out of the people that are easily baited, but at least you put some effort into it.
bondegnasker
3 months 4 weeks ago
Permalink
Very nice and to the point, FlatEarth! I'd like to add just one detail: It seems to me that Carlsen's obsession with "converting points" is more than just a technical trick to "win tournaments". There's a deeply rooted psychological issue there IMO. Have you noticed that he's only playing lower rated people these days? In other words, is Carlsen a coward?
GM Grand
3 months 4 weeks ago
Permalink
Awesome points. Magnus is such a coward. Never realized that he has been playing lower rated opponents. That was not his style just a few years back. Sad development.
adam
3 months 4 weeks ago
Permalink
classic, man, you're getting better by the day :D the sad thing is that the ones addressed, along with replies below, will likely not understand...
adam
3 months 4 weeks ago
Permalink
(reply to comment #1)
baladala
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
It was hard to imagine for me Vishy would ever fail like this. It is worse than some of his defeats in recent years. Simply Shocking.
Andreas
3 months 4 weeks ago
Permalink
Completely agree. As far as I know Anand had plenty of time to calculate. I dare to say I would have done the endgame from this point ahead better, as a 2100 patzer. Well, maybe not. Anyway, I guess this performance was a contribution to a little less 'undisputed-world-champion'
Thomas Oliver
3 months 4 weeks ago
Permalink
Anyone, even the very strongest, can make such rare mistakes or miscalculations. Was Kramnik an unworthy world champion because he once overlooked mate in one? One or two levels down, is Naiditsch a patzer because he gave a free piece to van Kampen (he was in that game, but not in the tournament as a whole)?
On the other hand, this was Anand's second big blunder in a short time, the first one was against Adams in London. Maybe he has a tendency to relax and become lazy in positions which he considers either dead-won (Hou Yifan) or dead-drawn (Adams).
redivivo
3 months 4 weeks ago
Permalink
Anand has indeed started to make more mistakes lately, he did also miss a win against Giri here, and a couple of them against Nakamura in London. Together with the Adams and Hou games that's four games of the last fifteen where mistakes by Anand changed the result, and this during a period when he has been playing relatively well otherwise.
Thomas Oliver
3 months 4 weeks ago
Permalink
First time I read that Anand played "relatively well" in London ... . The games against Giri and Nakamura had missed opportunities but not outright blunders where players with Elo 2100 can (correctly or reasonably) claim "I would have done better than Anand" - but they wouldn't have survived earlier Najdorf complications against Hou Yifan to get the upper hand. It's at least progress (compared to the period when he drew almost all of his games) that Anand gets winning positions and also wins some of these games.
People may be more critical towards Anand because he (still) is world champion - like it or not, according to FIDE rules and tradition he will keep his title until he loses a WCh match. But, for the sake of argument, let's assume or "declare" that Anand is no longer world champion. Then his overall play in Wijk aan Zee might already put him in the same league as Kramnik (who also misses opportunities every now and then) or Aronian. To reach Carlsen's level - by which I don't mean bridging the rating gap but competing for tournament victories - further progress may be required, but Wijk 2013 is clearly a step in the right direction.
trollaras
3 months 4 weeks ago
Permalink
Yes, you would have done much better, you would have managed to lose.
redivivo
3 months 4 weeks ago
Permalink
Ah, the classical Chessbomb chat line: "Nf5 was not a mistake unless you would have played better yourself".
choufleur
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
FlatEarth your analysis is nonsense
Bob
4 months 7 hours ago
Permalink
Yes. I like flatearth, he is very funny.
Anonymous
4 months 7 hours ago
Permalink
the earth is not flat but RC is
Morley
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
Anand did blunder the win away, but kudos to Hou for calculating the right drawing sequence. Must take a certain amount of mental toughness to fathom that Nf5 is a huge mistake, even if it is played by the World Champ when he's up a pawn. Tough break for Anand.
Caruana and Sokolov are really imploding. I'm sure they will be happy when this is over. Carlsen had probably his worst position of the tournament today, I really don't understand why Wang Hao would give up that knight for the bad bishop. At least this was an improvement on his last few games against Magnus? Hard to see anyone catching the world no. 1, but Aronian seems to be doing everything he can.
Quite a mix up in the B group, with Naiditsch beating Rapport. Down to the wire, the Tata Steel 2014 A spot is really being contested.
Lisa Schut's game in C was crazy ... in a 92 move game, it took her queen 60 moves to overcome White's two rooks. Good stuff!
eric
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
Why not 40... - Ne4+? Anand was really disappointing this time! Sorry about how he handled that position!
S3
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
Congrats to Hou but finding the draw wasn't really that hard after ..Nf5. She had little choice to take and the following moves were not particulary hard to find.
Which makes it even more sad for Anand. My guess is he was too lazy/tired to calculate a bit and he just assumed that all pawn endings would be won. Not uncommon with older players.
And Morley, I don't wanna nitpick, but Carlsen had a worse, perhaps even lost, position against Aronian. Still Hao's Nc6 was almost as strange as Anands Nf5.
Morley
4 months 7 hours ago
Permalink
Fair enough. I had forgotten how dire things were looking for black in that game. c6 is something of a miracle move, but if Aronian had gone into knight ending up a pawn by taking on f5 earlier, he might have been able to convert.
Thomas Oliver
4 months 7 hours ago
Permalink
Wang Hao-Carlsen today was indeed an improvement over Wang Hao-Carlsen, Biel 2012. Then the Chinese also had an advantage but ended up losing that game.
FlatEarth
4 months 7 hours ago
Permalink
JUSTICE, for a change. How little we see of that in matters concerning this pretender to the throne of the UndisputedWorldChampion.
RealityCheck
4 months 7 hours ago
Permalink
Say it loud FlatEarth Justice for one, justice for all. Hooowleluuuya! Preach!
Anonymous
4 months 8 hours ago
Permalink
Why you guy's on about this pampered goldfish? GM Susan Polgar soon be bringing The Great Wes Shark to the World Cup feast!
So will eat your pampered goldfish with tea and biscuits but not cheese. He hates cheese but he loves chess!!!
Pages
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions