Dortmund: Kramnik wins again, Ponomariov recovers
Vladimir Kramnik also won his second game at the Sparkassen Chess Festival in Dortmund, Germany. In the second round the Russian defeated Georg Meier of Germany. Ruslan Ponomariov recovered from his first round loss and defeated Anish Giri. Le Quang Liem and Hikaru Nakamura drew their game.
General info
The 39th Sparkassen Chess Meeting takes place July 21-31, 2011 in the City Theater of Dortmund, Germany. Like Biel, it's a 6-player double round robin event. This year Vladimir Kramnik, Hikaru Nakamura, Ruslan Ponomariov, Anish Giri, Le Quang Liem and Georg Meier play. For the second time Dortmund uses an anti-draw rule: the players are not allowed to offer a draw during the game. The game will be declared a draw when a win for either side is not possible any more, or in case of a three-fold repetition.
Round 2
The game between Le Quang Liem and Hikaru Nakamura ended rather quickly. The opening was promising: a 4.f3 Nimzo-Indian, and indeed the game became interesting quickly. However, the players quickly went for a move repetition. After that he went looking for a yoga place.
The next game to finish was Ruslan Ponomariov vs Anish Giri. The Ukrainian bounced back from his first round loss when his opponent started to play inaccurately in the middlegame.
Ponomariov-Giri
Dortmund, 2011

22. a4!
Fixing the a5 pawn before attacking it.
22... Bc6 23. Nb3 Qa7 24. Qxa7 Rxa7 25. f3

25... Rd8?
After this, amazingly, Black is already lost.
26. Bb5! Rxd1+
26... Bd7 27. Rd2 and Black cannot avoid the loss of a pawn.
27. Rxd1 Bxb5 28. axb5 Kf8 29. Nc5 Ra8 30. b6 Ke7 31. b7 Rb8 32. e5 Nd5 33. Ra1 Kd8 34. Rxa5 1-0

The game of the day was Georg Meier vs Vladimir Kramnik. In a Queen's Indian, the young German grandmaster was doing fine against the great Russian for long, and at move 25 the players repeated moves. Then, Kramnik wanted more:
Meier-Kramnik
Dortmund, 2011

Instead of playing 27...Na2 for the second time, Kramnik decides to play for a win with an amazing move:
27... Nc4!? 28. bxc4 d4 29. Bxg5?
The wrong choice. White had two good moves:
a) 29. Nxd4 Qxc5 30. Nf5 Rxd1+ 31. Qxd1 Qxc4 32. Nd6 Rd8 33. Bb6! Rxd6 34. Qxd6 g4 35. Qb8+ Bf8 36. Qxb7 gxh3 37. Qc8! and
b) 29. Rxd4 Rxd4 30. Nxd4! Qxc5 31. Nf5 Qe5 32. Nb5 Bf8 33. Qd2 and in both cases the complications seem to favour White.
29... Qxc5!
29... hxg5 30. Rxg5
30. Bxd8 d3!

The pointe of Black's 27th. White is in trouble.
31. Ne1?
Going down without a fight, but the alternatives were no picnic either:
a) 31. e4 Qxa7 (31... Rxd8 32. Nb5 Bxe4 33. Bg2) 32. Bh4 Qxa4 33. Rf1 Bxe4;
b) 31. Rd2 Qxa7 (31... dxe2 32. Ne1 Bd4 33. Rxd4 Qxd4 34. Qxh6) 32. Ne1 (32. Bh4 Rxe2 33. Rxe2 dxe2 34. Ne1 Qd4) 32... Rxd8 33. Nxd3 Nxd3 34. Rxd3 Rxd3 35. exd3 Qxa4.
31... Rxe2 32. Qf4 Rxf2! 0-1

Games round 2
Game viewer by ChessTempo
| Round 1 | 21.07.11 | 15:00 CET | Round 6 | 27.07.11 | 15:00 CET | |
| Meier | ½-½ | Le Quang Liem | Le Quang Liem | - | Meier | |
| Kramnik | 1-0 | Ponomariov | Ponomariov | - | Kramnik | |
| Giri | ½-½ | Nakamura | Nakamura | - | Giri | |
| Round 2 | 22.07.11 | 15:00 CET | Round 7 | 28.07.11 | 15:00 CET | |
| Le Quang Liem | ½-½ | Nakamura | Nakamura | - | Le Quang Liem | |
| Ponomariov | 1-0 | Giri | Giri | - | Ponomariov | |
| Meier | 0-1 | Kramnik | Kramnik | - | Meier | |
| Round 3 | 23.07.11 | 15:00 CET | Round 8 | 29.07.11 | 15:00 CET | |
| Kramnik | - | Le Quang Liem | Le Quang Liem | - | Kramnik | |
| Giri | - | Meier | Meier | - | Giri | |
| Nakamura | - | Ponomariov | Ponomariov | - | Nakamura | |
| Round 4 | 24.07.11 | 15:00 CET | Round 9 | 30.07.11 | 15:00 CET | |
| Giri | - | Le Quang Liem | Ponomariov | - | Le Quang Liem | |
| Nakamura | - | Kramnik | Nakamura | - | Meier | |
| Ponomariov | - | Meier | Giri | - | Kramnik | |
| Round 5 | 25.07.11 | 15:00 CET | Round 10 | 31.07.11 | 13:00 CET | |
| Le Quang Liem | - | Ponomariov | Le Quang Liem | - | Giri | |
| Meier | - | Nakamura | Kramnik | - | Nakamura | |
| Kramnik | - | Giri | Meier | - | Ponomariov |
Dortmund 2011 | Round 2 Standings
Photos © Georgios Souleidis
Links
Latest articles
-
29 min 50 sec ago
-
20 hours 43 min ago
-
21 hours 5 min ago
-
1 day 2 hours ago
-
1 day 16 hours ago
-
2 days 1 hour ago
-
2 days 3 hours ago
-
3 days 2 hours ago
-
3 days 4 hours ago
-
3 days 22 hours ago
-
4 days 15 hours ago
-
5 days 23 hours ago
-
5 days 23 hours ago
-
6 days 1 hour ago
-
6 days 20 hours ago
-
1 week 4 hours ago
-
1 week 18 hours ago
-
1 week 18 hours ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 2 days ago














Comments
Knallo
10 months 3 days ago
Permalink
Kramnik, who is utterly boring. Kramnik, who only wants a draw with Black. Kramnik, who is a weak tactician.
Yes. We saw that today, didn't we?
Lobster
10 months 3 days ago
Permalink
We'll never know if Kramnik thought Nc4 was a winning move. If he did, he made a tactical mistake, and while the game was very exciting, it was not very accurate. And I'm a Kramnik fan.
realitycheck
10 months 2 days ago
Permalink
Very accurate games lead to the inevitable Draw so many people complain about.
My, my, my. Chess fans are very hard to please. My heart goes out to the players.
Georg Meier, your mum's still be proud of you. Can still remember the rapid game we watched you play against Morozevich at the Mainz Chess Classic. You had him on the ropes, down on one knee...
Moro's gibe "I knew you were gonna blow it" after the game was uncalled for. But.
You've come a long way since then. Keep giving these giants hell, they're bound to fall. Keep up the good works.
Thomas
10 months 2 days ago
Permalink
The tournament homepage writes (quoting or paraphrasing Kramnik?): "The ex- world champion deliberately took big risks, because he really wanted to beat his nominally weaker opponent." Sounds like he was well aware of the fact, or at least had a gut feeling that his spectacular creative play could have backfired - which would have been reminiscent of his loss with black against Naiditsch last year (penultimate round, different tournament situation, different but also nominally weaker opponent).
Myself, I had to quit watching live around move 25, thinking that Kramnik might be in trouble - being puzzled and, as a Kramnik supporter, positively shocked when I saw the result and then the few remaining moves some hours later! Thumbs up for his fighting spirit, not so sure if THIS game showed that he's a genius, but it did show that he's a better practical player than Georg Meier.
andorsm
10 months 2 days ago
Permalink
It will be better for chess if Kramnik plays more creative chess, he is still very good tactic player, his positional evaluation is unbelievable, but he is too discreet. It is good in matches but sometimes boring in robins.
jussu
10 months 2 days ago
Permalink
"boring" is a matter of taste, and "always wants a draw with black" has a grain of truth, but "weak tactitian" is just plain wrong and has always been.
andorsm
10 months 3 days ago
Permalink
It was awfully exciting game by Kramnik. Slightly academic at the beginning, equal in the middle and shocking at the end. Nc4 is a move of the day. Everybody was stunned by it. It is really difficult to decide which game is better: by Kramnik or by Carlsen.
Harish Srinivasan
10 months 3 days ago
Permalink
If you take into account that Kramnik was under 10 min. when he played Nc4 it is all the more spectacular. Black 30th move is also difficult to see. black was down a piece and 3 pawns and yet to reject 30...Qxa7 (getting back atleast the piece with compensation) and instead play the accurate 30...d3 was great.
excalibur
10 months 3 days ago
Permalink
Na2 was stronger and Kramniks game was more exciting than Carlsens.
Harish Srinivasan
10 months 3 days ago
Permalink
Kramnik did play Na2 first and white wanted a draw and started repeating and that is when Kramnik took his chances and played the bold Nc4. So in a practical sense Na2 turned out not stronger since it lead to a draw.
andorsm
10 months 3 days ago
Permalink
It will be interesting to know if Kramnik really had draw in his pocket and managed to calculate that complications after Nc4 would be for his advantage or he decided to proceed winning attemp leading by intuition. For example his sacrifice with Ivanchuk in Tall memorial 2009 was intuitive and half-correct.
I have a feeling that Nc4 is also not the best move theoretically but taking into consideration acute lack of time his move was absolutly correct. Chess is as bussiness: more risk more money
Johnny
10 months 3 days ago
Permalink
Games like Meier vs Kramnik (Dortmund 2011) will threaten to do the unthinkable:
make me into a fan of KRAMNIK and root for Vlady at every chance i get!!
This one looked like more of a Nakamura swindle. The final tactic is relatively simple, but of course the path leading up to the final tactic is anything but simple!!
Go Kramnik. Teach these little whippersnappers to respect their elders. 40 is the new 20. Yeah buddy.
danny1
10 months 3 days ago
Permalink
kramnik is 36, not 40.
Thorn
10 months 2 days ago
Permalink
Which makes him 16! ;)
excalibur
10 months 3 days ago
Permalink
Obviously that's to take nothing away from the genius that is Volodoya.
Arne Moll
10 months 3 days ago
Permalink
Fantastic effort by Kramnik!
Stanley Peters
10 months 3 days ago
Permalink
Yes indeed! Agreed! Fab effort by Kramnik.
Arne Moll
10 months 2 days ago
Permalink
If Shirov or Tal had played Nc4 people would have called it genius play, but because we expect solid play from Kramnik, people focus on the correctness of the concept. I don't think that's fair. Moves and concepts don't have to be correct to be called genius.
Thomas
10 months 2 days ago
Permalink
Point taken - but usually (at least against opponents of roughly equal strength) Kramnik himself cares a lot, apparently more than most of his peers, about the objective "komputar" evaluation of the position. Would 'people' call Nc4 "genius play" if Meier had played the best moves, and won the game?
Arne Moll
10 months 2 days ago
Permalink
Well, perhaps not, but it takes two to create a masterpiece, doesn't it? ;-)
christos (greece)
10 months 2 days ago
Permalink
How could he have played the best moves all the way? He is not a computer program. And Kramnik knew who he was playing against.
Many of Shirov's, Tal's etc. sacrifices would be rejected if their opponent had a lot of time to analyze and find the best moves. But this kind of gamble is correct because they, as stronger players, are likely to win more often than they lose.
szoker
10 months 1 day ago
Permalink
Kramnik ! ;)
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions