Top

Eleven GMs finish shared 1st in Budva

17 March 2009, 22.00 CET | Last modified: 0:09 | By Peter Doggers  | Filed under: Reports | Tags:

Final standingsAt the European Championship in Budva, no less than 11 grandmaster have finished on shared first position with a 8/11 score. On Wednesday, tiebreaks will decide on the medals, and on who will qualify for the FIDE World Cup.

The 10th European Chess Championship, an 11-round Swiss, takes place in Budva, Montenegro from March 5th (day of arrival) until March 19th (day of departure) 2009. It’s organized by the Montenegro Chess Federation under the auspices of the City of Budva and the European Chess Union. The European Championship is a qualification event for the next World Cup. According to FIDE regulations and the decision of the ECU Board, 22 players will qualify. The first prize is ‚Ǩ 15,000, second is ‚Ǩ 12,000 and the third player earns ‚Ǩ 10,000.

Top boards

The top boards in the 11th round

European Championship 2009 | Final standings (top 100)

Rk. T Name FED Rtg Pts. TB1 TB2 TB3 rtg+/-
1 GM Sokolov Ivan NED 2657 8,0 63,0 76,5 5 14,7
2 GM Inarkiev Ernesto RUS 2656 8,0 62,5 76,0 6 17,0
3 GM Naiditsch Arkadij GER 2693 8,0 62,5 76,0 5 10,3
4 GM Tomashevsky Evgeny RUS 2664 8,0 62,0 75,5 5 8,0
5 GM Navara David CZE 2638 8,0 60,5 74,0 6 15,6
6 GM Malakhov Vladimir RUS 2692 8,0 60,5 73,5 5 8,0
7 GM Grachev Boris RUS 2655 8,0 60,0 73,0 6 10,3
8 GM Jobava Baadur GEO 2669 8,0 59,5 71,5 7 13,4
9 GM Kobalia Mikhail RUS 2634 8,0 59,0 72,0 5 16,2
10 GM Guseinov Gadir AZE 2661 8,0 57,5 70,0 5 7,7
11 GM Nyback Tomi FIN 2644 8,0 54,5 66,5 6 10,2
12 GM Meier Georg GER 2608 7,5 63,5 76,5 5 18,4
13 GM Nijboer Friso NED 2559 7,5 62,0 74,0 5 27,8
14 GM Fedorchuk Sergey A UKR 2633 7,5 61,5 75,5 6 12,4
15 GM Timofeev Artyom RUS 2671 7,5 61,5 74,0 4 6,4
16 GM Sjugirov Sanan RUS 2562 7,5 61,5 73,5 6 28,4
17 GM Bartel Mateusz POL 2594 7,5 60,5 73,5 4 20,3
18 GM Mamedov Rauf AZE 2638 7,5 59,5 72,5 4 11,6
19 GM Areshchenko Alexander UKR 2673 7,5 59,0 70,5 5 1,5
20 GM Stevic Hrvoje CRO 2592 7,5 59,0 70,5 5 16,4
21 GM Vitiugov Nikita RUS 2687 7,5 58,5 71,5 4 2,6
22 GM Dreev Alexey RUS 2688 7,5 58,0 71,0 4 1,8
23 GM Bologan Viktor MDA 2687 7,5 58,0 70,5 5 3,4
24 GM Kurnosov Igor RUS 2602 7,5 57,5 70,5 5 13,9
25 GM Lupulescu Constantin ROU 2608 7,5 57,5 69,0 4 4,5
26 GM Papaioannou Ioannis GRE 2609 7,5 56,5 69,0 5 15,0
27 GM Mikhalevski Victor ISR 2608 7,5 56,0 69,0 6 9,1
28 GM Motylev Alexander RUS 2676 7,5 56,0 68,5 5 -1,9
29 GM Pashikian Arman ARM 2621 7,5 55,0 67,0 5 5,2
30 GM Nisipeanu Liviu-Dieter ROU 2675 7,5 53,5 66,0 5 0,3
31 GM Petrosian Tigran L ARM 2623 7,5 52,5 63,5 6 3,9
32 GM Svetushkin Dmitry MDA 2593 7,5 51,5 62,5 5 0,6
33 GM Sakaev Konstantin RUS 2619 7,5 51,0 63,0 4 3,4
34 GM Savchenko Boris RUS 2654 7,5 50,0 61,0 7 -5,9
35 GM Cheparinov Ivan BUL 2679 7,0 62,5 76,0 5 -1,1
36 GM Hillarp Persson Tiger SWE 2586 7,0 61,0 74,0 4 12,9
37 GM Akopian Vladimir ARM 2700 7,0 59,0 72,0 4 -4,2
38 GM Fressinet Laurent FRA 2666 7,0 57,5 70,0 4 -1,9
39 GM Lopez Martinez Josep Manuel ESP 2540 7,0 56,5 68,5 5 16,2
40 GM Zhigalko Sergei BLR 2587 7,0 56,0 68,5 5 7,6
41 GM Postny Evgeny ISR 2652 7,0 55,5 66,5 5 -3,6
42 GM Georgiev Kiril BUL 2634 7,0 55,0 68,5 4 2,6
43 GM Perunovic Milos SRB 2568 7,0 54,5 66,5 5 6,5
44 GM Kotronias Vasilios GRE 2603 7,0 54,0 67,0 6 3,5
45 GM Azarov Sergei BLR 2599 7,0 54,0 66,5 4 10,6
46 GM Ivanisevic Ivan SRB 2628 7,0 54,0 66,0 5 -3,4
47 GM Khalifman Alexander RUS 2622 7,0 53,0 64,5 3 -0,6
48 GM Lysyj Igor RUS 2620 7,0 52,0 64,5 5 0,6
49 GM Beliavsky Alexander G SLO 2646 7,0 51,0 62,0 4 -7,3
50 GM Volokitin Andrei UKR 2671 6,5 63,0 76,0 5 -4,7
51 FM Rasulov Vugar AZE 2391 6,5 60,5 74,0 4 59,0
52 GM Banikas Hristos GRE 2582 6,5 60,5 74,0 3 12,7
53 GM Bocharov Dmitry RUS 2647 6,5 60,5 73,5 4 -1,7
54 GM Kovacevic Aleksandar SRB 2543 6,5 60,0 72,0 4 13,2
55 GM Andriasian Zaven ARM 2564 6,5 60,0 72,0 3 12,4
56 GM Shomoev Anton RUS 2567 6,5 59,5 72,5 4 12,0
57 GM Popov Valerij RUS 2561 6,5 59,5 71,5 5 8,9
58 GM Van Wely Loek NED 2625 6,5 57,5 70,5 5 -4,9
59 GM Savic Miodrag R SRB 2525 6,5 57,5 70,0 5 13,5
60 GM Popov Ivan RUS 2541 6,5 57,5 70,0 4 8,8
61 GM Predojevic Borki BIH 2650 6,5 57,0 69,5 3 -4,1
62 GM Rodshtein Maxim ISR 2650 6,5 57,0 69,0 4 -7,3
63 GM Tiviakov Sergei NED 2685 6,5 56,5 69,5 4 -7,6
64 GM Wojtaszek Radoslaw POL 2608 6,5 56,5 67,5 4 1,5
65 GM Riazantsev Alexander RUS 2634 6,5 56,0 69,0 3 -3,1
66 GM Gagunashvili Merab GEO 2585 6,5 56,0 68,0 5 -2,5
67 GM Safarli Eltaj AZE 2564 6,5 56,0 67,5 4 7,3
68 GM Khairullin Ildar RUS 2574 6,5 56,0 67,0 2 6,2
69 GM Iordachescu Viorel MDA 2584 6,5 55,5 68,0 3 2,0
70 GM Lenic Luka SLO 2547 6,5 55,5 66,5 5 8,9
71 IM Nyzhnyk Illya UKR 2503 6,5 55,5 66,5 5 13,5
72 GM Maze Sebastien FRA 2578 6,5 55,0 67,5 4 0,6
73 GM Jovanovic Zoran CRO 2558 6,5 55,0 67,5 3 -0,5
74 GM Ragger Markus AUT 2540 6,5 55,0 67,0 4 12,1
75 GM Erdos Viktor HUN 2583 6,5 55,0 66,5 4 -1,6
76 GM Maletin Pavel RUS 2557 6,5 54,0 67,0 5 1,9
77 GM Aleksandrov Aleksej BLR 2636 6,5 54,0 65,5 6 -8,0
78 GM Milanovic Danilo SRB 2552 6,5 54,0 65,5 5 7,8
79 GM Huzman Alexander ISR 2602 6,5 53,5 66,5 5 -3,2
80 GM Nikolic Predrag BIH 2623 6,5 53,5 66,5 4 -4,6
81 GM Berkes Ferenc HUN 2651 6,5 52,5 65,0 2 -5,4
82 GM Vallejo Pons Francisco ESP 2702 6,5 52,5 64,5 5 -15,8
83 GM Evdokimov Alexander A RUS 2545 6,5 52,5 64,0 5 0,7
84 GM Belov Vladimir RUS 2627 6,5 52,5 63,5 3 -7,7
85 GM Vuckovic Bojan SRB 2576 6,5 52,0 64,5 5 0,7
86 GM Timman Jan H NED 2582 6,5 52,0 64,0 5 -2,7
87 GM L'Ami Erwin NED 2603 6,5 51,5 63,5 5 -3,3
88 GM Ruck Robert HUN 2558 6,5 51,5 63,5 5 4,1
89 GM Nepomniachtchi Ian RUS 2628 6,5 51,5 63,0 5 -9,9
90 GM Minasian Artashes ARM 2557 6,5 51,5 63,0 5 -0,9
91 GM Khenkin Igor GER 2644 6,5 51,0 63,0 4 -11,9
92 GM Potkin Vladimir RUS 2613 6,5 50,5 61,0 4 -8,2
93 GM Pikula Dejan SRB 2570 6,5 50,5 60,5 5 -2,1
94 IM Szabo Gergely-Andras-Gyula ROU 2506 6,5 50,5 60,5 4 7,2
95 GM Berg Emanuel SWE 2606 6,5 49,5 61,5 5 -8,1
96 IM Vavrak Peter SVK 2489 6,5 49,5 60,5 5 -1,7
97 GM Romanov Evgeny RUS 2576 6,0 61,5 73,0 4 7,4
98 GM Brkic Ante CRO 2550 6,0 60,5 73,0 5 3,9
99 GM Iljushin Alexei RUS 2564 6,0 60,0 72,0 3 5,2
100 GM Mastrovasilis Athanasios GRE 2485 6,0 60,0 69,0 4 18,0


Full standings here.

This is what the regulations say:

Tie-break Matches
In the European Individual Chess Championship and European Individual Women’s Chess Championship tie-breaks are organized only in the following cases:
a) to establish the Champion;
b) to establish the medal winners;
c) to establish qualifiers, for the World Chess Championship.
In the case of a) and b) the relevant tie-break matches will decide the final ranking and the money prizes connected with these places.
In the case of c), the relevant tie-break matches will not influence the final ranking and the money prizes will be shared equally.
System of the Tie-break matches:
Additional matches of two games will be played with 15 minutes on the clock and addition of 10 seconds before each move.
If this match is drawn again, then two games will be played with five minutes plus two seconds per move.
If this match is again drawn, then the sudden-death game will be played with white having 5 minutes on the clock and black having 4 minutes, without any addition. White has to win the sudden-death game in order to win the match.
In case that more than three tie-break rounds have to be played, the Chief-Arbiter – after confirmation by the ECU President or his representative – may change the playing schedule in such a way that the tie-break matches can be finished within one day.
Detailed Tournament Regulations for the tie-break matches and the time schedule will be announced on Friday, 17 March at 22.30 at the Technical Meeting for tie breaks.

Tomorrow the tiebreaks are scheduled at 10:00 CET.

Links:


ShareThis Print Print

Comments

8 Responses to “Eleven GMs finish shared 1st in Budva”

  1. sjoerd on March 18th, 2009 02:58

    Interesting rankings. Early leader Volokitin didn’t do well after his los against Jobava.Kornusov almost made shared first, and if Grachev would have won his winning endgame against Navarra he might have been clear first.

  2. sjoerd on March 18th, 2009 03:05

    I don’t know this Grachev fellow. He is Russian I presume? How long has he been playing chess?

  3. Michel on March 18th, 2009 08:26

    My compliments for Nijboer. Except the first round he only met 2600+ players and scored 7.5 point. Compare this with an other Dutch player, Van Wely, who met no 2600+ player!

  4. SOD on March 18th, 2009 10:20

    van Wely can play better or worse at times, but in general he´s too mediocre to be considered a top GM

  5. Castro on March 20th, 2009 00:49

    Questions:
    1. The rules state that they could alter the schedule of the tie-breaks, in order to have them all in one day. But they did much more than that, they changed the tie-break system, didn’t they?
    2. Why have the 12th-18th players been exempted of the tie-breaks? That could not have been because of lack of time, as the tie-breaks for WCC only started in the afternoon… (And even if it was because of time, it’d look unfair, because they had 7,5 points, as the others — 19th to 34th — and the rules seem to impose tie-break games for all with the same points).
    3. Was it to classify 22 players to the WCC, as writen everywhere, or 22+3 medal winners=25, as it looks like?
    4. In the FIDE site we have that there will be 46 players from Europe. Here are 22 (or 25?), but how exactly does one classify the reminders?
    Can anyone here enlight this unfair-looking or not understandable issues?
    Thanks.

  6. Thomas on March 20th, 2009 10:22

    Castro, I can at least answer your fourth question: As posted by danyplayer on Dailydirt, the previous European championship (2008 in Plovdiv, Bulgaria) also was a World Cup qualifier. That’s why two players tied at 7.5 points (Bologan and Papaioannou) and already qualified from 2008 didn’t join (delined to play?) the rapid tiebreaks. And last year’s champion Tiviakov is and remains qualified despite the fact that he was only 63rd (with 6.5 points) at this occasion.
    I think some World Cup spots are also given away based on ELO rating, don’t know the exact rules, minimum required rating, … .
    You have a point with question #2, indeed it seems to be at odds with the written rules. Yet IMO there is some justice in directly seeding players with better (tournament) tiebreaks. Georg Meier was permanently on the top boards until his 9th round loss against Sokolov; he was the only one of the entire 7.5 point bunch playing four of the eventual top 10. Wait, maybe I am biased being German … next examples: Nijboer and Sjugirov faced ten players rated 2600 or higher. Not sure how this happened – apparently due to their relatively low ratings (2559 and 2562) they consistently got tougher drawings than Meier (rated 2608).

    I agree though that it would have been preferable to specify such a rule in the written regulations before the tournament. While it is impossible to anticipate ALL possible situations, the one which actually occurred can hardly be called unexpected.

  7. Api on March 20th, 2009 13:18

    Plovdiv 2008 explains also why there were seemingly 25 qualifiers instead of 23. Nyb?§ck and Grachev had alredy qualified, and were not counted here.

  8. Thomas on March 20th, 2009 14:37

    Maybe there could – instead – be a bonus for those players who qualified twice … automatic seeding into the second round of the World Cup (virtually playing against yourself in the first round)?
    I am only half kidding, and maybe it is not all that ridiculous. Jumping over the hurdle twice is an achievement, just look at the result of last year’s champion Tiviakov in Budva … .

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!





Bottom