Gelfand-Anand G11, another Nimzo-Indian, drawn after 24 moves (VIDEO)

The 11th match game between Boris Gelfand and Vishy Anand was another Nimzo-Indian and ended in a draw after 24 moves The score in Moscow is 5.5-5.5 with just one more game to play, in which the World Champion has white. This game will be played on Monday. If the final score is 6-6, a rapid/blitz tiebreak will be played on Wednesday.
Another draw in the Tretyakov today | Photos by Anastasia Karlovich
|
Anand & Gelfand walking to their board for game 11
The score in Moscow is still even after the penultimate classical game, and so a win on Monday by either player will immediately decide the match in his favour. Although it's surely going to be a tense affair, it's likely that we'll see something we've seen many times before: two very cautious players who won't be fighting a very long game, but agree to a draw as soon as the position is more or less equal.
Two years ago the score was also equal in Sofia with one game to go. Veselin Topalov didn't feel he'd have much of a chance in the tiebreak, and went all or nothing. We don't expect Gelfand to do the same...
Today's game was mostly interesting because of the situation on the clock. In the second 4.e3 Nimzo-Indian of the match, Anand finally manage to outprepare his opponent by playing the off-beat 8...Bd7. Gelfand took a long think: for 38 minutes he was checking the possibilities and trying to remember theory.

Anand has just played 8...Bd7; Gelfand going for a deep think
He did go for the most ambitious continuation, and so there were hopes of actually having a good game today. White was definitely keeping an edge, but the question was how serious Gelfand's timetrouble would get. Perhaps because of the clock situation (Anand had played quickly and had all the time in the world) Gelfand chose a very safe move 17 with which he exchanged queens.
Here Gelfand needed two moves (a4-a5 and f2-f3) to get the ideal position (and a serious advantage), but he could only play one at a time and with a tactical sequence Anand (starting with 20...Ne4!) could liberate himself and there was nothing left to play for.
Today's video includes a brief interview with the famous trainer Mark Dvoretsky.
Two years ago Anand retained his title by defeating Topalov with Black in the final game. This time he has the luxury of playing that last game with the white pieces. He's likely to continue with the safety first approach, but if there is a chance, he'll surely try for more. Everything depends on whether he'll manage to surprise his opponent in the opening. Gelfand has to do just one thing: play like he did in ten of the eleven games, and try not to think about that one blunder...
Sunday is another rest day and so on Monday we'll know more. In case of a draw, Tuesday is also a rest day and the tiebreak will start on Wednesday at 12:00 local time (10:00 CET).
We'd like to mention one more time the excellent blog Mate in Moscow where you'll find great background stories and photos!
Match score
Latest articles
-
7 hours 7 min ago
-
1 day 2 hours ago
-
1 day 6 hours ago
-
2 days 1 hour ago
-
3 days 4 hours ago
-
3 days 4 hours ago
-
3 days 16 hours ago
-
4 days 2 hours ago
-
4 days 8 hours ago
-
4 days 13 hours ago
-
5 days 4 hours ago
-
5 days 10 hours ago
-
6 days 2 hours ago
-
6 days 11 hours ago
-
6 days 11 hours ago
-
1 week 4 min ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 2 days ago











Comments
Anonymous
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Of course, with your sixty move rule, the player that brings about a repetition of the position loses.
Rodzjer
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Funny rules, but there's a gap. In this way people will see deadly boring 60+ move draws if one player benefits from that. Instead of deadly boring 20-25 move draws. From the two, I'd still prefer the latter.
I say: re-instate the old formula of first to 6 points wins the match and draws don't count. We'll see contestants battling for full points and we'll get at least 6 decisive results before the match is over.
bhabatosh
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Only then we will see Age is a factor in chess or not , it wont be as easy like this . I do hope younger players will be benefited from this and we will have more fun watching this . Anand may opt not to play many games in each year and happily keeping his Word Title , fair he can do that but only after putting the world title under intense battle.
Bronkenstein
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Another good white effort by Gandalf , hoping for anything more in Vishy´s prepared line would be childish - same as expecting Anand to play on in the final position.
Looks like we are up for some exciting TBs.
What's Next?
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Chess on highest level is - draw. Gambling is losing or winning.
Mike
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Chess at high level is like checkers at high level (computer exhausted)? For me Chess at high level means the superiority of a human mind against another, it means for example Capablanca...whose adversaries did not understand why they loose without making any wrong move...
Anonymous
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
But the problem is the match rules allow the players to take a draw when they are afraid they might lose....hence the short draws. A sport interested in sponsorship would never tolerate such a state of affairs.
Anonymous
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Chess at highest level = Computer Chess
Any home computer, set to not accept draws under any circumstances, would totally smash especially these two guys.
Anonymous
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Running at highest level = horses
What's Next?
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Chess at highest level = winning - is a fairy tail.
Mike
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
If all that matters is just to win a game...Just play dice...You don't need Chess...
bhabatosh
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Chess at highest level means = intense fight , not draws in 15-20 moves .....you can not play few moves and draw the game and go home taking 1 M $ . there must be blood everyday even it is draw . many sports does have draws in highest level , but they dont have luxury of finishing the game as and when they want to ....
Thomas
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
But most other sports have the "luxury" of knowing in advance when the game is over - whereas chess is open-ended and offering plus accepting a draw is one possibility to finish the game. Unlike Anonymous' suggestion above, the draws in Moscow didn't happen because one or both players were afraid of losing, but because neither player saw realistic winning chances against a strong opponent, and both considered it pointless to keep pushing wood just to reach move 40 (or 60 or 80 or whatever).
BTW according to one author (Ulrich Stock reporting for the German newspaper "Die Zeit") today's game had lots of drama:
http://www.zeit.de/sport/2012-05/schach-wm-remis
Three pages are too much to translate from German, maybe Google translate can help those who can't read the original.
Anonymous
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Exactly correct.
dev anand
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
unfortunately as a vishy anand fan I am forced to admit - the king is dead. He is too toothless to pose a threat to the modern generation. I dont think he will survive a match with the US Chess Champion - forget Aronian, Kramnik or Carlsen. I expect him to lose to Gelfand tomorrow - his play is not active enough to win. He should have refreshed his team - done something to change things around - unfortunately too late now.
FvT
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Personally, this match is as exciting as Kramnik - Leko...who cares about quality if there is no fight?
What's Next?
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Anand losing game 12? Not a chance. He showed in game 11 that a surprise move gives a big time advantage. And game 13 is a rapid game...How about big time advantage then... Congratulations to the WC title Anand.
NN
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
This match is 10/10 interesting to any serious chess player. Those who don't find it interesting should simply train harder and become stronger in chess, so that perhaps some day they will be able to follow World Championship matches.
Sligunner
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
---deleted---
http://www.chessvibes.com/terms
Chris
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
match is interesting??
don.t you see "king is naked"
as kid had told in a fairy tale ?
Rodzjer
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Sure NN, you are so brilliant that you are the only one that sees the 10/10 interest to "serious" chess players...
Offer half of your ego to the Red Cross and world hunger is solved.
Anonymous
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Gary Kasparov's comments re the future of chess were extremely important (and heartening)...His support for the Sofia rule and changing the starting position of the chess pieces in the future in top level chess tournaments and world championship matches tells us chess will adapt to the advances being made by computers with the traditional starting piece positions. Future generations will not find our game "played out" but with continued richness and new beauty.
Anonymous
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
I think S-Chess may be a better way to go: http://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess960-chess-variants/s-chess-program
Rodzjer
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
+1 +1 +1
redivivo
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Maybe a couple of Lasker's 8-0 title matches could be seen as boring in the way that they weren't much of matches, but at least Lasker showed why he was such a great player in them. Nowadays high quality is much too often equalled with drawing in the opening and avoiding creativity and complications. The less that happen in a game the stronger the players are said to be by the chess masochists, but that won't change the fact that no one will remember this title match next week.
Zarathoustra
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Anand 6th at the live rating list. After this event,if he wins, he will have to focus again on the legitimacy of his crown, by winning some events. Or he just decides to drop chess, because it doesn't make sense anymore.
redivivo
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Anand's play has been so insipid the last years that it's hard to imagine that he will continue playing much longer, it's obvious that he doesn't enjoy it anymore. He was an awesome player once but he has disappointed not only here, also in his previous events last year in London, Tal Memorial and Bilbao has he failed to produce a plus score.
Whatever happens in the tiebreak the same people will keep repeating the same old same old in the future about players saving preparation and being much stronger than their actual results, but they won't believe it themselves any more than they do now. Anand may be 6th on the live rating at the moment, but it's been a while since he played like a top ten player.
Thomas
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Anand certainly played like a top ten player (or better) in Wijk aan Zee 2011 - which is now 1 1/2 years ago. He finished in second place only due to Nakamura's outlier performance. Before, he was consecutively second in Bilbao, Nanjing and London. His total score against Carlsen in these events: +2=4.
So "the last years" is wrong, and "last year" actually just means second half of 2011. Whether that's enough to draw substantial conclusions, I doubt it ... .
redivivo
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Well, last one and a half year after being second behind Naka in January 2011 then, but that time has been bad enough for a player of his general level. Most people rank Anand as one of the ten greatest players ever, and he is the current World Champion. He should be able to play chess on an entirely different level than he has been doing in Bilbao, Moscow, London and Moscow again if his heart is in it.
Chris
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
in that match Anand is playying vs computer preparation not vs Gelfand.
Matt
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Can't remember watching such a bad match.....
Sligunner
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
I agree. Crap from two average GMs. Nine bore draws with only one game (the Anand fortress) of any fighting spirit and real interest, and two wins that were really losses – second-rate play from the supposed creme de la creme. If only both could lose this game... whatever happens, this match should be a watershed. If it isn't, no one will want to sponsor the world championship ever again.
Anonymous
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Lol! why do you keep watching then?
RainPiper
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
For all those who complain of being bored by the match: Make an appointment with some other chess players, switch off the engines, follow the match live and give it a serious think what *you* would have played in place of the WC contenders.
Let me assure you: It's fun! We did it yesterday at our chess club. It was a great event and we enjoyed the afternoon tremendously.
Lee
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
This is also why the non-engine assisted commentary is so awesome. I don't have any of the engine enabled sites running while watching the live telecast, as it takes alot of the mystery out of the positions.
dev anand
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
world bore championships - starring bore-anand and bore-is drawfand.
John
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
This match has so little fight... :-(
Deep Mikey
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Cool pic on the "Mate in Moscow"-site with Peter and HWS! :D http://mateinmoscow.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/27-may-rest-day-moscow-is-m...
Manu
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Fortunately , this is about to change , next match rules will be different , is there is a next match since this already proves what Carlsen and me (ehemm) already knew : we need World championship tournaments like San Luis , not this boring duels which couldn be more ignored by the almost the whole world .
I hope Gelfand wins tomorrow , just to see lots of people annoyed by the fact that the Champ is not even a top ten player.
Cyric Renner
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
This is why the draw offer has to be removed from chess. Sofia rules have to be in effect for the next World Championship.
TM
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
It's actually simple: Just abolish the (unnatural) castling rule. Games will naturally be much sharper and the entire opening theory will be erased at once.
Martin
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Sorry, but that sounds just random. If you really want to change something, i would go for Chess 960 (Fischer-random). Theory is gone forever, and it would be a fight from move 1.
Soviet School
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Anand should go for f3 anti grunfeld today.
Gelfandbreally used to like 6 c5 in samisch variation so may go for it again I.e. 3 c5
Anonymous
11 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
utter gutlessness
Pages
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions