Karjakin wins ACP World Rapid Cup
Dmitry Jakovenko and Sergey Karjakin today play the final of the ACP World Rapid Cup in Odessa, Ukraine. Friday Karjakin eliminated Shirov and Grischuk, while Jakovenko was too strong for Eljanov and Gurevich. Update: After four draws in the rapids, and two in the blitz, Karjakin won the Armageddon game.
The 4th ACP World Rapid Cup takes place May 27-29 in Odessa, Ukraine. The venue is the Odessa National Academy of Law. It's a 16-player knockout tournament with 16 participants with two-game matches, except for the final which has four games. Again sponsored by the Pivdenny Bank in Odessa, the prize fund is USD $70,000 (13,000 more than last year) with USD $14,000 for the winner.
The rate of play is 20 minutes per game with an increment of 5 seconds per move. If the initial match is drawn 1-1 there are two blitz games with a time control of 3 minutes with an increment of 2 seconds per move starting from move 1. If this tie-break ends in a draw (1-1) a final decisive Armageddon blitz game with White starting with 5 minutes and Black wth draw odds only 4 minutes.
Day 2
Grischuk and Movsesian started their match with an interesting battle in a Chebanenko Slav, full of positional sacrifices. With a queen and passed pawn against rook, bishop and three pawns, Grischuk decided the game by playing for mate. In his White game, Movsesian couldn't get through Grischuk's Petroff and "had to resign to a draw", a phrase we used experimentally before here.
Gurevich, who knocked out Ivanchuk on the first day, continued strongly. He beat Gashimov with the black pieces after the big blunder 40.Ra7??

(and not even with the move 40...Ne3+). Then, as if he were to say "this opening of yours wasn't correct when I was a top 10 player", Gurevich happily allowed Gashimov's Benoni, but the Azeri GM tried it in a different flavour, with ...Bd6. Soon more normal Benoni structures arose, and indeed Gurevich played it strongly, with a well-timed e4-e5-e6, and after many complications he ended up with an extra pawn, and then offered a draw.
Jakovenko held Eljanov to a draw with Black in a closed QGD (5.Bf4, 7.c5) and in the second game, a Caro-Kann Advance, it went wrong for the Ukrainian already in the opening. After 12.h4! Eljanov couldn't solve the problem of how to safe the bishop on g6.

The longest quarter-final was Karjakin vs Shirov. The first rapid game went to Shirov, who played a lovely Berlin Wall endgame with White. Then Karjakin used the Exchange Ruy Lopez (suddenly very popular again at top level) to level the score in the 5...Bg4 main line.
In the first blitz game, a 12.d5 Zaitsev, again it was Shirov who won a smooth game with White. For the second time Karjakin was in a must-win situation, and the two repeated their Exchange Ruy Lopez. Shirov deviated, but this time he lost even quicker. In the Armageddon game Karjakin had Black, improved upon his Zaitsev and cashed in when Shirov allowed his kingside getting weakened.
Also against Grischuk, in the semi-finals, Karjakin had to make up for a loss in game 1. This time he lost with White - Grischuk played another strong Najdorf - and so he had to win with Black. He did so, amazingly, in an Exchange Slav, from what looked like a horrible position after 20 moves.

20...Rxf4! was the only way to stay in the game. From the moment Karjakin got a passed pawn, Grischuk started to make more and more mistakes.
In the first blitz game, a Sicilian with gxf6, Karjakin's clear plan of attacking e6 was very instructive, as the pawn eventually dropped. In the next game Grischuk then seemed to be on his way to reaching the Armageddon, winning the bishop pair, pushing a pawn to c7 and ending up with an extra piece, but with 4 against 3 on the kingside he couldn't convert it into a full point. (Couldn't Karjakin start that simple plan he showed at the end, putting the king on h8 and the bishop on the long diagonal, already immediately after the queen's were exchanged, we wonder.)
So today the final is between compatriots Jakovenko and Karjakin. They play four rapid games, instead of two, and it's already at 12:00 local time (11:00 CET, so in half an hour from now at the moment of writing).
All four rapid games and the two blitz games ended in a draw today, and then Karjakin won the Armageddon game to take the cup. He was a pawn up in an ending but the technical task wasn't easy, until Jakovenko got tricked and lost a piece. Games of the final have been addded to the game viewer.Update: day 3 (final)
Results:
| 1/8 | 1/4 | 1/2 | Final | Winner | ||||
| Grischuk, Alexander | ![]() |
|||||||
| 2 : 0 | Grischuk, Alexander | ![]() |
||||||
| Motylev, Alexander | ||||||||
| 1.5 : 0.5 | Grischuk, Alexander | ![]() |
||||||
| Movsesian, Sergei | ![]() |
|||||||
| 1.5 : 0.5 | Movsesian, Sergei | |||||||
| Naiditsch, Arkadij | ||||||||
| 1.5 : 2.5 | Karjakin, Sergey | |||||||
| Shirov, Alexei | ![]() |
|||||||
| 3 : 2 | Shirov, Alexei | ![]() |
||||||
| Bacrot, Etienne | ||||||||
| 2 : 3 | Karjakin, Sergey | |||||||
| Karjakin, Sergey | ![]() |
|||||||
| 3 : 1 | Karjakin, Sergey | |||||||
| Drozdovskij, Yuri | ||||||||
| 4 : 3 | Karjakin, Sergey | |||||||
| Eljanov, Pavel | ![]() |
|||||||
| 1.5 : 0.5 | Eljanov, Pavel | ![]() |
||||||
| Moiseenko, Alexander | ||||||||
| 0.5 : 1.5 | Jakovenko, Dmitry | ![]() |
||||||
| Jakovenko, Dmitry | ![]() |
|||||||
| 2 : 0 | Jakovenko, Dmitry | |||||||
| Inarkiev, Ernesto | ||||||||
| 1.5 : 0.5 | Jakovenko, Dmitry | |||||||
| Ivanchuk, Vassily | ![]() |
|||||||
| 0.5 : 1.5 | Gurevich, Mikhail | ![]() |
||||||
| Gurevich, Mikhail | ||||||||
| 1.5 : 0.5 | Gurevich, Mikhail | |||||||
| Gashimov, Vugar | ![]() |
|||||||
| 3 : 2 | Gashimov, Vugar | |||||||
| Tregubov, Pavel V. | ||||||||
Game viewer
Game viewer by ChessTempo

Sergey Karjakin: verrrry tough to beat

Dmitry Jakovenko, also in the final

Vassily Ivanchuk, eliminated in round 1, grabbing the mic in the commentary room

What is this, the Primera Division, or Formula 1? :-)
Photos © Boris Buchman, more here
Links
Latest articles
-
7 min 17 sec ago
-
7 hours 52 min ago
-
1 day 4 hours ago
-
1 day 11 hours ago
-
2 days 4 hours ago
-
2 days 9 hours ago
-
2 days 9 hours ago
-
2 days 13 hours ago
-
2 days 23 hours ago
-
2 days 23 hours ago
-
4 days 1 hour ago
-
4 days 11 hours ago
-
5 days 3 hours ago
-
5 days 10 hours ago
-
6 days 3 hours ago
-
6 days 5 hours ago
-
6 days 10 hours ago
-
6 days 10 hours ago
-
1 week 1 hour ago
-
1 week 11 hours ago












Comments
JM
3 years 3 weeks ago
Permalink
To answer the question posed in the report: I do not think Karjakin (in his final game against Grischuk) could have used his defensive idea (Kh8, bishop on long diagonal) before the white h-pawn was off the board. Otherwise white goes h6 and Bg7 at some point to 'promote' his h-pawn into a g-pawn.
Peter Doggers
3 years 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Right. King on g6, pawn on h6, and then bishop on f8. Guess that wins, yes. :-)
aun1
3 years 3 weeks ago
Permalink
the english attack is not "busted", in fact it is still quite strong. the problem is that players on the black side of it prefer not to allow white to play it, so they opt for the anti-english with 5...ng4
Sumit Balan
3 years 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Is the English attack busted at the highest level ?? I saw both Karjakin and Motylev lost to Grischuk in this event ! And most of the 1.e4 English attack players has now shifted to 1.d4, like Anand, Svidler,Topalov,Morozevich etc and the ultra sharp playees like Shirov and others now plays 6.Bg5 against Najdorf.Gischuk himself, an English attack 1.e4 player now plays mostly 1.d4 ?!.. As a die hard English attack fan i am sad at this very bad situation for the English attack.
noyb
3 years 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Looks like Vasya has gone hip-hop on us! lol
Mike
3 years 3 weeks ago
Permalink
I hate this game viewer.
jakkaavo
3 years 3 weeks ago
Permalink
In the last game Grischuk - Karjakin where they drew, why didn't Grischuk play 47. Qh8+ Kxh8 48. c8=Q+ Kg7 49. Qxc6 winning
Peter Doggers
3 years 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Why is that winning? Because you end up with an extra bishop? Like... in the game?
Jesper Norgaard
3 years 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Who was getting black in the final Armageddon (or rather, why)? When Jakovenko resigned, how was the time left? I presume the Armageddon game did not have any increment.
Sumit Balan
3 years 3 weeks ago
Permalink
@ aun1 > Just look at the game Karjakin-Grishchuk and Motylev-Grishcuk, it is just the pure 6.f3 English attack with 10.a5 variation,which is played by the likes of Cheparinov and Bu Xenjianxie .Karjakin lost in this varition twice, once here and an earlier game, also with Grishcuk in Russian club cup if i remember correctly.
Emily
3 years 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Who was getting black in the final Armageddon (or rather, why)? When Jakovenko resigned, how was the time left? I presume the Armageddon game did not have any increment.
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions