London GP R9: Mamedyarov takes the lead from Gelfand

Shakhriyar Mamedyarov is the new leader at the FIDE Grand Prix in London. On Monday the Azerbaijani beat Leinier Dominguez while the leader of the tournament, Boris Gelfand, went down for the first time, against Alexander Grischuk. Hikaru Nakamura lost his fourth game in a row, to Mickey Adams, and Veselin Topalov defeated Vassily Ivanchuk.
Mamedyarov leads in London with two rounds to go | Photo © Ray Morris-Hill
|
In a spectacular round with four decisive games, the standings were shaken up considerably. Gelfand snatched a poisoned pawn and lost his first game of the tournament to Grischuk, which gave Mamedyarov the chance to take over the lead by defeating Dominguez. At the other end of the leaderboard Nakamura's form crisis continued – the American lost against Adams. In the last two rounds Mamedyarov will defend his half point lead against Wang Hao and Leko.
Grischuk won in 19th century style, and after the game he said: "I was not 100% sure that the sacrifice would win, but I saw that I had at least perpetual." GM Robert Fontaine added: "Such a move just has to be played."
After the game Gelfand did analyze with Grischuk. The conclusion was that taking on d2 was already the decisive mistake. If Gelfand had castled there "Black's chances to draw are bigger than White's chances to win" (Grischuk).
Videos by Macauley Peterson
Mamedyarov nicely outplayed Dominguez in a Bogo-Indian with an early g2-g4-g5 push. The new leader wasn't sure about this plan, and thought that it was about equal until the inaccurate d6-d5 push. The players quickly reached an ending, and White used his bishop pair with maximum effect.
Nakamura played the Caro-Kann against Adams and blitzed out his opening moves. He then probably miscalculated something, because his rook got sort of stuck on a4 without doing much, and White obtained total control over the d-file.
Gelfand and Grischuk are now half a point behind Mamedyarov, but so is Topalov. On Monday the Bulgarian managed to win a slightly better ending against Ivanchuk.
Wang Hao and Leko had theoretical fight, even though the Chinese played this Nimzo line for the first time and Leko did not expect it. The Hungarian had bad memories, losing two crucial games with Black in it. This time he played accurate enough.
Giri vs Kasimdzhanov seemed to be heading for a draw quickly as soon as Black managed to get ...Ne4 and ...f5 in. However, Giri found a way to continue, and at some point Black allowed some sort of breakthrough. In an position with only heavy pieces, both kings were under attack by the opponent queen, so a perpetual was always in the air. It's not clear whether White could win somewhere.
Schedule & pairings
| Round 1 | 15:00 CET | 21.09.12 | Round 2 | 15:00 CET | 22.09.12 | |
| Kasimdzhanov | ½-½ | Leko | Leko | 1-0 | Ivanchuk | |
| Nakamura | 0-1 | Gelfand | Adams | ½-½ | Mamedyarov | |
| Topalov | ½-½ | Grischuk | Giri | ½-½ | Wang Hao | |
| Dominguez | ½-½ | Giri | Grischuk | ½-½ | Dominguez | |
| Wang Hao | ½-½ | Adams | Gelfand | ½-½ | Topalov | |
| Mamedyarov | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | Kasimdzhanov | 0-1 | Nakamura | |
| Round 3 | 15:00 CET | 23.09.12 | Round 4 | 15:00 CET | 24.09.12 | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Leko | Leko | ½-½ | Adams | |
| Topalov | ½-½ | Kasimdzhanov | Giri | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | |
| Dominguez | ½-½ | Gelfand | Grischuk | 1-0 | Mamedyarov | |
| Wang Hao | ½-½ | Grischuk | Gelfand | 1-0 | Wang Hao | |
| Mamedyarov | 1-0 | Giri | Kasimdzhanov | ½-½ | Dominguez | |
| Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Adams | Nakamura | ½-½ | Topalov | |
| Round 5 | 15:00 CET | 25.09.12 | Round 6 | 15:00 CET | 27.09.12 | |
| Topalov | ½-½ | Leko | Leko | ½-½ | Giri | |
| Dominguez | ½-½ | Nakamura | Grischuk | ½-½ | Adams | |
| Wang Hao | ½-½ | Kasimdzhanov | Gelfand | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | |
| Mamedyarov | ½-½ | Gelfand | Kasimdzhanov | 0-1 | Mamedyarov | |
| Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Grischuk | Nakamura | 0-1 | Wang Hao | |
| Adams | ½-½ | Giri | Topalov | 1-0 | Dominguez | |
| Round 7 | 15:00 CET | 28.09.12 | Round 8 | 15:00 CET | 29.09.12 | |
| Dominguez | ½-½ | Leko | Leko | ½-½ | Grischuk | |
| Wang Hao | ½-½ | Topalov | Gelfand | ½-½ | Giri | |
| Mamedyarov | 1-0 | Nakamura | Kasimdzhanov | 1-0 | Adams | |
| Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Kasimdzhanov | Nakamura | 0-1 | Ivanchuk | |
| Adams | 0-1 | Gelfand | Topalov | ½-½ | Mamedyarov | |
| Giri | ½-½ | Grischuk | Dominguez | ½-½ | Wang Hao | |
| Round 9 | 15:00 CET | 01.10.12 | Round 10 | 15:00 CET | 02.10.12 | |
| Wang Hao | ½-½ | Leko | Leko | - | Gelfand | |
| Mamedyarov | 1-0 | Dominguez | Kasimdzhanov | - | Grischuk | |
| Ivanchuk | 0-1 | Topalov | Nakamura | - | Giri | |
| Adams | 1-0 | Nakamura | Topalov | - | Adams | |
| Giri | ½-½ | Kasimdzhanov | Dominguez | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Grischuk | 1-0 | Gelfand | Wang Hao | - | Mamedyarov | |
| Round 11 | 12:00 CET | 03.10.12 | ||||
| Mamedyarov | - | Leko | ||||
| Ivanchuk | - | Wang Hao | ||||
| Adams | - | Dominguez | ||||
| Giri | - | Topalov | ||||
| Grischuk | - | Nakamura | ||||
| Gelfand | - | Kasimdzhanov |
London GP 2012 | Round 9 standings
Latest articles
-
32 min 51 sec ago
-
8 hours 17 min ago
-
1 day 5 hours ago
-
1 day 12 hours ago
-
2 days 5 hours ago
-
2 days 10 hours ago
-
2 days 10 hours ago
-
2 days 13 hours ago
-
3 days 7 min ago
-
3 days 12 min ago
-
4 days 2 hours ago
-
4 days 11 hours ago
-
5 days 4 hours ago
-
5 days 10 hours ago
-
6 days 3 hours ago
-
6 days 5 hours ago
-
6 days 10 hours ago
-
6 days 11 hours ago
-
1 week 1 hour ago
-
1 week 12 hours ago






Comments
KingTal
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
The first 4 guys were Candidates last year, maybe they acually were worth it. )
Chris
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
The start 5 were candidates
KingTal
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
I meant that the guys placed 1-4 at moment in this tournament were in the Candidate matches last year, whatever you were trying to say. lol
Chris
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
The 5th one, Leko was playing WCCh match :)
sen
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
It is suprising to see no comments from great nakumura's fan.Is this worst performance by a number rank 5 fide player ever on loosing four consecutive matches ? Nak is out of top 10 live ratings!
hansie
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
The Top Gun has five losses now in the tourney, the last four straight ones, and three losses to forty-year plus players.
eric
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Nakamura is having a terrible tournament. But he will be back in Top-10 soon, it is for sure. By the way I am not a Naka fan, but I love to see him playing interesting chess.
flea
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Funny how u confuse impotent chess with interesting chess. The most interesting side of this is the pathetic amount of idiotic ideas he puts in his games . This guy is no big deal. He will evaporate very soon from the top chess world.
eric
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Look at the liverating list again man:) Who is back in the list?
choufleur
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Nakamura 2800+ by the end of the year ?
RealityCheck
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Carlsen 2853.5 Biel? Bilbao? Boring!
123
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Maybe he should re-hire Kasparov.
Spectator
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Rather a horrible loss by Gelfand. Reminds me of early 20th century games!
Thomas
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Before today, Gelfand had scored 2.5/3 with the Sicilian - it took an offbeat line (something he couldn't possibly prepare?) to beat him ... .
NN
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Why blame the opening, when he played such a move as ...Qxd2 in the middlegame? I was watching the game live, and I wondered how could he miss the reply Bxe6, or, if he didn't miss it, how could he underestimate it. It is immediately obvious this is a very dangerous sacrifice for Black. And ...0-0 was such an obvious alternative, putting the King to safety.
flea
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Yeah that was smth very weird.
Thomas
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Yeah but this would leave him a pawn behind with little compensation, only some (vague?) hopes based on opposite-colored bishops. To me it seems that something had already gone wrong before - hard to say when, where and why, in any case Grischuk managed to steer clear of typical Sicilian structures and plans.
Bartleby
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Gelfand's game reminded me of his loss in the WCh, where he over-confidently went into a line that didn't work tactically, and, uncharacteristically for GM play, didn't re-evaluate it in time. He gave up his lead without a real fight.
Bronkenstein
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Gandalf was the first to deviate (6...Nc6 or, identically , 8...Nc6) - one would expect Grischuk - if anyone - to be surprised, but instead Boris then spent almost half an hour on his VERY next move! @ that point, I was almost sure that he will mindfart and lose - as he did =(
Chris
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Gandalf?! I didn't know fictional characters played chess at the international level!
Chris
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Have been 2 or more Chrises? :-)
Bronkenstein
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Nobody told you that Lord of the Rings is in fact the documentary about Barriss Gandalf, AKA the Cookie Exterminator? =)
Chris
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Would have been Naka Moro he would withdraw from tournament.
MJul
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Moro withdrew and spend months without playing torunaments before because he had several health issues (or chronic disease, we don't know). He even talk about being ill all the time when he was a kid.
If you don't know you should better investigate before making such statements.
Chris
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Moro withdraws many times. After the last one he won blitz championship in Moscow in short time.
MJul
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Yes, but blitz it's not classical. Remember Tal defeated Kasparov in Blitz a month before he died.
Chris
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
The point was that he has been healthy.
Ill person does not play tournaments.
MJul
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Did you read what I wrote? Tal was ill, he runned away from the hospital while dying and still won versus Kasparov.
Anonymous
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Bwahahaha @ Nakamura!! Love to see an arrogant loser get his just deserts.
Let's face it, he had this coming to him for a looong time! ..I ca't stop laughing. Lol!!
Anonymous
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
"Just desert?" Which one of his victories he didn't deserve? All his successes have come from his talent and hard work.
The fact that you rejoice in someone else's misfortune speaks for your character
RG13
8 months 3 weeks ago
Permalink
Topalov is back in the saddle!
noyb
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Nakamura needs to hire a coach. Situation indicates multiple problems, not just one. Opening choices, emotional fatigue, and psychology all factors. I'd suggest Adrian Mikhalichishin!
Anonymous
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
He needs a shrink more than a coach.
Casey Abell
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Oh boy, a depressed tweet from Naka today...
While I do my absolute best to commit harakiri, (chess) at least her calming presence from afar puts it all in perspective.
Bartleby
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
That's rather poetic.
Casey Abell
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
It's rather down in the dumps.
Aiy9W
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
"While I do my absolute best to commit harakiri, (chess) at least her calming presence from afar puts it all in perspective."
naka tweet 4h ago
Anonymous
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Gelfand surrendered the lead in this tourney for the same reason he surrendered the lead during his WC match - pawn snatching!
foo
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
i thought it was more like rook snatching ;)
Anonymous
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
It's a sad time for Nakamura and his fans. But we must remember his strange series of losses against Carlsen that didn't account for their rating differences - losses that both attributed to psychological rather than skill. Here, in a tournament to decide who will challenge the WC, he makes the same kind of errors, the same type of losses.
I think Nakamura must first believe he can be the WC, only thien will things turn around for him in the Grand Prix.
RG13
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
That and perhaps change his style of play to something more classical or perhaps even Soviet. His Tata Steele victory while being coached by Kasparov is prominent.
sen
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
We can't call it is a odd and strang series of losses.This performance is expected from nakamura in WC cycle.Nakamura is not mentally strong to compete in World championship he can't perform when it really matters.Atleast now he should stop his bigmouthing and understand what seperates from infant with MAN.There is big surprise stored in candidates matches 2013 (ie magnus loosed badly).I think aronian will take the mantle from anand after next two cycles(ie anand should retain next two championship).
Chris
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
Do you play tournament chess?
I doubt.
sen
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
No i don't, iam quite busy with software profession.
Chris
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
So you should not make remarks about tournament play.
sen
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
i don't think there is a rule in chessvibes forum on commenting that it needs pre-requiste to be an tournament player.Just accept that your favourite over hype nakamura is a flop show here and going to be a big flop in future.
Chris
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
I do not mean that it is forbidden but that the remarks made by person who does not know the tournament play are sometimes funny or ridiculous.
sen
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
No i don't, iam quite busy with software profession.
RealityCheck
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
@ sen Don't be offended--
"what separates from infant with MAN" is usually expressed in other words. For example: Competing for a shot at the world championship title "separates the men from the boys"
sen
8 months 2 weeks ago
Permalink
i used the word "INFANT" knowingly.
Pages
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions