Nigel Short vs his mobile: 0-1
The European Union Championships have reached the third round and the biggest story so far was Grandmaster Nigel Short's loss against Ketevan Arakhamia-Grant when his phone made a sound during the round.
By Manuel Weeks
The European Chess Championships take place 9-18 September in the World Museum of Liverpool, Great Britain. There has been already plenty of interesting incidents and drama in the first two rounds, not to mention some very nice chess.
Michael Adams has been untroubled so far as he continues to fight his way back into the top ten players in the world, but it was the other big name in British Chess, or rather his mobile, who made the news so far.
It's probably the most unfortunate way to lose a game of chess, to have ones own mobile phone go off. To make matters worse you actually take it out from your jacket and place it upon the table believing it has been switched off only for it to make its distinctive sound hours later. A surprised Ketevan could only reply in disbelief, but I saw you turn it off!? Nigel accepted his loss and might be seen out shopping for an iPhone to replace his current model.

The game Nigel Short vs Ketevan Arakhamia-Grant...

..and a close-up of the same photo | ?Ǭ© Liverpool Chess International 2008
John Saunders, Editor-in-chief of British Chess Magazine and member of the organisation in Liverpool, wrote us:
The close-up clearly shows Nigel's mobile beside him on the table (on top of a book about Fidel Castro). He switched the phone off at the beginning of the game and was seen to do so by his opponent. It emitted the familiar Nokia ringtone at 4.29pm precisely (I was an 'ear-witness'). Nigel says this was a 'battery low' warning which must have overridden the switched-off status in some way. Warning to all chessplayers: if you have a new or sophisticated phone, maybe it is safest to take out the battery before play starts.
The tournament has an the strongest field for any Open event ever held in the United Kingdom and includes a strong Dutch contingent that includes Tiviakov, L'Ami, Smeets, Werle and many young promising IMs. In the second round the first Dutch versus Dutch pairing occurred when IM Wouter Spoelman faced Sergei Tiviakov (actually visible in the same picture above). The two battled hard till the game ultimately finished in a draw.
The two top French players are also here to show their wares. Former child prodigy Etienne Bacrot had a curious end to his game yesterday when his game finished in a draw after his opponent Scottish GM John Shaw claimed a draw due to the 50 move rule of no capture or pawn move occurring. I must admit I have never seen this occur in a game before. The French player had been applying pressure throughout the whole game but could not break down the Scots defences.
The current French child prodigy Maxime Vachier-Lagrave has shown that he will not only break into the world's elite but will stay there and make an impact. The quiet young man will be well over 2700 on the next list and has no plans to stop there.
German Champion Daniel Fridman has been enjoying a rich vein of form lately claiming the National championship as well as winning the strong open that was held in Liverpool last year alongside the UK versus China match. Daniel clearly enjoys himself in as the locals like to call it, "Old Blighty".
The grandmasters are certainly not having their own way with many draws and already a few losses by this elite group. And so already in round 3 we see many GM versus GM clashes and because of the wide disparity in ratings still existing, it promises to be a round of fighting chess.
Michael Adams gives an interview just before the tournament starts
The tournament hall (boards 1-22) during the opening ceremony
Alexander Beliavsky - does he even have a mobile?

Keti Arakhamia-Grant - beating Short but not enjoying it too much probably

Etienne Bacrot, who recently won the French Ch in a rapidplay tiebreak against...

...top-GM-to-be Maxime Vachier-Lagrave

Yes, the current British Champion Stuart Conquest is present as well
Links:
















Comments
arne
3 years 5 months ago
Permalink
Hmm isn't the purpose of switching off a phone to avoid low battery messages?
Manu
3 years 5 months ago
Permalink
I believe that the rule should state that there cant be no cellphones in the playing hall, at all.
If i were a posible sponsor of an event i wouldnt like even the remote posibility of cheating on the horizon.
In my opinion the heads of the tournament should provide the players enough protection against this situations.A player whos mind is trying to concentrate on the board may not be aware that his work is going to be wasted by any evil remote device.
xtra
3 years 5 months ago
Permalink
well it is equally disturbing to the other players in the playing hall...so the rule has to be the way it is. I?Ǭ¥d like to think it would work with a lighter rule (first a warning, then loss), but with so many players it would be very unpractical.
TrapArecev
3 years 5 months ago
Permalink
Nokia >> connecting people... even if they don't want it....
Martin
3 years 4 months ago
Permalink
Things like this are the reason I always turn my phone in silent mode before switching it off. I had it switching on in my pocket a few times..
By the way, stop being so paranoid about cheating.
Ben
3 years 4 months ago
Permalink
It should be the arbiter making the call for any pro event - players don't need the hypothetical guilt trips involved if the decision were left to them.
What should be the rule is that the violator of the rule is forfeited for the game, but the game is allowed to continue, if the violator wants, for rating purposes, with the violator losing half of his remaining time. This way the integrity of the rating system is upheld. Where there are norm concerns, use the game's rated result, not the forfeit victory.
Henk
3 years 5 months ago
Permalink
Why isnt the rule that your oponent has to claim the winn, At least that would be more fair. Rules are there for players. Not for arbiters.
Manu
3 years 5 months ago
Permalink
I think this incident its way more serious than it seems.The real question is : how is this posible? If anyone (not only GM Short ) can be near a chess board with a mobile device of anykind something is missing.
I have no doubt about GM Short or his integrity , but for cheating in chess you only need to morse-code the moves in anyway to get terrific advantages.
Security is the next real issue , the future of chess depends on it.
Chao
3 years 5 months ago
Permalink
Actually, Nigel had been in constant communication with Fidel during the game. He was about to make a blunder and the Great Leader tried to warn him...
Doesn't anyone else think it was silly to forfeit the guy even though he obviously had done everything as required ("please turn off all your electronic devices during takeoff and landing...")?! It does serve him right a little though, given his earlier anti-Bulgarian diatribes :)
Wrong Rook
3 years 5 months ago
Permalink
It was not Fiedel on the phone,but Cheparinov (...!!!???) wishing good luck to his beloved friend!!
Manu
3 years 5 months ago
Permalink
@Wrong Rook: lol ,it would be really the ultimate revenge!
semipatz
3 years 5 months ago
Permalink
It's only one letter from Fidel to FIDE. Obviously, it's all some sort of Commie conspiracy. :)
Your comment
Speak your mind
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions