Tata R3: Carlsen beats Aronian, takes over the lead

Magnus Carlsen is the new leader at the 74th Tata Steel Chess Tournament in Wijk aan Zee, The Netherlands. The Norwegian defeated Levon Aronian on Monday. Other victories in the A group went to Sergey Karjakin and Teimour Radjabov, who won against Anish Giri and David Navara respectively. Pentala Harikrishna and Maxim Turov maintained their lead in the B and C groups.
Carlsen won the important game between the two highest rated participants
|
A bit surprisingly, the press room was very quiet on this first week day of the tournament. Some journalists, who had visited the tournament in the first weekend, were already gone - will they return later? Others - in fact most - probably decided to come by during the second half, when everything will be decided. And so, on the day when world number one Magnus Carlsen faced tournament leader Levon Aronian, almost nobody noticed, well, at least not in Wijk aan Zee! (By the way, this is also the reason why there hasn't been one of those famous press-conferences-with-demo-board yet.)

But of course, everyone noticed. Obviously, everyone is following the games at the official website. Kudos to the organizers for picking up something that was done before by the Russian Chess Federation: Pascal Pflaum's applet for streaming the live games. The German programmer created this splendid applet for the Schachbundesliga two years ago, and at some point started licensing his software to other organizations. It was already used during e.g. last year's FIDE World Cup, and on the website WhyChess (which saw its funding terminated recently).

And so the tens of thousands of chess fans enjoyed online yet another great game by Magnus Carlsen, who slowly outplayed Levon Aronian, then let a big advantage almost slip away but eventually won a BN vs R (and only a few pawns) ending.
I was completely winning of course, then I tried to find the most accurate way and evidently I didn't. Probably it was winning til the end, but if so it was only by luck. A win is a win.

As Jan Timman explained to us last week during our interview, one of the few weakness left in Anish Giri's play is that he can be overoptimistic. It looks like this was the case also in the third round, when the Dutchman couldn't resist the anti-positional 20...f5, a move condemned by his opponent Sergey Karjakin after the game. The Moscovite added:
Finally of course I'm happy. It was difficult to recover but I managed to play a more or less good game today. It wasn't an easy win.

The third winner of the day was Teimour Radjabov, who saw his opponent going wrong already in the opening. Just when David Navara seemed to be putting up a stubborn defence, the Czech dropped a full knight.

In the B group local heros Erwin l'Ami, Jan Timman and Sergey Tiviakov won. Timman must have enjoyed the final part of his game against Ilya Nyzhnyk.

Jan Timman still attracting lots of attention at the start of the round
The 250-euro Piet Zwart Prize was awarded to Lithuania’s Viktorija Cmylite for her victory against Holland’s Sipke Ernst.

In the C-group this prize is just 100 euros, and in the third round two players had to split the money: Elisabeth Paehtz and Matthew Sadler. Their game, a Modern Defence, was indeed spectacular:

Daily video by the organizers
Games group A, round 3
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group A | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Navara | ½-½ | Topalov | Topalov | ½-½ | Van Wely | |
| Gelfand | 0-1 | Giri | Gashimov | ½-½ | Kamsky | |
| Radjabov | ½-½ | Caruana | Ivanchuk | ½-½ | Carlsen | |
| Karjakin | 0-1 | Aronian | Aronian | 1-0 | Nakamura | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | Caruana | 1-0 | Karjakin | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Gashimov | Giri | ½-½ | Radjabov | |
| Kamsky | ½-½ | Van Wely | Navara | ½-½ | Gelfand | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Gelfand | ½-½ | Topalov | Topalov | - | Gashimov | |
| Radjabov | 1-0 | Navara | Ivanchuk | - | Van Wely | |
| Karjakin | 1-0 | Giri | Aronian | - | Kamsky | |
| Nakamura | ½-½ | Caruana | Caruana | - | Carlsen | |
| Carlsen | 1-0 | Aronian | Giri | - | Nakamura | |
| Kamsky | ½-½ | Ivanchuk | Navara | - | Karjakin | |
| Van Wely | ½-½ | Gashimov | Gelfand | - | Radjabov | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Radjabov | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Karjakin | - | Gelfand | Aronian | - | Gashimov | |
| Nakamura | - | Navara | Caruana | - | Van Wely | |
| Carlsen | - | Giri | Giri | - | Kamsky | |
| Kamsky | - | Caruana | Navara | - | Carlsen | |
| Van Wely | - | Aronian | Gelfand | - | Nakamura | |
| Gashimov | - | Ivanchuk | Radjabov | - | Karjakin | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Karjakin | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Aronian | |
| Nakamura | - | Radjabov | Caruana | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Carlsen | - | Gelfand | Giri | - | Gashimov | |
| Kamsky | - | Navara | Navara | - | Van Wely | |
| Van Wely | - | Giri | Gelfand | - | Kamsky | |
| Gashimov | - | Caruana | Radjabov | - | Carlsen | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Aronian | Karjakin | - | Nakamura | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Nakamura | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Caruana | |
| Carlsen | - | Karjakin | Giri | - | Aronian | |
| Kamsky | - | Radjabov | Navara | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Van Wely | - | Gelfand | Gelfand | - | Gashimov | |
| Gashimov | - | Navara | Radjabov | - | Van Wely | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Giri | Karjakin | - | Kamsky | |
| Aronian | - | Caruana | Nakamura | - | Carlsen | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Carlsen | - | Topalov | Topalov | - | Giri | |
| Kamsky | - | Nakamura | Navara | - | Caruana | |
| Van Wely | - | Karjakin | Gelfand | - | Aronian | |
| Gashimov | - | Radjabov | Radjabov | - | Ivanchuk | |
| Ivanchuk | - | Gelfand | Karjakin | - | Gashimov | |
| Aronian | - | Navara | Nakamura | - | Van Wely | |
| Caruana | - | Giri | Carlsen | - | Kamsky | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Kamsky | - | Topalov | ||||
| Van Wely | - | Carlsen | ||||
| Gashimov | - | Nakamura | ||||
| Ivanchuk | - | Karjakin | ||||
| Aronian | - | Radjabov | ||||
| Caruana | - | Gelfand | ||||
| Giri | - | Navara |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group A | Round 3 standings
Games group B, round 3
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group B | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Reinderman | ½-½ | Motylev | Motylev | ½-½ | Potkin | |
| Bruzon | 0-1 | Harikrishna | Tiviakov | 1-0 | Timman | |
| Lahno | 1-0 | Ernst | Nyzhnyk | ½-½ | l'Ami | |
| Harika | ½-½ | Vocaturo | Vocaturo | 1-0 | Cmilyte | |
| Cmilyte | 0-1 | Nyzhnyk | Ernst | ½-½ | Harika | |
| l'Ami | 1-0 | Tiviakov | Harikrishna | 1-0 | Lahno | |
| Timman | ½-½ | Potkin | Reinderman | ½-½ | Bruzon | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Bruzon | ½-½ | Motylev | Motylev | - | Tiviakov | |
| Lahno | ½-½ | Reinderman | Nyzhnyk | - | Potkin | |
| Harika | 0-1 | Harikrishna | Vocaturo | - | Timman | |
| Cmilyte | 1-0 | Ernst | Ernst | - | l'Ami | |
| l'Ami | 1-0 | Vocaturo | Harikrishna | - | Cmilyte | |
| Timman | 1-0 | Nyzhnyk | Reinderman | - | Harika | |
| Potkin | 0-1 | Tiviakov | Bruzon | - | Lahno | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Lahno | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Harika | - | Bruzon | Vocaturo | - | Tiviakov | |
| Cmilyte | - | Reinderman | Ernst | - | Potkin | |
| l'Ami | - | Harikrishna | Harikrishna | - | Timman | |
| Timman | - | Ernst | Reinderman | - | l'Ami | |
| Potkin | - | Vocaturo | Bruzon | - | Cmilyte | |
| Tiviakov | - | Nyzhnyk | Lahno | - | Harika | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Harika | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Vocaturo | |
| Cmilyte | - | Lahno | Ernst | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| l'Ami | - | Bruzon | Harikrishna | - | Tiviakov | |
| Timman | - | Reinderman | Reinderman | - | Potkin | |
| Potkin | - | Harikrishna | Bruzon | - | Timman | |
| Tiviakov | - | Ernst | Lahno | - | l'Ami | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Vocaturo | Harika | - | Cmilyte | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Cmilyte | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Ernst | |
| l'Ami | - | Harika | Harikrishna | - | Vocaturo | |
| Timman | - | Lahno | Reinderman | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Potkin | - | Bruzon | Bruzon | - | Tiviakov | |
| Tiviakov | - | Reinderman | Lahno | - | Potkin | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Harikrishna | Harika | - | Timman | |
| Vocaturo | - | Ernst | Cmilyte | - | l'Ami | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| l'Ami | - | Motylev | Motylev | - | Harikrishna | |
| Timman | - | Cmilyte | Reinderman | - | Ernst | |
| Potkin | - | Harika | Bruzon | - | Vocaturo | |
| Tiviakov | - | Lahno | Lahno | - | Nyzhnyk | |
| Nyzhnyk | - | Bruzon | Harika | - | Tiviakov | |
| Vocaturo | - | Reinderman | Cmilyte | - | Potkin | |
| Ernst | - | Harikrishna | l'Ami | - | Timman | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Timman | - | Motylev | ||||
| Potkin | - | l'Ami | ||||
| Tiviakov | - | Cmilyte | ||||
| Nyzhnyk | - | Harika | ||||
| Vocaturo | - | Lahno | ||||
| Ernst | - | Bruzon | ||||
| Harikrishna | - | Reinderman |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group B | Round 3 standings
Games group C, round 3
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group C | Pairings
| Round 1 | 14.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 2 | 15.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Sadler | 1-0 | Hopman | Hopman | 0-1 | Turov | |
| Tania | ½-½ | Grover | Schut | ½-½ | Danielian | |
| Paehtz | 0-1 | Tikkanen | Haast | ½-½ | Goudriaan | |
| Brandenburg | ½-½ | Ootes | Ootes | ½-½ | Adhiban | |
| Adhiban | 1-0 | Haast | Tikkanen | ½-½ | Brandenburg | |
| Goudriaan | 1-0 | Schut | Grover | 1-0 | Paehtz | |
| Danielian | 0-1 | Turov | Sadler | ½-½ | Tania | |
| Round 3 | 16.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 4 | 17.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Tania | ½-½ | Hopman | Hopman | - | Schut | |
| Paehtz | ½-½ | Sadler | Haast | - | Turov | |
| Brandenburg | ½-½ | Grover | Ootes | - | Danielian | |
| Adhiban | ½-½ | Tikkanen | Tikkanen | - | Goudriaan | |
| Goudriaan | 1-0 | Ootes | Grover | - | Adhiban | |
| Danielian | ½-½ | Haast | Sadler | - | Brandenburg | |
| Turov | 1-0 | Schut | Tania | - | Paehtz | |
| Round 5 | 19.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 6 | 20.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Paehtz | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Haast | |
| Brandenburg | - | Tania | Ootes | - | Schut | |
| Adhiban | - | Sadler | Tikkanen | - | Turov | |
| Goudriaan | - | Grover | Grover | - | Danielian | |
| Danielian | - | Tikkanen | Sadler | - | Goudriaan | |
| Turov | - | Ootes | Tania | - | Adhiban | |
| Schut | - | Haast | Paehtz | - | Brandenburg | |
| Round 7 | 21.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 8 | 22.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Brandenburg | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Ootes | |
| Adhiban | - | Paehtz | Tikkanen | - | Haast | |
| Goudriaan | - | Tania | Grover | - | Schut | |
| Danielian | - | Sadler | Sadler | - | Turov | |
| Turov | - | Grover | Tania | - | Danielian | |
| Schut | - | Tikkanen | Paehtz | - | Goudriaan | |
| Haast | - | Ootes | Brandenburg | - | Adhiban | |
| Round 9 | 24.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 10 | 25.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Adhiban | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Tikkanen | |
| Goudriaan | - | Brandenburg | Grover | - | Ootes | |
| Danielian | - | Paehtz | Sadler | - | Haast | |
| Turov | - | Tania | Tania | - | Schut | |
| Schut | - | Sadler | Paehtz | - | Turov | |
| Haast | - | Grover | Brandenburg | - | Danielian | |
| Ootes | - | Tikkanen | Adhiban | - | Goudriaan | |
| Round 11 | 27.01.12 | 13.30 CET | Round 12 | 28.01.12 | 13.30 CET | |
| Goudriaan | - | Hopman | Hopman | - | Grover | |
| Danielian | - | Adhiban | Sadler | - | Tikkanen | |
| Turov | - | Brandenburg | Tania | - | Ootes | |
| Schut | - | Paehtz | Paehtz | - | Haast | |
| Haast | - | Tania | Brandenburg | - | Schut | |
| Ootes | - | Sadler | Adhiban | - | Turov | |
| Tikkanen | - | Grover | Goudriaan | - | Danielian | |
| Round 13 | 29.01.12 | 12.00 CET | ||||
| Danielian | - | Hopman | ||||
| Turov | - | Goudriaan | ||||
| Schut | - | Adhiban | ||||
| Haast | - | Brandenburg | ||||
| Ootes | - | Paehtz | ||||
| Tikkanen | - | Tania | ||||
| Grover | - | Sadler |
Tata Steel 2012 | Grandmaster Group C | Round 3 standings

After the round, Veselin Topalov could be found in the bar of the venue, analyzing with his fresh new second, GM Romain Edouard from France
Latest articles
-
1 hour 2 min ago
-
2 hours 14 min ago
-
1 day 4 hours ago
-
1 day 23 hours ago
-
2 days 3 hours ago
-
2 days 23 hours ago
-
4 days 1 hour ago
-
4 days 2 hours ago
-
4 days 13 hours ago
-
5 days 6 min ago
-
5 days 5 hours ago
-
5 days 10 hours ago
-
6 days 1 hour ago
-
6 days 8 hours ago
-
6 days 23 hours ago
-
1 week 8 hours ago
-
1 week 8 hours ago
-
1 week 21 hours ago
-
1 week 2 days ago
-
1 week 2 days ago










Comments
vhomas topalov
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
someone said:
"Just try to imagine Kasparov and Karpov playing a game as miserable as that of Carlsen and Aronian today."
well I did it at once,
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1067044
check with houdini (as you all do today), Karpov missing a 2 move win twice,
at a certain point the graphic will look like a saw,
on his recent book Kasparov was somewhat ashamed of this game ahahah,
I am a little tired of hearing people who stetes that player of previuos ages
were better, estimating as a mistake every second-choise of fritz-ribka-houdini
Anonymous
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Take the best three games between Kasparov and Karpov and compare them with the best three games between Carlsen/Aronian or Carlsen/Anand or Carlsen/Kramnik. A noticeable difference in the quality of play, in favour of the Kasparov/Karpov pair,will be evident.
redivivo
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Well, Kasparov and Karpov are sometimes seen as the two greatest players ever, and they played 144 games against each other only in title matches. It's still difficult to judge level of play, but much to ask of Carlsen, recently turned 21, to already be greater than Kasparov with shorter time controls and no game adjournments.
brabo
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
You are fully right. In the 80's, adjournment after move 40 was still the rule and slower timelimits of 2,5h/ 40 moves too. If you compare the quality of the chessgames of today and back then one needs to take this into account. I guess the adjournment and longer timelimit gives maybe in the 80's an advantage of 50 points in quality. Today the advantage would be bigger as today computers would permit the phase after the adjourment to be played much better than in the 80's.
B.t.w. ratings have been slightly influenced due to the shorter timelimits and the abolishment of the adjournments. People who played the new type of game better, will have gained a little bit points compared with the others. However overall I don't believe the ratingsystem detoriated to a clear inflation or deflation due to these changes as some players have won and others have lost a few points.
S3
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I'm glad that you both implicitely agree on the K's playing much better games. Must be quite a step.
btw; on faster time controls; every player nowadays is booked up to the max thanks to engines and databases.The opening phase can be played much quicker nowadays.
brabo
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
Then I have to disappoint you. I don't agree that the K's were playing much better games with or without any correction on the quality.
I only said that you need to compare apples with apples otherwise it has little sense. Give Carlsen 6 months time to prepare only for Aronian in a wc, 2,5 hours/ 40 moves and adjourning possibilities after 40 moves and you can bet the standard of his normal play will still rise.
Will you compare players A's blitzgames with player B's correspondence games and then say player B presents the best quality games so is the best player? No, well me neither as it doesn't say a thing about who is better.
brabo
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
How ridiculous to make such comparison! Do you know how many games Kasparov - Karpov played against each other? 144 alone in wc matches and around 186 in total. It is much easier to find 3 games out of 186 games instead of the maybe 30 games Carlsen played against Aronian, Anand, Kramnik together.
Another point which makes it ridiculous. Kasparov was mature when he played the 186 games (except the very first game in which Kasparov was younger than Carlsen today). What I mean, is that one can only compare Carlsen games of the last 2, maybe 3 years as older ones are clearly inferiour. You see this youth-aspect also in the first game Karpov - Kasparov played before the wc where Kasparov himself admits that he still had to learn a lot (read book 7 Karpov - Kasparov 75-85).
Finally there is a serious difference in preparation and dedication in wc matches and tournaments. To be correct one should only take the none wc matches as carlsen didn't play yet a wc match so in the end only 44 games would remain from Karpov - Kasparov and I think that you will be quite dissappointed in the level of play as I remember that many of these none wc games were not containing the same intensity and level as the wc games.
S3
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
A dude is comparing play and quality of games and you say it's ridiculous, when in fact you seem to have done the same already.
After all your only "defense" consists of making up excuses for why MC's games are worse (I noticed you suddenly limited your post to Carlsen instead of Carlsen and Aronian for some reason)
Carlsen-Aronian was just not that good a game, get over it. They can play a lot better than this, clearly, and it was a bit of a letdown to see the top rated players play a game like this.
redivivo
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I don't think it was a letdown for anyone else than the couple of users that flood these forums every time Carlsen wins a game to explain how unimpressive he is.
brabo
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
The original poster compared games played by Carlsen against the other (ex) 2800 players (Anand, Kramnik and Aronian). So I just continued on Carlsen but ok we are diverting from the subject.
Comparing play and quality of games is ok if done in a balanced corrective way.
The original poster is just comparing apples with oranges as he simply ignores a lot of aspects.
1 example: defining who is a stronger chessplayer by comparing top 3 out of 186 games and top 3 out of 30 games without any corrections is ridiculous. Anybody knowing a bit statistics knows this.
Anonymous
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
How about taking a random sample of Kasparov's games and Carlsen's games, you will still end up with the same conclusion, Kasparov's games are of higher quality than Carlsen's. Make whatever comparison you want, Carlsen has still a lot way to go to reach Kasparov's level (even young Kasparov's level), let alone the absolute determination, the killer instinct, Kasparov had to be always the winner, always the champion.
brabo
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
If you take randomly games then your conclusion will also be randomly.
If you really want to compare apples with apples then one needs to select the games carefully and not completely randomly. I am thinking of following criteria:
- Timecontrol has to be more or less the same in all the games of K and C. (No blitz, rapid or any games which could last 10 hours or more...)
- No adjourment possibilities
- No wc matches (in which somebody can prepare himself on 1 person for 6 months and gets a lot of extra free days between the games)
- Rating of Kasparov and Carlsen must be close (say 20 points) as it has no sense to take games from Carlsen or Kasparov when they were still clearly progressing
- Rating of opponents must be beyond a certain standard. It has no point to look at games where the opponent has less than 150 points than yourself.
- 50 games or more must be selected to minimize the effect of randomness.
If you do all that and you put it in a topengine, make an evaluation profile (as is now done for the ongoing Tatatournament) of the games then I am quite confident that you won't see a difference in average quality of the selected games between K and C. In fact such similar work has been done recently in http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~regan/papers/pdf/ReHa11c.pdf and http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/%7Eregan/papers/pdf/RMH11b.pdf.
I know public perception is what you claim but as often happens, here facts and strong statistical work show a different less romantic reality.
redivivo
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
By the way, I wonder about TWIC's assessment of Radjabov-Navara:
"Certainly by the time Navara dropped a piece to a small combination he was totally busted anyway"
TWIC doesn't see Navara's 29. ... Nc7 as ?? or ? or even ?! but just concludes that "black is lost anyway" whatever he plays.
Thomas Richter
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
TWIC (i.e. Mark Crowther) may have taken this assessment from the tournament homepage:
"Teymour Radjabov of Azerbaijan’s win over Czech GM David Navara was not a case of sheer luck (see picture). Far from it. The Azeri, white in a King’s Indian, held a clear advantage throughout most of the encounter and was gradually increasing the pressure when Navara hastened matters by blundering away a piece on his 29th."
Even if this is correct, it seems strange to me compared to what they write on Karjakin's win against Giri: "In the third A-group win of the day, Lady Luck did play an important part. The player who profited from her smile was Sergei Karjakin of the Ukraine and he was extremely happy about it."
To me both games were pretty similar: black played an inaccuracy early on (12.-Qe6 by Navara, 20.-f5 by Giri) and subsequently sacrificed or lost material. The only difference was that Giri - fair enough - played on an exchange down while Navara resigned immediately. Why does Radjabov get full credit, while Karjakin is called lucky?
h8dgeh0g
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
i vaguely remember N+B ending appearing in a blindfold game between two supergm couple of years ago. carlsen could be one of them, i cant remember now. the defending side did not wait to be mated, he resigned on the spot.
Zeblakob
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
I remember that Cheparinov played such endgame till the end (he was the losing side). But it was a usual game (Chess olympiad some years ago).
Zeblakob
1 year 4 months ago
Permalink
The only one who can answer to S3 iz Septimus.
Pages
Your comment
By posting a comment you are agreeing to abide our Terms & Conditions