During that fisrt match it seemed as if Gary was not 100%, but he refused to discuss what was going on with him....any info come out later regarding his very weak play against VK?

As most other players he is especially principled when it is to his advantage.

You can't blame FIDE for that particular match -- Kasparov had left FIDE, and Kramnik wasn't FIDE world champion at the time. FIDE had nothing to do with it.

Now here is a lame comment. You obviously no nothing about chess.

Kramnik played Leko after the latter qualified for a title match in Kramnik's own cycle, doing this didn't consist of much of a concession from Kramnik's side, he could hardly avoid to ever defend his own title again and it had already been four years. After that he said that he was under no obligation to play Kasparov since the Prague Agreement was no longer valid:

"You say that the main point is that Kasparov lacks justification to play you?

I think so. At the moment, yes. It is very sad to say but his only justification at the moment is a big name. It’s not his play, not his results, not anything. Of course he is a great player and I have great respect for him. He is a fantastic player, a huge name and the public likes him very much and justifiably so, but this is the world championship, not some private business. Peter Leko won the Candidates. He deserved to play a match. I beat Garry and now I have won this match and deserve to be World Champion. You cannot just make some deals and present some names and do whatever you want.’"

http://www.kramnik.com/eng/interviews/getinterview.aspx?id=50

Kasparov didn't "destroy" any match against Pono, he signed all papers immediately while the latter refused after making all kinds of last minute demands (for some reason he refused to play if there was a rest day before a tiebreak or if the anti-doping laboratories were placed outside Ukraine or Russia):

http://www.kyivpost.com/news/nation/detail/17788/