Top

The Navara Fanclub

7 February 2007 20:30 PM CET | Last modified: 15:36 | By Arne Moll  | Filed under: Reports | Tags: ,

One of the most remarkable participants in the Corus Chess tournament was the Czech top talent David Navara. Navara (22, rating 2719) is a special boy. Extremely modest, polite, apologizing all the time, he makes an unworldly as well as a heart-warming impression, enhanced by his monotonous manner of speaking and his habit of looking at the floor while he talks. In the pressroom people soon started calling him ‘cutie’ and ‘honey’ - words normally reserved for certain player’s wifes, female journalists and press employees.

Navara, who is never casually dressed, is striking on the stage by the way he sits at the board - as far as possible removed from his opponents, never bent over the board, as if he really never wants to disturb them. He is also the only one to applaud when at the start of the round, the daily prize is awarded. He greets all his colleagues with a polite nod of the head, speaks to the press of ‘grandmaster Anand’ and is always prepared to explain a certain position. During post mortems he is sometimes silent for minutes, taking in the position, calculating variations, evaluating positions. He speaks his languages fluently, and even talks a little Dutch: “goedenmiddag [good afternoon].”

Navara may be a unique character in the chess world due to his appearance, at least as interesting and impressive are his chess games. During the Corus tournament all attention was mainly focused on the ‘big three’, Topalov, Kramnik and Anand. Of course this is understandable - but Navara was the only one to draw all three of them with Black!

He started the tournament excellently with draws against Aronian, Svidler and Kramnik and a victory over Carlsen. The he collapsed temporarily, losing to Radjabov, Van Wely, Karjakin and Shirov, but still drawing Topalov. By the time Navara started his final sprint - beating Ponomariov and a draw against Anand in the last round, the Chessvibes team was so impressed by the little Czech, that we already talked about an informal Navara fanclub. Navara is a player to watch constantly. He plays a quiet, positional sort of chess - the real deal, that is. This is especially clear from his draws against Kramnik and Anand and his victory over Ponomariov. To honour David Navara, below you find an analysis of his game again Kramnik, partly based on Russian notes of GM Landa and IM Notkin on the www.chesspro.ru site and on Sergei Shipov’s notes on www.crestbook.com.

>> open in a new window

Comments

7 Responses to “The Navara Fanclub”

  1. Erwin on 7 February 2007 23:24 PM

    Heren van de Navara fanclub toch…

    Jullie held won natuurlijk wel van Van Wely! Wat gebeurde er overigens voor vreemde dingen in die verliespartij tegen Karjakin?

  2. fanclub on 8 February 2007 0:18 AM

    Navara fanclub is a great idea. Have you thought of it like the Veselin Topalov fan clup page. Or you have a different idea.

  3. Yuri on 8 February 2007 8:49 AM

    My appreciation for ’slow chess’ (Kramnik, Karpov, Navara(!)) increases each day with same steadiness as ageing. Where can I subscribe for the fanclub?

  4. peter on 8 February 2007 9:24 AM

    What a great analysis by the way. (Do open this game viewer in a new window to replay the game more comfortably!) It’s intructive in a chess sense, but also for the fact that a drawn game in itself is certainly not a problem for chess, only a quick draw is.

  5. trainee on 9 February 2007 0:08 AM

    Ben het helemaal met jullie eens, ik ben ook sinds het Corustoernooi fan van Navara!

  6. Simon on 9 February 2007 21:51 PM

    Hello, I read the comment to game Kramnik-Navara in “The Navara Fanclub” article and I cannot understand well why alternative ending after 59. draw noted at end of the comment is considered as a tie (… 59. Kxe2 Rh2+ 60. Kd3 Rg2 61. Kc4 Rxg3 62. b6 Rh3 63. b7 Rh8 64. Rb1 Rb8 65. Kc5 Ke4=). It seems very badly for black. Isn’t there a mistake? Thanks for answer! Simon

  7. Ron on 20 August 2007 14:47 PM

    Simon, its a theoretical draw. See Averbach. Regards
    Ron

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!





Bottom